Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 39.621 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 39.621 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 39.621

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 39
PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 39.621
39.621 Permanency determination by the court.
(1) Time is of the essence for permanency of children in the dependency system. A permanency hearing must be held no later than 12 months after the date the child was removed from the home or within 30 days after a court determines that reasonable efforts to return a child to either parent are not required, whichever occurs first. The purpose of the permanency hearing is to determine when the child will achieve the permanency goal or whether modifying the current goal is in the best interest of the child. A permanency hearing must be held at least every 12 months for any child who continues to be supervised by the department or awaits adoption.
(2) The permanency goal of maintaining and strengthening the placement with a parent may be used in all of the following circumstances:
(a) If a child has not been removed from a parent, even if adjudication of dependency is withheld, the court may leave the child in the current placement with maintaining and strengthening the placement as a permanency option.
(b) If a child has been removed from a parent and is placed with the parent from whom the child was not removed, the court may leave the child in the placement with the parent from whom the child was not removed with maintaining and strengthening the placement as a permanency option.
(c) If a child has been removed from a parent and is subsequently reunified with that parent, the court may leave the child with that parent with maintaining and strengthening the placement as a permanency option.
(3) The permanency goals available under this chapter, listed in order of preference, are:
(a) Reunification;
(b) Adoption, if a petition for termination of parental rights has been or will be filed;
(c) Permanent guardianship of a dependent child under s. 39.6221;
(d) Permanent placement with a fit and willing relative under s. 39.6231; or
(e) Placement in another planned permanent living arrangement under s. 39.6241.
(4)(a) At least 3 business days before the permanency hearing, the department shall file its judicial review social services report with the court and serve copies of the report on all parties. The report must include a recommended permanency goal for the child, suggest changes to the case plan, if needed, and describe why the recommended goal is in the best interest of the child.
(b) Before the permanency hearing, the department shall advise the child and the individuals with whom the child will be placed about the availability of more permanent and legally secure placements and what type of financial assistance is associated with each placement.
(5) At the permanency hearing, the court shall determine:
(a) Whether the current permanency goal for the child is appropriate or should be changed;
(b) When the child will achieve one of the permanency goals;
(c) Whether the department has made reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan currently in effect; and
(d) Whether the frequency, duration, manner, and level of engagement of the parent or legal guardian’s visitation with the child meets the case plan requirements.
(6) The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in determining the permanency goal for the child. The court must also consider:
(a) The reasonable preference of the child if the court has found the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference; and
(b) Any recommendation of the guardian ad litem.
(7) If a child will not be reunited with a parent, adoption, under chapter 63, is the primary permanency option. If the child is placed with a relative or with a relative of the child’s half brother or half sister as a permanency option, the court may recognize the permanency of this placement without requiring the relative to adopt the child. If the court approves a permanency goal of permanent guardianship of a dependent child, placement with a fit and willing relative, or another planned permanent living arrangement, the court shall make findings as to why this permanent placement is established without adoption of the child to follow. If the court approves a permanency goal of another planned permanent living arrangement, the court shall document the compelling reasons for choosing this goal.
(8) The findings of the court regarding reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan must be explicitly documented, made on a case-by-case basis, and stated in the court order.
(9) The case plan must list the tasks necessary to finalize the permanency placement and shall be updated at the permanency hearing if necessary. If a concurrent case plan is in place, the court may choose between the permanency goal options presented and shall approve the goal that is in the child’s best interest.
(10) The permanency placement is intended to continue until the child reaches the age of majority and may not be disturbed absent a finding by the court that the circumstances of the permanency placement are no longer in the best interest of the child.
(a) If, after a child is residing in the permanent placement approved at the permanency hearing, a parent who has not had his or her parental rights terminated makes a motion for reunification or increased contact with the child, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the dependency case should be reopened and whether there should be a modification of the order.
(b) At the hearing, the parent must demonstrate that the safety, well-being, and physical, mental, and emotional health of the child is not endangered by the modification.
(c) The court shall base its decision concerning any motion by a parent for reunification or increased contact with a child on the effect of the decision on the safety, well-being, and physical and emotional health of the child. Factors that must be considered and addressed in the findings of fact of the order on the motion must include:
1. The compliance or noncompliance of the parent with the case plan;
2. The circumstances which caused the child’s dependency and whether those circumstances have been resolved;
3. The stability and longevity of the child’s placement;
4. The preferences of the child, if the child is of sufficient age and understanding to express a preference;
5. The recommendation of the current custodian; and
6. The recommendation of the guardian ad litem, if one has been appointed.
(11) Placement of a child in a permanent guardianship, with a fit and willing relative, or in another planned permanent living arrangement does not terminate the parent-child relationship, including, but not limited to:
(a) The right of the child to inherit from his or her parents;
(b) The parents’ right to consent to the child’s adoption; or
(c) The parents’ responsibility to provide financial, medical, and other support for the child as ordered by the court.
History.s. 28, ch. 2000-139; s. 19, ch. 2006-86; s. 12, ch. 2012-178; s. 18, ch. 2017-151; s. 8, ch. 2018-103; s. 10, ch. 2019-128.

