Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 624.311 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 624.311 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 624.311 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 624.311

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 624
INSURANCE CODE: ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
624.311 Records; reproductions; destruction.
(1) Except as provided in this section, the department, commission, and office shall each preserve in permanent form records of its proceedings, hearings, investigations, and examinations and shall file such records in its office.
(2) The records of insurance claim negotiations of any state agency or political subdivision are confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) until termination of all litigation and settlement of all claims arising out of the same incident.
(3) The department, commission, and office may each photograph, microphotograph, or reproduce on film, or maintain in an electronic recordkeeping system, all financial records, financial statements of domestic insurers, reports of business transacted in this state by foreign insurers and alien insurers, reports of examination of domestic insurers, and such other records and documents on file in its office as it may in its discretion select.
(4) To facilitate the efficient use of floor space and filing equipment in its offices, the department, commission, and office may each destroy the following records and documents pursuant to chapter 257:
(a) General closed correspondence files over 3 years old;
(b) Agent, adjuster, and similar license files, including license files of the Division of State Fire Marshal, over 2 years old; except that the department or office shall preserve by reproduction or otherwise a copy of the original records upon the basis of which each such licensee qualified for her or his initial license, except a competency examination, and of any disciplinary proceeding affecting the licensee;
(c) All agent, adjuster, and similar license files and records, including original license qualification records and records of disciplinary proceedings 5 years after a licensee has ceased to be qualified for a license;
(d) Insurer certificate of authority files over 2 years old, except that the office shall preserve by reproduction or otherwise a copy of the initial certificate of authority of each insurer;
(e) All documents and records which have been photographed or otherwise reproduced as provided in subsection (3), if such reproductions have been filed and an audit of the department or office has been completed for the period embracing the dates of such documents and records; and
(f) All other records, documents, and files not expressly provided for in paragraphs (a)-(e).
History.s. 26, ch. 59-205; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 1, ch. 79-52; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 23, 37, 809(1st), ch. 82-243; s. 41, ch. 83-215; ss. 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 2, ch. 93-78; s. 10, ch. 95-211; s. 364, ch. 96-406; s. 1720, ch. 97-102; s. 44, ch. 2002-206; s. 765, ch. 2003-261; s. 22, ch. 2004-335.

F.S. 624.311 on Google Scholar

F.S. 624.311 on CourtListener

Amendments to 624.311


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 624.311

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. City of North Miami, 452 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...NOTES [1] The trial court declined to consider any ground for exemption from the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act other than that contained in our directions to determine which written communications were privileged. North Miami asserted that section 624.311(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982), exempts certain confidential communications. Because the Herald requested the material in question before section 624.311 became effective, it has no effect on this case....
Copy

XL SPECIALTY INS. v. Aircraft Holdings, 929 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5850, 2006 WL 1058208

...Accordingly, this statutory comparison was not applicable and therefore absent in the Ruiz analysis. [5] Had the legislature intended to eliminate the privilege when the underlying claim on the policy was concluded, as argued by Aircraft Holdings, it could have said so in section 624.155 but did not. Cf. § 624.311(2), Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1985).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

your question is answered in the affirmative. Section 624.311, F.S., expressly provides in pertinent part: