The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See, e.g., § 212.12(1)(a)1., Fla. . . .
. . . See section 212.12(12), Florida Statutes.” . . . See §§ 212.06(4) & 212.12(12), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . In addition, section 212.12(12) provides that it is the Legislature’s intent that only the end consumer . . . Florida’s law provides an even stronger basis for reaching the same result, as section 212.12(12) expressly . . .
. . . appears that the continued detention of Petitioner, a Mariel Cuban, would be governed by 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . According to Petitioner, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 applies to his circumstances and his present detention under . . . Section 212.12(a) clearly defines the category of alien to which it applies, and Petitioner falls within . . . Ebbert, 331 Fed.Appx. 191, 192 (3rd Cir.2009) (petitioner initially detained under 8 C.F.R. § 212.12, . . . Continued Detention Under 8 C.F.R. § 241.14(f) Having determined that 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 does not apply . . .
. . . . § 212.12, has recommended Castro-Morales’s continued detention due to his criminal history and his . . .
. . . The TDT statutes, specifically section 212.12(5)(b), Florida Statutes, provides: In the event any dealer . . .
. . . . § 212.12, he was further granted asylum or refugee status. . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12-13 (the “Cuban Review Plan”), adopted in 1987, confer special administrative authority to . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(c). . . . . § 212.12(b)(1). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(2). . . . . § 212.12) governing their detention and eligibility for parole. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(4)(iii). . . . Id. § 212.12(h) (emphasis added). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(c). . . . As § 212.12(d)(1) provides, A Cuban Review Panel shall, except as otherwise provided, consist of two . . .
. . . . § 212.12(h) (2004). Clark, 125 S.Ct. at 721 n. 3. . . . subject to the one-year limitation or the Secretary's discretionary authority to revoke parole under § 212.12 . . .
. . . See 8 CFR § 212.12(h) (2004) (preserving discretion to revoke parole). . . .
. . . . § 212.12 within three months of the revocation of his parole and annual reviews thereafter. . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . .
. . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. . . . Id. § 212.12(a). . . . Id. § 212.12(f). . . . Id. § 212.12(f)(l)-(3). Mr. . . . . § 212.12. Mr. . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2003), which governs the cases of Mariel Cubans who remain in the Attorney General’s custody . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12-13, established a parole review program for removable "Mariel Cubans.'' . . .
. . . . § 212.12, which provides procedures and criteria for an annual parole review of excluded Mariel Cubans . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. . . . See id. § 212.12(d)(2). . . . Section 212.12 sets forth the following factors to be weighed in the parole determination: (1) the nature . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(3). . Former § 1226 was entitled “Exclusion of aliens.” . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . . over a year ago, she has not received an individualized parole review, as required under 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . the detention of aliens arriving from Cuba between April 15, 1980, and October 20, 1980. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . its determination whether to recommend further detention or release detainee on parole. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . The failure to provide the review is a clear violation of 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(g)(2). . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2002) (Parole determinations and revocations respecting Mariel Cubans). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(e). . . . According to § 212.12(d)(1), The Director shall designate a panel or panels to make parole recommendations . . . third member of any Panel shall be the Director of the Cuban Review Plan or his designee. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(g)(2). . . .
. . . . § 212.12-13 . Sierra v. I.N.S., 258 F.3d 1213, 1218 (10th Cir.2001). . See Shaughnessy v. . . .
. . . . § 212.12, the INS reviewed Borre-ro’s parole status in March 2001. . . . We hold, however, that the regulations governing the parole of Mariel Cubans, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12, are . . .
. . . . § 212.12(d). . . . . § 212.12(d)(2). . . . Id., § 212.12(d)(3). . . . released on parole until suitable sponsorship or placement has been found for the detainee,” id., § 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2002) (the “Cuban Review Plan”). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(h) (2002). . . . proceedings against a Mariel Cuban; or (4) The period of parole has expired without being renewed. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . Compare 8 C.F.R. § 241.4 (2001) with 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 (2002). . . . . § 212.12(b)(1). . . .
. . . . § 212.12, on three separate occasions since Petitioner’s return to INS custody on April 20, 1998. . . . Because the procedures set forth under 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 are constitutionally firm and Petitioner received . . . The procedures set forth under 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 for the Cuban Review Panel to follow when reviewing . . .
