Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 607.1202 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 607.1202 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 607.1202 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 607.1202

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 607
FLORIDA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
View Entire Chapter
607.1202 Shareholder approval of certain dispositions.
(1) A corporation may sell, lease, exchange, or otherwise dispose of all, or substantially all, of its property (with or without good will), otherwise than in the usual and regular course of business, on the terms and conditions and for the consideration determined by the corporation’s board of directors, but only if the board of directors proposes and its shareholders approve the proposed transaction.
(2)(a) To obtain the approval of the shareholders under subsection (1), the board of directors must first adopt a resolution approving the disposition, and thereafter, the disposition must also be approved by the corporation’s shareholders.
(b) In submitting the disposition to the shareholders for approval, the board of directors must recommend the proposed transaction to the shareholders of record unless:
1. The board of directors makes a determination that because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances it should not make such a recommendation; or
2. Section 607.0826 applies.
(c) If either subparagraph (b)1. or subparagraph (b)2. applies, the board of directors shall inform the shareholders of the basis for its so proceeding without such recommendation.
(3) The board of directors may set conditions for approval of the disposition or the effectiveness of the disposition.
(4) If the disposition is required to be approved by the shareholders under subsection (1) and if the approval is to be given at the meeting, the corporation shall notify each shareholder, regardless of whether entitled to vote, of the meeting of shareholders at which the disposition is to be submitted for approval. The notice must state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the disposition and shall contain a description of the disposition and the consideration to be received by the corporation. Furthermore, the notice shall contain a clear and concise statement that, if the transaction is effected, shareholders dissenting therefrom are or may be entitled, if they comply with the provisions of this chapter regarding appraisal rights, to be paid the fair value of their shares and such notice must be accompanied by a copy of ss. 607.1301-607.1340.
(5) Unless this chapter, the articles of incorporation, or the board of directors acting pursuant to subsection (3) requires a greater vote or a greater quorum, the approval of the disposition shall require the approval of the shareholders at a meeting at which a quorum exists consisting of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the disposition.
(6) After a disposition has been approved by the shareholders under this chapter, and at any time before the disposition has been consummated, it may be abandoned by the corporation without action by the shareholders, subject to any contractual rights of other parties to the disposition.
(7) A disposition of assets in the course of dissolution is governed by ss. 607.1401-607.14401 and not by this section.
(8) For purposes of this section, the assets of a direct or indirect consolidated subsidiary shall be deemed to be the assets of the parent corporation.
(9) For purposes of this section, the term “shareholder” includes a beneficial shareholder and a voting trust beneficial owner.
History.s. 117, ch. 89-154; s. 153, ch. 90-179; s. 20, ch. 2003-283; s. 160, ch. 2019-90; s. 40, ch. 2020-32.

F.S. 607.1202 on Google Scholar

F.S. 607.1202 on CourtListener

Amendments to 607.1202


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 607.1202

Total Results: 9  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Corp. Exp. Off. Prods., Inc. v. Phillips, 847 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2003).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 321, 19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1505, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 521, 2003 WL 1883697

...an entirely different entity, the acquiring business. The asset sale to that entity may include some or all of the corporate assets, and the transferred assets may include tangibles such as machinery and intangibles such as accounts receivable. See § 607.1202(1), Fla....
Copy

Levine v. Levine, 734 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 445693

...[4] These include sections 607.0902(7) and (8), Florida Statutes (1997), regarding shareholder determination of proposed voting rights attendant to control-share acquisitions; section 607.1103(4), relating to proposed mergers or share exchanges; and section 607.1202(4), regarding sales or exchanges of all or substantially all of corporate assets outside the regular course of business....
Copy

Badger v. S. Farm Bureau Life Ins., 612 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15895, 2010 WL 2990009

...Southern Farm’s counsel told Brashear that the Valuation reflected a “fair price.” PSC made a counteroffer of $4.4 million, and the companies agreed to the sale at that price. Because Florida law requires a corporation to obtain shareholder approval in order to sell a principal asset, Fla Stat. § 607.1202, Brashear prepared and mailed to PSC shareholders a meeting notice and proxy statement detailing the proposed debenture sale....
Copy

Boettcher v. IMC Mortg. Co., 871 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1057824

...ourt for further proceedings. Facts and Procedural History *1049 IMC is a publicly held corporation. [1] On November 15, 1999, IMC sold a substantial amount of its assets to Citifinancial Mortgage Company, a subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc. Pursuant to section 607.1202, a majority of the shareholders of IMC were required to approve the sale....
Copy

