Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 493.6118 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 493.6118 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 493.6118 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 493.6118

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 493
PRIVATE INVESTIGATIVE, PRIVATE SECURITY, AND REPOSSESSION SERVICES
View Entire Chapter
493.6118 Grounds for disciplinary action.
(1) The following constitute grounds for which disciplinary action specified in subsection (2) may be taken by the department against any licensee, agency, or applicant regulated by this chapter, or any unlicensed person engaged in activities regulated under this chapter:
(a) Fraud or willful misrepresentation in applying for or obtaining a license.
(b) Use of any fictitious or assumed name by an agency unless the agency has department approval and qualifies under s. 865.09.
(c) Being found guilty of or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, or being convicted of a crime that directly relates to the business for which the license is held or sought. A plea of nolo contendere shall create a rebuttable presumption of guilt to the underlying criminal charges, and the department shall allow the individual being disciplined or denied an application for a license to present any mitigating circumstances surrounding his or her plea.
(d) A false statement by the licensee that any individual is or has been in his or her employ.
(e) A finding that the licensee or any employee is guilty of willful betrayal of a professional secret or any unauthorized release of information acquired as a result of activities regulated under this chapter.
(f) Proof that the applicant or licensee is guilty of fraud or deceit, or of negligence, incompetency, or misconduct, in the practice of the activities regulated under this chapter.
(g) Conducting activities regulated under this chapter without a license or with a revoked or suspended license.
(h) Failure of the licensee to maintain in full force and effect the commercial general liability insurance coverage required by s. 493.6110.
(i) Impersonating, or permitting or aiding and abetting an employee to impersonate, a law enforcement officer or an employee of the state, the United States, or any political subdivision thereof by identifying himself or herself as a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement officer or official representative, by wearing a uniform or presenting or displaying a badge or credentials that would cause a reasonable person to believe that he or she is a law enforcement officer or that he or she has official authority, by displaying any flashing or warning vehicular lights other than amber colored, or by committing any act that is intended to falsely convey official status.
(j) Commission of an act of violence or the use of force on any person except in the lawful protection of one’s self or another from physical harm.
(k) Knowingly violating, advising, encouraging, or assisting the violation of any statute, court order, capias, warrant, injunction, or cease and desist order, in the course of business regulated under this chapter.
(l) Soliciting business for an attorney in return for compensation.
(m) Transferring or attempting to transfer a license issued pursuant to this chapter.
(n) Employing or contracting with any unlicensed or improperly licensed person or agency to conduct activities regulated under this chapter, or performing any act that assists, aids, or abets a person or business entity in engaging in unlicensed activity, when the licensure status was known or could have been ascertained by reasonable inquiry.
(o) Failure or refusal to cooperate with or refusal of access to an authorized representative of the department engaged in an official investigation pursuant to this chapter.
(p) Failure of any partner, principal corporate officer, or licensee to have his or her identification card in his or her possession while on duty.
(q) Failure of any licensee to have his or her license in his or her possession while on duty, as specified in s. 493.6111(1).
(r) Failure or refusal by a sponsor to certify a biannual written report on an intern or to certify completion or termination of an internship to the department within 15 working days.
(s) Failure to report to the department any person whom the licensee knows to be in violation of this chapter or the rules of the department.
(t) Violating any provision of this chapter.
(u) For a Class “G” licensee, failing to timely complete requalification training as required in s. 493.6113(3)(b).
(v) For a Class “K” licensee, failing to maintain active certification specified under s. 493.6105(6).
(w) For a Class “G” or a Class “K” applicant or licensee, being prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm by state or federal law.
(x) In addition to the grounds for disciplinary action prescribed in paragraphs (a)-(t), Class “R” recovery agencies, Class “E” recovery agents, and Class “EE” recovery agent interns are prohibited from committing the following acts:
1. Recovering a motor vehicle, mobile home, motorboat, aircraft, personal watercraft, all-terrain vehicle, farm equipment, or industrial equipment that has been sold under a conditional sales agreement or under the terms of a chattel mortgage before authorization has been received from the legal owner or mortgagee.
2. Charging for expenses not actually incurred in connection with the recovery, transportation, storage, or disposal of repossessed property or personal property obtained in a repossession.
3. Using any repossessed property or personal property obtained in a repossession for the personal benefit of a licensee or an officer, director, partner, manager, or employee of a licensee.
4. Selling property recovered under the provisions of this chapter, except with written authorization from the legal owner or the mortgagee thereof.
5. Failing to notify the police or sheriff’s department of the jurisdiction in which the repossessed property is recovered within 2 hours after recovery.
6. Failing to remit moneys collected in lieu of recovery of a motor vehicle, mobile home, motorboat, aircraft, personal watercraft, all-terrain vehicle, farm equipment, or industrial equipment to the client within 10 working days.
7. Failing to deliver to the client a negotiable instrument that is payable to the client, within 10 working days after receipt of such instrument.
8. Falsifying, altering, or failing to maintain any required inventory or records regarding disposal of personal property contained in or on repossessed property pursuant to s. 493.6404(1).
9. Carrying any weapon or firearm when he or she is on private property and performing duties under his or her license whether or not he or she is licensed pursuant to s. 790.06.
10. Soliciting from the legal owner the recovery of property subject to repossession after such property has been seen or located on public or private property if the amount charged or requested for such recovery is more than the amount normally charged for such a recovery.
11. Wearing, presenting, or displaying a badge in the course of performing a repossession regulated by this chapter.
