Cases from cite.case.law:

CASCADES AV LLC, v. EVERTZ MICROSYSTEMS LTD., 335 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . MPEP § 201.07. . . .

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. TRUVEN HEALTH ANALYTICS INC., 293 F. Supp. 3d 1038 (N.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . MPEP § 201.07. The '126 patent claims the benefit of Provisional Application Ser. . . .

CERTUSVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. S N LOCATING SERVICES, LLC, S N, 287 F. Supp. 3d 580 (E.D. Va. 2018)

. . . See MPEP § 201.07."). . . .

ASGHARI- KAMRANI v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION,, 252 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . See also Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) § 201.07. .This continuation application claims . . .

H. KHAL, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 690 F. App'x 499 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . light exertion (Rule 202.07), whereas this case involves a grid rule based on sedentary exertion (Rule 201.07 . . .

JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. v. CELLTRION HEALTHCARE CO. LTD., 211 F. Supp. 3d 364 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . applications are limited to subject matter disclosed in the earlier application, see MPEP §§ 201.06, 201.07 . . . submitted form, or that its applications met the PTO’s definition of a continuation application in MPEP § 201.07 . . .

BROWN, v. W. COLVIN,, 146 F. Supp. 3d 489 (W.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . skills [sic], a finding of ‘not disabled’ is appropriate under the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule' 201.07 . . .

WORD TO INFO, INC. v. GOOGLE INC., 140 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . MPEP § 201.07 (9th ed. 2014). . . .

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY, I LLC, v. I LLC, v., 134 F. Supp. 3d 877 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . Plaintiffs specifically point to Sections 201.07 and 306 the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP . . .

G. HAGENBUCH, v. SONRAI SYSTEMS,, 130 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . MPEP § 201.07 (5th Ed., 15th Rev., Aug. 1993) (emphasis added). . . . MPEP § 201.07 (5th Ed., 15th Rev., Aug. 1993); see also Molins PLC v. . . .

iLIFE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. BODY MEDIA, INC., 90 F. Supp. 3d 415 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . MPEP § 201.07. . . .

ANTARES PHARMA, INC. v. MEDAC PHARMA INC., 771 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . MPEP § 201.07 (9th ed. Mar.2014); see also 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b). . . .

GOODWIN, v. COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO,, 45 F. Supp. 3d 692 (N.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . (Id. at 244 [citing Summit County Ordinance § 201.07(a) ].) . . .

ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. ACTAVIS, INC. LLC, v., 746 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . See MPEP § 201.07. The '482 patent is not related to any of the licensed patents. . . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 201.07 (8th ed. Rev.9, Oct. 2012). . . .

MEDINOL LTD. v. CORDIS CORPORATION, 15 F. Supp. 3d 389 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Accord Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 ("The disclosure presented in the continuation must . . .

v. W. COLVIN, 978 F. Supp. 2d 88 (D. Mass. 2013)

. . . The ALJ applied Medical-Vocational Rule 201.07, which directs a finding of not disabled when a claimant's . . .

USHIP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 102 Fed. Cl. 326 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . Id. at 403; see also Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (8th ed. 2010) ("MPEP”). . 37 C.F.R . . .

USHIP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 98 Fed. Cl. 396 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (8th ed., rev. 7, July 2008) (“MPEP”) (explaining continuation . . .

GADDIS, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 417 F. App'x 106 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . See MVR 201.06; 201.07. . . .

AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. DELPHI CORPORATION,, 776 F. Supp. 2d 469 (E.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . . § 201.07. . . .

SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v., 726 F. Supp. 2d 396 (D. Del. 2010)

. . . See MPEP § 201.07. . . .

HARARI v. C. HOLLMER E., 602 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. at 201.07; 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b). . . . MPEP 201.07; 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b). . . .

AMGEN INC. v. F. HOFFMANN- LA ROCHE LTD, GMBH, LA, 580 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. SPIRE BIOMEDICAL, INC., 635 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) § 201.07. . . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedures ("MPEP”) § 201.07. . . .

