Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 607.1602 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 607.1602 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 607.1602 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 607.1602

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 607
FLORIDA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
View Entire Chapter
607.1602 Inspection of records by shareholders.
(1) A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at the corporation’s principal office, any of the records of the corporation described in s. 607.1601(1), excluding minutes of meetings of, and records of actions taken without a meeting by, the corporation’s board of directors and any board committees of the corporation established under s. 607.0825, if the shareholder gives the corporation written notice of the shareholder’s demand at least 5 business days before the date on which the shareholder wishes to inspect and copy.
(2) A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at a reasonable location specified by the corporation, any of the following records of the corporation if the shareholder meets the requirements of subsection (3) and gives the corporation written notice of the shareholder’s demand at least 5 business days before the date on which the shareholder wishes to inspect and copy:
(a) Excerpts from minutes of any meeting of, or records of any actions taken without a meeting by, the corporation’s board of directors and board committees of the corporation maintained in accordance with s. 607.1601(1);
(b) The financial statements of the corporation maintained in accordance with s. 607.1601(2);
(c) Accounting records of the corporation;
(d) The record of shareholders maintained in accordance with s. 607.1601(4); and
(e) Any other books and records.
(3) A shareholder may inspect and copy the records described in subsection (2) only if:
(a) The shareholder’s demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose;
(b) The shareholder’s demand describes with reasonable particularity the shareholder’s purpose and the records the shareholder desires to inspect; and
(c) The records are directly connected with the shareholder’s purpose.
(4) The corporation may impose reasonable restrictions on the disclosure, use, or distribution of, and reasonable obligations to maintain the confidentiality of, records described in subsection (2).
(5) For any meeting of shareholders for which the record date for determining shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting is different than the record date for notice of the meeting, any person who becomes a shareholder subsequent to the record date for notice of the meeting and is entitled to vote at the meeting is entitled to obtain from the corporation upon request the notice and any other information provided by the corporation to shareholders in connection with the meeting, unless the corporation has made such information generally available to shareholders by posting it on its website or by other generally recognized means. Failure of a corporation to provide such information does not affect the validity of action taken at the meeting.
(6) The right of inspection granted by this section may not be abolished or limited by a corporation’s articles of incorporation or bylaws.
(7) This section does not affect:
(a) The right of a shareholder to inspect and copy records under s. 607.0720 or, if the shareholder is in litigation with the corporation, to the same extent as any other litigant; or
(b) The power of a court, independently of this chapter, to compel the production of corporate records for examination and to impose reasonable restrictions as provided in s. 607.1604(3), provided that, in the case of production of records described in subsection (2) at the request of the shareholder, the shareholder has met the requirements of subsection (3).
(8) A corporation may deny any demand for inspection made pursuant to subsection (2) if the demand was made for an improper purpose, or if the demanding shareholder has within 2 years preceding his, her, or its demand sold or offered for sale any list of shareholders of the corporation or any other corporation, has aided or abetted any person in procuring any list of shareholders for any such purpose, or has improperly used any information secured through any prior examination of the records of the corporation or any other corporation.
(9) A shareholder may not sell or otherwise distribute any information or records inspected under this section, except to the extent that such use is for a proper purpose as defined in subsection (11).
(10) For purposes of this section, the term “shareholder” means a record shareholder, a beneficial shareholder, or an unrestricted voting trust beneficial owner.
(11) For purposes of this section, a “proper purpose” means a purpose reasonably related to such person’s interest as a shareholder.
(12) The rights of a shareholder to obtain records under subsections (1) and (2) shall also apply to the records of subsidiaries of the corporation.
History.s. 151, ch. 89-154; s. 12, ch. 94-327; s. 42, ch. 97-102; s. 219, ch. 2019-90; s. 64, ch. 2020-32.

F.S. 607.1602 on Google Scholar

F.S. 607.1602 on CourtListener

Amendments to 607.1602


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 607.1602

Total Results: 18  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Michael Urfirer v. Robert Cornfeld, 408 F.3d 710 (11th Cir. 2005).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7778, 2005 WL 1039101

