CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13241
...of his vehicles. (Dkt. 119, ¶ 4(s)). Procedural History Plaintiff initially filed this action in state court. It was removed to federal court. (Dkt. 1). In the original Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that his arrest was unlawful because Fla. Stat. §§
341.102 and
559.939 and Article III, § 11(20) of the Florida Constitution prohibited the Commission from regulating state-licensed "sellers of travel" such as himself....
...travel." (Dkt. 44). The Thirteenth Circuit Court for Hillsborough County granted the Commission's motion for summary judgment, holding that the Commission had the authority to regulate "public vehicles" notwithstanding the provisions of Fla. Stat. §§
341.102 and
559.939 and Article III, § 11(20)....
...Act, (b) the Commission's authority to regulate the operation of public vehicles in Hillsborough County does not extend to intercounty transportation, and (c) the Commission's authority to regulate Plaintiff's activities is "preempted" by Fla. Stat. § 341.102(1)....
...vehicles in which Plaintiff has operated and continues to operate [including Plaintiff's "15-passenger bus"] fall within the purview of the special act." (Dkt. 48-4 at 3) (emphasis added). Additionally, the circuit court determined that "Fla. Stat. § 341.102 does not shield Plaintiff from [Commission] regulation" since "Plaintiff's business activities fail to meet the criteria set forth under Fla. Stat. § 341.102 (1) or (2)." (Dkt....