403.087 Permits; general issuance; denial; revocation; prohibition; penalty.—
(1) A stationary installation that is reasonably expected to be a source of air or water pollution must not be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified without an appropriate and currently valid permit issued by the department, unless exempted by department rule. In no event shall a permit for a water pollution source be issued for a term of more than 10 years, nor may an operation permit issued after July 1, 1992, for a major source of air pollution have a fixed term of more than 5 years. However, upon expiration, a new permit may be issued by the department in accordance with this chapter and the rules of the department.
(2) The department shall adopt, and may amend or repeal, rules for the issuance, denial, modification, and revocation of permits under this section.
(3) A renewal of an operation permit for a domestic wastewater treatment facility other than a facility regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program under s. 403.0885 must be issued upon request for a term of up to 10 years, for the same fee and under the same conditions as a 5-year permit, in order to provide the owner or operator with a financial incentive, if:
(a) The waters from the treatment facility are not discharged to Class I municipal injection wells or the treatment facility is not required to comply with the federal standards under the Underground Injection Control Program under chapter 62-528 of the Florida Administrative Code;
(b) The treatment facility is not operating under a temporary operating permit or a permit with an accompanying administrative order and does not have any enforcement action pending against it by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the department, or a local program approved under s. 403.182;
(c) The treatment facility has operated under an operation permit for 5 years and, for at least the preceding 2 years, has generally operated in conformance with the limits of permitted flows and other conditions specified in the permit;
(d) The department has reviewed the discharge-monitoring reports required under department rule and is satisfied that the reports are accurate;
(e) The treatment facility has generally met water quality standards in the preceding 2 years, except for violations attributable to events beyond the control of the treatment plant or its operator, such as destruction of equipment by fire, wind, or other abnormal events that could not reasonably be expected to occur; and
(f) The department, or a local program approved under s. 403.182, has conducted, in the preceding 12 months, an inspection of the facility and has verified in writing to the operator of the facility that it is not exceeding the permitted capacity and is in substantial compliance.
The department shall keep records of the number of 10-year permits applied for and the number and duration of permits issued for longer than 5 years.
(4) The department shall issue an operation permit for a domestic wastewater treatment facility other than a facility regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program under s. 403.0885 for a term of up to 10 years if the facility is meeting the stated goals in its action plan adopted pursuant to s. 403.086(7).
(5) The department shall issue permits on such conditions as are necessary to effect the intent and purposes of this section.
(6) The department shall issue permits to construct, operate, maintain, expand, or modify an installation which may reasonably be expected to be a source of pollution only when it determines that the installation is provided or equipped with pollution control facilities that will abate or prevent pollution to the degree that will comply with the standards or rules adopted by the department, except as provided in s. 403.088 or s. 403.0872. However, separate construction permits shall not be required for installations permitted under s. 403.0885, except that the department may require an owner or operator proposing to construct, expand, or modify such an installation to submit for department review, as part of application for permit or permit modification, engineering plans, preliminary design reports, or other information 90 days prior to commencing construction. The department may also require the engineer of record or another registered professional engineer, within 30 days after construction is complete, to certify that the construction was completed in accordance with the plans submitted to the department, noting minor deviations which were necessary because of site-specific conditions.
(7)(a) The department shall require a processing fee in an amount sufficient, to the greatest extent possible, to cover the costs of reviewing and acting upon any application for a permit or request for site-specific alternative criteria or for an exemption from water quality criteria and to cover the costs of surveillance and other field services and related support activities associated with any permit or plan approval issued pursuant to this chapter. The department shall review the fees authorized under this chapter at least once every 5 years and shall adjust the fees upward, as necessary, within the fee caps established in this paragraph to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index or similar inflation indicator. The department shall establish by rule the inflation index to be used for this purpose. In the event of deflation, the department shall consult with the Executive Office of the Governor and the Legislature to determine whether downward fee adjustments are appropriate based on the current budget and appropriation considerations. However, when an application is received without the required fee, the department shall acknowledge receipt of the application and shall immediately return the unprocessed application to the applicant and shall take no further action until the application is received with the appropriate fee. The department shall adopt a schedule of fees by rule, subject to the following limitations:
1. The fee for any of the following may not exceed $32,500:
a. Hazardous waste, construction permit.
b. Hazardous waste, operation permit.
c. Hazardous waste, postclosure permit, or clean closure plan approval.
d. Hazardous waste, corrective action permit.
