Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.711 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 672.711 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 672.711 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.711

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
672.711 Buyer’s remedies in general; buyer’s security interest in rejected goods.
(1) Where the seller fails to make delivery or repudiates or the buyer rightfully rejects or justifiably revokes acceptance then with respect to any goods involved, and with respect to the whole if the breach goes to the whole contract (s. 672.612), the buyer may cancel and whether or not he or she has done so may in addition to recovering so much of the price as has been paid:
(a) “Cover” and have damages under the next section as to all the goods affected whether or not they have been identified to the contract; or
(b) Recover damages for nondelivery as provided in this chapter (s. 672.713).
(2) Where the seller fails to deliver or repudiates the buyer may also:
(a) If the goods have been identified recover them as provided in this chapter (s. 672.502); or
(b) In a proper case obtain specific performance or replevy the goods as provided in this chapter (s. 672.716).
(3) On rightful rejection or justifiable revocation of acceptance a buyer has a security interest in goods in his or her possession or control for any payments made on their price and any expenses reasonably incurred in their inspection, receipt, transportation, care and custody and may hold such goods and resell them in like manner as an aggrieved seller (s. 672.706).
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 607, ch. 97-102.
Note.s. 2-711, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.711 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.711 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.711


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.711

Total Results: 10  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Bland v. Freightliner LLC, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 26 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 49 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 524, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10190, 2002 WL 1257657

...[2] The case was removed to federal court based upon diversity of citizenship. The Blands seek to rescind the contract for Freightliner's failure to cure the defects. Alternatively, the Blands seek to revoke the acceptance of their new motor vehicle pursuant to Section 672.711, Florida Statutes (2001)....
Copy

Goodell v. KT Enter., Ltd., 394 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 129, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19599

...The testimony showed that the new unit and the unit contracted for were of the same general type. We note that we do not consider that Goodell's first mailgram waived his right to cover. First, return to the status quo obviously depended upon an immediate return of the deposit money. Further, as stated in Section 672.711: (1) Where ......
Copy

Armadillo Distrib. Enter., Inc. v. Hai Yun Musical Instruments Manufacture Co., 142 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 93 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 40, 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 41, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150398, 2015 WL 6750813

922 So.2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Fla. Stat. § 672.711. Florida law also provides for recovery of general
Copy

Royco, Inc. v. Cottengim, 427 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 465

...or the purchase of a mobile home and to recover the sums they had paid Royco. The trial court ruled the Cottengims had not accepted the mobile home; Royco had materially breached the sales contract; and the Cottengims could cancel the contract under section 672.711, Florida Statutes (1981), even though they had an adequate remedy at law (damages)....
...although it was given adequate time and opportunity to do so. Although some pre-Code Florida cases held that rescission was not an available remedy to a buyer if the breach was curable by an award of damages, [2] the rule is clearly otherwise under section 672.711....
...f the price as has been paid: (a) "Cover" and have damages under the next section as to all the goods affected whether or not they have been identified to the contract; or (b) Recover damages for nondelivery as provided in this chapter (s. 672.713). § 672.711(1), Fla....
Copy

Sav-A-Stop Inc. v. Mayfair Super Markets, Inc. (In Re Sav-A-Stop Inc.), 119 B.R. 317 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 484, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2022, 1990 WL 138991

...Goldstein, 450 So.2d 262 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Dade County, Florida v. Palmer and Baker Engineers, Inc., 318 F.2d 18 (5th Cir.1963). *324 If SAS had breached the Prepaid Rent Agreement, Mayfair's claim for damages is governed by Chapter 672 of the Florida Statutes. Section 672.711 sets forth all buyer's remedies. Section 672.711(1) provides that: "where the seller fails to make delivery ......
Copy

Peppler v. Kasual Kreations, Inc., 416 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 158

...writ of common law certiorari. As noted, this action was brought as one for "rescission." The Uniform Commercial Code, while abandoning the term "rescission" in favor of "revocation of acceptance," § 672.608, Fla. Stat. (1979), and "cancellation," § 672.711, Fla....
Copy

Northside Fire Exting. Serv. & Welding Supplies, Inc. v. Wilson Davis Ford, Inc., 426 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1174

...Appellants timely revoked their acceptance of the goods delivered upon discovery of the defect. See section 672.608, Florida Statutes (1981). Appellees then stood in breach of the sales contract and appellant Northside had all the remedies provided by section 672.711, Florida Statutes (1981)....
Copy

Jones, Morrison, Etc. v. Contemporary, Etc., 414 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...The court told Jones's counsel she could tell the jury "what damages you want in your closing arguments." Jones argues that the court's refusal to give this instruction constitutes reversible error. Jones based its action for purchase price and incidental and consequential damages on section 672.711(1), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides: Where ......
Copy

Fryatt v. Lantana One, Ltd., 866 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 305719

...Appellee purchased a computer system, which did not function properly, for his retail outlet stores from appellants. The trial court properly found that appellee rightfully revoked acceptance of the computer system. Where the buyer rightfully revokes acceptance, the buyer is entitled to the purchase price that has been paid. § 672.711(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Trial testimony revealed that appellee purchased the computer system from the appellants for three of its stores for a total price of $22,000. Thus, the trial court properly awarded damages of $22,000. See § 672.711(1), Fla....
Copy

Hikes v. McNamara Pontiac, Inc., 510 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1996, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9884

codified in the Uniform Commercial Code as section 672.-711(1), Florida Statutes, which provides that

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.