The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Moreover, section 56.30 allows for the examination of the judgment debtor to occur before a third party . . . See § 56.30, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . . § 34:11-56.30. . . .
. . . order granting partial summary judgment"); Mot. 8 (purportedly citing 11 Moore's Federal Practice § 56.30 . . . and which, if it did, would fall within the summary judgment volume (11) regarding Rule 56 (hence § 56.30 . . .
. . . . §§ 34:11-56.25; 34:11-56.26(9); 34:11-56.28; 34:11-56.30. . . .
. . . . §§ 34:11-56.30 to -56.31. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed. 1998); see, e.g., Weiner v. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed. 1998)) (internal quotations omitted). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed. 1998)); see Yeary v. Goodwill Indus. . . .
. . . As the factual basis for the plea, the government explained that 56.30 grams of cocaine base were seized . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed. 1998); see, e.g., Faibisch v. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998); see, e.g., Weiner v. . . .
. . . differently insofar as it concerns the applicability of the evidence. 11 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.30 . . .
. . . Moore Et Al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998)). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.30[4] at p. 56-230 (3d ed.2006) (“[c]ourts have concluded that a . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1997). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[8][e] (3d ed.2004). . . .
. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[3][b]; see also id. § 56.30[3][d]. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.30[4] (3d ed.1997). . . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 3D § 56.30[7][c], at 56-236 (2003). . . .
. . . consider only the allegations contained on the face of the complaint....” 11 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 56.30 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998). . . .
. . . 177 F.3d 507, 514 (6th Cir.1999) (quoting 11 James William Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30 . . .
. . . Moore Et Al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998). . . .
. . . . § 56.30[4] (3rd ed 2000); Bordeaux v. Lynch, 958 F.Supp. 77, 82 (N.D.N.Y.1997). . . .
. . . . of Virginia, 177 F.3d 507 (6th Cir.1999) (quoting James Moore, et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 56.30 . . .
. . . . of Virginia, 177 F.3d 507 (6th Cir.1999), quoting James Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30 . . .
. . . . of Virginia, 177 F.3d 507 (6th Cir.1999), quoting James Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30 . . .
. . . Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. at 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505; 11 Moore’s Federal Practice, §§ 56.13[3] and 56.30[7] . . .
. . . MOORE ET AL., MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998); see also Greenberg, 177 F.3d at 514 ( . . .
. . . MooRe et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1998). . . .
. . . Moóre et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30[4] (3d ed.1997). . . .
. . . Defendant should have moved for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), 11 Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.30 . . .
. . . that 194,438 of the 345,307 Hispanic residents in the City of Chicago were United States citizens, or 56.30% . . .
. . . 72.15 65.91 -18.86 55.71 57.07 55.92 51.91 -08.84 54.73 52.18 49.92 47.30 +00.75 60.04 55.25 60.55 56.30 . . .
. . . Michele Nethercott 52.50 hours Rhonda Lipkin 72.00 hours Bernadette Moffat 40.40 hours Kelly McGrath 56.30 . . . 7,312.00 Nethercott 52.50 $40 2,100.00 Lipkin 72.00 $40 2,880.00 Moffet 40.40 $40 1,616.00 McGrath 56.30 . . .
. . . Michele Nethercott 52.50 hours Rhonda Lipkin 72.00 hours Bernadette Moffat 40.40 hours Kelly McGrath 56.30 . . . hours @$40 per hour— 2,880.00 Bernadette Moffet 40.40 hours @ $40 per hour— 1,616.00 Kelly McGrath 56.30 . . .
. . . The district court eliminated 46 of the 56.30 hours for Kramer and all 11 of the hours for Needle for . . .
. . . Cargo - 4,834 EXHIBIT C Shipment - Quantity -Rate per L/T 3/31/73 9,324 L/T $54.04 5/29/73 8,552.9 L/T 56.30 . . . Additional Allocation Total Rate Amount 3/31/73 3,500 L/T 3,500 $54.04 $189,140 5/29/73 3,500 L/T 3,500 56.30 . . .
. . . In 1973, 56.30% of the blacks worked in the five “undesirable” clusters, while only 32.93% of the whites . . .
. . . (e) $56.30 lost pay from the work program. . . .
. . . 36.30 “Gracias” Mexico pack; Jumbo crates: 36 50. 30 tO O 45 40. 30 to O “Pearl”; Batley crates: 27 56.30 . . .
. . . Los Angeles Municipal Code § 56.30. . See Marshall v. Sawyer, 301 F.2d 639, 646 (9th Cir. 1962). . . . .
. . . the Debenture Holders’ Committee, for a balance of $15,535.34 on a bill for services, together with $56.30 . . .