Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 501.2075 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 501.2075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 501.2075 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 501.2075

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION
View Entire Chapter
501.2075 Civil penalty.Except as provided in s. 501.2077, any person, firm, corporation, association, or entity, or any agent or employee of the foregoing, who is willfully using, or has willfully used, a method, act, or practice declared unlawful under s. 501.204, or who is willfully violating any of the rules of the department adopted under this part, is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation. Willful violations occur when the person knew or should have known that his or her conduct was unfair or deceptive or prohibited by rule. This civil penalty may be recovered in any action brought under this part by the enforcing authority; or the enforcing authority may terminate any investigation or action upon agreement by the person, firm, corporation, association, or entity, or the agent or employee of the foregoing, to pay a stipulated civil penalty. The department or the court may waive any such civil penalty if the person, firm, corporation, association, or entity, or the agent or employee of the foregoing, has previously made full restitution or reimbursement or has paid actual damages to the consumers or governmental entities who have been injured by the unlawful act or practice or rule violation. If civil penalties are assessed in any litigation, the enforcing authority is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. A civil penalty so collected shall accrue to the state and shall be deposited as received into the General Revenue Fund unallocated.
History.s. 3, ch. 83-117; s. 1, ch. 92-40; s. 5, ch. 92-133; s. 9, ch. 93-38; s. 630, ch. 97-103; s. 4, ch. 2001-39; s. 25, ch. 2001-214.

F.S. 501.2075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 501.2075 on CourtListener

Amendments to 501.2075


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 501.2075

Total Results: 11  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Millennium Commc'ns & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Off. of Atty. Gen., 761 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cited 76 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 986399

...ther acts and practices alleged therein; reimbursement to all consumers; and to assess Millennium civil penalties in the amount of $10,000 for each act or practice found to be in violation of chapter 501, part II, Florida Statutes (1997) pursuant to section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (1997)....
Copy

Sarkis v. Pafford Oil Co., Inc., 697 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Cited 40 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 193841

...The elements of this statutory action are independent of the elements of a simple breach of contract and the remedies available for a "willful" violation of the statute, as alleged in the amended complaint, are not the same as those available in a contract action. § 501.2075, Fla.Stat....
Copy

Gentry v. Harborage Cottages-Stuart, LLLP, 602 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28301, 2009 WL 689714

...Pukka Dev., Inc., 550 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir.2008) (citation omitted). Therefore, Harborage's violation of the ILSFDA's anti-fraud provision also constitutes a violation of the FDUTPA. [8] There *1257 remains, however, an issue of material fact concerning the damages to which Plaintiffs are entitled. See § 501.2075, Fla....
Copy

Army Aviation Heritage Found. & Museum, Inc. v. Buis, 504 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (N.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22260, 2007 WL 951804

...[4] In determining the appropriate amount of nominal damages, I find particularly persuasive the Florida legislature's statutory codification of a civil penalty for willful violations of FDUTPA in actions brought by the "enforcing authority." [5] See § Fla. Stat. 501.2075. Section 501.2075 is entitled "civil penalty" and states, in relevant part, that Except as provided in s....
...used, a method, act, or practice declared unlawful under s. 501.204, or who is willfully violating any of the rules of the department adopted under this part, is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation. Fla. Stat. § 501.2075....
...secure "a business advantage" by. Defendants. Thus, I find that FDUTPA adequately embraces the defamatory statements, and its civil penalty is of greater relevance had no such overlap existed. Further, although I recognize that the civil penalty in § 501.2075 is applicable only to actions commenced by the "enforcing authority" and not to actions commenced by private parties, I nevertheless find that the legislature's codification of a specific monetary range of not more than $10,000 for each v...
Copy

3B TV, INC. v. State, Off. of Atty. Gen., 794 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 1110559

...Although, in view of our holding above, it is not necessary for us to address this question, because this penalty issue will almost certainly arise in any new trial, we address the issue to provide guidance to the trial court. See Hall v. State, 752 So.2d 575 (Fla.2000). *749 Section 501.2075, Florida Statutes, provides for a civil penalty for willful violation of the act of "not more than $10,000 for each such violation." Under Florida law, a penalty provision must be strictly construed and is not to be extended by construction....
...inuing violation of such an order can be separately penalized. [2] By contrast, section 501 .2075, applicable here, provides only that the State may recover "a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation." There is no provision in section 501.2075 for separate penalties for multiple days of a continuing offense. Given the express statutory authorization for per diem penalties under section 501.208, we conclude that the absence of similar language in section 501.2075 clearly indicates that the Legislature did not intend to authorize the imposition of daily penalties for continuing conduct under section 501.2075....
Copy

DLA v. Father & Son Moving & Storage, 643 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 486557

...The "Definitions" section of the act provides support for the construction of the majority opinion. Section 501.203(3) defines "Violation of this part" as meaning "either a violation of a provision of this part or a violation of a rule promulgated pursuant to this part." § 501.203(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). Furthermore, section 501.2075 provides a civil *27 penalty for any entity "who engages in any act or practice declared in this part to be unlawful" or "who violates any of the rules of the Department of Legal Affairs promulgated under this part." If, as appellee...
Copy

State v. Sobieck, 701 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 593912

...nses and corporate charters of Sobieck or his business to operate in the resale of tickets business. It also assessed two civil penalties, totalling $20,000.00 for two separate actions which involved unfair and deceptive trade practices, pursuant to section 501.2075 (a civil penalty of $10,000.00 for each violation) for willfully violating section 501.204 by engaging in unfair methods of competition, unconscionable acts or practices, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce....
...alty sought in fact constituted a second punishment. In this case, there was no such disproportionateness shown or established. As stated above, Sobieck was fined $10,000.00 for two willful violations of the Deceptive and Unfair Trade practices Act, section 501.2075, arising out of two transactions engaged in as a registered seller of travel, pursuant to section 559.927....
Copy

Jose Ramon Montenegro v. Antonio Socorro (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...Appellants, Jose Ramon Montenegro and Asiven, LLC, filed an eight- count complaint against appellees, Antonio Socorro and Iquantics Corp., alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, constructive fraud, civil theft, violation of section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2022), Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), money received, and tortious interference with a business relationship....
Copy

Kenneth Kerrivan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

... Case: 18-13045 Date Filed: 03/24/2020 Page: 26 of 31 The Tobacco Companies ask us to compare the awards of punitive damages to the civil penalties authorized for willful violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. See Fla. Stat. § 501.2075....
Copy

George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Dec 16, 2022

...endant “is willfully using, or has willfully used, a method, act, or practice declared unlawful under [Fla. Stat. § 501.204], or who is willfully violating any of the rules of the department adopted under this part.” Id. § 501.2075....
Copy

Outreach Hous., LLC v. Off. of the Attorney Gen., Dep't of Legal Affairs, 221 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2983990, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10052

whether to grant a civil penalty pursuant to section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2008), which permits the

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.