PURDUE PHARMA PRODUCTS L. P. SRL, v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., 584 F. Supp. 2d 664 (D. Del. 2008)

. . . Transco Prods., 38 F.3d at 555 (citing MPEP § 201.07). . . .

TOMMASETTI, v. J. ASTRUE,, 533 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . The ALJ also found that the VE’s testimony augmented Rule 201.07 of the Medical Vocational Guidelines . . . Pursuant to Rule 201.07, a claimant of advanced age who is limited to sedentary work, has a high school . . . Rule 201.07 is augmented by Rule 201.00(f), which states that “[i]n order to find transferability of . . . work analysis under Rule 202.00(c), to his case, which involves a sedentary work analysis under Rule 201.07 . . . A plain reading of Rule 201.07 makes clear that it is not augmented by Rule 202.00(c), the specific text . . .

BRASSICA PROTECTION PRODUCTS LLC v. CAUDILL SEED WAREHOUSE CO. INC., 591 F. Supp. 2d 389 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07, available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/ mpep . . .

M. McNAIR, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 537 F. Supp. 2d 823 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Because Plaintiff possesses transferable skills, Ruling 201.07, and not Ruling 201.06, applies. . . . Ruling 201.07 directs a finding of "not disabled.” (20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. . . . P, App. 2, Table No. 2, Ruling 201.07). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUCAS,, 499 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . See Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Administrative Regulations 109.01, 113.18, 201.07, and . . .

PASS SEYMOUR, INC. v. HUBBELL INCORPORATED,, 532 F. Supp. 2d 418 (N.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07; see also Cargill, Inc. v. . . .

CARLSON MARKETING GROUP, INC. v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, 517 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (D. Minn. 2007)

. . . . § 201.07. . . .

ENZO THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. OF WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE,, 477 F. Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Va. 2007)

. . . . § 201.07; see also 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b) (2006) (authorizing the filing of continuation application). . . .

METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. v. SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 460 F. Supp. 2d 571 (D.N.J. 2006)

. . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (8th ed.2005); see also Applied Materials, Inc. v. . . .

AVOCENT HUNTSVILLE CORP. v. CLEARCUBE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 443 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (N.D. Ala. 2006)

. . . Of Commerce, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §§ 201.06, 201.07, 201.08, 201.11 (7th ed.1998, rev . . .

K. NILSSEN GEO v. OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC., 440 F. Supp. 2d 884 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . MPEP § 201.07. . . .

L. DEVRIES, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 138 F. App'x 34 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Accordingly, Rule 201.07 properly applied. See 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. . . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.07 (a claimant who is over 55, is at least a high school graduate, can perform a . . .

BIOGEN IDEC MA INC. v. TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK,, 332 F. Supp. 2d 286 (D. Mass. 2004)

. . . MPEP § 201.07. . . .

BRISTOL- MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, v. PHARMACHEMIE B. V., 361 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . Bristol-Myers cites several cases and a provision (section 201.07) of the 1972 version of the Manual . . .

IP INNOVATION L. L. C. v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., 303 F. Supp. 2d 923 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, § 201.07. . . .

STRATAGENE v. INVITROGEN CORPORATION, 225 F. Supp. 2d 608 (D. Md. 2002)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (8th ed. 2001) (“MPEP”). . . .

GOTZ, v. Jo BARNHART,, 207 F. Supp. 2d 886 (E.D. Wis. 2002)

. . . P, App. 2, §§ 201.06, 201.07, 201.14, & 201.15. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. D. HORN, 185 F. Supp. 2d 530 (D. Md. 2002)

. . . Graham, Handbook of Federal Evidence § 201.07 (5th ed.2001). . . .

A. BAILEY, v. DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF MICHIGAN, 157 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (6th Ed., Rev.3, 1997) (“The disclosure presented in . . .

COLETTA, v. G. MASSANARI,, 163 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (N.D. Cal. 2001)

. . . Part 404, Rule 201.07 of Table No. 1, Subpart P, Appendix 2 (“the grids”); (3) erred because the number . . . 201.00(f) and subsequently improperly applied the grids (in direct contravention of footnote 1 to Rule 201.07 . . .

AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS, INC. v. EVANS MANUFACTURING, INC. a, 139 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (N.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . See MPEP § 201.07; Transco Prods., Inc. v. . . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07; Transco Prods., Inc. v. . . .

C. KERNS, v. S. APFEL,, 160 F.3d 464 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . After finding that Kerns’ skills were transferable, the Appeals Council then applied Rule 201.07 of 20 . . .

M. BONNER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 698 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . In accordance with rule 201.07, an individual such as Ms. Bonner is classified as not disabled. . . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, § 201.00, Table No. 1, rule 201.07 (1997). . . . She asserts that rule 201.07 cannot apply unless she possesses transferable skills and that the hearing . . . The hearing officer applied rule 201.07 which lists advanced age, education, and previous work experience . . . Bonner meets the age and education variables under both mies 201.06 and 201.07 of Table No. 1 because . . .

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. v. ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS AMERICA, INC. d b a ASM N. V., 98 F.3d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.07 (6th Ed.1995) (MPEP). . . .

R. VAUGHAN, v. SHALALA,, 58 F.3d 129 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . the full range of sedentary work activity, but that she was not disabled within the framework of Rule 201.07 . . .

TRANSCO PRODUCTS INC. v. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC., 38 F.3d 551 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

. . . See MPEP § 201.07. . . .

W. WATERS, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 827 F. Supp. 446 (W.D. Mich. 1992)

. . . See also Rules 201.15, 201.07, and 201.00(f) of 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2. . . .

B. TERRY, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 903 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Rules 201.06, 201.07 (Table No. I). . . .

KINGSDOWN MEDICAL CONSULTANTS, LTD. E. R. v. HOLLISTER INCORPORATED,, 863 F.2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

. . . correctness that attaches to administrative action; (3) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, section 201.07 . . .

GREGORY, v. R. BOWEN,, 844 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 404.1563(d) (1987), and has a high-school education, placing her under Rule 201.06 or Rule 201.07 . . .

ALBORS, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 817 F.2d 146 (1st Cir. 1986)

. . . The AU also applied grid rule 201.07 (residual functional capacity for sedentary work, advanced age, . . . Grid rule 201.07, which the AU applied, directs a finding of not disabled. . . . rules is that rule 201.06 (disabled) applies when a claimant’s skills are not transferable whereas rule 201.07 . . . provide for direct entry into skilled work Skilled or semiskilled — skills not transferable Disabled 201.07 . . .

RENNER, v. M. HECKLER,, 786 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . The ALJ applied Rule 201.07 of 20 C.F.R. . . .

R. STEWART, v. M. HECKLER,, 631 F. Supp. 376 (D. Del. 1986)

. . . The AU then used this finding to justify reference to grid Rule 201.07, Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart . . .

DuBREUIL, v. R. BOWEN,, 677 F. Supp. 32 (D. Mass. 1986)

. . . capacity for sedentary exertion”, the claimant would nevertheless be found “not disabled” under Rule 201.07 . . .

W. TOM, v. HECKLER,, 779 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . provide for direct entry into skilled work Skilled or semiskilled — skills not transferable Disabled 201.07 . . . The appropriate rule in this case, the Secretary contends, is Rule 201.07. . . .

W. INGLE, v. M. HECKLER,, 763 F.2d 169 (4th Cir. 1985)

. . . Compare 20 C.F.R., Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.06 with Rule 201.07. . . .

ROBERTSON, v. M. HECKLER,, 603 F. Supp. 147 (N.D. Cal. 1985)

. . . ), if plaintiff has skilled or semiskilled skills which are transferable she is not disabled (Rules 201.07 . . .

DAVIS, v. HECKLER,, 748 F.2d 293 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . P, §§ 201.07, 201.15, 202.07, 202.15. . 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 1 (1983). . . .

K. ROBINSON, v. M. HECKLER,, 593 F. Supp. 96 (D. Me. 1984)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table 2, Rule 201.07, as well as the testimony of a vocational expert . . .

LITTON SYSTEMS, INC. v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,, 728 F.2d 1423 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

. . . new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the primary examiner,” MPEP § 201.07 . . .

