Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 154.306 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 154.306 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 154.306 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 154.306

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 154
PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
154.306 Financial responsibility for certified residents who are qualified indigent patients treated at an out-of-county participating hospital or regional referral hospital.Ultimate financial responsibility for treatment received at a participating hospital or a regional referral hospital by a qualified indigent patient who is a certified resident of a county in the State of Florida, but is not a resident of the county in which the participating hospital or regional referral hospital is located, is the obligation of the county of which the qualified indigent patient is a resident. Each county shall reimburse participating hospitals or regional referral hospitals as provided for in this part, and shall provide or arrange for indigent eligibility determination procedures and resident certification determination procedures as provided for in rules developed to implement this part. The agency, or any county determining eligibility of a qualified indigent, shall provide to the county of residence, upon request, a copy of any documents, forms, or other information, as determined by rule, which may be used in making an eligibility determination.
(1) A county’s financial obligation for each certified resident who qualifies as an indigent patient under this part, and who has received treatment at an out-of-county hospital, shall not exceed 45 days per county fiscal year at a rate of payment equivalent to 100 percent of the per diem reimbursement rate currently in effect for the out-of-county hospital under the medical assistance program for the needy under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, as amended, except that those counties that are at their 10-mill cap on October 1, 1991, shall reimburse hospitals for such services at not less than 80 percent of the hospital Medicaid per diem. However, nothing in this section shall preclude a hospital that has a formal signed agreement with a county to treat such county’s indigents from negotiating a higher or lower per diem rate with the county. No county shall be required to pay more than the equivalent of $4 per capita in the county’s fiscal year. The agency shall calculate and certify to each county by March 1 of each year, the maximum amount the county may be required to pay by multiplying the most recent official state population estimate for the total population of the county by $4 per capita. Each county shall certify to the agency within 60 days after the end of the county’s fiscal year, or upon reaching the $4 per capita threshold, should that occur before the end of the fiscal year, the amount of reimbursement it paid to all out-of-county hospitals under this part. The maximum amount a county may be required to pay to out-of-county hospitals for care provided to qualified indigent residents may be reduced by up to one-half, provided that the amount not paid has or is being spent for in-county hospital care provided to qualified indigent residents.
(2) No county shall be required to pay for any elective or nonemergency admissions or services at an out-of-county hospital for a qualified indigent who is a certified resident of the county if the county provides funding for such services and the services are available at a local hospital in the county where the indigent resides; or the out-of-county hospital has not obtained prior written authorization and approval for such hospital admission or service, provided that the resident county has established a procedure to authorize and approve such admissions.
(3) For the purpose of computing the maximum amount that a county having a population of 100,000 or less may be required to pay, the agency must reduce the official state population estimates by the number of inmates and patients residing in the county in institutions operated by the Federal Government, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Health, or the Department of Children and Families, and by the number of active-duty military personnel residing in the county, all of whom shall not be considered residents of the county. However, a county is entitled to receive the benefit of such a reduction in estimated population figures only if the county accepts as valid and true, and does not require any reverification of, the documentation of financial eligibility and county residency which is provided to it by the participating hospital or regional referral hospital. The participating hospital or regional referral hospital must provide documentation that is complete and in the form required by s. 154.3105.
(4) The county where the indigent resides shall, in all instances, be liable for the cost of treatment provided to a qualified indigent patient at an out-of-county hospital for any emergency medical condition which will deteriorate from failure to provide such treatment if such condition is determined and documented by the attending physician to be of an emergency nature; provided that the patient has been certified to be a resident of such county pursuant to s. 154.309.
(5) No county shall be liable for payment for treatment of a qualified indigent who is a certified resident and has received services at an out-of-county participating hospital or regional referral hospital, until such time as that hospital has documented to the agency and the agency has determined that it has met its charity care obligation based on the most recent audited actual experience.
History.s. 5, ch. 77-455; s. 9, ch. 88-294; s. 5, ch. 90-295; s. 2, ch. 91-173; s. 5, ch. 98-191; s. 1, ch. 2001-222; s. 38, ch. 2014-19.

