Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 112.3175 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 112.3175 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 112.3175 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 112.3175

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
112.3175 Remedies; contracts voidable.
(1) Any contract that has been executed in violation of this part is voidable:
(a) By any party to the contract.
(b) In any circuit court, by any appropriate action, by:
1. The commission.
2. The Attorney General.
3. Any citizen materially affected by the contract and residing in the jurisdiction represented by the officer or agency entering into such contract.
(2) Any contract that has been executed in violation of this part is presumed void with respect to any former employee or former public official of a state agency and is voidable with respect to any private sector third party who employs or retains in any capacity such former agency employee or former public official.
History.s. 8, ch. 75-208; s. 2, ch. 2001-266.

F.S. 112.3175 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.3175 on CourtListener

Amendments to 112.3175


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 112.3175

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

St. John Med. Plans, Inc. v. Gutman, 696 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8161, 1997 WL 394852

...Additionally, subsection (c) provides that liability is “to the state,” indicating that standing is conferred on the State of Florida, not on -individual citizens. 2 Therefore, the plaintiffs have no standing under the Florida Constitution. 3 The plaintiffs’ alternative argument is that they have standing under section 112.3175, Florida Statutes (1995)....
Copy

Indian Creek Country Club, Inc. v. Indian Creek Vill., 211 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 192013, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 452

...e of the interests involved were speculative, that is, there were no special assessments planned in 1996, and indeed 3(1) Any contract that has been executed in violation of this part is voidable: (a) By any party to the contract. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 112.3175 (West). 15 none occurred until 2010; the degree to which the interests of all Club members may have been affected by the vote was not known until 2010, and then the Club would have to apportion...