CopyCited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 4381126
...Notwithstanding its apparent inconvenience to the majority, Belvedere continues to stand for the principle of law that riparian or littoral rights are generally inseparable from riparian or littoral uplands in this State. See
476 So.2d at 651-52; see also §
253.141(1), Fla....
...are appurtenant to and are inseparable from the riparian land. " (emphasis supplied)). Today, the majority has returned to a "hopelessly illogical hypothesis" without even an attempt to advance some rational analysis that conforms to the Florida Constitution, our common law, and section 253.141, Florida Statutes....
...643, 644 (Fla.1909) ("Riparian rights are incident to the ownership of lands contiguous to and bordering on navigable waters. The common-law rights of riparian owners with reference to the navigable waters are incident to the ownership of the uplands that extend to [the] *1124 high-water mark. " (emphasis supplied)); § 253.141(1), Fla....
...tion of the original water lines." Bd. of Trs. of the Internal Improvement Fund v. Medeira Beach Nominee, Inc.,
272 So.2d 209, 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973) (quoting Hughes v. Washington,
389 U.S. 290, 293-94,
88 S.Ct. 438,
19 L.Ed.2d 530 (1967)); see also §
253.141(1), Fla....
...*1126 between the MHWL and the low-water mark, while, in contrast, the littoral-upland holder's ownership continues until, and includes, the MHWL. See, e.g., White v. Hughes,
139 Fla. 54,
190 So. 446, 449 (1939); see also art. X, § 11, Fla. Const; §
253.141(1), Fla....
...ate riparian or littoral property from the resulting MHWL simply violates all prior notions of waterfront property rights in Florida. See, e.g., Sand Key,
512 So.2d at 936; Kendry v. State Road Dep't of Fla.,
213 So.2d 23, 27-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); §
253.141(1), Fla....
...Accordingly, I cannot agree that the Sovereign may create a substantially wider "foreshore," which unnecessarily destroys the inherent and essential nature of riparian and littoral property along with valuable property rights. Under our common law, article X, section 11 of the Florida Constitution, and section 253.141, Florida Statutes, the Sovereign only owns the land between the MHWL and the low-water mark (along with the land under navigable waters), and the private littoral-upland owner owns the land up to, and including, the MHWL....
...than accreted portions of land which the State may readjust to maintain the reestablished MHWL at the recorded ECL), [27] the State could sustain the common-law rule and remain true to its definition of littoral and riparian rights contained within section 253.141(1), Florida Statutes: "The land to which the owner holds title must extend to the ordinary high watermark of the navigable water in order that riparian [or littoral] rights may attach. " § 253.141(1), Fla....
...rning the shore to its pre-restoration status, which means that the MHWL would naturally move away from the ECL and contiguous ownership would remain with the littoral-upland owners, not the State. See art. X, § 11, Fla. Const; §§
161.211(2)-(3),
253.141(1), Fla....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1112700
...stal permits. The relevant part of Rule 18-21.004(3) provides: Riparian Rights. (a) None of the provisions of this rule shall be implemented in a manner that would unreasonably infringe upon the traditional, common law riparian rights, as defined in Section 253.141, F.S., of upland property owners adjacent to sovereignty submerged lands....
...water remain intact [5] ; (2) the right to use the water for navigational purposes; (3) the right to an unobstructed view of the water; and (4) the right to receive accretions [6] and relictions to the property." Sand Key Assocs.,
512 So.2d at 936. Section
253.141(1), Florida Statutes (2005) describes riparian rights: (1) Riparian rights are those incident to land bordering upon navigable waters....
...1st DCA 1999) (stating that "[c]urrently, the State's ownership extends up to the ordinary high water mark of navigable waterways, and an individual must own property down to the ordinary high water mark in order to possess riparian rights," citing Florida Statutes including section 253.141)....
...e of an express bilateral agreement to do so with the condemnee;" and concluding that "the act of condemning petitioners' lands without compensating them for their riparian property rights under these facts was an unconstitutional taking"). See also § 253.141(1), Fla....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 499
...In this case, where the upland owner refuses, consent must be denied by the Trustees. Subsequent to its original intent to deny, the D.E.P. issued a "clarification" on February 28, 1996, which stated simply: Riparian rights are held only by the title holder or the holder of a lease of the riparian uplands. See § 253.141, Florida Statutes....
...Secret Oaks Owners Ass'n,
689 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). [3] Parlato v. Secret Oaks Owners Ass'n,
652 So.2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). [4] Parlato v. Secret Oaks Owners Ass'n,
689 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The D.E.P. was not a party to either case. [5] The D.E.P. relies on section
253.141, Florida Statutes (1995), which provides: Riparian rights defined; certain submerged bottoms subject to private ownership. (1) Riparian rights are those incident to land bordering upon navigable waters....
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14665, 2000 WL 1675996
...The Trust’s reliance on case law holding that riparian rights are a recognized property right, the loss of which is compensable, is not persuasive, for in the instant case there is no taking of the Trust’s riparian rights. The City’s reliance on the definition of “riparian rights” found in section 253.141, Florida Statutes (1999), is also misplaced, for that chapter relates to State-owned lands and the definition is restricted to “land bordering upon navigable waters.” Nevertheless, we find that the better view of “riparian right...