2. The permit fee for a drinking water construction or operation permit, not including the operation license fee required under s. 403.861(7), shall be at least $500 and may not exceed $15,000.
3. The permit fee for a Class I injection well construction permit may not exceed $12,500.
4. The permit fee for any of the following permits may not exceed $10,000:
a. Solid waste, construction permit.
b. Solid waste, operation permit.
c. Class I injection well, operation permit.
5. The permit fee for any of the following permits may not exceed $7,500:
a. Air pollution, construction permit.
b. Solid waste, closure permit.
c. Domestic waste residuals, construction or operation permit.
d. Industrial waste, operation permit.
e. Industrial waste, construction permit.
6. The permit fee for any of the following permits may not exceed $5,000:
a. Domestic waste, operation permit.
b. Domestic waste, construction permit.
7. The permit fee for any of the following permits may not exceed $4,000:
a. Wetlands resource management—(dredge and fill and mangrove alteration).
b. Hazardous waste, research and development permit.
c. Air pollution, operation permit, for sources not subject to s. 403.0872.
d. Class III injection well, construction, operation, or abandonment permits.
8. The permit fee for a drinking water distribution system permit, including a general permit, shall be at least $500 and may not exceed $1,000.
9. The permit fee for Class V injection wells, construction, operation, and abandonment permits may not exceed $750.
10. The permit fee for domestic waste collection system permits may not exceed $500.
11. The permit fee for stormwater operation permits may not exceed $100.
12. Except as provided in subparagraph 8., the general permit fees for permits that require certification by a registered professional engineer or professional geologist may not exceed $500, and the general permit fee for other permit types may not exceed $100.
13. The fee for a permit issued pursuant to s. 403.816 is $5,000, and the fee for any modification of such permit requested by the applicant is $1,000.
14. The regulatory program and surveillance fees for facilities permitted pursuant to s. 403.088 or s. 403.0885, or for facilities permitted pursuant to s. 402 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq., and for which the department has been granted administrative authority, shall be limited as follows:
a. The fees for domestic wastewater facilities shall not exceed $7,500 annually. The department shall establish a sliding scale of fees based on the permitted capacity and shall ensure smaller domestic waste dischargers do not bear an inordinate share of costs of the program.
b. The annual fees for industrial waste facilities shall not exceed $11,500. The department shall establish a sliding scale of fees based upon the volume, concentration, or nature of the industrial waste discharge and shall ensure smaller industrial waste dischargers do not bear an inordinate share of costs of the program.
c. The department may establish a fee, not to exceed the amounts in subparagraphs 5. and 6., to cover additional costs of review required for permit modification or construction engineering plans.
(b) If substantially similar air pollution sources are to be constructed or modified at the same facility, the applicant may submit a single application and permit fee for construction or modification of the sources at that facility. If substantially similar air pollution sources located at the same facility do not constitute a major source of air pollution subject to permitting under s. 403.0872, the applicant may submit a single application and permit fee for the operation of those sources. The department may develop, by rule, criteria for determining what constitutes substantially similar sources.
(c) The fee schedule shall be adopted by rule. The amount of each fee shall be reasonably related to the costs of permitting, field services, and related support activities for the particular permitting activity taking into consideration consistently applied standard cost-accounting principles and economies of scale. If the department requires, by rule or by permit condition, that a permit be renewed more frequently than once every 5 years, the permit fee shall be prorated based upon the permit fee schedule in effect at the time of permit renewal.
(d) Nothing in this subsection authorizes the construction or expansion of any stationary installation except to the extent specifically authorized by department permit or rule.