...Count IV was an equitable demand for an accounting from LJS. Count V sought an equitable injunction compelling LJS to disclose its books and records. Count VI alleged that Urfirer, as a former Cambridge shareholder, had a statutory right under Florida Statutes §§ 607.1602, 607.1604, 620.143, and 620.8403 to inspect Cambridge’s books and records....
...Urfirer concedes that Florida law does not guarantee him access to these records as a former shareholder, since Cambridge is a corporation rather than a partnership, and Florida law guarantees access to corporate records only to present shareholders. See Fla. Stat. §§ 607.1602(1) (“A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at the corporation’s principal office, any of the 32 records of the corporation described in s. 607.1601(5) . . . .”); 607.1602(2) (“A shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect and copy, during regular business hours at a reasonable location specified by the corporation, any of the following records of the corporation if the shareholder meets the requirements of subsection (3) ....
...from claiming a statutory entitlement to inspect Cambridge’s books. Urfirer further argues that even if he does not qualify as a shareholder, a court nevertheless has discretion to grant him inspection rights. He cites Florida Statutes § 607.1602, which provides that shareholders are entitled to inspect corporate records, and notes that “[t]his section does not affect . . . [t]he power of a court, independently of this act, to compel the production of corporate records for examination.” Fla. Stat. § 607.1602(5)(b). Section 607.1602(5)(b), however, merely reiterates that a court has the equitable power to grant nonshareholders access to corporate records as it sees fit; it does not create a statutory right of inspection or grant courts any new statutory authority to authorize inspections by nonshareholders....
...f from judgment are now moot. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED. 4 The Cornfelds argue that even shareholders are entitled to inspect records only in “good faith” and for a “proper purpose,” see Fla. Stat. § 607.1602(3), and that Urfirer has shown neither....
Copy

Tucci v. Smoothie King Franchises, Inc., 215 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15147, 2002 WL 1888689

...ds that Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Defendant Smoothie King for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and Count V must be dismissed with prejudice. VI. Inspection of Corporate Records In Count VI, Plaintiff alleges violations of Section 607.1602 and Section 607.1620 of the Florida Business Corporation Act; however, in his response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, he concedes that this Count is an improper cause of action....
Copy

Synchron, Inc. v. Kogan, 757 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 485551

...would be obliged to raise sua sponte. See 84 Lumber Co. v. Cooper, 656 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). But it may be possible for Kogan to amend his complaint to assert a shareholder's right to inspect grounded in Florida statutory or common law. See § 607.1602, Fla....
Copy

Universal Eng'g Testing v. Israel, 707 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 95317

...owing respondent, Deborah Israel, as Trustee of the Israel Children's Trust, to review Universal's corporate records. We grant the petition and quash the order allowing discovery. Respondent sought review of Universal's corporate records pursuant to section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1995)....
...In the instant case, we find the trial court abused its discretion by requiring disclosure of confidential and proprietary documents before the ultimate issue of respondent's stockholder status and her right to review and inspect those same documents under section 607.1602 has been decided....
...ired production of financial documents which would constitute part of the accounting itself, before a determination was made that a basis for an accounting had been established). *902 Respondent cannot be allowed to bypass the showing required under section 607.1602 to copy financial corporate records by obtaining those documents through the discovery process....
...estion of ownership, and if that threshold is passed, to allow the trial court to hold an in camera inspection of the documents to determine their relevance on that issue. PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED. W. SHARP, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 607.1602, Florida Statutes, allows a shareholder to inspect certain records of a corporation only if the shareholder's demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose, the shareholder describes the purpose and records with reasonable pa...
Copy

Comput. Solutions, Inc. v. Gnaizda, 633 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 974, 1994 WL 45165

...ional documentation reflecting CSI's intangible assets and contingent liabilities. CSI did not produce these documents. Gnaizda filed a motion supported by the affidavit of his accountant seeking enforcement of his rights to inspect CSI's books. See § 607.1602, Fla....
...CSI petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari on grounds that there has been a clear departure from the essential requirements of the law which will cause CSI irreparable harm. The current statute regulating shareholder access to corporate records is section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1991). The records sought here fall into the categories of "[a]ccounting records of the corporation," id. § 607.1602(2)(b), and "other books and records." Id. § 607.1602(2)(d)....
...subsection (2) only if: (a) His demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose; (b) He describes with reasonable particularity his purpose and the records he desires to inspect; and (c) The records are directly connected with his purpose. Id. § 607.1602(3)....
...3d DCA 1990), review denied, 581 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 1991); Jewelers International Showcase, Inc. v. Mandell, 529 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); and Sage v. State ex rel. Perrone, 313 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). That argument is without merit. In the first place, section 607.1602 took effect July 1, 1990. Ch. 89-154, §§ 151, 168, Laws of Fla. It explicitly provides for access to accounting records, as well as other books and records, so long as they are directly connected with a proper purpose and the other requirements of subsection 607.1602(3) are satisfied....
...on of the overbreadth argument. In conclusion, Gnaizda's request was for the proper purpose of stock valuation, supported by an affidavit from his accountant, made with sufficient specificity, and consisted of examinable documents as contemplated by section 607.1602, Florida Statutes. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law. Certiorari is denied. GODERICH, J., concurs. BASKIN, Judge dissenting. I would grant the petition and quash the order under review. The majority misconstrues the effect of section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1991), as it applies to the facts in this case....
...Scorpio Music, Inc., 567 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 581 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 1991). Section 607.157(4), Florida Statutes (1989), permitted the examination of the corporation's "relevant books and records of accounts, minutes, and record of shareholders...." Section 607.1602(2)(a)-(d), Florida Statutes (1991), permits, in pertinent part, inspection of accounting records of the corporation, the record of shareholders, and any other books and records. I do not discern a more expansive statutory authority in section 607.1602 which the majority relies on to permit the inspection of insurance policies, employment agreements, and agreements for nondisclosure, among other documents....
...The accountant's affidavit is insufficient where, as here, it merely asserts conclusory statements as to the need for the documents without providing a factual basis for its conclusion. In summary, I would hold that the order compelling production of corporate documents exceeds the authority of section 607.1602 and would grant certiorari. NOTES [1] Gnaizda had already filed suit against CSI asserting breach of contract with respect to his prior employment relationship with CSI. Meanwhile, he made a shareholder request for access to corporate documents pursuant to section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1991). When the request was denied, he elected to file a motion in the pending lawsuit to compel access to records under section 607.1602....
Copy