(y) Installation, placement, or use of a tracking device or tracking application in violation of s. 934.425.
(z) Failure of any licensee to notify his or her employer within 3 calendar days if he or she is arrested for any offense.
(2) When the department finds any violation of subsection (1), it may do one or more of the following:
(a) Deny an application for the issuance or renewal of a license.
(b) Issue a reprimand.
(c) Impose an administrative fine in the Class I category pursuant to s. 570.971 for every count or separate offense.
(d) Place the licensee on probation for a period of time and subject to such conditions as the department may specify.
(e) Suspend or revoke a license.
(3) The department may deny an application for licensure citing lack of good moral character only if the finding by the department of lack of good moral character is supported by clear and convincing evidence. In such cases, the department shall furnish the applicant a statement containing the findings of the department, a complete record of the evidence upon which the determination was based, and a notice of the rights of the applicant to an administrative hearing and subsequent appeal.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1)(c) and subsection (2):
(a) If the applicant or licensee has been convicted of a felony, the department shall deny the application or revoke the license unless and until civil rights have been restored by the State of Florida or by a state acceptable to Florida and a period of 10 years has expired since final release from supervision.
(b) A Class “G” applicant who has been convicted of a felony shall also have had the specific right to possess, carry, or use a firearm restored by the State of Florida.
(c) If the applicant or licensee has been found guilty of, entered a plea of guilty to, or entered a plea of nolo contendere to a felony and adjudication of guilt is withheld, the department shall deny the application or revoke the license until a period of 3 years has expired since final release from supervision.
(d) A plea of nolo contendere shall create a rebuttable presumption of guilt to the underlying criminal charges, and the department shall allow the person being disciplined or denied an application for a license to present any mitigating circumstances surrounding his or her plea.
(e) The grounds for discipline or denial cited in this subsection shall be applied to any disqualifying criminal history regardless of the date of commission of the underlying criminal charge. Such provisions shall be applied retroactively and prospectively.
(5) Upon revocation or suspension of a license, the licensee shall forthwith return the license which was suspended or revoked.
(6) The agency or Class “DS” or “RS” license and the approval or license of each officer, partner, or owner of the agency, school, or training facility are automatically suspended upon entry of a final order imposing an administrative fine against the agency, school, or training facility, until the fine is paid, if 30 calendar days have elapsed since the entry of the final order. All owners and corporate or agency officers or partners are jointly and severally liable for fines levied against the agency, school, or training facility. The agency or Class “DS” or “RS” license or the approval or license of any officer, partner, or owner of the agency, school, or training facility may not be renewed, and an application may not be approved, if the owner, licensee, or applicant is liable for an outstanding administrative fine imposed under this chapter. An individual’s approval or license becomes automatically suspended if a fine imposed against the individual or his or her agency is not paid within 30 days after the date of the final order, and remains suspended until the fine is paid. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, an individual’s approval or license may not be suspended and an application may not be denied if the licensee or the applicant has an appeal from a final order pending in any appellate court.
(7) An applicant or licensee shall be ineligible to reapply for the same class of license for a period of 1 year following final agency action resulting in the denial or revocation of a license applied for or issued under this chapter. This time restriction shall not apply to administrative denials wherein the basis for denial was:
(a) An inadvertent error or omission on the application;
(b) The experience documented by the department was insufficient at the time of application;
(c) The department was unable to complete the criminal background investigation due to insufficient information from the Department of Law Enforcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or any other applicable law enforcement agency; or
(d) Failure to submit required fees.
(8)(a) Upon notification by a law enforcement agency, a court, or the Department of Law Enforcement and upon subsequent written verification, the department shall temporarily suspend a Class “G” or Class “K” license if the licensee is arrested or charged with a firearms-related crime that would disqualify such person from licensure under this chapter. The department shall notify the licensee suspended under this section of his or her right to a hearing pursuant to chapter 120. A hearing conducted regarding the temporary suspension must be for the limited purpose of determining whether the licensee has been arrested or charged with a disqualifying firearms-related crime.
(b) If the criminal case results in a nondisqualifying disposition, the department shall issue an order lifting the suspension upon the licensee’s submission of a certified copy of the final resolution to the department.
(c) If the criminal case results in a disqualifying disposition, the suspension remains in effect and the department shall proceed with revocation proceedings pursuant to chapter 120.
(9)(a) Upon notification by a law enforcement agency, a court, or the Department of Law Enforcement and upon subsequent written verification, the department shall temporarily suspend a license if the licensee is arrested or charged with a forcible felony as defined in s. 776.08. The department shall notify the licensee suspended under this section of his or her right to a hearing pursuant to chapter 120. A hearing conducted regarding the temporary suspension must be for the limited purpose of determining whether the licensee has been arrested or charged with a forcible felony.
(b) If the criminal case results in a nondisqualifying disposition, the department shall issue an order lifting the suspension upon the licensee’s submission of a certified copy of the final resolution to the department.
(c) If the criminal case results in a disqualifying disposition, the suspension remains in effect and the department shall proceed with revocation proceedings pursuant to chapter 120.
History.ss. 2, 11, ch. 90-364; s. 8, ch. 91-248; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 5, ch. 93-49; s. 9, ch. 94-172; s. 534, ch. 97-103; s. 6, ch. 97-248; s. 4, ch. 2005-143; s. 9, ch. 2011-205; s. 16, ch. 2012-67; s. 5, ch. 2013-251; s. 29, ch. 2014-150; s. 2, ch. 2015-137; s. 17, ch. 2017-85; s. 2, ch. 2024-114.

