Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 16.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 16.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 16.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 16.01
16.01 Residence, office, and duties of Attorney General.The Attorney General:
(1) Shall reside at the seat of government and shall keep his or her office in the capitol.
(2) Shall perform the duties prescribed by the Constitution of this state and also perform such other duties appropriate to his or her office as may from time to time be required of the Attorney General by law or by resolution of the Legislature.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall, on the written requisition of the Governor, a member of the Cabinet, the head of a department in the executive branch of state government, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, or the Minority Leader of the Senate, and may, upon the written requisition of a member of the Legislature, other state officer, or officer of a county, municipality, other unit of local government, or political subdivision, give an official opinion and legal advice in writing on any question of law relating to the official duties of the requesting officer.
(4) Shall appear in and attend to, in behalf of the state, all suits or prosecutions, civil or criminal or in equity, in which the state may be a party, or in anywise interested, in the Supreme Court and district courts of appeal of this state.
(5) Shall appear in and attend to such suits or prosecutions in any other of the courts of this state or in any courts of any other state or of the United States. This subsection is not intended to authorize the joinder of the Attorney General as a party in such suits or prosecutions.
(6) Shall act as co-counsel of record in capital collateral proceedings.
(7) Shall have and perform all powers and duties incident or usual to such office.
(8) Shall make and keep in his or her office a record of all his or her official acts and proceedings, containing copies of all official opinions, reports, and correspondence, and also keep and preserve in the office all official letters and communications to him or her and cause a registry and index thereof to be made and kept, all of which official papers and records shall be subject to the inspection of the Governor of the state and to the disposition of the Legislature by act or resolution thereof.
(9) May periodically publish a report of his or her official opinions and may prepare and publish an index or consolidated index or indexes of opinions.
History.s. 2, ch. 2, 1845; ch. 1845, 1871; RS 85; GS 87; RGS 101; CGL 125; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 7, ch. 59-1; s. 1, ch. 78-399; s. 1, ch. 79-159; s. 7, ch. 81-259; s. 1, ch. 85-123; s. 45, ch. 95-147; s. 10, ch. 97-313; s. 6, ch. 2001-266.

F.S. 16.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

POSTAL POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 368 F. Supp. 3d 1136 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . (CBA § 16.01.) . . . (CBA § 16.01.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN,, 334 F. Supp. 3d 860 (W.D. Ky. 2018)

. . . Cir. 2015) ("The jury instructions accorded with this circuit's Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions §§ 16.01 . . .

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY, v. SCHOLASTIC, INC., 321 F. Supp. 3d 830 (M.D. Tenn. 2018)

. . . No. 9); L.Civ.R. 16.01. A motion to disqualify is a non-dispositive motion. . . .

LEEBER REALTY LLC v. TRUSTCO BANK,, 316 F. Supp. 3d 594 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . § 16.01.) . . . Here, § 16.01 of the Lease states that if the Premises are "rendered wholly untenantable," the "Landlord . . . (Lease § 16.01.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. HILLIE,, 289 F. Supp. 3d 188 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions § 16.01 (including the Dost factors in the definition . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GUY,, 708 F. App'x 249 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . After the government proposed that the district court use Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction § 16.01 . . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 16.01, Sexual Exploitation of Children: Using a Minor to Engage . . . See Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instr. § 16.01. . . .

GRETNA RACING, LLC, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 178 So. 3d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .2d 10, 13 (Fla. 1986) (noting that although the attorney general has the ability pursuant to section 16.01 . . .

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC. v. MAKARIOS- OREGON, LLC, LLC,, 210 F. Supp. 3d 1259 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . It contains two parts, Section 16.01 and Section 16.02. . . . In Section 16.01, the Richmond Lease provides in relevant part: The Tenant shall, upon the expiration . . .

DRAPER LLC LLC v. HEALEY,, 827 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016)

. . . Id. 16.01. . . .