Collier Anesthesia, PA v. Worden, 726 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 22508

...Items possibly relevant to an accounting are not discoverable until the right to an accounting has first been established. See Zebouni v. Toler, 513 So.2d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Once that occurs, discovery may proceed to the actual accounting. Id. *344 Section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1997), allows a shareholder of a corporation to inspect and copy corporate accounting records, if: 1) the shareholder's demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose; 2) the shareholder describes with reasonable particularity his purpose and the records he desires to inspect; and 3) the records are directly connected with the shareholder's purpose. See § 607.1602(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). A corporation may deny such request for inspection if it believes the request was made for an improper purpose. See § 607.1602(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). According to section 607.1602(9), Florida Statutes (1997), a "proper purpose" is a purpose reasonably related to such person's interest as a shareholder....
...a right to an accounting of respondent). Since the pleadings disputed the issue as to whether an accounting right existed, the trial court was first required to find that the physicians were entitled to an accounting by meeting the criteria found in section 607.1602(3), Florida Statutes (1997), before granting the motion to inspect corporate records....
Copy

World Time Corp. of Am. v. Mizrachi, 702 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13682, 1997 WL 756637

...DeMaria of Tew & Beasley, L.L.P., Miami, for appellee. PER CURIAM. This appeal arises out of the trial court's order compelling the appellant corporation to allow the appellee shareholder to inspect and copy the corporate records, pursuant to sections 607.1602 and 607.1604, Florida Statutes (1995)....
...Two and one-half years after the parties had entered the agreement, the purchasing shareholder defaulted on his interest payments and subsequently refused to make any more payments. The appellee then gave the appellant corporation notice of his intent to inspect the corporate records. Pursuant to section 607.1602, a shareholder of a corporation is entitled to inspect certain enumerated corporate books and records for a proper purpose, upon demand and at least five business days notice....
Copy

Williams v. Liberty Bancorporation, C., 40 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10013, 2010 WL 2695649

...Rosenbluth, Jr., of Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley & Dunlap, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. We find no reversible error in the trial court's determination that appellants' request for certain documents of Liberty Bancorporation did not comply with section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (2007)....
Copy

Delaney v. Santafe Healthcare, Inc., 741 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12032, 1999 WL 718476

...Delaney has a “proper purpose” for his request to inspect SantaFe’s records. “Proper purpose” is not defined in section 617.2103(3)(a). The term is defined for the purposes of inspection rights relating to other types of corporations in sections 607.1602(9) and 617.1602(7). Section 607.1602(9), pertaining to for-profit corporations, defines a “proper purpose” for inspection as “a purpose reasonably related to such person’s interest as a shareholder.” Similarly, section 617.602(7), pertaining to not-for-profit...
Copy

Swan v. Trost, 100 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19550, 2012 WL 5458080

...thias Trost on the basis that he was next of kin. See § 736.0603(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). When the trial court issued *1210 the order on review, the ward was alive and Ms. Swan had no duty to Matthias Trost. Citrus Park Corporate Documents Similarly, section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (2009), provides for inspection of corporate documents only by shareholders. Although section 607.1602(5) (b) provides that “a court, independently of this act, [may] compel the production of corporate records for examination,” Matthias Trost’s status as next of kin does not justify his access to confidential corporate records when he lacks any standing as a shareholder....
Copy

Villa Bellini Ristorante & Lounge, Inc. v. Ciro Mancini (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

