The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.01

14.01 Governor; residence; office; authority to protect life, liberty, and property.—The Governor shall reside at the head of government, and the Governor’s office shall be in the capitol. The Governor may have such other offices within the state as he or she may deem necessary. The Governor may employ as many persons as he or she, in his or her discretion, may deem necessary to procure and secure protection to life, liberty, and property of the inhabitants of the state, also to protect the property of the state.

History.—ch. 1660, 1868; RS 68; GS 69; RGS 83; CGL 104; s. 1, ch. 65-54; s. 32, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 14.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

REBAR TRADE ACTION COALITION, Ve A. S. v. UNITED STATES,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 1371 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . Habas maintains that Commerce's selection of the 14.01% rate is unreasonable because Commerce could not . . . Habas's arguments about the alleged insufficiency of Commerce's corroboration of the 14.01% rate ignore . . . Considering the record as a whole, the court concludes that Commerce reasonably corroborated the 14.01% . . . Habas provides no insight as to how Commerce may have reasonably selected an AFA rate other than 14.01% . . . Commerce further explained how it applied its "established hierarchy" in selecting the 14.01% rate. . . .

L. APONTE, v. BROWN BROWN OF FLORIDA, INC., 382 F. Supp. 3d 1318 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Instructions (Civil Cases) § 10.1.1 at 11 (2018); Eighth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions (Civil Cases) § 14.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SERRANO- RAMIREZ,, 322 F. Supp. 3d 860 (M.D. Tenn. 2018)

. . . Instr. 6th Cir. 14.01 (2017 ed.). . . .

RENWICK, v. PNK LAKE CHARLES, L. L. C. L, 901 F.3d 605 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Gov't , 2007-2432 (La. 5/21/08), 982 So.2d 795, 799 n.1 (quotations omitted); Maraist & Galligan § 14.01 . . .

IN RE TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY, v., 587 B.R. 606 (D. Del. 2018)

. . . "Senior Indebtedness" that benefits from subordination under § 14.01(2) of the PHONES Notes is defined . . .

LEEBER REALTY LLC v. TRUSTCO BANK,, 316 F. Supp. 3d 594 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (Lease § 14.01(b).) . . .

NUNES, v. RUSHTON,, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (D. Utah 2018)

. . . NIMMER & DAVID NIMMER, NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 14.01[A] (Rev. Ed. 2017). . . .

SMITH, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS,, 285 F. Supp. 3d 846 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . . § 14.01). . . .

GRAHAM, Jr. v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Jr., 288 F. Supp. 3d 711 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . . § 14.01. . . .

BARCROFT MEDIA, LTD. v. COED MEDIA GROUP, LLC,, 297 F. Supp. 3d 339 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Banian Ltd. , 280 F.Supp.2d 10, 17-19 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) ; see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.01[C][1] . . .

ZDEMIR BORU SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. UNITED STATES,, 273 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . Commerce selected an AFA CVD rate of 14.01 percent, derived from Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty . . . In that determination, 14.01 percent was the program-specific rate applied for the Export Tax Rebate . . . Second, Ozdemir argues that even if Commerce’s selection of the CWP & T 1986 14.01 percent rate as AFA . . . Ozdemir argues that Commerce failed to corroborate the 14.01 percent rate, which the agency must do “ . . . Ozdemir argues that on a program-wide basis, the 14.01 percent rate is far removed from the commercial . . .

CITY OF EL CENIZO, v. STATE, 264 F. Supp. 3d 744 (W.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . peace officers, including, inter alia, to “interfere without warrant to prevent or suppress crime”), 14.01 . . .

KUN, v. KINDERCARE EDUCATION LLC, f k a LLC, a k a, 258 F. Supp. 3d 221 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . background information of • [employees] for positions licensed, approved or funded by EEC. 606 CMR 14.01 . . .

UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016)

. . . In the Final Results, Commerce assigned weighted-average dumping margins of 14.01% to Union and 3.29% . . . In that redetermination (“First Remand Redetermination”), Commerce revised Union’s margin from 14.01% . . .

BECKER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. J. P., 172 F. Supp. 3d 777 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . One provision cited by Plaintiff and Defendants — the Indenture § 14.01(b) — does apply to the facts . . . However, § 14.01(b) is subject to two different interpretations.- It can be read to preserve BNYM’s rights . . . compensation, losses, liabilities, costs, expenses, and counsel fees that are payable to BNYM under § 14.01 . . . Defendants maintain that the Indenture § 14.01(b) preserved the Indenture Trustee’s asserted rights to . . . exist under the cited provisions, and those nonexistent rights were not preserved by the Indenture § 14.01 . . .

UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFL- CIO, v. Y. IGE,, 166 F. Supp. 3d 1159 (D. Haw. 2016)

. . . Act 262 are incorporated into the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreements pursuant to Section 14.01 . . . Section 14.01 of the Collective Bargaining Agreements, entitled “Prior Rights, Benefits and Perquisites . . . A plain reading of Section 14.01 demonstrates that it operates as an internal limitation on the Collective . . .

GRANT HEILMAN PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. v. McGRAW- HILL COMPANIES,, 115 F. Supp. 3d 518 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . In all instances, the relief should match the proof.” 5 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.01[C][1], Section 504 . . .

CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS, v. WeCARE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC,, 109 F. Supp. 3d 329 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Section 14.01 provides: “Applicable Law and Venue. . . . The choice-of-law provision in the Agreement (Section 14.01) clearly states that "[t]he law of the Commonwealth . . .

TOTO, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,, 60 F. Supp. 3d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . ¶¶ 14.01, 14.05.) . . .

SOUTHERN OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COOPERATIVA DE SEGUROS MULTIPLES,, 143 So. 3d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Stempel, Stempel on Insurance Contracts § 14.01[B] at 14-17 (3d ed. . . .

In SEPTEMBER LITIGATION. LLC, v. LLC, WTC Co. LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, L. P. HMH WTC, WTC LLC, AMR UAL, 751 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . See, e.g., 2 The Law of Hazardous Waste: Management, Cleanup, Liability and Litigation § 14.01[8][b] . . .

ASARCO LLC, a v. CEMEX, INC. a LLC, a, 21 F. Supp. 3d 784 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Cooke, The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01[1] (2013 ed.). . . . See Cooke, supra, § 14.01[4][c][iii][B] (collecting cases). “ ‘In case of merger of one corporation into . . .

UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 968 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . In the Remand Redetermination, Commerce revised Union’s weighted average dumping margin from 14.01% to . . .

VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS, De v. CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS, v., 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Ann. art. 14.01(b), 14.06(a)-(b) (West 2011). II. . . . Proc. art. 14.01; 14.06; 15.17. . . . P. art. 14.01, 14.06, 15.17. . Arizona v. . . .

IN RE A. BROCK,, 494 B.R. 534 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2013)

. . . Brock and Diane Melree Brock, Article 14.01, section E. . Zanelli v. . . .

STANFORD, v. UNITED STATES v., 948 F. Supp. 2d 729 (E.D. Ky. 2013)

. . . explaining that defendants may bring third-party complaints for contribution via Kentucky Civil Rule 14.01 . . .

In SEPTEMBER LITIGATION LLC, v. LLC, WTC Co. LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, L. P. HMH WTC, WTC LLC, AMR UAL, 931 F. Supp. 2d 496 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . defenses based on certain types of “unforeseeable intervening events.” 4-14 Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01 . . . Id. at § 14.01 [8][b][ii]. Must an “act of war” be unforeseen? . . . See 3 The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01[8][b], at 14-162.2 (Susan M. Cooke, ed., 2001). . . .

W. ROBERTSON, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 26 Vet. App. 169 (Vet. App. 2013)

. . . I, § 14.01(l)(b), (d) (updated Jan. 24, 1977) ([hereinafter M21-1]); M21-1 MR, pt. . . .

J. BACHORZ A. v. MILLER- FORSLUND, L., 703 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Article XIV, subsection 14.01 provided that waiver of any breach, covenant or condition, or acceptance . . .

DUNCAN- WILLIAMS, INC. v. CAPSTONE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, H. UC LLC, LLC,, 908 F. Supp. 2d 898 (W.D. Tenn. 2012)

. . . P. 14.01) (“[SJuch contribution claims are not premature.” (citing Velsicol Chem. Corp. v. . . .

UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES, HYSCO,, 837 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . weighted-average dumping margins of 3.29% to HYSCO, 0.01% to the POSCO Group (a de minimis margin), 14.01% . . . contributed to the increase in Union’s margin from the Preliminary Results (3.94%) to the Final Results (14.01% . . . Review-Specific Average Rate” of 8.65%, calculated as a simple average of the margins assigned to Union (14.01% . . . the margins assigned on remand to the two individually-examined respondents, Union (which received a 14.01% . . . This rate was a simple average of the rates of Union (14.01%) and HYSCO (3.29%). Id. at 13,-491. . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 472 B.R. 223 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . Indebtedness of the Company shall be subordinated to or pari passu with the Securities; (PHONES Indenture, § 14.01 . . . (ADH Ex. 2, § 14.01(2))(emphasis added). . . . (PHONES Indenture, § 14.01(2)). . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 464 B.R. 208 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . As stated in Section 14.01: The Securities shall be subordinated to Senior Indebtedness as set forth . . . PHONES Indenture, § 14.01, at 61. . . .

AUTHENTIC BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC. v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION,, 835 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . §§ 14.01(6), 16.01(3), 16.03,19.01(a). . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 464 B.R. 126 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . By way of background, section 14.01 of the PHONES indenture states that the PHONES shall be subordinated . . . (DCL Ex. 668 at § 14.01(2)). . . . Section 14.01 defines “Indebtedness” to be: (i) all obligations represented by notes, bonds, debentures . . . {Id. at §' 14.01(1)). . . . (Id. at § 14.01(2)). . . .

QEP ENERGY COMPANY, a v. M. SULLIVAN,, 444 F. App'x 284 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . Taylor, Oil & Gas § 14.01 (Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Inst.1985); see also Aplt. . . .

J. BACHORZ A. v. MILLER- FORSLUND, L., 812 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . No. 29, Ex. 1, § 14.01 (“The waiver by Landlord of any breach of any term, covenant or condition herein . . .

TMTV, CORP. v. MASS PRODUCTIONS, INC. o, a k a o o-, 645 F.3d 464 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 504(b); see also 4 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 14.01[A], at 14-7. . . .

BIG DIPPER ENTERTAINMENT, L. L. C. L. L. C. v. CITY OF WARREN,, 641 F.3d 715 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . XIV, § 14.01(s). . . . On February 1, 2006, Warren published a notice of intent to amend § 14.01(s) once again, this time to . . . On March 28, 2006, the city council added the following language to § 14.01(s): To be consistent with . . . As so amended, § 14.01(s) encompasses the 7001 Convention property. . . . Big Dipper claims that § 14.01(s), as amended, is an unconstitutional restriction upon speech. . . .

COUNTY OF CHARLES MIX, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 799 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D.S.D. 2011)

. . . S.Ct. 2474, 41 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974)); see also Felix Cohen, Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.01 . . .

SOUTH DAKOTA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 787 F. Supp. 2d 981 (D.S.D. 2011)

. . . S.Ct. 2474, 41 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974)); see also Felix Cohen, Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- LOPEZ,, 761 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (D.N.M. 2010)

. . . Ann. art. 14.01(a) (Vernon 1977) ("A peace officer or any other person, may, without a warrant, arrest . . .

NORTH CAROLINA, COOPER, v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. V. A. L. F. J. Jr. Of, 615 F.3d 291 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . Stein et ah, Administrative Law § 14.01. . . .

AGERE SYSTEMS, INC. SPS LLC TI LLC v. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION FCG Co. NRM, 602 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . courts have developed several principles for application in such suits. 4 The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01 . . .

LUYSTER, W. M. v. TEXTRON, INC. AVCO KS KS USA, v. v., 266 F.R.D. 54 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . (citing Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 14.01(3) (2d ed.1979))); Bessler, Note, 66 Ind. . . .

KOVACIC, v. LARRY BROWN ENTERPRISES, L. L. C. d b a, 693 F. Supp. 2d 660 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Chapter 14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 14.01(a) provides: A peace officer or any . . . Proc. art. 14.01(a) (2005). . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HINES,, 358 F. App'x 596 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Stempel, Stempel on Insurance Contracts § 14.01 (3d ed 2007)). . Gulf States Ins. Co. v. . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 14.01 of the CSA defines "Force Majeure” as: Any act, event or condition which has had a material . . .

BIG DIPPER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. v. CITY OF WARREN,, 658 F. Supp. 2d 831 (E.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . First, Plaintiffs claim that the locational restrictions of Section 14.01, prohibiting SOBs from locating . . . 1, 2006, Warren published a Public Notice of its intention to make additional amendments to Section 14.01 . . . “On March 28, 2006, Warren enacted amended Section 14.01 (s), codified as Ordinance 30-964, and Article . . . “Section 14.01(s), as amended March 28, 2006, provides: To be consistent with the objective and stated . . . City of Warren, 02-CV-70062, a similar constitutional challenge was made to Section 14.01(s) and was . . .