F.S. 154.306 on Google Scholar

F.S. 154.306 on CourtListener

Amendments to 154.306


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 154.306

Total Results: 7  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

1988," Part IV, Ch. 154, F.S. (1988 Supp.). 2 Section 154.306, F.S. (1988 Supp.). 3 Section 154.301, F.S
Copy

Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics of the Univ. of Florida ex rel. Bd. of Regents v. Council of Jacksonville, 398 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19665

Because she was an indigent, Shands, pursuant to Section 154.306, Florida Statutes, submitted the hospital bill
Copy

Tallahassee Mem'l Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Lewis, 399 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19993

determines the existence of such an emergency. See § 154.306. Additionally, Section 154.-314 provides that
Copy

City of Jacksonville v. C.J. Ventures, Inc., 558 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1577, 1990 WL 25937

...lic beverages. The City has enacted chapter 154, Jacksonville Municipal Code, regulating the hours for the sale, consumption and service of alcoholic beverages in all establishments licensed by the state. Part III of that ordinance, sections 154.301-154.306, governs the Sunday sale of alcoholic beverages in establishments selling food prepared, served and consumed on the premises....
...Sections 154.301 and 154.304 govern the hours of operation of licensed establishments Monday through Saturday, and the hours of sale of alcoholic beverages on *135 New Year’s Eve. Section 154.305 prohibits certain Sunday sales for consumption off the premises. Section 154.306 provides the penalty for violating any provision of chapter 154....
...n” finding, among other things, that the ordinance in question violates the due process provisions of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and enjoining the City and the Sheriff from enforcement of sections 154.302 through 154.306 of the ordinance, with respect to C.J....
Copy

Dade Cnty. v. Am. Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 1987).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 48, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1376

...overnmental programs or third-party payors. As American concedes, the primary purpose of chapter 154, part IV, is to establish the counties' responsibility for medical care costs when one county's resident receives care in another county's hospital. Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1985), clearly reveals the legislature's intent: Ultimate financial responsibility for treatment received at a regional referral hospital by a certified indigent patient who is a resident of the State of Florida but...
...traightforward statement of intent to impose a duty on counties, appearing as it does as a part of "The Florida Health Care Responsibility Act." [4] Even accepting the Court's conclusion that section 154.302 was intended to work only in concert with section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1985), pertaining to the treatment of one county's resident at another county's hospital or a "regional referral hospital," one is left to wonder why a county should be required to pay reimbursement when its indigen...
Copy

St. Mary's Hosp. v. Okeechobee Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 442 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25114, 3 Soc. Serv. Rev. 1099

...the intent of the Legislature to place the ultimate financial obligation for the medical treatment of indigents on the county in which the indigent resides, for all those costs not fully reimbursed by other governmental programs or third-party payors. 154.306 Financial responsibility for out-of-county indigent patients treated at a regional referral hospital Ultimate financial responsibility for treatment received at a regional referral hospital by a certified indigent patient who is a resident...
...Three patients are involved. They were certified indigents and residents of Okeechobee County. St. Mary’s Hospital furnished emergency treatment to them. Such care was not available in Okeechobee County. The treatment charges exceed the limitation found in Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981). St. Mary’s contends that it is statutorily entitled to full payment. Okeechobee contends that it is not statutorily required to make full payment, but says it is responsible for a lesser sum according to the limitations in Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981)....
...of Okeechobee County, acting as an administrative agency, determined that Okeechobee was not required to pay the full amount of St. Mary’s charges. It was determined that St. Mary’s could only collect in accordance with the limitations found in Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981)....
...While not a model of clarity, we find that they are sufficiently clear and reconcilable so as to not require construction or nullification, in whole or part. As we see it, the legislative intent announced in Section 154.302, Florida Statutes (1981), is basically repeated in the first sentence of Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981). It is immediately followed by the limitations in question. Thus we hold that the home county is responsible for all charges with the limitation or cap found in the second sentence of Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981), subject further to the exceptions found in the third sentence of Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981)....
Copy

Dade Cnty. v. Am. Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 463 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 520, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12565

basically repeated in the first sentence of Section 154.306, Florida Statutes (1981). It is immediately

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.