Home Furniture Depot, Inc. v. ENTEVOR AB, 753 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 257183

...ts property otherwise than in the usual course of business, only by following certain statutory requirements. The requirement of primary significance in this case is the approval by a majority of the stockholders of the corporate transferor. [5] See § 607.1202, Fla....
...the plaintiff. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985). [3] In addition to becoming a stockholder in the "new" corporation in lieu of Lee Blackwell, Carrie Blackwell also was named one of the three directors as well as the President. [4] § 607.1202(1), Fla....
Copy

Barfield v. Sana of Jacksonville, Inc. (In Re Barfield), 261 B.R. 793 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 727, 2001 WL 435353

...A corporation may transfer all or substantially all of its assets outside of the ordinary course of business on the terms and conditions and for the consideration deemed appropriate by the corporation's board of directors, if the board of directors proposes and the shareholders approve of the transaction. See FLA.STAT. § 607.1202(1)....
Copy

Padron Warehouse v. Realty Assocs. Fund III, 377 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

...$9.5 million. Id. at 45, 49. Separate documentation showed that the purchase price of the PWC warehouse was $4.75 million. See Smulian Depo., Ex. 4 at 1 [D.E. 114]. [3] On March 22, 1995, Mr. Padron also certified that, in compliance with Fla. Stat. § 607.1202, PWC held a meeting on March 27, 1995 — supposedly five days after Mr....
...According to PWC, if the purchase and sale agreement was signed on March 22nd and the shareholders' meeting took place on March 27th, the minority shareholders could not have possibly have been given the required 10-day statutory notice under *1266 Fla. Stat. § 607.1202....
...Andrew Smulian, the attorney who represented Realty in the transaction, cannot recall whether he knew there were minority shareholders at the time of the sale, and does not recall requesting shareholder approval, beyond the certificate of compliance with § 607.1202....
...For example, as explained earlier, see footnote 3, there is no evidence that Realty had a 1994 appraisal valuing the warehouse around $6 million, and hence no evidence that Realty was buying the property well below market value. Third, although PWC is right that the timing of Mr. Padron's certificate under Fla. Stat. § 607.1202 should have indicated to Realty that the minority shareholders did not have the requisite 10-day statutory notice to object, that does not suggest (or *1274 create a triable issue) that Realty was guilty of fraud so as to negate § 692.01. This is because § 607.1202 does not provide for after-the-fact relief against a third-party purchaser....
Copy

Padron Warehouse Corp. v. Realty Assocs. Fund III, L.P., 377 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18462, 2005 WL 1691898

...$9.5 million. Id. at 45, 49. Separate documentation showed that the purchase price of the PWC warehouse was $4.75 million. See Smulian Depo., Ex. 4 at 1 [D.E. 114]. 3 On March 22, 1995, Mr. Padrón also certified that, in compliance with Fla. Stat. § 607.1202 , PWC held a meeting on March 27, 1995 — supposedly five days after Mr....
...According to PWC, if the purchase and sale agreement was signed on March 22nd and the shareholders’ meeting took place on March 27th, the minority shareholders could not have possibly have been given the required 10-day statutory notice under *1266 Fla. Stat. § 607.1202 ....
...Andrew Smulian, the attorney who represented Realty in the transaction, cannot recall whether he knew there were minority shareholders at the time of the sale, and does not recall requesting shareholder approval, beyond the certifícate of compliance with § 607.1202....
...For example, as explained earlier, see footnote 3, there is no evidence that Realty had a 1994 appraisal valuing the warehouse around $6 million, and hence no evidence that Realty was buying the property well below market value. Third, although PWC is right that the timing of Mr. Padron’s certificate under Fla. Stat. § 607.1202 should have indicated to Realty that the minority shareholders did not have the requisite 10-day statutory notice to object, that does not suggest (or *1274 create a triable issue) that Realty was guilty of fraud so as to negate § 692.01. This is because § 607.1202 does not provide for after-the-fact relief against a third-party purchaser....
Copy

Baker v. Petway, 740 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1999 WL 641434

...t Five is an action for breach of fiduciary duty against Seldin; Count Six is an action for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against Seldin, the Jacksonville Jaguars, Ltd. defendants, and Weaver; Count Seven is an action for violation of section 607.1202, Florida Statutes, against Petway and Jacksonville Jaguars, Ltd....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.