Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 185.35 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 185.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 185.35 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 185.35

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 185
MUNICIPAL POLICE PENSIONS
View Entire Chapter
185.35 Municipalities that have their own retirement plans for police officers.In order for a municipality that has its own retirement plan for police officers, or for police officers and firefighters if both are included, to participate in the distribution of the tax fund established under s. 185.08, a local law plan must meet minimum benefits and minimum standards, except as provided in the mutual consent provisions in paragraph (1)(g) with respect to the minimum benefits not met as of October 1, 2012.
(1) If a municipality has a retirement plan for police officers, or for police officers and firefighters if both are included, which, in the opinion of the division, meets minimum benefits and minimum standards, the board of trustees of the retirement plan must place the income from the premium tax in s. 185.08 in such plan for the sole and exclusive use of its police officers, or its police officers and firefighters if both are included, where it shall become an integral part of that plan and be used to fund benefits as provided herein. Effective October 1, 2015, for noncollectively bargained service or upon entering into a collective bargaining agreement on or after July 1, 2015:
(a) The base premium tax revenues must be used to fund minimum benefits or other retirement benefits in excess of the minimum benefits as determined by the municipality.
(b) Of the additional premium tax revenues received that are in excess of the amount received for the 2012 calendar year, 50 percent must be used to fund minimum benefits or other retirement benefits in excess of the minimum benefits as determined by the municipality, and 50 percent must be placed in a defined contribution plan component to fund special benefits.
(c) Additional premium tax revenues not described in paragraph (b) must be used to fund benefits that are not included in the minimum benefits. If the additional premium tax revenues subject to this paragraph exceed the full annual cost of benefits provided through the plan which are in excess of the minimum benefits, any amount in excess of the full annual cost must be used as provided in paragraph (b).
(d) Of any accumulations of additional premium tax revenues which have not been allocated to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, 50 percent of the amount of the accumulations must be used to fund special benefits and 50 percent must be applied to fund any unfunded actuarial liabilities of the plan; provided that any amount of accumulations in excess of the amount required to fund the unfunded actuarial liabilities must be used to fund special benefits.
(e) For a plan created after March 1, 2015, 50 percent of the insurance premium tax revenues must be used to fund defined benefit plan component benefits, with the remainder used to fund defined contribution plan component benefits.
(f) If a plan offers benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, such benefits, excluding supplemental plan benefits in effect as of September 30, 2014, may be reduced if the plan continues to meet minimum benefits and the minimum standards. The amount of insurance premium tax revenues previously used to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits before the reduction, excluding the amount of any additional premium tax revenues distributed to a supplemental plan for the 2012 calendar year, must be used as provided in paragraph (b). However, benefits in excess of the minimum benefits may not be reduced if a plan does not meet the minimum percentage amount of 2.75 percent of the average final compensation of a police officer or provides an effective benefit that is less than 2.75 percent as a result of a maximum benefit limitation, as described in s. 185.16(2)(b).
(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)-(f), the use of premium tax revenues, including any accumulations of additional premium tax revenues which have not been allocated to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, may deviate from the provisions of this subsection by mutual consent of the members’ collective bargaining representative or, if none, by a majority of the police officer members of the fund, and by consent of the municipality, provided that the plan continues to meet minimum benefits and minimum standards; however, a plan that operates pursuant to this paragraph and does not meet the minimum benefits as of October 1, 2012, may continue to provide the benefits that do not meet the minimum benefits at the same level as was provided as of October 1, 2012, and all other benefit levels must continue to meet the minimum benefits. Such mutually agreed deviation must continue until modified or revoked by subsequent mutual consent of the members’ collective bargaining representative or, if none, by a majority of the police officer members of the fund, and the municipality. An existing arrangement for the use of premium tax revenues contained within a special act plan or a plan within a supplemental plan municipality is considered, as of July 1, 2015, to be a deviation for which mutual consent has been granted.
(2) The premium tax provided by this chapter must be used in its entirety to provide retirement benefits to police officers, or to police officers and firefighters if both are included. Local law plans created by special act before May 27, 1939, shall be deemed to comply with this chapter.
(3) A retirement plan or amendment to a retirement plan may not be proposed for adoption unless the proposed plan or amendment contains an actuarial estimate of the costs involved. Such proposed plan or proposed plan change may not be adopted without the approval of the municipality or, where required, the Legislature. Copies of the proposed plan or proposed plan change and the actuarial impact statement of the proposed plan or proposed plan change shall be furnished to the division before the last public hearing on the proposal is held. Such statement must also indicate whether the proposed plan or proposed plan change is in compliance with s. 14, Art. X of the State Constitution and those provisions of part VII of chapter 112 which are not expressly provided in this chapter. Notwithstanding any other provision, only those local law plans created by special act of legislation before May 27, 1939, are deemed to meet the minimum benefits and minimum standards in this chapter.
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision, with respect to any supplemental plan municipality:
(a) Section 185.02(6)(a) does not apply, and a local law plan and a supplemental plan may continue to use their definition of compensation or salary in existence on March 12, 1999.
(b) A local law plan and a supplemental plan must continue to be administered by a board or boards of trustees numbered, constituted, and selected as the board or boards were numbered, constituted, and selected on December 1, 2000.
(5) The retirement plan setting forth the benefits and the trust agreement, if any, covering the duties and responsibilities of the trustees and the regulations of the investment of funds must be in writing and copies made available to the participants and to the general public.
(6) In addition to the defined benefit component of the local law plan, each plan sponsor must have a defined contribution plan component within the local law plan by October 1, 2015, for noncollectively bargained service, upon entering into a collective bargaining agreement on or after July 1, 2015, or upon the creation date of a new participating plan. Depending upon the application of subsection (1), a defined contribution component may or may not receive any funding.
(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a municipality that has implemented or proposed changes to a local law plan based on the municipality’s reliance on an interpretation of this chapter by the Department of Management Services on or after August 14, 2012, and before March 3, 2015, may continue the implemented changes or continue to implement proposed changes. Such reliance must be evidenced by a written collective bargaining proposal or agreement, or formal correspondence between the municipality and the Department of Management Services which describes the specific changes to the local law plan, with the initial proposal, agreement, or correspondence from the municipality dated before March 3, 2015. Changes to the local law plan which are otherwise contrary to minimum benefits and minimum standards may continue in effect until the earlier of October 1, 2018, or the effective date of a collective bargaining agreement that is contrary to the changes to the local law plan.
History.s. 7, ch. 59-320; s. 2, ch. 61-119; s. 3, ch. 63-196; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 23, ch. 86-42; s. 47, ch. 93-193; s. 956, ch. 95-147; s. 74, ch. 99-1; s. 7, ch. 2002-66; s. 6, ch. 2004-21; s. 11, ch. 2011-216; s. 14, ch. 2015-39; s. 31, ch. 2020-2.