(e) For all domestic waste collection system permits and drinking water distribution system permits, the department shall adopt a fee schedule, by rule, based on a sliding scale relating to pipe diameter, length of the proposed main, or equivalent dwelling units, or any combination of these factors. The department shall require a separate permit application and fee for each noncontiguous project within the system.
(8) A permit issued pursuant to this section does not become a vested right in the permittee. The department may revoke any permit issued by it if it finds that the permitholder has:
(a) Submitted false or inaccurate information in the application for the permit;
(b) Violated law, department orders, rules, or conditions which directly relate to the permit;
(c) Failed to submit operational reports or other information required by department rule which directly relate to the permit and has refused to correct or cure such violations when requested to do so; or
(d) Refused lawful inspection under s. 403.091 at the facility authorized by the permit.
(9) The department shall not issue a permit to any person for the purpose of engaging in, or attempting to engage in, any activity relating to the extraction of solid minerals not exempt pursuant to chapter 211 within any state or national park or state or national forest when the activity will degrade the ambient quality of the waters of the state or the ambient air within those areas. In the event the Federal Government prohibits the mining or leasing of solid minerals on federal park or forest lands, then, and to the extent of such prohibition, this act shall not apply to those federal lands.
(10) A violation of this section is punishable as provided in this chapter.
Cited 51 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...ting molten sulphur. The air pollution potential from prill is controlled by moisture. During off-loading at dockside, the prill is sprayed with water to prevent dusting. Agrico initiated this proceeding by filing an application with DER pursuant to section 403.087, Florida Statutes (1977), for a construction permit to construct a terminal facility in Tampa to handle prill sulphur. Since the proposed terminal facility would constitute a potential pollution source under section 403.087, Agrico was required to comply with the procedure in chapter 17-4, Florida Administrative Code, which requires an applicant first to obtain a construction permit and then, after testing for compliance with pollution standards, an operation permit....
...at the rule-making function of an agency is "quasi-legislative action," and its activities in that respect "must be considered with deference to that function." ( Agrico, supra, at 762) *788 DER's Rule 17-4.07, Florida Administrative Code implements Section 403.087 (and other provisions), Florida Statutes....
Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...derive that power from a statutory base. Section 120.54(14), Fla. Stat. (1981). Grove Isle contends on appeal, as it did before the DOAH hearing officer, that the challenged rules are invalid because they were enacted without legislative authority. Section 403.087, Florida Statutes (1981), provides specific statutory authority which allows DER to "adopt, amend, or repeal rules, regulations, and standards for the issuance, denial, and revocation of permits." Also, section 403.061(7), Florida Sta...
...l. In other words, the rule appears to allow DER to determine arbitrarily whether an applicant has proposed an activity which is "clearly in the public interest" based on DER's subjective and unwritten notions of what the "public interest" might be. Section 403.087(2), Florida Statutes (1981), lays an affirmative duty upon DER to issue permits. Section 403.087, inter alia, states: (3) The department shall issue permits on such conditions as are necessary to effect the intent and purposes of this section....
Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1998 WL 732936
...For example, section 403.061 (powers and duties) authorizes DEP to establish all rules and regulations necessary "to control and prohibit pollution of air and water in accordance with the law and rules and regulations adopted and promulgated by it." § 403.061, Fla. Stat. (1993). Section 403.087(3) (issuance of permits) directs DEP to "issue permits on such conditions as are necessary to effect the intent and purpose of this section." Id. § 403.087(3)....
Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...ratory judgment in which the trial court determined that appellees-Oyster Bay Estates, Inc., and Robert I. Kornegay, may proceed with development of their waterfront property in Wakulla County without being required to obtain a permit under Sections 403.087 and 403.088, Florida Statutes (1979)....
...The issue concerning the sufficiency of appellees' 1969 permit arose by virtue of the State's assertion of jurisdiction to impose additional permitting requirements under subsequently enacted legislation. Specially, Chapter 71-203, Florida Statutes (1979), effective January 1, 1972 (now Sections 403.087 and 403.088, Florida Statutes (1979)), required a permit for the construction or maintenance of any installation which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution....
