Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

...991 (1909). Moreover, in the sale of goods, the Uniform Commercial Code now recognizes that a contract does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties intended to form an agreement and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy. § 672.204(3), Fla....

...he enclosed user guide." Id. at ¶ 28. Florida law provides that "[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract." Fla. Stat. § 672.204(1) (adopting U.C.C....

...or inferred in whole or in part from the parties’ conduct.’” Kolodziej v. Mason, 774 F.3d 736, 741 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting L & H Constr. Co. v. Circle Redmont, Inc., 55 So. 3d 630, 634 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2011)); see also Fla. Stat. § 672.204(1) (“A contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.”)....

...In view of the longstanding relationship between Azuelos of MPI and OTP, the fact that OTP did not require a letter of credit from MPI and a firm price prior to authorizing the trial shipment does not undermine OTP's claim that such an agreement existed. Section 672.204(3), Florida Statutes, provides in part: (3) Even though one or more terms are left open a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy....

...The only cases exempt from this rule are damages for intangible losses. The parties have not cited, and the court has not located, any case construing Florida law on the issue of whether prejudgment interest is available in a breach of contract action arising under Florida's gap-filling statutes, Fla.Stat. §§ 672.204(3), 672.305 where the parties do not agree as to the price of goods sold....

...The contract should not be held void for uncertainty unless there is no other way out.... Indefiniteness much reach the point where construction becomes futile. Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp., 302 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1974) (emphasis added). The U.C.C. requires even less. Section 672.204(3) of the Florida Statutes provides that: Even though one or more terms are left open a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.204(3)....

...As the court explained in TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co. Ltd., Florida law provides that “[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both- parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.” Fla. Stat. § 672.204 (1) (adopting U.C.C....

...Sweeney, 687 So.2d 68, 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Moreover, Florida law provides that “[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.” Fla. Stat. § 672.204 (1) (adopting U.C.C....

...The Florida Supreme Court in Blackhawk held that "even though all of the details are not definitely fixed, an agreement may be binding if the parties agree on the essential terms and seriously understand and intend the agreement to be binding on them." Blackhawk, 302 So.2d at 408. Similarly, the Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.204, Florida Statutes (1985), governing the formation of contracts for sales [4] provides in pertinent part: (3) Even though one or more terms are left open a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended...

...Sweeney, 687 So.2d 68, 69 (Fla. 3rd Dist.Ct. App.1997). Moreover, Florida law provides that "[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract." Fla. Stat. § 672.204(1) (adopting U.C.C....

...Sweeney, 687 So.2d 68, 69 (Fla. 3rd Dist.Ct. App.1997). Moreover, Florida law provides that "[a] contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract." Fla. Stat. § 672.204(1) (adopting U.C.C....

...In addition according to the U.C.C., "Even though one or more terms are left open, a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy." Id. § 672.204(3)....

..."[g]lass cockpit," and a "premium interior." (Id.) Finally, the contract states that Diamond will seek FAA IFR-certification and JAA certification. ( Id. ) Such detail is adequate to describe with sufficiency the subject matter of the contract. See § 672.204(3), Fla....

5th Dist. Ct. App. 2011)); see also Fla. Stat. § 672.204(1) (“A contract for sale of goods may be made

Sculley based on Mr. Sculley’s conduct pursuant to § 672.204(1), Florida Statutes,19 apparently of the view