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC. v. MAKARIOS- OREGON, LLC, LLC,, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . In § 16.01, the lease states: The Tenant shall, upon the expiration or termination of this lease for . . . complying with current seismic codes, whether the judgment in the FED proceeding bars Makarios’s § 16.01 . . . The Court held that the § 16.01 obligations are distinct from the § 7.01 obligations and therefore are . . . Renewal of Ross’s lease in 2006 indicates nothing about the landlord’s intent to enforce § 16.01 ,,on . . . For these reasons, Makarios and its predecessors have not waived the requirement under § 16.01 of the . . .

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC. v. MAKARIOS- OREGON, LLC, LLC,, 180 F. Supp. 3d 745 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . In § 16.01, that lease stated: The Tenant shall, upon the expiration or termination of this lease for . . . Similarly, § 16.01 of the 1966 Richmond Lease requires Ross to surrender the building “in good order, . . . covenant to make repairs—whereas Makarios brings its breach of contract claims in this case under § 16.01 . . . Makarios argues that (1) Ross has not shown that its duties under § 7.01 and § 16.01 are identical; ( . . . 2) issue preclusion should not apply because Ross has not shown that the § 16.01 surrender duties were . . .

BARATI, v. STATE, 198 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 16.01(4) & (5), Fla. Stat. . . .

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC. LLC, LD Co., 816 F.3d 721 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 16.01 (2015) (“The exclusive rights are disjunctive: one may infringe by . . .

UNITED STATES v. BECKMAN, Jr., 624 F. App'x 909 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . The jury instructions accorded with this circuit’s Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions §§ 16.01, 16.09 . . . Beckman objected to Jury Instruction No. 4, Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions §§ 16.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SOMERVILLE,, 618 F. App'x 69 (3d Cir. 2015)

. . . Jury Instructions § 16.01 (2008) (supp.2014) (including the name of the drug as part of the jury instructions . . .

In SKYPORT GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. v., 528 B.R. 297 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . by the method prescribed by its internal laws for service of documents in domestic actions; (3) Rule 16.01 . . .

DRAPER, LLC, LLC, v. T. HEALEY,, 98 F. Supp. 3d 77 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . . § 16.01. B. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. WRIGHT,, 774 F.3d 1085 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 16.01, which addresses the elements of § 2251(a), suggests that . . . Pattern J.I. 16.01, committee commentary. . . . .

AMERICAN BUSINESS USA CORP. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 151 So. 3d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Id. at ¶ 16.01 [2]. . . .

MONACO, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Charter, art. 16, § 16.01. . . . Charter, art. 16, § 16.01; City Code §§ 120.202(a); 120.302(a). . . .

BASER, v. TRI- STATE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 69 F. Supp. 3d 845 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . shall hold office during the pleasure of the board,” except as otherwise provided elsewhere in Sections 16.01 . . .

FLORIDA CARRY, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA,, 133 So. 3d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 16.01(4), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that the Attorney General “[s]hall appear in and . . .

FRANKLIN v. CITY OF SLIDELL,, 969 F. Supp. 2d 644 (E.D. La. 2013)

. . . Slidell Civil Service Rule 16.01 provides that an employee may be discharged or suspended without pay . . .

CARTY, Jr, v. STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, v., 733 F.3d 550 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . § 1, sec. 6a(a), repealed by Texas Workers’ Compensation Act of 1989, 71st Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 1, § 16.01 . . . Texas Workers’ Compensation Act of 1989, 71st Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 1, §§ 4.05(f), 16.01(10), amended by . . .

BLOOMBERG L. P. v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,, 949 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . §§ 16.01(e), 38.451. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ADAN, 913 F. Supp. 2d 555 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

. . . For the lead agent in any criminal action, Local Criminal Rule 16.01(a)lg expressly requires the preservation . . . Moreover,' Local Criminal Rule 16.01(a)(2)a.l. expressly requires disclosure of any recorded statement . . . Local Criminal Rule 16.01(a)lg makes the rough notes of the agents in the case an express responsibility . . . Local Criminal Rule 16.01(a)(2)a.l expressly requires disclosure of any recorded statement of a defendant . . .

Jo BONDI, v. S. TUCKER,, 93 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Florida and pursuant to her [putative] authority under § 16.01 . . . Section 16.01(4), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that the Attorney General “[s]hall appear in and . . .