SMITH, v. COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO GROUP MEDICAL BENEFIT PLAN,, 624 F. Supp. 2d 844 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . (Medical Plan at Section 22.01, Dental Plan at Section 14.01). . . . (See Medical Plan at Section 22.01, Dental Plan at Section 14.01). . . . (See Medical Plan Section 22.01, Dental Plan Section 14.01). . . .

PREFERRED AUTOMOTIVE SALES, INC. v. DCFS USA, LLC, d b a f k a, 625 F. Supp. 2d 459 (E.D. Ky. 2009)

. . . CR 14.01 permits defendants to "assert [claims] against a person not a party to the action who is or . . .

In AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. a DB v. a, 402 B.R. 87 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)

. . . (See R-37 at § 14.01(i).) 28. . . . Servicer to remit ... any payment required to be made under the terms of this Agreement” (R-37 at § 14.01 . . . {See R-37 at §§ 1, 4, 9(xiv) (seller’s consideration); §§ 1, 14.01(vii), 15, and Exh. 8 §§ 11.09(iii) . . . (R-37 at § 14.01(vii).) 42. . . .

NDEH, v. MIDTOWN ALEXANDRIA, L. L. C., 300 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . Costello, Virginia Remedies § 14.01 (2008)(stating that “contracts for the sale of interests in realty . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO,, 578 F. Supp. 2d 941 (S.D. Ohio 2008)

. . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ,, 284 F. App'x 156 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Proc. art. 14.01 & 14.03; Drago v. State, 553 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.Crim. App.1977). . . .

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. S. U. B. INC., 979 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Stempel, Stempel on Insurance Contracts, § 14.01[B], at 14-17 (3d ed. 2007) (“The CGL, like most insurance . . .

E. BOUCHAT, v. BON- TON DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED Of ESPN, USA, a k a t a t a ACG, t a K- s CVS ESPN a k a a k a W t a KW NFL NFL a k a NFL R. NFL II a k a a k a TKO TV t a t a WJFK t a WLIF a k a a k a D. C. a k a a k a N. A. a k a a k a a k a USA, E. v. AA ABC, ABC A. D. s d b a t a a k a CBS d b a CBS C I USA, s L. P. d b a t a CSS CUI, D. s DSJ E J USA d b a ERTL ESPN, d b a N. T. T. FSC GFG H H LLC s HPI USA IMC USA t a J. D. J. F. J. W. d b a F. H. t a Jr. s S. La MBI, MBNA a k a MBNA a k a MBNA a k a MBNA NA MGI USA MGWHIZ, t a a k a s a k a s, a k a t a L. P. t a t a t a NFL LP, a k a NFL NFL, a k a a k a NFL a k a NTN VF a k a d b a P K a k a PK t a Me t a d b a P. A. LLC DIV IMC d b a d b a d b a a k a RCA a k a d b a t a t a USA, a k a L. P. d b a a k a SDI t a LLC d b a d b a a k a L. P. St. t a St. d b a a k a d b a d b a d b a USA LLC L. P. d b a T. d b a USA USA V. d b a V. USA d b a VF USA, J. C. t a t a a k a B B d b a At- A- t a d b a At- A- a d b a LLC a k a a k a d b a a k a LLC a k a LP A. R. C. d b a F. a k a s d b a d b a d b a LP, LLP SBM, d b a USA NFL LLC d b a d b a On- LLC L. P. d b a d b a KR d b a d b a VF U. S. A. d b a s G- III Go, d b a LLC By- US d b a E. v. LLC, E. v., 506 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.01[A] (1994). . . .

COVENANT MEDIA OF ILLINOIS, L. L. C. v. CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS,, 496 F. Supp. 2d 960 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . Stat. 440/14.01 (1998). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARNOLD,, 486 F.3d 177 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . See 1-14 Weinstein’s Evidenoe Manual § 14.01[1]. . . .

CALETZ, ESTATE OF COLON, a a a v. BLACKMON, 476 F. Supp. 2d 946 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . N.E.2d 402, 405, 204 Ill.Dec. 178 (1994)); see also, Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, No. 14.01 . . .

NITSCH, v. CITY OF EL PASO,, 482 F. Supp. 2d 820 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . P. art. 14.01(b). . . .

ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION,, 474 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . primarily to protect the insured from claims by third parties. 2 Stempel, Stem/pel on Insurance Contracts § 14.01 . . .

GALEN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 74 Fed. Cl. 377 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . . § 79-4-14.01-14.09) and involuntary or administrative dissolution (termination by the Secretary of . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO,, 456 F. Supp. 2d 904 (S.D. Ohio 2006)

. . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c). . . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution § 14.01. . . . . See Zoning Resolution § 14.01. . Intervenor relies on Wallingford v. . . .

In KRYSTAL CADILLAC- OLDSMOBILE- GMC TRUCK, INC. v. GMC V., 371 B.R. 49 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2006)

. . . See Amended Plan, Case No. 1-94-bk-01547, at ¶¶ 10.01 & 14.01 (Doc. 195). . . . See Amended Plan, Casé No. l-94-bk-01547 at ¶¶ 10.01 & 14.01 (Doc. 195). . . . .

ROTHGERY, v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS,, 413 F. Supp. 2d 806 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Ann. arts. 14.01-14.06 (West 2005 & West. Supp.2005). . . . .

AGWAY, INC. EMPLOYEES K THRIFT INVESTMENT PLAN, Co. v. G. MAGNUSON,, 409 F. Supp. 2d 136 (N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . A §§ 14.01, 15.01-15.02. . . . .

SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, a a v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, D. M., 425 F.3d 735 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . the Supreme Court have occasionally used the terms interchangeably, see 1 American Law of Mining § 14.01 . . .

MOLINA- ACOSTA, v. MARTINEZ,, 392 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D.P.R. 2005)

. . . Townsend, 224 F.3d 24, 27 (1st Cir.2000); see e.g., Jayson & Longstretch, 3 Handling Federal Tort Claims § 14.01 . . .

M. BARLOW, MONCEBAIZ, v. OWENS, II,, 400 F. Supp. 2d 980 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . Ann. art. 14.01 (Vernon 2005). . . . Ann. art. 14.01 (Vernon 2005); Lago Vista, 532 U.S. at 354, 121 S.Ct. at 1557. . . .

STOKES, v. SAGA INTERNATIONAL HOLIDAYS, LTD., 376 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . . § 14.01(a) Transfer This action was transferred from the United States District Court, Northern District . . .

HENSLEE, J. E. A. v. PROVENA HOSPITALS, d b a M. D., 369 F. Supp. 2d 970 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, No. 14.01 (1995). . . .

Dr. A. RODRIGUE, v. OLIN EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION,, 406 F.3d 434 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . Robert Hillman, et al., Common Law and Equity Under the Uniform Commercial Code, ¶ 14.01[1] (1985). . . .

In RECOTON CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 358 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . According to Plaintiffs, a published report confirms that Chu sold 10,000 shares of Recoton stock at $14.01 . . .

In WORLDCOM, INC. ERISA LITIGATION ALL ACTIONS, 354 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Plan designated the Plan Administrator and the Investment Fiduciary as “named fiduciaries,” see Plan § 14.01 . . . Plan § 14.01. . . .

CITIGROUP, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS, L. P., 336 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Lease §§ 1.05 & 14.01 (defining “Initial Work” and “Alterations”). . . .

R. SPARACO, Jr. v. LAWLER, MATUSKY, SKELLY ENGINEERS LLP, B. PC, 313 F. Supp. 2d 247 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . but only to the extent that two different types of harm have been suffered. 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.01 . . . . § 504’s requirement that a plaintiff elect between statutory damages and actual damages. 4 Nimmer 14.01 . . .

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, v. ALCO PACIFIC, INC., 308 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (C.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . See e.g. 4-14 Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01; see also Hyampom, 903 F.Supp. at 1394. . . .

MATSUSHITA ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. v. CINRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC., 299 F. Supp. 2d 370 (D. Del. 2004)

. . . Holmes, supra, § 14.01. . . .

CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD. a v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a a G. Jr., 287 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Board found that rent increases of 12.86% to 14.01% per unit would generate an additional $286,690.80 . . .

PALMER, v. W. CLARKE,, 293 F. Supp. 2d 1011 (D. Neb. 2003)

. . . Ann. arts. 14.01-14.04. . . .

HOMESTAKE LEAD COMPANY OF MISSOURI, v. DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION,, 282 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . Partnership Agreement § 14.01 & Art. I. . . . Section 14.01, Home-stake notes, provides that disputes should first be brought before the partnership . . .

