CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2355290
...roper only in Alachua County, so that UF's venue motion should have been granted. In reaching this conclusion, we recognize that Woodfin involved a statute that also employed the mandatory language of "shall." However, that statute, Florida Statutes section 24.110, did not involve two sentences providing home venue privileges yet differentiating between them as in the present case....
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 33 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1812, 2012 WL 2308158, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12490
...In other words, we look for substantial evidence
supporting the agency’s final decision. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(E). However, in
2007, the Secretary of Labor revised the ARB’s standard of review of an ALJ’s
factual findings in an ERA case from de novo review to substantial evidence
review. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b)....
...evidence, we must review the ALJ’s RDO to see if it, rather than the ARB’s FDO,
was in fact based on substantial evidence.
Pursuant to the Secretary of Labor’s regulation, the ARB should have
reviewed the ALJ’s factual findings for substantial evidence. 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
...egle’s employment. The
question for the ARB, however, was not whether the ARB could support
alternative factual findings with substantial evidence, but whether the ALJ could
support its original findings with substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b);
see also Adefemi v....
...issue [was] legal, not factual.” Calle v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,
504 F.3d 1324, 1330 (11th
Cir. 2007). The unresolved issues in the instant case are based on factual findings
and will require the ARB to consider whether the ALJ’s RDO was based upon
substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 587687
...driver. We review the trial court's denial of a motion for change of venue using the abuse of discretion standard. Rivera v. State,
859 So.2d 495, 511 (Fla.2003); Safety Nat. Cas. Corp. v. Florida Mun. Ins. Trust,
818 So.2d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Section
24.110, Florida Statutes, states that "venue for all civil or administrative actions against the department shall be in Leon County." The Department argues that the so-called "home venue" provision is clear and unambiguous, and should be given its plain and obvious meaning unless doing so would create an absurd result....
...er circumstances presented and the interests of the other parties. Id. at 394 (emphasis added). We conclude that the Grice considerations of "justice, fairness, and convenience" apply to the facts of this case and that this exception should apply to section 24.110....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 110, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2115, 2016 WL 463455
...ALJ’s findings and conclusions in an FWPCA claim. “[I]n 2007, the Secretary of
Labor revised the [Board’s] standard of review of an ALJ’s factual findings . . .
from de novo review to substantial evidence review.” Stone & Webster,
684 F.3d
at 1132; see also 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b) (“The [Board] will review the factual
findings of the ALJ under the substantial evidence standard.”)....
...ts to
supervisors and coworkers, even if those complaints ultimately lack merit. Stone
& Webster Eng’g Corp. v. Herman (“Stone & Webster I”),
115 F.3d 1568, 1575
(11th Cir. 1997), superseded in part by regulation on other grounds, 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b); Bechtel Constr....
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...All matters arising out of or proceeding under the following provisions of Florida Statutes (1993) will be assigned to the Administrative Division: (a) Chapter 120 (the Florida Administrative Procedure Act) (b) Chapter 440 (the Florida Workers' Compensation Act) (c) Section
24.110 (All civil or administrative actions against the Lottery Department) (d) Section 39.074 (Decisions of Governor and Cabinet regarding siting of juvenile facilities) (e) Section
72.011 (Actions by taxpayers, resident and non-resident, ch...
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
...In other words, we look for substantial evidence
supporting the agency’s final decision. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(E). However, in
2007, the Secretary of Labor revised the ARB’s standard of review of an ALJ’s
factual findings in an ERA case from de novo review to substantial evidence
review. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b)....
...evidence, we must review the ALJ’s RDO to see if it, rather than the ARB’s FDO,
was in fact based on substantial evidence.
Pursuant to the Secretary of Labor’s regulation, the ARB should have
reviewed the ALJ’s factual findings for substantial evidence. 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
...egle’s employment. The
question for the ARB, however, was not whether the ARB could support
alternative factual findings with substantial evidence, but whether the ALJ could
support its original findings with substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b);
see also Adefemi v....
...issue [was] legal, not factual.” Calle v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,
504 F.3d 1324, 1330 (11th
Cir. 2007). The unresolved issues in the instant case are based on factual findings
and will require the ARB to consider whether the ALJ’s RDO was based upon
substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
...In other words, we look for substantial evidence
supporting the agency’s final decision. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(E). However, in
2007, the Secretary of Labor revised the ARB’s standard of review of an ALJ’s
factual findings in an ERA case from de novo review to substantial evidence
review. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b)....
...evidence, we must review the ALJ’s RDO to see if it, rather than the ARB’s FDO,
was in fact based on substantial evidence.
Pursuant to the Secretary of Labor’s regulation, the ARB should have
reviewed the ALJ’s factual findings for substantial evidence. 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
...egle’s employment. The
question for the ARB, however, was not whether the ARB could support
alternative factual findings with substantial evidence, but whether the ALJ could
support its original findings with substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b);
see also Adefemi v....
...issue [was] legal, not factual.” Calle v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,
504 F.3d 1324, 1330 (11th
Cir. 2007). The unresolved issues in the instant case are based on factual findings
and will require the ARB to consider whether the ALJ’s RDO was based upon
substantial evidence. See 29 C.F.R. §
24.110(b)....
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13643
“shall.” However, that statute, Florida Statutes section
24.110, did not involve two sentences providing home