CopyCited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1987 A.M.C. 944
...The plaintiffs appeal that order. The defendant cross-appeals the court's evidentiary rulings concerning plaintiff's lost business opportunities and the testimony of plaintiff's expert regarding a coefficient of friction test. Plaintiffs/appellants argue that section 327.32, Florida Statutes (1981), places a higher degree of care upon a boat owner/operator in order to prevent injuries to others....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
...ntalities in this state and any operator of such boats shall, during any utilization of said boats, exercise the highest degree of care in order to prevent injuries to others. Appellant argues, and we agree, that Florida Statute 371.52 (now known as section 327.32, Florida Statutes (1981)) places a higher degree of care upon a boat operator than a person who is not operating a boat....
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2964929
...me to be rendered physically incapacitated, although not unconscious. Beyond the medical testimony, it is important to our consideration that Mr. Purvis was operating an airboat at the time of his accident and demise. This is of significance because Section 327.32, Florida Statutes (2002), entitled "Vessel declared dangerous instrumentality; civil liability," reads: All vessels, of whatever classification, shall be considered dangerous instrumentalities in this state, and any operator of a vesse...
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21789
favor, in spite of appellant’s argument that section
327.32, Florida Statutes (1981), is not designed to
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
a vessel operator unless the owner is present, §
327.32, Fla. Stat. (2022), limiting the liability of
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
a vessel operator unless the owner is present, §
327.32, Fla. Stat. (2022), limiting the liability of