In TRANSCOLOR CORPORATION, v. M. Sr., 296 B.R. 343 (Bankr. D. Md. 2003)

. . . Section 14.01. Lapides signed the Supplemental Indenture on behalf of both Alleco and Transcolor. . . . Section 14.01 provided as follows: Personal Immunity from Liability of Incorporators, Shareholders, etc . . . Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, nothing in this Section 14.01 is intended . . .

L. BUCKLEW, v. HAWKINS, ASH, BAPTIE CO. LLP, HAB,, 329 F.3d 923 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . GFI, 193 F.3d 92, 108 n. 7 (2d Cir.1999); Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, vol. 4, § 14.01[A], pp. 14-5 to 14- . . .

RAMOS, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC., 256 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 14.01, pp. 14-2 to 14-3 (2d Ed.1994). . . .

In PRESLEY,, 288 B.R. 732 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2003)

. . . See 1A Collier on Bankruptcy § 14.01 [4.6] atpp. 1258-59, and § 17.27 atp. 1719, fn. 3 (14th ed.1978) . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. ARRINGTON,, 309 F.3d 40 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. . . Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions (Criminal) ¶ 14.01, at 14-25 (2002); 2 Kevin F. . . . Cf. 1 Sand ¶ 14.01, at 14-25 {"If a violation of section 111(b) is charged, add'. . . . find the defendant guilty you must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he acted forcibly. 1 Sand ¶ 14.01 . . .

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PULASKI, v. T. CURRY P. C. R. M. v. P. C., 301 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 2002)

. . . P. 14.01. . . .

DRIEBEL, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, t, L., 298 F.3d 622 (7th Cir. 2002)

. . . Silveü, PubliC Employee Dischaege & Discipline § 14.01[D] at 989 (2001). Cf. United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHELL OIL COMPANY v., 294 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . See 3 The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01[8][b], at 14-162.2 (Susan M. Cooke, ed., 2001). . . .

L. SCHUMACHER, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 196 F. Supp. 2d 716 (N.D. Ill. 2002)

. . . functioning and performing daily activities, and therefore did not meet the “B” criteria under Listing 14.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHELL OIL COMPANY v., 281 F.3d 812 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . See 3 The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.01[8][b], at 14-162.2 (Susan M. Cooke, ed., 2001). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERKINS, 166 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (W.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . Tex.Code.Crim.PROc.Ann. art. 14.01(a) (Vernon 1977). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SEALED JUVENILE, 255 F.3d 213 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . Ann., art. 14.01(b) (Vernon 1977), it expressly states that a Customs agent is not a peace officer. . . . Ann. art. 14.01(a) (Vernon 1977) ( “A peace officer or any other person, may, without a warrant, arrest . . . Ann. art. 14.01(a) (giving the power to a “peace officer or any other person ”) (emphasis added). . . . ANN. art. 14.01(a) (requiring the arresting person to have witnessed a felony or a breach of the peace . . .

ESTATE OF RICK, Jr. RICK, v. STEVENS, Q a a, 145 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (N.D. Iowa 2001)

. . . Transfer pursuant to § 14.01(a).1039 III. CONCLUSION.1040 Where should this case be litigated? . . .

ATWATER v. CITY OF LAGO VISTA, 532 U.S. 318 (U.S. 2001)

. . . Ann., Art. 14.01 (Vernon 1977) (“for any offense committed in his presence or within his view”); Utah . . .

WILLIAMS, v. BLAISDELL,, 173 F. Supp. 2d 574 (N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . Lance’s understanding of the possession order, his conduct would have been consistent with Article 14.01 . . .

TOKIO MARINE FIRE INSURANCE GROUP, v. J. J. PHOENIX EXPRESS, LTD. v. J. J. v. U. S. A., 156 F. Supp. 2d 889 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . Saul Sorkin, 3 Goods in Transit § 14.01 [1] (2000) [hereafter “Sorkin”]. . . . Id. at § 14.01[2], a. . . .

SINCO, INC. v. METRO- NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD COMPANY,, 133 F. Supp. 2d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Article 14.01 provided: Contractor shall ensure that all goods, components, parts, equipment, accessories . . .

In GUNDRY GLASS, INC. FINOVA v., 257 B.R. 422 (Bankr. D. Md. 2001)

. . . ALEXANDER GORDON, IV, GORDON ON MARYLAND FORECLOSURES, § 14.01 (3d ed.1994). . . .