. . . . § 212.12. {See Doc. 6, Exhibits 4-7). . . . . § 212.12(d)(2). Petitioner has been denied parole after each review. . . . for reviewing, on an annual basis, the possibility of parole for detained Mariel Cubans. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12, is being followed, Petitioner is receiving all of the process he is due as an inadmissible . . . In 1987 the Justice Department enacted the Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12, which expands consideration . . . Id. at § 212.12(g)(2). . . . the Attorney General’s procedures for review of each detainee’s case, now formalized at 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2001) (“The Plan”). . . . See id. § 212.12(d)(1). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(2). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(8). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(4)(h). . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . . .
. . . . § 212.12(d)(3). . . . When the Review panel considered Navarro’s case, it followed the procedure outlined in section 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2001), is constitutional in light of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Zadvydas . . . Order, supplemental briefs on the following three issues: (1) Whether the Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . taxation which was contrary to the dictates of section 212.081(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), and section 212.12 . . .
. . . , the procedure authorized by Congress to review their detention is the Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12(d)(1), would have reviewed Casanova’s case and considered whether to release him, weighing . . . See 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12(d)(2)(iii) & (iv) and 212.12(d)(3)(h). . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . . received annual consideration for immigration parole in accordance with the Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (“Parole determinations and revocations respecting Mariel Cubans”). . . . his continuing post-removal detention, pursuant to the “Cuban Review Plan” set forth at 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12, 212.13; Gisbert, 988 F.2d at 1443-44; Alvarez-Mendez, 941 F.2d at 959. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(4); Gisbert, 988 F.2d at 1443-44 & n. 11; Alvarez-Mendez, 941 F.2d at 959. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(4)(ii). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(f); Fernandez-Roque, 734 F.2d at 579, 582-84. . . . On April 10, 1998, the INS Associate Commissioner, citing 8 C.F.R. § 212.12, informed him in a Final . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . . In 1987, the Justice Department enacted the Cuban Review Plan (“CRP”), 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. . . . Under this plan, detained Mariel Cubans are granted an annual hearing by INS. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(g)(2) . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(4). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(3). Other circuit courts have reached a similar result. . . .
. . . . § 212.12(g)(2). . . . See id. § 212.12(b), (d). . . . Id. § 212.12(e). . . . decisions for Mariel Cubans to the Associate Commissioner for Enforcement as provided by 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . that parole would no longer be appropriate”); see also id. § 212.12(d)(2) (including as criteria for . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (2001), appeared to satisfy the due process rights afforded to inadmissible aliens under the . . . Compare 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(b)(1), and 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(4)(h), with 8 C.F.R. § 241.4(h)(2). . . . Id. at § 212.12(d)(4)(i)-(ii). . . . Id. at § 212.12(d) (emphasis added). . . . See Parole Determinations and Revocations Respecting Mariel Cubans, 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 (2001). . . . .
. . . . § 212.12, to identify the procedural rights at issue. See, e.g., Garcia-Arena v. . . . Stated differently, Rosales suggests that the immigration parole procedure contained in 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . Absent a violation of § 212.12, which Rosales has not demonstrated, he has no procedural due process . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d). .Insofar as Rosales's appellate brief might be read to assert a violation of . . . 8 C.F.R. § 212.12, any such claim is belied by the record. . . . . § 212.12 (the “Cuban Review Plan”). See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(a). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(g)(2). . . . See id. at § 212.12(g)(3). . . . See id. § 212.12(b)(1). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(2). . . .
. . . . § 212.12, and that the United States violated a supposed contract under which he would become a citizen . . .
. . . . §§ 212.4, 212.12, 212.14, 212.16 — respecting oil and gas royalty management, yet the complaint still . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12, 212.13). . . . Mariel Cubans are excluded from these procedures as parole reviews for them are governed by 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12) and continued detention of removable or deporta-ble aliens (8 C.F.R. § 241.4). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 (providing for annual review by two-member panels, written recommendations, and . . .
. . . . § 212.12, during which times respondent claims he has never accepted responsibility for his actions . . . See 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12-13. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. See also In re Mariel Cuban Habeas Corpus Petitions, 822 F.Supp. at 195. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(b). See also Padron-Baez, No. 95-320, 1995 WL 419799 at *1 (D.N.J. . . .
