The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Pursuant to section 77.06(3) of the Florida Statutes (2017), however, Bank's answer specifically alleged . . . garnishee may include and retain the same, ... subject to disposition as provided in this chapter.... § 77.06 . . .
. . . Fargo “has placed a ‘hold’ on the Safe Deposit Box in accordance with Chapter 77, and primarily-Section 77.06 . . . First Issue: Cause of Action Section 77.06(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (2012)-, imposed a statutory . . . There is no reason to apply a different interpretation of section 77.06 when tangible property in a safe . . . Wells Fargo suggests that there is no private cause of action created by section 77.06, but we disagreed . . . found none, suggesting that a claim against a negligent bank for a breach of its duty under section 77.06 . . .
. . . Holdings, Inc., 982 So.2d 628, 632 (Fla.2008) (citing § 77.06, Fla. Stat. (2002)). . . .
. . . The Court notes that USAmeribank’s Answer does not comply with Ch. 77.06(2), Fla. . . . The filing of US-Ameribank’s Answer which complies with Sec. 77.06, F-S., would trigger Plaintiff Regions . . .
. . . See § 77.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
. . . good faith has retained the sum of 428, 129.06 in accordance with Chapter 77, and primarily Section 77.06 . . . See also § 77.06(3), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 77.06. . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1). . . .
. . . Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (2008), specifically provides that in a garnishment action, “[sjervice . . .
. . . garnishee's answer should be regarded as anything other than its statutory compliance with section 77.06 . . .
. . . Florida Statute Section 77.06 established the effect of service of a writ of garnishment upon a garnishee . . . and provided in relevant part as follows: 77.06. . . . Stat § 77.06 (1999). . . . The Florida legislature amended Florida Statute Section 77.06 in 2000, abrogating the ruling of the Eleventh . . . Pursuant to the amended Section 77.06, service of a writ of garnishment thereafter did create a lien . . .
. . . virtue of the amendment to the Florida garnishment statute effective July 1, 2000, Florida Statutes § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06, was adopted by the Florida legislature to alter the previous decision held by the Eleventh . . . The court in Marinean, held that “[u]nder current § 77.06 Fla. . . . Plaintiff does not dispute the proposition of the effect of the amendment to Florida garnishment statute § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06(1) provides that the service of a writ creates a lien which attaches to the property at . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1) provides that the “service of a writ creates a lien in or upon any such debts or property . . . legislature in its amendment to the Florida garnishment statute effective in 2000, Florida Statutes § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06, which became effective July 1, 2000, specifically overruled the decision in In re Masvidal . . . The court in Martineau held that “[u]nder current § 77.06 Fla. . . . Stat. § 77.06(1) provides that the service of a writ creates a lien which attaches to the property at . . .
. . . . § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . Section 77.06(3), Florida Statutes (2002), states: In any case where a garnishee in good faith is in . . . See § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 77.06(3), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 77.06(3), Fla. Stat. As stated by the Third District in Dixie National Bank v. . . .
. . . . § 77.06. . . . Section 77.06(3) provides that the garnishee shall not be held liable to the defendant or “to any other . . .
. . . General argues, however, that amendments made to section 77.01 and section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . decision in Mims, however, the Florida legislature amended the Florida garnishment statute, section 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06(a) (last line to subsection (a) was added by the amendments). . . .
. . . . & Publ’g Corp., 679 So.2d 795, 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), approved, 698 So.2d 254 (Fla.1997); § 77.06( . . .
. . . See §§ 77.01, 77.06, Fla. . . .
. . . Plaintiff Robert Hilson would have received $132.83 under the repayment option and $77.06 if he elected . . .
. . . Appellees contend that Farm Credit violated the requirements of section 77.06, Florida Statutes, by failing . . .
. . . The district court found that section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1995), only allowed Bell-South to satisfy . . . was clear that Security Bank’s liability in default could not exceed the amount prescribed in section 77.06 . . . Section 77.06, Florida Statutes (1995), specifies the effect of a writ of garnishment. . . . Security Bank, 679 So.2d at 804 (Jorgenson, J., dissenting); accord § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . .” § 77.06(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). As stated in United Presidential Life Ins. v. . . . and any other persons having or appearing to have an ownership interest in the involved property. § 77.06 . . . disagree with the court's assertion that this provision is in any way inconsistent with subsection 77.06 . . . Subsection 77.06(1) makes the garnishee liable to the plaintiff for the assets of the garnishment defendant . . . . § 77.06(1) Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . The statute states: 77.06 Writ; effect.— (1) Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all . . . Subsection 77.06(1), quoted in part II. . . . Subsection 77.06(1) by its terms applies to all writs of garnishment. . . . Subsection 77.081(2), relied on by BellSouth, must be read in pari materia with subsection 77.06(1). . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1) (1989). . . . Specifically, the court held: First of all, the effect of service according to Fla.Stat. § 77.06(2) is . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1) (1989). . . . Specifically, the court held: First of all, the effect of service according to Fla.Stat. § 77.06(2) is . . .