F.S. 39.621 on Google Scholar

F.S. 39.621 on Casetext

Amendments to 39.621


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 39.621
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 39.621.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

L. S. L. S. M. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 274 So. 3d 556 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See §§ 39.522(3), 39.621(11), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; K.C. v. . . .

N. A. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES Ad, 267 So. 3d 430 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . B.D. , 102 So.3d 707, 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (statutory interpretation of section 39.621 is reviewed . . . Section 39.621(2), Florida Statutes (2018), authorizes a "maintain and strengthen" case plan in only . . . the child with that parent with maintaining and strengthening the placement as a permanency option. § 39.621 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE FAST- TRACK REPORT., 249 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2018)

. . . (adding paragraph (d) to § 39.621(5), Fla. Stat. (2017) ). . . . (amending §§ 39.6013, 39.621(5), 39.6221(1), 39.701(2)(d), Fla. . . .

IN INTEREST OF T. C. J. A. I. E. A. R. v. Ad, 239 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . with the Department's case plan at least seventy-two hours before the hearing on court's approval); § 39.621 . . .

A. S. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 232 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . permanent guardianship was reopened without notice, and cites to the provisions of Florida Statute section 39.621 . . . However, section 39.621(10) and B.D. are intended to prescribe the procedure that the trial court must . . . Section 39.621(10) reads as follows: The permanency placement is intended to continue until the child . . .

IN INTEREST OF I. N. a E. N. v. Ad K. O., 224 So. 3d 900 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 39.621(10). . . . requirements of the law because, while -its written order addresses the best interest factors of section 39.621 . . . applicable statutory provisions, and because its findings under the best interest factors of section 39.621 . . . , the best interest factors have been renumbered from subsection (10) to subsection (11) of section 39.621 . . .

S. C. P. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 220 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 39.621, Fla. Stat. (2016); R.N. v. . . .

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM O B O A. E. L. E. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, B. B. J. E., 207 So.3d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . prioritized tenuous parental contact over the children’s right to permanency, in direct conflict with section 39.621 . . .

S. M. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 202 So. 3d 769 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Section 39.621, Florida Statutes (2016), specifies that permanent guardianship shall be considered only . . . section 39.501), the case plan (section 39.6011), and finally the permanency determination (section 39.621 . . . clearly stated its preference of permanency options for children in the dependency -system in section 39.621 . . . . 39.6231; or (e) Placement in another planned permanent living arrangement under s. 39.6241 Id. §§ 39.621 . . . clear in the Legislature’s statutory requirement that “[t]ime is of the essence” in dependency cases. § 39.621 . . .

M. M. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 189 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2016)

. . . (citing §§ 39.521, 39.621, Fla. Stat. (2014);. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.345; F.E., 1 So.3d 305). . . . post-dependency orders as non-final because of the possibility of future modification is compatible with section 39.621 . . . Specifically, section 39.621(9) provides that the court shall hold' a hearing to determine whether modification . . . have not been terminated submits a motion for reunification or increased contact with the child. § 39.621 . . .

R. J. a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 187 So. 3d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . is living in licensed care on his or her 18th birthday and who has not achieved permanency under s. 39.621 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad v. J. S. S. I., 183 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . DCA 2009) (reversing and remanding for trial court to consider and address all six factors of section 39.621 . . .

STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, v. A. A. A. S. A., 171 So. 3d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 39.621(2)(a)-(e) lists permanency options for dependent children in order of legislative preference . . . Section 39.621(1) also notes that “[t]ime is of the essence for permanency of children in the dependency . . . prioritized tenuous parental contact over the children’s right to permanency, in direct conflict with section 39.621 . . .

J. B. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 170 So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2015)

. . . review hearing); 39.506 (arraignment); 39.507 (dependency adjudicatory hearing); 39.521 (disposition); 39.621 . . .

M. M. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 170 So. 3d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 39.621(9) of the Florida Statutes affords the father the unqualified ability to return to the . . . Id.; see also § 39.621, Fla. . . . Because an order terminating supervision does not necessarily end a dependency proceeding, see §§ 39.521, 39.621 . . .