...ssary before the development could be completed as originally planned. [2] Being unsuccessful in obtaining the required permits, appellees filed for declaratory judgment in the circuit court, seeking a determination that the requirements of Sections 403.087 and 403.088 cannot be enforced so as to require a permit....
...However, in reversing the Department's action the court was not ruling upon whether the property owner was subject to statutory enactments under which the standards were promulgated. The opinion mentions the circumstance that, pending the application, amendments to Chapter 403 were enacted (Section 403.087(1), Chapter 71-203, Laws of Florida). This reference to a statutory change was only incidental to the court's decision, since state "certification" was required by federal law independently of and *894 prior to the enactment of the permit requirements of Section 403.087....
...hority to establish a permit system, apparently no regulations implementing this permitting authority for air and water pollution sources were promulgated until May 17, 1972, Chapter 17-3, Florida Administrative Code, following enactment of Sections 403.087, 403.088, Florida Statutes (1971)....
...The answer alleges also that appellees applied to the Department for certification (under Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), and a permit (Chapter 403), which were denied. [3] See footnote 1 as to adoption of rules implementing permit requirements of Sections 403.087 and 403.088, Florida Statutes (1971)....
...uction or expansion of any installation that may be a source of air or water pollution; . ." See footnote I regarding permits. Section 403.061(16) was retained in the 1971 Florida Statutes, but additional provisions were added, particularly Sections 403.087 and 403.088 expressly prohibiting construction or maintenance of an installation "reasonably expected to be a source of air or water pollution . . without an appropriate and currently valid permit issued by the department ...," (Section 403.087(1)), and prohibiting "discharge into waters within the state" which reduces the quality of the receiving waters below the classification established for them (Section 403.088(1) et seq.)....
...Public Law 92-500 (Title 33 U.S.C. § 1341). For history see 1972 U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, page 3668. [7] The Sexton Cove ruling could be applied to a change in water quality standards after application for a permit for completed work under Sections 403.087 or 403.088, Florida Statutes....
Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...(27) Perform any other act necessary to control and prohibit air and water pollution, and to delegate any of its responsibilities, authority, and powers, other than rulemaking powers, to any state agency now or hereinafter established. [9] (Emphasis supplied). With respect to proscribed developmental activities, section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes (1981), prohibits the operation, maintenance, construction, expansion, or modification, without an appropriate and currently valid permit, of any "stationary installation [10] which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution," "unless exempted by department rule." In accordance with its mandate under section 403.087, DER properly promulgated and adopted rules and regulations relating to the issuance of such permits....
...He shall be and have been a member of the bar of Florida for the preceding five years. He shall devote full time to his duties, and he shall not engage in the private practice of law. State attorneys shall appoint such assistant state attorneys as may be authorized by law. [5] See §§ 403.087(1); 403.161(1)(a), (b); Rules 17-4.02(3), (17); 17-4.03, 17-4.28(1)(3), Fla....
Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1616
...laration that the final order allowed LMI to use the anchors without a permit. DER issued its declaratory statement finding that use of the type of anchors described in the petition would require a permit. This finding was based upon Florida Statute Section 403.087(1), which requires that a permit be obtained for "any stationary installation which will reasonably be expected to be a source of pollution." "Stationary" is undefined by rule or statute....
Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 178
...inier. Section 403.061, Florida Statutes (1983), gives DER the power and duty to "establish a permit system whereby a permit may be required for the operation, construction or expansion of any installation that may be a source of air ... pollution;" Section 403.087(1) states that "no stationary installation which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air ......
...Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums, 421 So.2d 623 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The crux of this case is simply that before Gardinier may be allowed to proceed with a project that will reasonably be expected to cause water pollution, or air pollution, or both, an "appropriate" permit is required. Section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes (1983)....
...inary to agency action." [3] It can hardly be argued that a "no permit required" decision confers any right to construct or operate a source of pollution, since the statutes, and related rules, conclusively prohibit such activities without a permit. Section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes (1983)....