. . . Pursuant to sections 77.055 and 77.06, Florida Statutes (1989), the advertising agency served a copy . . . personal property of defendant in his possession or control at the time of the service of the writ....” § 77.06 . . .
. . . The garnishment statute, section 77.06, Florida Statutes, provides that a garnishee is liable to the . . .
. . . Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes, provides: Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all . . . Under the clear terms of § 77.06(1), National Health Laboratories, Inc., remains liable to plaintiff . . .
. . . . § 77.06 (1981). . . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) Service of the writ . . . Fla.Stat. § 77.06(1) (1981) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: Section 77.06. . . .
. . . We hold that under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the garnishee bank is liable to the garnishor . . . It therefore follows that under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the garnishee is liable to . . . Under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), this sum represents the full extent of the garnishee . . . Section 77.06(2), Florida Statutes (1983), specifically so provides: "(2) [The garnishee] shall report . . . Section 77.06(3), Florida Statutes (1983), specifically so provides: "(3) In any case where a garnishee . . .
. . . Section 77.06 provides that service of the writ of garnishment on the garnishee shall make the garnishee . . .
. . . motions to dissolve solely upon plaintiff’s failure to comply with the notice provisions of Section 77.06 . . . Section 77.06(2) Florida Statutes carves an exception to this general rule by requiring notice of the . . . Taken against this statutory framework, the notice provision of Section 77.06(2) Florida Statutes is . . . Therefore, a plaintiffs failure to serve Section 77.06(2) notice on the defendant cannot form the basis . . . the entry of a final judgment in garnishment until such time as the plaintiff complies with Section 77.06 . . .
. . . Section 77.06, Florida Statutes (1979), limits the liability of a garnishee to those “debts due by him . . .
. . . Florida Statutes, § 77.06; In re Demountable House Corp., 58 F.Supp. 955 (S.D.Fla.1945). . . .
. . . warrant on the Dubins and their response — the applicable period under the garnishment statute, section 77.06 . . .
. . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: Section 77.06. . . . . § 77.06(1) Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . NORTON, BANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE § 77.06, at 6-11 (1982). . . .
. . . . § 77.06 at Part 77 — Page 6 (1981). . . .
. . . The provision, codified as Section 77.06(2), Florida Statutes (1979), requires a garnishee bank to report . . . We do not read Section 77.06(2) as imposing liability upon a garnishee bank for whatever sum is reflected . . . More importantly, Section 77.06(2) makes absolutely no reference to liability. . . . Section 77.06(1) governs the liability of garnishees. . . .
. . . . & Prac. 77.06, at pp. 6-7 (1982). . . .
. . . The only notice requirement is set forth in § 77.06(2), which provides that where the garnishee is a . . . service of the writ on the garnishee; the 20 day time period could end before any notice is given under § 77.06 . . . scheme of Chapter 77 there is no provision for service of the writ upon the judgment debtor; even § 77.06 . . . circumstance: when a “bank or other financial institution authorized to accept deposits” is the garnishee. § 77.06 . . . Since the debtor in this case received notice under the provisions of § 77.06(2) we do not need to resolve . . .
. . . . & Pract,, Part 77.06. . . .
. . . Spanos Enterprises, Inc., 332 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); §§ 77.06(3), 77.061, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . . §§ 77.031, 77.04, 77.06, 77.07, Fla.Stat. (1975). . § 85.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1977): BY SALE WITHOUT . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1) (West Supp.1977); 3 Florida Jurisprudence § 112, at 277-78 (1955). . . .
. . . order dissolving a writ of garnishment entered prior to judgment pursuant to Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06 . . .
. . . of recent judicial treatment of similar prejudgment procedures, we hold that Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06 . . . Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06, and 77.07, Florida Statutes (1975), insofar as they pertain to prejudgment . . . The writ shall state the amount named in plaintiffs motion. 77.06 Writ; effect — (1)Service of the writ . . . District Court of Appeal who, in turn, transferred it here: Are the provisions of §§ 77.031, 77.04 and 77.06 . . .
. . . The Florida statutory prejudgment provisions, §§ 77.031, 77.04, and 77.06 et seq., Fla. . . . General Finance Corp., Sup.Ct.Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 6 (15 U.S.C. § 1673 preempts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06 . . .
. . . . § 77.06 provides that service of the writ of garnishment upon the garnishee “shall make garnishee liable . . .
. . . alleged fear of liability for improperly garnisheeing the wrong accounts since Florida Statutes, § 77.06 . . .
. . . . § 77.06(1), F.S.A., reads: “Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all debts due by him . . . It is clear that Florida garnishment statutory provisions §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A., do not contain . . . Specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1673, pre-empts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A. . . . conclusion, we hold that 15 U.S.C. § 1673, is a substantive provision and preempts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06 . . .
. . . . § 77.06(2), F.S.A. See also Fla.Stat. § 673.3-409, F.S.A. Cf. Poland v. . . .
. . . Appellants refer to §§ 77.04 and 77.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. requiring the garnishee to respond by answer . . .
. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.06, 77.18, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . By the terms of our statute, § 77.06, Fla.Stat.1957, F.S.A., the garnishee is answerable “for all indebtedness . . .