Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 400.121 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 400.121 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 400.121 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 400.121

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 400
NURSING HOMES AND RELATED HEALTH CARE FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
400.121 Denial, suspension, revocation of license; administrative fines; procedure; order to increase staffing.
(1) The agency may deny an application, revoke or suspend a license, and impose an administrative fine, not to exceed $500 per violation per day for the violation of any provision of this part, part II of chapter 408, or applicable rules, against any applicant or licensee for the following violations by the applicant, licensee, or other controlling interest:
(a) A violation of any provision of this part, part II of chapter 408, or applicable rules; or
(b) An adverse action by a regulatory agency against any other licensed facility that has a common controlling interest with the licensee or applicant against whom the action under this section is being brought. If the adverse action involves solely the management company, the applicant or licensee shall be given 30 days to remedy before final action is taken. If the adverse action is based solely upon actions by a controlling interest, the applicant or licensee may present factors in mitigation of any proposed penalty based upon a showing that such penalty is inappropriate under the circumstances.

All hearings shall be held within the county in which the licensee or applicant operates or applies for a license to operate a facility as defined herein.

(2) Except as provided in s. 400.23(8), a $500 fine shall be imposed for each violation. Each day a violation of this part or part II of chapter 408 occurs constitutes a separate violation and is subject to a separate fine, but in no event may any fine aggregate more than $5,000. A fine may be levied pursuant to this section in lieu of and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 400.23. Fines paid shall be deposited in the Health Care Trust Fund and expended as provided in s. 400.063.
(3) The agency shall revoke or deny a nursing home license if the licensee or controlling interest operates a facility in this state that:
(a) Has had two moratoria issued pursuant to this part or part II of chapter 408 which are imposed by final order for substandard quality of care, as defined by 42 C.F.R. part 483, within any 30-month period;
(b) Is conditionally licensed for 180 or more continuous days;
(c) Is cited for two class I deficiencies arising from unrelated circumstances during the same survey or investigation; or
(d) Is cited for two class I deficiencies arising from separate surveys or investigations within a 30-month period.

The licensee may present factors in mitigation of revocation, and the agency may make a determination not to revoke a license based upon a showing that revocation is inappropriate under the circumstances.

(4) If the agency has placed a moratorium pursuant to this part or part II of chapter 408 on any facility two times within a 7-year period, the agency may suspend the nursing home license.
(5) An action taken by the agency to deny, suspend, or revoke a facility’s license under this part or part II of chapter 408 shall be heard by the Division of Administrative Hearings of the Department of Management Services within 60 days after the assignment of an administrative law judge, unless the time limitation is waived by both parties. The administrative law judge must render a decision within 30 days after receipt of a proposed recommended order.
(6) The agency is authorized to require a facility to increase staffing beyond the minimum required by law, if the agency has taken administrative action against the facility for care-related deficiencies directly attributable to insufficient staff. Under such circumstances, the facility may request an expedited interim rate increase. The agency shall process the request within 10 days after receipt of all required documentation from the facility. A facility that fails to maintain the required increased staffing is subject to a fine of $500 per day for each day the staffing is below the level required by the agency.
(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, agency action in an administrative proceeding under this section may be overcome by the licensee upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary.
(8) In addition to any other sanction imposed under this part or part II of chapter 408, in any final order that imposes sanctions, the agency may assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of the case. Payment of agency costs shall be deposited into the Health Care Trust Fund.
History.s. 11, ch. 69-309; s. 1, ch. 69-267; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 9, ch. 70-361; s. 1, ch. 70-439; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 239, ch. 77-147; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 19, ch. 78-95; ss. 6, 9, ch. 79-268; ss. 7, 18, ch. 80-186; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 15, 79, 83, ch. 83-181; s. 30, ch. 93-177; ss. 14, 49, ch. 93-217; s. 36, ch. 96-169; s. 1, ch. 98-248; s. 11, ch. 99-394; s. 20, ch. 2001-45; s. 65, ch. 2007-230; s. 13, ch. 2008-9.