F.S. 493.6118 on Google Scholar

F.S. 493.6118 on CourtListener

Amendments to 493.6118


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 493.6118

Total Results: 13  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Hernandez v. State, Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 629 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11558, 1993 WL 469351

...Shortly after his release from prison, Hernandez applied for and was granted a private investigator’s license. In 1991 the legislature tightened the qualifications for a private investigator’s license by amending chapter 493. The controlling provision is section 493.6118(4), Florida Statutes, which provides: [I]f the applicant or licensee has been convicted of a felony in any state ..., the department shall deny the application or revoke the license unless and until civil rights have been restored by the State of Florida ......
...whether a great public interest is served by the statute, the extent to which any right is abrogated, and the nature of the right affected. State Dep’t of Transp. v. Knowles, 402 So.2d 1155, 1158 (Fla.1981). We hold that retroactive application of section 493.6118(4) is not unconstitutional because a private investigator’s license is not a property right, and the legislative determination, that a great public interest is served by denying the license to a convicted felon, is not arbitrary....
Copy

Yeoman v. CILB, 919 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 3487856

...express an absolute bar to licensure for applicants with a prior felony conviction whose civil rights have not been restored, it could and would have done so. See, e.g., 447.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004) (licensing and permitting of business agents); § 493.6118(4)(a), Fla....
Copy

Lucas A. Sanchez-Del Valle v. Dep't of Agric. & Consum. Servs., Div. of Licensing (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

his Security Officer’s License pursuant to Section 493.6118(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2023), following
Copy

Rod's Recovery Agency v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 606 So. 2d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10507, 1992 WL 277276

KAHN, Judge. Pursuant to an administrative complaint filed by the Department of State, Division of Licensing (Division), the Division issued a final order finding the appellants, Rod’s Recovery Agency and Rodney J. Finch (Rod’s) in violation of section 493.6118(l)(g) and section 493.6118(l)(n), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990). The Division assessed an administrative fine against Rod’s as to each of these two violations. We affirm the final agency order as to the violation of section 493.6118(l)(n), and reverse as to the violation of section 493.6118(l)(g)....
...y, Florida, Respondent employed Tabetha Butler and Tom Butler to perform repossessions when such persons did not have a [sic] valid Class “E” Recovery Agent licenses or Class “EE” Recovery Agent Intern licenses. Respondent is in violation of section 493.6118(l)(n), Florida Statutes. Count II During the period February 28, 1991 to March 12, 1991, in Escambia County, Florida, Respondent conducted or advertised the business of a recovery agency without a valid Class “R” Recovery Agency License. Respondent is in violation of section 493.6118(l)(g), Florida Statutes, and Rule 1C-3.122(1), Florida Administrative Code....
Copy

