Cases from cite.case.law:

RAHIMI, v. GLOBAL DISCOVERIES, LTD. LLC,, 252 So. 3d 804 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Finally, section 197.552 provides that: All tax deeds shall be issued in the name of a county and shall . . . Id. § 197.552. . . . Pointe at Heritage Isles Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 124 So.3d 302, 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("Under sections 197.552 . . .

A. ASHEAR, v. SKLAREY,, 247 So. 3d 574 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 197.552, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in relevant part: All tax deeds shall be issued in . . .

AGM INVESTORS, LLC, v. BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P. A. a M. H. R. LM LLC, a, 219 So. 3d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Pursuant to sections 197.552 and 197.573(2), the association’s lien for assessments that were unpaid . . .

VILLAGES OF AVIGNON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, v. BURTON, Jr., 215 So. 3d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . For example, section 197.552, enacted in 1972, specifically provides that an existing CDD lien will survive . . . If we were to continue to apply the Kostecos construct, it would render sections 197.552 and 190.024 . . .

A TO Z PROPERTIES, INC. v. FAIRWAY PALMS II CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. INC., 137 So. 3d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The trial court rejected appellant’s argument that section 197.552, Florida Statutes, extinguished the . . . On appeal, appellant argues that, pursuant to section 197.552, the unpaid assessments did not survive . . . Section 197.552 states in relevant part: “Except as specifically provided in this chapter, no right, . . . interest, restriction, or other covenant shall survive the issuance of a tax deed .... ” § 197.552, Fla . . . Thus, sections 197.552 and 197.573(2) control over section 718.116(l)(a), because they are “the more . . .

LUNOHAH INVESTMENTS, LLC. v. GASKELL,, 158 So. 3d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . liability to pay unpaid assessments were extinguished upon issuance of the tax deed by virtue of sections 197.552 . . . liens for unpaid assessments did not survive the issuance of the tax deed by operation of sections 197.552 . . . Sections 197.552 and 197.573(2) specifically address the survival of restrictive covenants after issuance . . . 720.3085(2)(b) is construed to apply here, it is directly contradictory to the more specific sections 197.552 . . . Sections 197.552 and 197.573(2) extinguish any covenant that creates a lien or requires a grantee to . . .

CRICKET PROPERTIES, LLC, a v. NASSAU POINTE AT HERITAGE ISLES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 124 So. 3d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We reverse because, under sections 197.552 and 197.573(2), Florida Statutes (2011), any lien for unpaid . . . Section 197.552 addresses the limitation on the survival of rights, interests, restrictions, and other . . . Instead, sections 197.552 and 197.573(2) specifically address the survival or extin-guishment of liens . . . Sections 197.552 and 197.573(2) are therefore the more specific statutes as to the key issue, and any . . . Under sections 197.552 and 197.573(2), any lien Nassau may have had for unpaid homeowners association . . .

CITY OF PALM BAY, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 114 So. 3d 924 (Fla. 2013)

. . . 2004) (providing lien priority and superiority for non-home rule municipality special assessments); § 197.552 . . .

MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. SECOND SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., 56 So. 3d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The County responded by asserting section 197.552 and the primacy of its code liens. . . . Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 197.552 any liens in favor of Miami-Dade County shall survive the . . . Section 197.552, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in relevant part: a lien of record held by a municipal . . .

HUTCHINSON ISLAND REALTY, INC. v. BABCOCK VENTURES, INC., 867 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Reviewing the clerk’s compliance with the notice requirements of section 197.552(1), Florida Statutes . . . Saada, 608 So.2d 806 (Fla.1992), which held that the notice required by section 197.552(1) is notice . . .

ARSALI, LLC, v. KIPP,, 866 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 197.552, Fla. Stat. (2002). FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur. . . .

SUGARMILL WOODS OAKS VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. M. WIRES,, 766 So. 2d 487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . The first is section 197.552, which governs tax deeds. . . .

C. MOBLEY, v. HUNT,, 722 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Under section 197.552, Florida Statutes (1995), “no right [or] interest ... shall survive the issuance . . .

C. SKELTON, v. MARTIN, C. K., 673 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 197.552, Fla.Stat. (1991); Locke v. Stuart, 113 So.2d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, v. NASHID PROPERTIES, INC., 636 So. 2d 875 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . In this case we must decide whether, under the dictates of section 197.552, Florida Statutes (1987), . . . county government (sic) unit,’ which survives the issuance of a tax deed within the meaning of section 197.552 . . . At the time Nashid took its tax deed, section 197.552, Florida Statutes (1987), as amended by Ch. 79- . . . assignor’s lack of a protected interest does not alter the City’s entitlement to the benefits of section 197.552 . . .

CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL CORP. a a v. HALCON ENTERPRISES, INC. a FDIC a Or An, 842 F. Supp. 499 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . Section 197.552. . . .

USA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. M. STEWARD, 588 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . In so holding, the court specifically relied upon section 197.552, Florida Statutes, which expressly . . .

In LAKE GRADY ROAD BRIDGE DISTRICT, ZARAGOSA PROPERTIES, INC. v. L. AKE, B., 119 B.R. 853 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 197.552, the Debtor enjoys tax exemptions by virtue of its status as a municipal or governmental . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. SOHN,, 566 So. 2d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Furthermore, Section 197.552, Florida Statutes, expressly provides, “Except as specifically provided . . .

J. ADAMS v. T. A. ADAMS, Jr., 512 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . adverse possession against the other family members and that the plaintiffs were “estopped” by section 197.552 . . . deed is invalid on its face, the court erred in finding that the plaintiffs were “estopped” by section 197.552 . . . Assuming the tax deed to be of no effect, neither the provision of section 197.552 stating “no right, . . .

D. R. L. INC. v. W. MURPHY A., 508 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Appellant’s tax deeds are themselves prima facie evidence of their own validity (see section 197.552, . . .