. . . . § 212.12. . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12-13 (1998). . . . Sheet (Id. at 3-7) forms to indicate that Rodriguez's interview was conducted pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 for execution of the existing deportation order or his continued custody or resumption of . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. it does not appear that Petitioner appealed this decision, and Petitioner has . . . However, subsequent reviews by the Cuban Review Panel are discretionary. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. . . . Panel within the Department of Justice for those detainees who are not given parole pursuant to section 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12, which provides for the annual evaluation of detainees by a review panel to reassess their . . . provides for the annual evaluation of detainees to reassess their eligibility for parole. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(2). . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12(d)(4)(ii). . . .
. . . to have evaded the payment of the tax for purposes of liability for the penalty provided in section 212.12 . . .
. . . “great weight” to rule 12A1.038, and found that its “estimated assessment” was valid under section 212.12 . . . We find that under section 212.12(5), DOR properly based its assessment on the only information available . . .
. . . addition to interest in the amount of $9,238 (12% annually), and a penalty of $7,219 pursuant to section 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12(a) (parole provisions applicable to Mariel Cuban detainees detained in any facility, or awaiting . . .
. . . Section 212.12(5)(b) provides: (b) In the event any dealer or other person charged herein fails or refuses . . . Section 212.12(5)(b) allows the Department to assess by guesstimates based upon selected available data . . . It seems clear from the language of section 212.12(5)(b) that its best estimate provisions should not . . . Section 212.12(5)(b) provides that the information used for the assessment must be based on “information . . . The Depart-merit’s audit was based on improper data and improper reliance on section 212.12(5)(b) and . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12-13, a set of regulations governing the standards and procedures used by the INS to evaluate . . . See id. § 212.12. . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(4). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(3). . . . government promulgated its detailed regulations governing parole review for the Mariel Cubans. 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12 . . .
. . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12. . . . Id. at § 212.12(d)(4)(i). . . . Id. at § 212.12(d)(2). . . . Id. at § 212.12(d)(3). . . . Id. at § 212.12(b)(1). . . .
. . . The penalty in this instance is imposed pursuant to section 212.12, Florida Statutes (1991), which provides . . . for fine and punishment as provided by law for a conviction of a misdemeanor of the first degree. § 212.12 . . .
. . . collected), Blackshears is fully subject to the penalties and interest provisions set out in section 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12, payment methods for royalties, id. § 212.14, assignment of leases, id. § 212.22, cancellation . . .
. . . . § 212.12(12), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . . § 212.12(2), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1988). . . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12-212.13. . . . See id. § 212.12(d)(2)-(3). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(4)(i)-(ii). . . . Id. § 212.12(d)(4)(iii). . . .
. . . restitution order the judge required payment of $36,412, which includes the 50% penalty arising under section 212.12 . . . (2)(a), Florida Statutes, and the interest provided by section 212.12(3). . . . On the other hand, it is not quite so clear that the 50% penalty in section 212.12(2)(a) constitutes . . . conclude that so much of the restitution order as requires the payment of civil penalties under section 212.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12 and 212.13. . . . threat to the community, and the detainee is unlikely to violate the conditions of parole. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . Section 212.12 (1992). . . .
. . . . §~ 212.12, 212.13. . . . These procedures, which have been followed in the present case, are set forth in 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12, . . . (Emphasis added.) . 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 grants Marie! . . . Section 212.12(d)(4). . . . Although section 212.12 establishes criteria to be considered by the review panel there provided for . . .
. . . The Department assessed a 50 percent penalty under subsection 212.12(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) . . . Under subsection 212.12(2), “[w]hen any person ... required ... to make any return or to pay any tax . . . Id. § 212.12(2)(a). . . . In addition, willful evasion under paragraph 212.12(2)(a) is a first degree misdemeanor. . . . collection and enforcement as other taxes imposed under this part, except that a dealer’s credit under s. 212.12 . . .
. . . . § 212.12(5)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . . § 212.12(h) (1990), because of his murder conviction. . . . See 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 (1990). . . . Mariel Cuban for emergent reasons or for reasons deemed strictly in the public interest,” 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . danger to the safety of other persons or to property,” see 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e)(3); see also 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . These regulations are codified in the Mariel Cuban parole determination plan at 8 C.F.R. 212.12 and 212.13 . . . A Cuban Review Panel, provided by 212.12(d)(1), analyzes the detainee’s situation and develops parole . . . The detainee is not likely to violate the terms of his parole. 8 C.F.R. 212.12(d)(2). . . . See 8 C.F.R. 212.12(g)(2). . . . The process includes a scheduled review of each ease in which parole is revoked. 8 C.F.R. 212.12(g)(1 . . .