Aguilar v. Florida Dept. of Agric. & Consum. Servs., Div. of Licensing, 871 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6602, 2004 WL 1057710

...ces, Division of Licensing. The amended final order also provided that Aguilar’s “[failure to make timely payment shall result in the automatic suspension of any licenses issued to Respondent or the denial of any licenses applied for pursuant to Section 493.6118(6), Florida Statutes.” We have reviewed both the brief submitted by Aguilar and the record on appeal, *1067 but find no basis for reversing the amended final order. However, we would like to note that section 493.6118(6) provides in part that “[a]n individual’s ... license becomes automatically suspended if a fíne imposed against the individual ... is not paid within 30 days after the date of the final order, and remains suspended until the fine is paid.” § 493.6118(6), Fla. Stat. (2003) (emphasis added). Further, section 493.6118(6) also provides that “[n]otwith-standing the provisions of this subsection, an individual’s ......
Copy

Marin v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 689 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198, 1997 WL 134341

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 493.6118(2), Fla....
Copy

Thomas v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 836 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1140, 2003 WL 244885

PER CURIAM. Because the appellant has not demonstrated that the Department of State committed any error of law or procedure, we affirm the license revocation under section 493.6118, Florida Statutes (2002)....
Copy

Carswell Investigations v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 705 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 912, 1998 WL 39381

weapon in the course of regulated conduct and section 493.6118(l)(k) for knowingly violating a Georgia statute
Copy

Weissbrod v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 688 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1707, 1997 WL 80292

...We affirm the findings and conclusions of both the hearing officer and of the Department of State. The Department of State’s Final Order states that the “[r]espondent shall CEASE AND DESIST engaging in activities regulated by Chapter 493, Florida Statutes, and the license shall be returned to the Department pursuant to Section 493.6118(5), Florida Statutes.” As it appears that the Appellant possesses more than one license governed by Chapter 493, we remand this case for a specification of which license the Department is referring to and the exact duration of the cease and desist order....
Copy

Duxbury v. State, 264 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Duxbury admitted that neither his supervisor nor the police explicitly or implicitly told him or suggested that he would be fired from his job unless he cooperated with and gave recorded statements to the police. Given the lack of any actual threats that he would be terminated, Duxbury relied upon section 493.6118(1)( o ), Florida Statutes (2015), 4 as providing a legal obligation to cooperate with police, arguing that it created a de jure threat that he would be fired if he refused to speak with the authorities....
...made and that the statutory provision was limited in scope and did not require cooperation with police in a criminal investigation. Duxbury renewed his motion to suppress during trial, and it was once again denied. We agree with the trial court that section 493.6118(1)( o ) only requires security guards to cooperate with investigations conducted by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, which is the licensing and disciplinary body overseeing security guards....
...The shoes in question recovered from Duxbury's home were a popular brand and a common size with nothing more to match the shoe prints to those particular shoes. Chapter 493 applies to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services' regulation of private investigators, private security guards, and repossession agents. Section 493.6118(1)( o ) states that grounds for disciplinary proceedings include: "Failure or refusal to cooperate with or refusal of access to an authorized representative of the department engaged in an official investigation pursuant to this chap...
Copy

Duxbury v. State, 264 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Duxbury admitted that neither his supervisor nor the police explicitly or implicitly told him or suggested that he would be fired from his job unless he cooperated with and gave recorded statements to the police. Given the lack of any actual threats that he would be terminated, Duxbury relied upon section 493.6118(1)( o ), Florida Statutes (2015), 4 as providing a legal obligation to cooperate with police, arguing that it created a de jure threat that he would be fired if he refused to speak with the authorities....
...made and that the statutory provision was limited in scope and did not require cooperation with police in a criminal investigation. Duxbury renewed his motion to suppress during trial, and it was once again denied. We agree with the trial court that section 493.6118(1)( o ) only requires security guards to cooperate with investigations conducted by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, which is the licensing and disciplinary body overseeing security guards....
...The shoes in question recovered from Duxbury's home were a popular brand and a common size with nothing more to match the shoe prints to those particular shoes. Chapter 493 applies to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services' regulation of private investigators, private security guards, and repossession agents. Section 493.6118(1)( o ) states that grounds for disciplinary proceedings include: "Failure or refusal to cooperate with or refusal of access to an authorized representative of the department engaged in an official investigation pursuant to this chap...
Copy

Libby Investigations v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 685 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13210, 1996 WL 728686

complaint justified action provided for in section 493.6118(2), providing for suspension or revocation
Copy

Intelligence Grp., Inc. v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 610 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414, 1992 WL 362140

the Department alleged was misconduct under section 493.6118(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1989). Oglesby denied

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.