...arry out its responsibility of insuring, through the application of statutory minimum standards, that local plans are managed, administered, operated and funded in such a manner as to maximize protection of pension trust funds. For example, Sections
175.171,
175.181,
175.191 and
175.231, Florida Statutes, upon which these proposed rules are based in part, establish minimum standards which clarify and define Section
175.351(1), and are thereby applicable to both chapter and local law funds......
...ter funds, and thus do not affect the local law funds of the City and other municipalities. We find it unnecessary to discuss these rules further. Rule 4-54.035 Rule 4-54.035 deals with "optional forms of retirement income" and states quite simply, "Section
175.171, Florida Statutes, provides minimum standards for all Chapter Funds and all Local Law Funds." Its stated purpose is to implement section
175.171. Section
175.171(1) provides in part that "in lieu of the amount and form of retirement income payable in the event of normal retirement specified in Section
175.162" (a chapter plan retirement section), a firefighter may elect to receive retirement income in accordance with the enumerated options. Section
175.171(2) states that if a firefighter dies before his normal or early retirement date and has chosen an option under
175.171, his benefits will be paid in accordance with section
175.201 (a chapter plan provision allowing for refund of contributions to the firefighter's heirs). The City argues that the proposed rule improperly applies section
175.171 to local law plans because it contradicts, first, the express provisions in section 175.321 defining which sections of chapter 175 are applicable to local law plans and, second, the explicit provision in section
175.351(6) allowing local law plans to incorporate death or survivor benefits "as the municipalities wish" so long as such benefits do not exceed the stated limitations. All parties apparently agree that the refund provisions *863 in section
175.201, referred to in section
175.171, apply only to chapter plans. The Department and the hearing officer rely upon the Department's construction of section
175.021 as amended and the Department's invalid test as authority for applying section
175.171 by implication to local law plans. We agree with the City's argument. Although section
175.171 was amended by chapter 86-41, the amending bill did not contain any expression by the legislature that section
175.171 would be applicable to local law plans. Since we have rejected the Department's construction of the 1986 amendments as making applicable by implication other provisions of chapter 175 to local law plans, we hold that section
175.171 is not applicable to local law plans and that rule 4-54.035 is invalid for exceeding the Department's delegated legislative authority....