ESTEE LAUDER, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 815 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . shrimps (heading 16.05), a can of paté de foie (heading 16.02), a can of cocktail sausages (heading 16.01 . . .

AUTHENTIC BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC. v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION,, 835 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . § 16.01(a). . . . See id. § 16.01(a). . . . See id. §§ 14.01(6), 16.01(3), 16.03,19.01(a). . . . See id. § 16.01. . . .

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. f k a Co. v. APOTEX INC., 790 F. Supp. 2d 868 (S.D. Ind. 2011)

. . . (Kaliner Tr. 542:5-13; AA-16.01-.02; TX 784 at ALP002-001040; Abelson Tr. 1789:16-1790:2). . . . (Kaliner Tr. 542:5-15; AA-16.01-.02; TX 784 at ALP002001041). . . . (Kaliner Tr. 530:17-532:14; AA-16.01-.02; TX 784). 309. . . . (Yanni Tr. 171:10-172:2; Kaliner Tr. 536:3-8, 538:1-539:1; AA-16.01-.02). 310. By 2003, Dr. . . . (Kaliner Tr. 542:16-22; AA-16.01-.02; TX 784 at ALP002-001040, 41). 312. . . .

W. L. GORE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MEDTRONIC, INC. USA,, 778 F. Supp. 2d 667 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . Chisum on Patents § 16.01 (2010) (“Direct infringement thus consists of the making, using, selling or . . .

P. WHEELER, v. LISLE- WOODRIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,, 804 F. Supp. 2d 759 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . LisleWoodridge Fire Protection District” (“Board Rules”) to carry out its purpose as allowed by 70 ILCS 705/16.01 . . .

QPRO INC. v. RTD QUALITY SERVICES USA, INC., 761 F. Supp. 2d 492 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . (Id., ¶ 16.01). The lease also includes a bar against special, indirect, or consequential damages. . . .

In A. McMILLEN, A. v. d b a, 440 B.R. 907 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2010)

. . . Federal Practice and Procedure § 1367 (3d ed. 2004); 2 Moore’s Manual: Federal PraotiCe AND Procedure § 16.01 . . .

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY- STATE OF NEW YORK, TDX P. C. TDX v. v. a k a t a d b a PA. U. S. f k a d b a d b a a k a XYZ P. C. v. P. C. P. C. P. C. LBL U. S. A., 735 F. Supp. 2d 42 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . General Conditions § 16.01, entitled "Occupancy Prior to Acceptance,” provides in pertinent part that . . .

BINGHAM, v. MASSACHUSETTS,, 616 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Newton et. al., Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 16.01[2], at 1037 (2005 ed.). . . .

BINGHAM, v. MASSACHUSETTS,, 616 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Newton et. al., Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 16.01[2], at 1037 (2005 ed.). . . .

QPRO INC. v. RTD QUALITY SERVICES USA, INC., 718 F. Supp. 2d 817 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . (Id., Ex. 1, ¶ 16.01). . . .

INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, v. M- K SIGNS, INC., 713 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . XVI, § 16.01(3); id., Ex. 2 (Trust Agreement), art. VI, § 6. . . .

In DE LA FUENTE, De La De La De La v. N. A., 430 B.R. 764 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . . § 16.01(b)(4); West v. . . .

KODISH, v. OAKBROOK TERRACE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,, 604 F.3d 490 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . in cases of conflict, the Act takes precedence over the Illinois Municipal Code (see 70 ILCS § 705/16.01 . . . provisions of the Municipal Code from taking effect where they are inconsistent with the Act. 70 ILCS § 705/16.01 . . .

JOHN B. G. M. A. A. L. A. P. C. S. C. W. D. H. H. C. C. D. T. W. M. P. D. W. K. B. R. B. S. P. W. E. D. v. GOETZ, s, 879 F. Supp. 2d 787 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . Second, under Local Rule 16.01(e)(1), the pendency of a dispositive motion does not stay discovery. . . .