A. A. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 147 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Once a permanency order is in place, section 39.621(9), Florida Statutes (2014), places the burden on . . . trial court’s order denying modification fails to contain the findings of fact required by section 39.621 . . . hearing and to make written factual findings addressing the requisite factors enumerated in section 39.621 . . . See § 39.621(10)(a). . . . See § 39.621(10)(b), (c), (d) and (e). The trial court’s order fails to address these factors. . . . .

A. H. K. H. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 144 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Id.) see also § 39.621(9)-(10), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

In J. B. J. B. J. B. v. Ad, 130 So. 3d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . hearing this court reversed another judge in the Sixth Circuit when the Department did not obey section 39.621 . . . Section 39.621(3)(a) states: At least 3 business days before the permanency hearing, the department shall . . .

T. N. L. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 132 So. 3d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . section 39.522(2), however, the trial court must also make additional findings required under section 39.621 . . . Section 39.621(10) provides the following: The court shall base its decision concerning any motion by . . . recommendation of the current custodian; and (f) The recommendation of the guardian ad litem .... § 39.621 . . . 2011) (holding that trial court “incorrectly applied the ‘best interest’ factors set forth in section 39.621 . . . to why reunification would not be in the best interests of [the] child,” as required under section 39.621 . . .

A. M. J. S. N. M. v. DEPARTMENT CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 118 So. 3d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . .” § 39.621(9), Fla. Stat. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. W. H. C. H., 109 So. 3d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . also required to make written factual findings as to the six statutory factors contained in section 39.621 . . .

B. R. N. R. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, L. P. N. R. a, 106 So. 3d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 39.621(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), requires the Department to file and serve, at least three . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. In B. D., 102 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . To support its request for a full evidentiary hearing, the Department cited section 39.621(9), Florida . . . The motion for clarification also cited section 39.621(10), which states: The court shall base its decision . . . (enacting section 39.621(9) and (10)). The trial court did not comply with the law. . . . “Time is of the essence for permanency of children in the dependency system.” § 39.621(1), Fla. . . .

T. L. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 98 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The court went through the other factors in section 39.621(10), Florida Statutes (2011), which it is . . .

A. H. A. H. A. H. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 85 So. 3d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 39.621(1), Fla. Stat. (2009).) . . .

In K. M. a P. P. v., 86 So. 3d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 39.621(3)(a) states: At least 3 business days before the permanency hearing, the department shall . . .

S. V. R. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 77 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . and apparently inconsistent statutory provisions relating to reunification, sections 39.522(2) and 39.621 . . . custody to KB.’s father instead incorrectly applied the “best interest” factors set forth in section 39.621 . . . should be based on the “best interest of the child” standard and the six factors enumerated in section 39.621 . . . Nor do we question the general magistrate’s assessment of the “best interest” factors in section 39.621 . . . Section 39.621 is captioned "Permanency determination by the court.” . . .

In G. M. a C. M. v., 73 So. 3d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 39.621(10), Florida Statutes (2010), provides: The court shall base its decision concerning any . . . It included neither the mandatory factors in section 39.621(10) nor the requisite finding under section . . . The order does not include findings on three of the five factors required under section 39.621(10). . . . would endanger the child and must consider and address all applicable factors enumerated in section 39.621 . . .

D. T. N. N. a v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 54 So. 3d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . the case must be remanded, because the trial court failed to make the required findings under section 39.621 . . .

A. L. S. L. J. L. M. L. E. L. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 53 So. 3d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 39.621, Florida Statutes, requires that permanency hearings be held at specified times. . . . See § 39.621(2)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . mother, however, observes that “maintain and strengthen” is not a permanency goal recognized in section 39.621 . . . While DCF may be correct that under section 39.621 multiple permanency goals may be pursued, such goals . . . DCF understandably emphasizes the directive in section 39.621(1) that “time is of the essence for permanency . . .

M. I. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 45 So. 3d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Additionally, section 39.621, Florida Statutes (2009) addresses the amendment of case plan goals at the . . . hearing is to determine ... whether modifying the current goal is in the best interest of the child.” § 39.621 . . . The plain language of sections 39.6013 and 39.621 makes clear that a trial court may change the case . . . best interest of the child is the primary consideration in determining the permanency goal, as section 39.621 . . .

C. T. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 22 So. 3d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . say that “there are no less restrictive means legally available to establish permanency under section 39.621 . . .

