CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 1969281
...the plaintiffs. [5] The trial court characterized the claims set forth in the nineteen-count complaint as a single issue, "i.e., that [Pulte] knew or should have known the homes imperiled the health, safety and welfare of the public in violation of Section 553.70 of the Florida Statutes." The trial court did not address other issues raised by the plaintiffs concerning whether the arbitration clauses were unconscionable, nor did it analyze each claim independently in order to determine the true...
...The arbitration clauses are challenged under and pursuant to recognized contract defenses and as being both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. b. Second, the complaint addresses the Defendants' construction of houses which do not comply with the State Minimum Building Codes as codified at § 553.70, et sequitur, Fla....
