The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 162
COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 162.04

162.04 Definitions.—As used in ss. 162.01-162.13, the term:

(1) “Local governing body” means the governing body of the county or municipality, however designated.

(2) “Code inspector” means any authorized agent or employee of the county or municipality whose duty it is to assure code compliance.

(3) “Local governing body attorney” means the legal counselor for the county or municipality.

(4) “Enforcement board” means a local government code enforcement board.

(5) “Repeat violation” means a violation of a provision of a code or ordinance by a person who has been previously found through a code enforcement board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process, to have violated or who has admitted violating the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-300; s. 4, ch. 82-37; s. 10, ch. 83-216; s. 3, ch. 86-201; s. 3, ch. 89-268; s. 3, ch. 99-360; s. 22, ch. 2001-60.

Note.—Former s. 166.054.

F.S. 162.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 162.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 162.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 162.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 162.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BLUE FIELD SICHUAN FOOD INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 949 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . Field (PD II Surrogate & lf3-lflf at Ex. 1) Benchmark 4M 1999 Organic Fertilizer Organic fertilizer $162.04 . . . Blue Field’s proposed surrogates, by contrast, valued cow manure somewhere between $21.55 and $162.04 . . .

In BOSSERT, BOSSERT, v. UNITED STATES, 201 B.R. 553 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1996)

. . . 419.34 583.12 207.80 33.44 2,016.36 2,257.60 1,006.25 187.53 645.15 1,872.76 8,731.11 12,442.80 61.37 162.04 . . . Amount 940 12/31/84 Failure to Pay 26 USC § 6651 $ 61.37 943 12/31/84 Failure to Pay 26 USC § 6651 162.04 . . . The $162.04 penalty (related to the period ended 12/31/84) and the $523.86 penalty (related to period . . . Failure to Pay Failure to Deposit IRC Provision 26 USC § 6651 26 USC § 6651 26 USC § 6656 Amount $ 162.04 . . .

In ABDUL FARUQ AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. ABDUL FARUQ, 175 B.R. 618 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1994)

. . . balance, which had been paid down to $3,041.38, advanced the Abdul’Fa-ruqs $296.13 in cash, and included $162.04 . . .

FISHER S ISLAND, v. DADE COUNTY,, 47 Fla. Supp. 129 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1977)

. . . RU-4A Zoning 21.51 Tract 4 RU-4A Zoning 27.69 Tract 5 RU-4A Zoning 25.66 Tract 6 RU-4A Zoning 28.94 162.04 . . . application for zoning was as follows — District Boundary Changes: — Parcel A, Tracts 1 through 6, 162.04 . . .

v., 24 T.C. 1087 (T.C. 1955)

. . . as follows: $795.41 paid April 15, 1946; $41 credited against_the 1941 income tax overpayment; and $162.04 . . .

CONE v. WEST VIRGINIA PULP PAPER CO., 170 F.2d 770 (4th Cir. 1948)

. . . Defendant sent its check-for $162.04, the balance against it shown by the offset, and copy of defendant . . .

v., 8 Cust. Ct. 607 (Cust. Ct. 1942)

. . . by the appraiser as nondutiable, plus the charge for trucking from Uman to Progreso amounting to M$162.04 . . . by the appraiser as nondutiable, plus the charge for trucking from Uman to Progreso amounting to M$162.04 . . .

v., 8 Cust. Ct. 609 (Cust. Ct. 1942)

. . . the appraiser as nondutiable, and less the charge for trucking from Uman to Progreso amounting to M$162.04 . . . the appraiser as nondutiable, and less the charge for trucking from Uman to Progreso amounting to M$162.04 . . .