STEINHOFF, v. R. HARRIS,, 698 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1983)

. . . See Rules 201.03, 201.07, 201.11, 201.15, 201.-20, 201.22, 201.26, 201.29. . . .

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, v. CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., 525 F. Supp. 950 (N.D. Ill. 1981)

. . . Section 120; Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Sections 201.07, 201.08. Bendix Corporation v. . . .

G. CEDERBAUMS, v. HARRIS,, 484 F. Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . . § 2072; 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶¶ 201.07, 204.07 (2d ed. 1975). . . .

SHAFFER TOOL WORKS W. v. JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANY D., 424 F. Supp. 1269 (S.D. Tex. 1976)

. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, § 201.07, 6 Deller’s Walker on Patents Appendix V at 251 (2d Ed . . .

A. O. GROSS, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 390 F. Supp. 236 (D. Mass. 1975)

. . . Id., § 201.07. . . . .

PLASTIC CONTACT LENS COMPANY, v. GOTTSCHALK,, 484 F.2d 837 (D.C. Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 201.07 which contained the following paragraph: Where an application has been prosecuted to final . . .

SYLGAB STEEL WIRE CORPORATION, v. IMOCO- GATEWAY CORPORATION,, 357 F. Supp. 657 (N.D. Ill. 1973)

. . . application’s status as a continuation application [Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (R-29), § 201.07 . . . See § 201.07, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (hereinafter “MPEP”); and § 60, Rules of Practice . . .

MUELLER BRASS CO. v. READING INDUSTRIES, INC., 352 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Pa. 1972)

. . . See Sections 201.07 and 201.11 of the Manual of Patent Examining Practice (MPEP) a publication which, . . .

R. CRAIG N., 411 F.2d 1333 (C.C.P.A. 1969)

. . . with added emphasis, states the gist of the holding: We interpret • these passages [MPEP 706.03 (w), 201.07 . . .

In R. N., 56 C.C.P.A. 1438 (C.C.P.A. 1969)

. . . with added emphasis, states the gist of the holding: We interpret these passages [MPEP 706.03 (w), 201.07 . . .

S. KAGHAN, J. M., 387 F.2d 398 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . See also 201.07. . . . The reference to 201.07 is to its second paragraph, as follows: Where an application has been prosecuted . . .

In S. J. M., 55 C.C.P.A. 844 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . See also 201.07. . . . The reference to 201.07 is to its second paragraph, as follows: Where an application has been prosecuted . . . MPEP section 201.07 allows an applicant to file a continuation application and so establish a right to . . .

E. HERR, 377 F.2d 610 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . Compare MPEP 201.07, 201.11, and 706.03 (w). . . .

In E., 54 C.C.P.A. 1315 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . Compare MPEP 201.07, 201.11, and 706.03 (w). . . .

FRIED, 312 F.2d 930 (C.C.P.A. 1963)

. . . The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, (MPEP), 2nd Ed., in pertinent part reads as follows: “201.07 . . .

STATE PENINSULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, a v. M. GAY,, 90 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1956)

. . . It seems to me that Section 201.07, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires that, the transaction here be . . . documentary stamp taxes theretofore collected by appellee, Gay, as then Comptroller, under Section 201.07 . . . In the trial court and in this court relator contends that Sections 201.01 and 201.07, Florida Statutes . . . Section 201.07, Florida Statutes (Section 1, Chapter 15787, Laws of Florida^ Extraordinary Session, 1931 . . . Appellee contends that under Section 201.07, supra, the issuance of bonds by “any person” must take place . . .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LAFAYETTE LIFE INS. CO. LAFAYETTE LIFE INS. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 67 F.2d 209 (7th Cir. 1933)

. . . .-88 for the year 1926, and of $361.60 for the year 1927; that the correct amounts allowable are $201.07 . . .

CARPENTER, v. M. J. M. M. CONSOLIDATED,, 212 F. 868 (9th Cir. 1914)

. . . The interest amounted to $41.07, making a total payment of $201.07, leaving' unpaid the principal sum . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)