NANCE, v. WAYNE COUNTY,, 264 F.R.D. 331 (M.D. Tenn. 2009)

. . . See, Local Rule 16.01(e)(1) and 16.02(f)(2). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARRILES,, 654 F. Supp. 2d 557 (W.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Thomas Dienes et al., Newsgathering and the Law §§ 16.01-16.08 (3d. ed. 2005) (discussing development . . .

J. LAWRENCE, Jr. v. DISTRICT COURT,, 560 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . BACKGROUND The Bloomfield Township Ordinance under which Lawrence was convicted, No. 137, § 16.01(a), . . . gave the jury the following instructions: The defendant has been charged with a violation of Section 16.01 . . . Pursuant to Bloomfield Township Ordinance No. 137, § 16.01(a). .The defendants eventually won on summary . . .

A. DURAND, v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC., 560 F.3d 436 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . See Allm-erica Plan § 16.01. . . .

In W. HEIGLE, III, v. D. v. W. III,, 401 B.R. 752 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2008)

. . . Other corporate record keeping requirements, found at Section 79-4—16.01 of the Mississippi Code, impose . . .

HARVEY, v. STATE, 32 So. 3d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . public defender represents Harvey, and the Attorney General has appeared on behalf of the State, see § 16.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. KOZENY, Jr., 582 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Sand, et. al., Modem Federal Jury Instructions-Criminal ¶ 16.01, instr. 16-6 (2008). . . . .

McCABE HAMILTON RENNY CO. LTD. v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, LOCAL AFL- CIO,, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D. Haw. 2008)

. . . Section 16.01 of the CBA provides, “Employees shall be subject to discipline or discharge by the Employer . . .

In SEROQUEL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 244 F.R.D. 650 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . See Pl.Ex. 16.01. . . .

NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC. v. INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC., 497 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . See 17 C.F.R. 16.01(b). . . . See 17 C.F.R. 16.01(b)(2) (“Each reporting market shall record the following information ... . . .

DADELAND DEPOT, INC. v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO., 945 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 2006)

. . . For example, ‘Ds. 16.01’ would identify a section in chapter 16 of the Florida Statutes.” Linda S. . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. AMERICAN RE- INSURANCE CO., 441 F. Supp. 2d 646 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . . § 16.01[a]. . . . Coverage Disputes at § 16.01[a] (doctrine “preclude^] wasteful relitigation by a reinsurer of defenses . . .

EDLUND, v. SEAGULL TOWNHOMES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 928 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . first refusal to purchase the unit under the following provisions of its Declaration of Condominium: 16.01 . . . Seagull's declaration of condominium, but that the Association can approve the transfer after the fact: 16.01 . . .

GRIER, v. M. D. GOETZ, Jr., 424 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (M.D. Tenn. 2006)

. . . No. 1338, Proposed Rule § 1200-13-16.01(21)) (emphasis added). . . . Defendants argue that Proposed Rule § 1200-13-16.01(21) does not substitute Paragraph C(7)(b). . . . The literal reading of Proposed Rule § 1200-13-16.01(21), however, does exactly that. . . . No. 1338, Proposed Rule § 1200-13-16.01(21)(e)(i).) . . . No. 1338, Proposed Rule § 1200-13-16.01(21)(a)-(d), (e)(ii)-(iv).) . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACORD,, 133 F. App'x 886 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and that Acord was responsible for 16.01 . . .

AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,, 66 Fed. Cl. 315 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . Of this amount, $16.01 million represented major assets acquired in conjunction with the supervisory . . .

In HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC., 321 B.R. 498 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2005)

. . . Section 16.01 of the Plan, Discharge of the Debtor and Release of Claims Against Debtor and Related Parties . . . XVI § 16.01. This language does not conclude litigation, but rather fosters it. . . .

AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO. v. ANIERO CONCRETE CO. INC. Co. A M. S. T. Co. s,, 404 F.3d 566 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . See General Conditions § 16.01. . . .

AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,, 63 Fed. Cl. 637 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . Of this amount, $16.01 million represented major assets acquired in conjunction with the supervisory . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. AMERICAN RE- INSURANCE CO., 351 F. Supp. 2d 201 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 16.01[a]. . . .

NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC. v. INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., 323 F. Supp. 2d 559 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . . § 16.01(b)(2). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 373 F.3d 561 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . O'Malley et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, §§ 16.01, 16.03 (2000 & Supp. 2003) (quoting . . .

In FULTON BELLOWS COMPONENTS, INC. f k a JRGACQ, 307 B.R. 896 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004)

. . . provides for the following dispute resolution procedures, in material part: ARTICLE 16 Grievance Procedure 16.01 . . .

ONE WORLD ONE FAMILY NOW, a v. CITY OF KEY WEST, a a v. a, 293 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . City is “permanently enjoined from enforcing or attempting to enforce Key West Code of Ordinances §§ 16.01 . . .

CERRA, v. HARVEY,, 279 F. Supp. 2d 778 (S.D.W. Va. 2003)

. . . Plan, § 16.01(e). Neither party questions the Trustees’ full discretionary power. . . .

SPORT SUPPLY GROUP, INC. v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY RSKCo, 335 F.3d 453 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 16.01(a)(5) (defining a “trademark” as “a word, name, symbol, device, slogan or any combination thereof . . .

C. A. DICKERSON R. v. BAILEY,, 336 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . The particular statutes at issue in this case — principally § 107.07, but also, inter alia, § 16.01, . . . Although the contrast between § 107.07(a) and § 16.01(a)(4) is the most striking — three gallons versus . . . Bev.Code Ann. § 16.01(a)(4) (permitting in-state wineries to sell directly to Texas consumers up to 25,000 . . . Bev.Code Ann. § 16.01(a)(4). . Tex. Alco. Bev.Code Ann. § 107.07(a). . Tex. Alco. . . . Plaintiffs would likely have lacked standing to challenge only § 16.01 and the other TABC provisions . . .

BLACKMON, v. IVERSON, 324 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 16.01 (direct competition is not necessary in an idea misappropriation . . .

DIMENSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. OZ OPTICS LIMITED,, 218 F. Supp. 2d 653 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . Rule 16.01(1) requires that originating process (i.e., the summons and complaint) shall be served personally . . .

In GREATER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. O v., 282 B.R. 496 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Rule 16.01(1) provides, “... an originating process shall be served personally as provided in Rule 16.02 . . . Alternative Methods of Service As an alternative to personal service under Rule 16.01, the Ontario Rules . . .

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, v. UNITED STATES,, 54 Fed. Cl. 20 (Fed. Cl. 2002)

. . . See 8A Nichols at § 16.01[2]. . . . United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 227, 255 n. 25 (1985); 8A Nichols at § 16.01[1]; James Timothy Payne, Annotation . . .

INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. W. R. W. R., 215 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . Cooke, The Law of Hazardous Waste, § 16.01[2] at 16-4 (2001); 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). . . .

C. A. DICKERSON, R. v. BAILEY,, 212 F. Supp. 2d 673 (S.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . Noting that in-state winery permits are governed by Chapter 16, Defendant highlighted § 16.01(a)(4), . . .

INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. W. R. ECARG, W. R., 204 F. Supp. 2d 804 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . Cooke, The Law of Hazardous Waste, § 16.01[2] at 16-4 (2001); 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). . . .

OLIVE, v. MAAS,, 811 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2002)

. . . See §§ 16.01(5), 86.091, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

CARLSON HOLDINGS, INC. v. NAFCO INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. U. S. a k a TIG USA, NAC, 205 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Minn. 2001)

. . . Newman, Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes, § 16.01 (9th ed.1995); (emphasis added); Insurance Co . . .

V. KLECK d b a v. BAUSCH LOMB, INC. a a S. p. A., 145 F. Supp. 2d 819 (W.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Nimmer § 16.01 at 16-4. . . .

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, v. ASTRO- VALCOUR, INC., 110 F. Supp. 2d 104 (N.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . See generally 3 Rosenberg § 16.01[b]. . . .

SECULAR ORGANIZATIONS FOR SOBRIETY, INC. v. E. ULLRICH V. SOS v. E. V. v. SOS v. E. V. SOS, 213 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2000)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 16.01 (4th ed. 1996) (“The way to obtain . . .