F.S. 185.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 185.35 on CourtListener

Amendments to 185.35


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 185.35

Total Results: 12  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

City of St. Petersburg v. Remia, 41 So. 3d 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10448, 2010 WL 2788287

...Petersburg Police Pension Board of Trustees (collectively, the City) appeal a final summary judgment finding that former police officers who left service prior to vesting in the City's police pension fund were entitled to a refund of their contributions to the fund. We affirm. Sections 185.19, 185.08, and 185.35, Florida Statutes (2000), are central to the parties' dispute....
...to retire under the provisions of this chapter, such police officer shall be entitled to a refund of all of his or her contributions made to the municipal police officers' retirement trust fund without interest, less any benefits paid to him or her. Section 185.35 requires municipalities with their own police pension plans to meet minimum benefits and standards of chapter 185....
...of Ret., Nos. 08-4766, 09-0933, 09-0934, 09-0935, 09-0936, 09-0937, 09-0938, 2009 WL 1700310, *16 (Fla.Div.Admin.Hearings, May 28, 2009) (explaining that State is merely a collection agency for insurance premium taxes levied by a city). Relying on section 185.35(1), the City claims that any refund is a pension "benefit" that must await its receipt of premium tax income funds....
...The City contends that it cannot provide a refund because it lacks sufficient premium tax income revenue. The City offers no estimate as to when such funding would be available to pay refunds. The former police officers counter that a refund is not a benefit and nothing in section 185.35(1) requires that refunds come from premium tax income funds....
...With scant testimony about the development of an agency interpretation, the DOR witness opined that contribution refunds are "minimum benefits" that need not be refunded. We do not agree. *325 The DOR witness's opinion is neither binding nor persuasive. We see nothing in section 185.35(1) compelling the conclusion that a contribution refund is a benefit....
...fund when he leaves the force, notwithstanding the fact that an insurance contract purchased on his behalf *326 with his contributions has a cash value less than his contributions. Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 58-141. We see no reason why the requirements of section 185.35, relating to premium tax income, should have a bearing on the rights of the former police officers here....
...[1] We are not persuaded. Section 185.19(1) does not create a benefit or enhance the status of the officers. It merely establishes an entitlement to a refund. And, as noted earlier, no premium tax income is required as a source for those funds. See § 185.35(1)....
Copy

State, Dep't Mgmt. Servs. v. City of Delray Beach, 40 So. 3d 835 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10143, 2010 WL 2732873