...r unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life or property, including outdoor recreation. [7] On the issue of entitlement to the permit, the burden of proof would lie with the applicant, Gardinier. Rule 17-1.59, Florida Administrative Code. [8] Section 403.087(4), Florida Statutes (1983).
Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...tification from respondent that water quality standards would not be (were not) violated by the canals. Petitioner then made application to respondent for such certification. In the meantime, during the pendency of the application for certification, § 403.087(1), Florida Statutes, 1971 (Ch....
...l Board for its decision. After considerable delay, the Board advised that a hearing examiner would be appointed and hearing would be held on October 19, 1973. Ten days before the hearing, on October 9, 1973, respondent served notice of violation of § 403.087(1), supra, upon petitioner and the hearing was held on both petitioner's request for review of the denial of certification and on the notice of violation. Respondent thereafter considered the findings of the hearing examiner and denied petitioner's request for certification. Although it found petitioner to be in violation of § 403.087(1), supra, it took no penal action on the violation....
Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 7630
...Stat., (prohibiting pollution harmful to human, animal, aquatic or plant life, or property); and § 403.161(1)(b), Fla. Stat., (making it unlawful for any person to violate any lawful rule or regulation of the Department). The notice of violation did not specifically mention § 403.087, Fla....
...At the same time Sunshine filed a motion to dismiss arguing that because the discharge occurred prior to its purchase and use of the property, it had no legal responsibility for the cleanup. In its response to Sunshine's motion to dismiss, DER again failed to specifically allege Sunshine to be in violation of § 403.087, Fla....
...the result of acts or omissions of K & F; (3) that as owner of a contaminated property which is continuing to maintain a source of groundwater pollution appellant is "maintaining" a stationary installation which is a source of pollution contrary to § 403.087; and (4) that Sunshine is therefore responsible for abating the pollution emanating from its property....
...result of the acts or omissions of K & F, and that as owner of contaminated property which is continuing to constitute a source of groundwater pollution, Sunshine is "maintaining" a stationary installation which is a source of pollution contrary to § 403.087....
...shine maintained a polluting installation by taking no affirmative steps to abate the continuing discharge. Under the circumstances, I consider that the Department adequately sustained its conclusion that Sunshine violated the permit requirements of Section 403.087, Florida Statutes (1985)....
...In its opinion, the majority also refers to the fact that the agency found Sunshine liable for maintaining a stationary installation which could reasonably be expected to be a source of water pollution, in contravention of the permit requirement provisions of section 403.087, although Sunshine was not charged with violating this particular statute....
...hat the discharge was caused solely by the acts of a third party, and, as a result, Sunshine is exonerated from any liability. Nonetheless, if the majority's opinion was influenced in any respect by the failure of the agency to allege a violation of section 403.087 in its notice of violation, I cannot agree that the Department's failure to reference this statute prejudiced Sunshine from adequately defending itself....
...mit, given the general allegations stated. Moreover, despite the lack of reference to the statute in the initial notice of violation, the Department, before the case proceeded to hearing, in response to Sunshine's motion to dismiss, explicitly cited section 403.087....
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
...The delay here was occasioned by appellant's failure to provide adequate *725 pollution control facilities under Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, so as to bring the project within the standards or rules promulgated by the Department of Environmental Regulation. Section 403.087, Florida Statutes....
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...finding of fact that surface water contamination in the park site could be removed once detected. We reject appellant's arguments. DER's permitting jurisdiction over future park tenants is assured by the broad permitting jurisdiction granted DER by Section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes (1983), regarding "stationary installation[s] which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution......
...state water quality standards. Appellant contends that DER has no authority to permit the deposit of further pollutants from new sources into the already contaminated water, no matter how de minimis the impact on the receiving water, citing Sections 403.087 and 403.088, Florida Statutes (1983)....
...NOTES [1] Moreover, the stipulation entered into by DER and the developers requiring future park tenants to submit to the DER permitting process is an appropriate exercise of DER's statutory authority to condition the grant of permits "... as ... necessary to effect the intent and purposes of [Section 403]", Section 403.087(3), Florida Statutes (1983). [2] These statutes provide in relevant part: 403.087 Permits; general issuance; denial; revocation; prohibition; penalty....