L. M. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 20 So. 3d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . protective supervision neglects to address the six parental reunification factors set forth in section 39.621 . . . Additionally, section 39.621(10), Florida Statutes (2009), mandates that six factors “be considered and . . . reverse and remand for the trial court to consider and address all six factors contained in section 39.621 . . .

S. P. D. P. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 17 So. 3d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . S.P.’s strongest argument concerns the adequacy of the findings of fact in the order: Section 39.621( . . .

C. S. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 12 So. 3d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . discretion to deny reunification, we will reverse the order and remand for compliance with section 39.621 . . . in the best interest of the child, instead of documenting detailed factual findings as required by § 39.621 . . .

T. R. J. T. J. T. R. F. P. T. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN FAMILIES,, 13 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . 9.315(b), and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with sections 39.522 and 39.621 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. In C. W., 14 So. 3d 1041 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Reviewing the options available in section 39.621(2), the court determined that the goal of the case . . .

In T. F. a T. F. v., 8 So. 3d 474 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 39.621(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), allows adoption as a permanency goal option only “if a . . .

F. E. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ad, 1 So. 3d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . retains the unqualified ability to seek a modification or elimination of any restrictions under section 39.621 . . . Section 39.621(9) provides: The permanency placement is intended to continue until the child reaches . . .

L. J. S. J. S. A. S. W. S. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 995 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 39.621(10), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for the trial court to make detailed factual findings pursuant to section 39.621 . . .

M. M. L. H. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 987 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 39.621(6), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

G. V. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 985 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Further, section 39.621(10), Florida Statutes, directs the trial court to consider the following six . . . current custodian; and (f) The recommendation of the guardian ad litem, if one has been appointed. § 39.621 . . .

In B. C. D. H. M. H. G. J. G. J. G. J. M. H. v., 18 So. 3d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 39.621, Fla. Stat. (2007) (“Time is of the essence for children in the dependency system.”). . . .

E. I. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 979 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . motion for clarification, the Department asks this court to clarify its opinion by substituting section 39.621 . . . the section of the opinion referencing section 39.522(2), Florida Statutes, and substitute section 39.621 . . . of the case as the six factors to be considered by the court as per our opinion are found in section 39.621 . . .

C. D. B. G. C. D. A. D. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 974 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 39.621(10), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . concerning reunification solely on issues existing at the time the dependency case was initiated, section 39.621 . . . In this case, the trial court failed to follow the mandatory language of section 39.621(10). . . . See § 39.621(4)(a). . . .

In J. D. a G. P. v., 972 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 39.621(9), Fla. . . .

A. W. In B. W. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 969 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See §§ 39.001(1)(h), 39.013(5), 39.402(14)(e) & 39.621(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

J. M. L. T. D. T. K. T. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 969 So. 2d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 39.621(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2007). See In re K.M., 946 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). . . . Newly enacted section 39.621(9) provides that a permanent placement is not to be modified unless the . . . well-being, and physical, mental and emotional health of the child is not endangered by the modification. § 39.621 . . .

G. S. B. S. I. S. C. S. v. T. B. E. B., 969 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 39.621(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

L. R. v. J. F., 960 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . In 2006, the legislature added section 39.621(9). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, v. In J. F., 959 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . the permanent placement is established without adoption of the child to follow pursuant to section 39.621 . . .

D. R. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 963 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . child and instead permanently placing J.B. with his long-time foster caregivers pursuant to sections 39.621 . . . Fla. 1st DCA 2006), and substantial, competent evidence as to the best interests of the child, see §§ 39.621 . . .

B. L. M. L. L. L. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 950 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . from an order permanently committing L.L. to the long-term custody of a relative pursuant to sections 39.621 . . .

C. M. A. A. A v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 953 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . (adding language in §§ 39.01(51) & 39.621(2), Fla. . . . See §§ 39.01(51) & 39.621(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

In J. T. a v. R. T. Ad A. M. v. R. T. Ad R. T. v. Ad A. M. v. A. M. R. T. Ad R. T. v. A. M. Ad, 947 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 39.621(6) (emphasis added). . . .

In K. M. a T. W. v. Ad T. M., 946 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 39.621(1). . . . . § 39.621(2). . . . . § 39.621(3). . . . that the circumstances of the permanent placement are no longer in the best interests of the child. § 39.621 . . .

B. B. J. M. a v. P. J. M. K. M., 933 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 39.621(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

L. F. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES J. F., 837 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 39.621 provides: (1) When the court has determined that reunification with either parent is not . . .

B. D. E. F. E. a v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES T. M., 829 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 39.621(l)(b)2., Fla. . . .