.... -2- After September 20, 2016, Mancini, through counsel, made requests for inspection of books and records of VBRL pursuant to a statutory demand for inspection Chapter § 607.1602, Florida Statutes (2016 as amended) but said requests were denied because VBRL, Inc....
...submitted by the parties. 914 So. 2d at 1067-68. 5There is no question that if Mr. Mancini is a shareholder of Villa Bellini, Villa Bellini has a clear and indisputable statutory duty to allow him to inspect its corporate records in accordance with section 607.1602. -7- Now those who may be familiar with the arcana of mandamus jurisprudence6 might think the use of a mandamus petition in a private business dispute between private individuals is a bit—odd....
Copy

Schlesinger v. Schlesinger, 186 So. 3d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3075, 2016 WL 834035

...In the instant case, we find the trial court abused its discretion by requiring disclosure of confidential and proprietary documents before the ultimate issue of respondent’s stockholder status and her right to review and inspect those same documents under section 607.1602 has been decided.”); Arthur Finnieston, Inc....
Copy

D. Stephenson Constr., Inc. v. Mendiguren, 958 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8872, 2007 WL 1610440

PER CURIAM. Petitioner, D. Stephenson Construction, Inc., seeks a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order which granted respondent, a minority shareholder, the right to inspect corporate records under section 607.1602(2), Florida Statutes (2006). A shareholder may inspect the types of records specified by section 607.1602(2) only if the requirements of subsection (3) are met. Section 607.1602(3) provides: (3) A shareholder may inspect and copy the records described in subsection (2) only if: (a) The shareholder’s demand is made in good faith and for a proper purpose; (b) The shareholder describes with reasonable particu...
...Bose Yalamanchi, M.D., P.A., 669 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Picerne Dev. Corp. of Fla. v. Tasca & Rotelli, 635 So.2d 149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Petitioner alleges that respondent seeks the records for improper purposes which may harm the corporation. See § 607.1602(6), Fla....
...The trial court made no findings on petitioner’s claim that the requests were made for an improper purpose. The trial court’s order departs from the essential requirements of law because it contains no findings regarding the elements that must be established under section 607.1602(3) before a shareholder request for inspection under section 607.1602(2) may be granted....
...In Collier, the second district held: Since the pleadings disputed the issue as to whether an accounting right existed, the trial court was first required to find that the [shareholders] were entitled to an accounting by meeting the criteria found in section 607.1602(3), Florida Statutes (1997), before granting the motion to inspect corporate records....
...om shareholder’s accountant explaining why particular records needed to be inspected). The alleged tax liability is conspicuously absent from the letter demanding to inspect the records in this case. Before ordering inspection of the records under section 607.1602(2), the trial court was required to find that the elements of section 607.1602(3) were established....
Copy

Omes v. Ultra Enter., Inc., 116 So. 3d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 3336867, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10603

...Finding no error in the trial court’s determinations that the appellees complied with the pertinent statutory obligations, we affirm. The Complaint and Proceedings Below Omes filed a two-count complaint claiming unlawful denial of access to corporate books and records under section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (2011), and unlawful denial of access to limited liability company (LLC) records under section 608.4101, Florida Statutes (2011)....
...angible assets and contingent liabilities. [The corporation] did not produce these documents. [The shareholder] filed a motion supported by the affidavit of his accountant seeking enforcement of his rights to inspect [the corporation’s] books. See § 607.1602, Fla....
...The court denied a general request for the inspection of all other corporate records. Id. at 1101 (footnote omitted). In Computer Solutions, the corporation sought certiorari 5 because it claimed the additional records sought by its shareholder and his accountant were beyond the scope of section 607.1602....
...he letter or spirit of the records inspection statutes. Affirmed. . Access to the records of a corporation not for profit, though similar to that afforded regarding a corporation, is governed by section 617.1602, Florida Statutes (2011), rather than section 607.1602....
Copy

HeartPoint Global, Inc., etc. v. Dragon Blue Ltd., etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...Butchko, Judge. Sniffen & Spellman P.A., and Robert J. Hauser (West Palm Beach), for appellant. Shutts & Bowen LLP, Aleksey Shtivelman, and Douglas M. Kramer, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 607.1602(7)(b), Fla....
Copy

Lewis v. Conroy, Simberg & Gannon, P.A., 705 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 1998 WL 75060

corporate and accounting records pursuant to section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1997), which was stayed
Copy

Ottolina v. Miller Lakes Assocs., 717 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1998 WL 65310

motion to inspect corporate records under section 607.1602, Florida Statutes (1993). We reverse the order
Copy

Nu Med Home Health Care, Inc. v. Hosp. Staffing Servs. Inc., 664 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13021, 1995 WL 749618

books and records of the corporation under section 607.1602(2), Florida Statutes (1998). There is nothing

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.