...ty") challenging a determination by the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement ("Division"), that the City's police and firefighter pension plan must comply with chapter 99-1, Laws of Florida, which amended sections 175.351(1) and 185.35(1), Florida Statutes....
...But to be eligible to receive this premium tax revenue, municipal pension plans must meet certain criteria established by the Legislature. Prior to 1999, a city opting to take advantage of the premium tax distribution scheme had to demonstrate its retirement fund(s) met the operating standards set out in sections 175.351 and 185.35, as applicable. See §§ 175.351(1), 185.35(1), Fla....
...If deemed by the Division to be in compliance with those standards, a city could put the premium tax revenue in its pension fund for the exclusive use of firefighters and police officers, or it could use the revenue to pay extra benefits to retired officers and firefighters. See §§ 175.351(13), 185.35(2), Fla....
...(1997). Effective March 12, 1999, the Legislature overhauled chapters 175 and 185. See Ch. 99-1, Laws of Fla. Among other things, the Legislature instituted minimum retirement benefits for firefighters and police officers and amended sections 175.351 and 185.35 to make receipt of premium tax revenue contingent on meeting both the minimum operating standards and the minimum benefits....
..."[A]dditional premium tax revenues" means revenues received by a municipality... that exceed the amount received for calendar year 1997 and the term "extra benefits" means benefits in addition to or greater than those provided to general employees of the municipality. Ch. 99-1, § 74, at 61, Laws of Fla. (amending section 185.35) (emphasis added)....
...earnings. See § 185.02(4), Fla. Stat. (1999). But "supplemental plan municipalities" defined under sections 185.02(15) and (16), "may continue to use their definition of compensation or salary in existence on the effective date of [chapter 99-1]." § 185.35(3)(a), Fla....
...th the constitutional ban on laws impairing contracts." The court further concluded the Plan, as amended by the 1993 Agreement, meets the requirements of a supplemental plan under sections 175.032(17) and 185.02(15), Florida Statutes, and that under section 185.35(3), Florida Statutes, the provisions of section 185.02(4)(a) including overtime pay in the *840 calculation of police officers' earnings do not apply to the Plan....
...The trial court erred in concluding otherwise and granting summary judgment to the City on that basis. B. Whether the City is a "Supplemental Plan City" Exempt From the 300-hour Minimum Benefit Requirement As an additional ground for entering summary judgment for the City, the trial court determined the City is exempt under section 185.35(3)(a) from the 300 overtime hours minimum benefit requirement for police officer pension plans....
...uirements of this chapter shall not, solely by virtue of this subsection, reduce or diminish the monthly retirement income otherwise payable to each police officer covered by the retirement trust fund or plan. § 185.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). But section 185.35, which requires local pension plans to provide the minimum benefits set out in chapter 185, provides an exception: (3) Notwithstanding any other provision, with respect to any supplemental plan municipality: (a) Section 185.02(4)(a) shall not apply, and a local law plan and a supplemental plan may continue to use their definition of compensation or salary in existence on the effective date of this act. § 185.35(3)(a), Fla....
...Such a plan is an element of a local law plan and exists in conjunction with a defined benefit plan that meets the minimum benefits and minimum standards of this chapter. § 185.02(15), Fla. Stat. (1999) (emphasis added). See also Ch. 99-1, § 42, Laws of Fla. at 40. Further, under section 185.35(1), premium tax revenue may be either placed in the pension plan exclusively to pay extra benefits to police officers, or placed "in a separate supplemental plan to pay extra benefits to police officers." § 185.35(1)(b), Fla....
...evenue received pursuant to chapters 175 and 185 is put "in the existing pension fund for the exclusive use of plan members and beneficiaries." The trial court therefore incorrectly granted *843 summary judgment to the City based on the exemption in section 185.35(3)(a) for supplemental plan municipalities....
...nced the same arguments the City makes in the present case. See Fla. League of Cities v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., No. 03-1117RP (DOAH Sept. 23, 2003) (upholding proposed rules on grounds the statutes to be implemented—notably sections 175.351(13) and 185.35(2), Florida Statutes (1997), as amended by sections 35 and 74, chapter 99-1, Laws of Florida—required that "[e]xtra benefits [already] enacted ......
Copy

Haddix v. City of Panama City, 624 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 1993 WL 380137

the retirement benefits required. Further, section 185.35(1)(i) also requires the City to fund any actuarial
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2001).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

included.3 A similar provision is contained in section 185.35, Florida Statutes. Section 175.351, Florida
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1993).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

trustees of a firefighters' pension trust fund. 3 Section 185.35, F.S., allows municipalities with their own
Copy

Gates v. City of Jacksonville, 278 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8084

F.S.A.) on or before June 1 of each year. Section 185.35, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., allows the cities
Copy

Bailey v. City of Tampa, 175 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1965).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168

plan which met the standards prescribed in F.S. § 185.35, F.S.A.; that the taxes levied on insurance premiums
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

creating a new fund under s. 185.35, F.S.7 Section 185.35, F.S., sets forth the minimum standards for
Copy

City of Coral Springs v. Desepio, 524 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1222, 1988 WL 25782

Judge, dissenting. I believe the provisions of section 185.35, Florida Statutes (1979) permitted the city
Copy

City of Hollywood v. Hollywood Lodge 21, 329 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14051

the Police Pension Plan.” As amended in 1959, Section 185.35, F. S., provides in section (1) that in order
Copy

City of Wilton Manors v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 48 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18309, 2010 WL 4861747

...t fund to participate in the distribution of premium tax moneys under this chapter, all the provisions shall be complied with annually, including state acceptance pursuant to part VII of Chapter 112." [e.s.] § 185.10(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also § 185.35, Fla....
Copy

Bailey v. City of Tampa, 163 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4212

standard set forth in the *531enabling act (Section 185.35), the income from the taxes levied on insurance

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.