...a Statutes, which prohibits the extension of existing lands bordering on or being in the “navigable waters” of the State without compliance with statutes restricting bulkhead *508 lines waterward of the line of mean, or ordinary, high water; (2) section 403.087, Florida Statutes, which prohibits the construction, maintenance of any structure, equipment, facility, or operation which would reasonably be expected to be a source of pollution of “waters of the state” as defined in section 403...
...11 Upon enactment of the Wetlands Protection Act in 1984, FAR 17-4.022 was revised to provide an expanded list of vegetative species for purposes of delineating the DER wetlands jurisdictional line relating both to DER’s old pollution based regulatory authority (sections 403.087 and 403.161, Fla.Stat.), and also as to its new dredge and fill authority under the Wetlands Protection Act....
...Furthermore, the Perrys’ complaint does not allege, and there is no evidence, (1) that the fill dirt placed on the property in question by Field and Bruce in December, 1985, constituted a “structure” which could reasonably be expected to be a source of pollution invoking DER regulatory authority under section 403.087, Florida Statutes, or (2) that such fill dirt constituted a pollutant harmful or injurious to animal, plant or aquatic life or property so as to involve DER regulatory authority under section 403.161, Florida Statutes....
...However, we do find that the no-discharge plan did not constitute such a major or substantial change in the proceedings as to result in a due process violation. See Hopwood v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 402 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes, provides: (1) No stationary installation which will- reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution shall be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modified without an appropriate and cu...
...Estech argues that the order is within the department’s discretion and that Estech should be permitted to spend millions of dollars on construction while “taking its chances” that it will receive the groundwater permit necessary to begin operations. However, § 403.087(1) 6 is clear on its face in prohibiting the construction of a probable source of pollution without an appropriate permit....
...See generally, § 403.021; Fla.R.Admin.P. 17-3. . If the facts of the case were inverted so that the stipulation attempted to modify a no-discharge plan into a controlled discharge plan, due process issues would assume a different character. See Hopwood, supra. . 403.087 Permits; general issuance; denial; revocation; prohibition; penalty.— (1) No stationary installation which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution shall be operated, maintained, constructed, expanded, or modifie...
...[[Image here]] (27) Perform any other act necessary to control and prohibit air and water pollution, and to delegate any of its responsibilities, authority, and powers, other than rulemaking powers, to any state agency now or hereinafter established. 9 (Emphasis supplied). With respect to proscribed developmental activities, section 403.087(1), Florida Statutes (1981), prohibits the operation, maintenance, construction, expansion, or modification, without an appropriate and currently valid permit, of any “stationary installation 10 which will reasonably be expected to be a source of air or water pollution,” “unless exempted by department rule.” In accordance with its mandate under section 403.087, DER properly promulgated and adopted rules and regulations relating to the issuance of such permits....
...He shall be and have'been a member of the bar of Florida for the preceding five years. He shall devote full time to his duties, and he shall not engage in the private practice of law. State attorneys shall appoint such assistant state attorneys as may be authorized by law. . See §§ 403.087(1); 403.161(l)(a), (b); Rules 17-4.02(3), (17); 17-4.03, 17-4.28(1)(3), Fla.Admin.Code....
...3 And see , AGO 70-170 which discusses the authority of the Department of Environmental Regulation (formerly the Department of Air and Water Pollution Control) to establish a permit system for the construction, expansion, or operation of installations which may be a source of water pollution. 4 Section 403.087 (1), F.S. 5 Section 403.087 (4), F.S....
...equently adopted rule. Among the conditions listed on the 1983 permit were two conditions requiring the facility to operate backup and auxiliary facility or similar systems when necessary to achieve compliance with changes in Department rules. Also, section 403.087, Florida Statutes (1989), permits the Department to issue new permits upon the expiration of old permits only in accordance with Department rules and regulations then existing....
This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.