COLVILLE CONFEDERATED TRIBES, v. SOMDAY, II, L., 96 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (E.D. Wash. 2000)

. . . Article 16.01 of the “DRAFT” Plan Document provided that the Trustee accept the terms of the Trust created . . .

RAMOS SANTIAGO, v. WELLCRAFT MARINE CORP. v. v., 93 F. Supp. 2d 112 (D.P.R. 2000)

. . . Brau del Toro, Los Daños y Perjuicios Extracontractuales en Puerto Rico § 16.01, at 882 (1986). . . .

I. BOSTIC, v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INCORPORATED,, 87 F. Supp. 2d 611 (S.D.W. Va. 2000)

. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees ¶ 16.01 (1999) (“The practitioner must be aware that a court may disallow . . .

C. A. DICKERSON, R. v. BAILEY,, 87 F. Supp. 2d 691 (S.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 16.01(a)(4) (1997) provides, "The holder of a winery permit may: .... . . .

MUSSER DAVIS LAND CO. v. UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES,, 201 F.3d 561 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 16.01 (1996)(“During the past twenty-five years the 3D (three dimensional) seismic method has revolutionized . . .

PLANET HOLLYWOOD REGION IV INC. a v. HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION, a, 80 F. Supp. 2d 815 (N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . Impressa Perosa, S.R.I., 935 F.Supp. 458, 467 (S.D.N.Y.1996)(quoting McCarthy, at § 16.01[1] (3d ed.1996 . . .

DORER v. AREL,, 60 F. Supp. 2d 558 (E.D. Va. 1999)

. . . Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals § 16.01 [01][a] (1998). . . .

COMPUTER ECONOMICS, INC. v. GARTNER GROUP, INC., 50 F. Supp. 2d 980 (S.D. Cal. 1999)

. . . Milgrim, 4 Trade Secrets § 16.01[5][b] (1997) (arguing that a defendant cannot formulate an effective . . . Milgrim, 4 Trade Secrets § 16.01[5] (1997) (“soon after [a trade secret case] begins a plaintiff can . . .

C. BARNES, v. STATE, 743 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . We called respondents’ attention therein to section 16.01(4) (“The Attorney General ... . . . . §§ 16.01(4) and 27.02, Fla. Stat. (1998). . . . Raft also timely responded to the order, acknowledging sections 16.01(4) and 27.02 but arguing that, . . . Raft’s common law argument is plainly inconsistent with section 16.01(4) and section 27.02. . . . Section 16.01 unambiguously authorizes only the Attorney General to represent the state in the appellate . . .

WRENCH LLC, a v. TACO BELL CORP. a, 36 F. Supp. 2d 787 (W.D. Mich. 1998)

. . . The Court also cited 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 16.01 at 16-4 (1992) and Kienzle v. . . .

A. WILLIAMS, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC., 159 F.3d 266 (7th Cir. 1998)

. . . See generally 3 Herbert Newberg & Albert Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 16.01 (3d ed.1992) (listing . . .

In QC PIPING INSTALLATIONS, INC. B. MENDELSOHN, QC v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 225 B.R. 553 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . Section 16.01 provides that the “Owner may make a partial payment to the Contractor on the basis of an . . .

v. Co. Co., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 852 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Ruie 16.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in Ontario provides that “[a]n originating process shall . . .

UNITED STATES v. ISLIP, 18 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Rule 16.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in Ontario provides that "[a]n originating process shall . . .

BOTOSAN, v. H. FITZHUGH,, 13 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (S.D. Cal. 1998)

. . . . ¶ 16.01.) . . .

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, v. J. R. a, 710 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The Attorney General appeared and asserted that he has the statutory obligation under section 16.01(4 . . .

E. HOWARD, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 176 F.R.D. 265 (E.D. Tenn. 1997)

. . . of Mississippi; L.R. 8.04, Eastern District of Missouri; L.R. 32, Western District of Missouri; L.R. 16.01 . . .

L. WOKAS, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. d b a, 978 F. Supp. 839 (N.D. Ind. 1997)

. . . Rosenberg, 3 Patent Law Fundamentals § 16.01[l][b] (2d ed. 1997. Revision). . . .