. . . . § 212.12 to determine their eligibility for immigration parole. . . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (1990). . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12, 212.13. . . . each detainee is subject to additional individual restrictions as circumstances warrant. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12, 212.18. . . . See 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12, 212.13. . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12; 212.13. . . . See 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12, 212,13. . . . each detainee is subject to additional individual restrictions as circumstances warrant. 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12 and 212.13, “is not adversarial in nature and lacks fundamental procedural guarantees (e.g . . . The Attorney General has established and implemented the Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12 and 212.13 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.12 through 212.13 (1989). . . . The Cuban Review Plan, 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12-212.13 (1989), is attached to this Entry as Appendix I. . . . the petitioner that his parole status would be reconsidered within one year, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 212.12 . . . DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS: NONIMMIGRANTS; WAIVERS; ADMISSION OF CERTAIN INADMISSIBLE ALIENS; PAROLE § 212.12 . . . Parole granted under this section may be revoked pursuant to § 212.12. . . . .
. . . . § 212.12(d)(2)-(3) (areas for consideration by the Review Panel)). . . . , the regulatory procedures governing review by the Cuban Review Panel are set forth at 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12 . . . The INS regulations governing the Review Plan are set forth at 8 C.F.R. §§ 212.12 through 212.13 (1989 . . .
. . . . §§ 212.06 and 212.12, Fla.Stat. One of Rudd’s coconspirators was Ernest C. . . .
. . . , and further, that simultaneous imposition of an additional 25 percent penalty pursuant to section 212.12 . . . penalty equal to the use tax provided in this section “shall be in lieu of the penalty imposed by s. 212.12 . . . the mandatory penalty equal to the tax, which penalty is in lieu of the penalty provided in Section 212.12 . . . This penalty shall be in lieu of the penalty imposed by s. 212.12(2) and is mandatory and shall not be . . .
. . . for statutory interest assessed by it against appellees Air Jamaica and Wardair pursuant to Section 212.12 . . . The state’s motions request payment of the tax owed and statutory interest imposed by Section 212.12( . . . Section 212.12(4) provides that the department may settle or compromise any such injuries or penalties . . . See § 212.12(3), Fla.Stat. . . . Section 212.12(3) provides that “[w]hen any dealer or other person charged herein, fails to remit the . . .
. . . See Section 212.12(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1979). . . .
. . . This penalty shall be in lieu of the penalty imposed by s. 212.12(2) and is mandatory and shall not be . . .
. . . This penalty shall be in lieu of the penalty imposed by § 212.12(2) and is mandatory and shall not be . . .
. . . This penalty shall be in lieu of the penalty imposed by s. 212.12(2) and is mandatory and shall not be . . .
. . . transients occurring after October 1, 1982 plus accrued interest and late penalties as provided in Section 212.12 . . .
. . . See Sec. 212.12(12), Fla.Stat. (1981); Sec. 212.081(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . court conviction of petitioner on a charge of intentional evasion of payment of sales tax, Section 212.12 . . .
. . . The Department assessed the maximum 25% penalty under § 212.12(2). . . . Modification is allowed by § 212.12(5) if the penalty would be too severe or unjust, but it is not mandated . . .
. . . Section 212.12(12) contains a declaration of legislative intent that wherever, in construction, administration . . .
. . . . § 212.12 (1979). . . .
. . . The court was undoubtedly referring to subparagraph (5) of Section 212.12, which provided that for good . . .
. . . impose it will not be presumed.” 71 Am.Jur.2d State and Local Taxation § 33 (1973); and see Section 212.12 . . .
. . . cannot say that we would not agree with the result, but the stated reasons for the fixing of the fee at $212.12 . . .
. . . taxable transaction or incident and shall be due and payable, according to the brackets set forth in § 212.12 . . .
. . . As to the last point relating to the penalty assessed pursuant to F.S. 212.12(2), the final judgment . . .
. . . taxable transaction or incident and shall be due and payable, according to the brackets set forth in 212.12 . . .