F.S. 400.121 on Google Scholar

F.S. 400.121 on CourtListener

Amendments to 400.121


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 400.121

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

High Ridge Mgmt. Corp. v. State, 354 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4107

...ness. Summary judgment was granted in favor of appellees. The trial court found that Chapter 76-201, Laws of Florida does not violate due process or equal protection requirements of the Florida and United States Constitutions; that the provisions of Section 400.121, Florida Statutes (1975), have not been nullified; that the Administrative Procedures Act guarantees the right of hearing; that it is premature to challenge any proposed rules; that the rating system, in itself, is not, per se, uncons...
Copy

Agency for Health Care Admin. v. HHCI LTD., 865 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 57222

...AHCA's petition relied upon a then-new statute providing that AHCA shall revoke or deny a nursing home license if the interest controlling the nursing home operates another facility that has been cited for two Class I deficiencies within a 30-month period. See Ch.2001-45, § 70, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 400.121(3), Fla....
Copy

Magnolias Nursing & Convalescent Ctr. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., Off. of Licensure & Certification, 438 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21637

...On February 8, 1982, the Department entered a final order imposing a fine of $100.00 per day for each day of the violation, which continued for fifty-four days, but reduced the fine to a total of $5,000.00 to conform to the limitations contained in Section 400.121, Florida Statutes....
...Based upon our consideration of the foregoing and other arguments presented by appellant, we find the constitutional challenge to be without merit. The Department’s findings being fully supported by the record, and the penalty being within the permissible range of the statute, Section 400.121(2), Florida Statutes, this court is without authority to interfere with the penalty imposed....
Copy

Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. G & J Investments Corp., 541 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5397, 1988 WL 121467

...3d DCA 1983); compare the exception announced in Pan Am Tobacco Corporation v. Department of Corrections, 471 So.2d 4 (Fla.1985). . We also have serious doubt if G & J Investment Corporation, Inc. has any standing to complain of a license revocation pursuant to Section 400.121, Florida Statutes (1979) when the license was never in its name.
Copy

TR & SNF, Inc. d/b/a The Nursing Ctr. etc. v. Agency For Health Care Admin., 238 So. 3d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...The fact that an Agency employee sent the nursing home a letter with a deadline to provide the requested proof is immaterial because, under the penalty statute applicable to this case, the license revocation had to be based on a violation of a statute or a rule. See § 400.121(1)(a), Fla....
Copy

Rehab. Ctr. at Hollywood Hills, LLC v. State of Florida, Agency for Health etc., 250 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

moratorium as grounds to impose future penalties. Section 400.121(3)(a), Florida Statues, provides that AHCA
Copy

In re Bayou Shores SNF, LLC, 525 B.R. 160 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 151, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 5200, 2014 WL 7452363

...The Debtor can challenge the underlying finding of noncompliance that gave rise to termination; but once noncompliance has been established, it appears the Debtor cannot challenge termination of the provider agreement. Florida’s Medicaid statutes are different. Under section 400.121, Florida Statutes, the Debtor has the right to present factors that mitigate *173 against revocation or nonrenewal of its license. Although this Court has no say on whether revocation is appropriate under the circumstances — that decision is up to AHCA under section 400.121, Florida Statutes — it is apparent to the Court that there are a number of mitigating factors that could reasonably lead to the conclusion revocation is not appropriate....
...and Research Found., 252 B.R. 309, 327 (W.D.Pa.1999); In re Selma Apparel Corp., 132 B.R. 968, 969-70 (Bankr.S.D.Ala. 1991). . Universal Life Church, Inc. v. United States, 128 F.3d 1294, 1297 (9th Cir.1997) (internal citations omitted). . Ex. 20 at 89-91. . § 400.121 (3)(c)-(d), Fla....
Copy

Beverly Enter.-Florida, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 710 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3781, 1998 WL 171505

...The director of the Agency did not dispute the judge’s findings of fact, but corrected an error of law and concluded that a fine of $4000 was appropriate. The judge had ruled that the deficiency was a violation of section 400.102(1), Florida Statutes (1995), which warranted a fine not exceeding $500 pursuant to section 400.121(1)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 400 in the context of nursing home negligence and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.