Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 253 So. 3d 1024 (Fla. 2018)

. . . The Committee proposes amending standard criminal jury instructions 10.13 (Shooting or Throwing Missiles . . . Florida Bar News , the Committee received one comment pertaining to the proposal to amend instruction 10.13 . . . With regard to instruction 10.13, we modify the title to replace "Missiles in Dwelling" with "A [Missile . . . APPENDIX 10.13 SHOOTING OR THROWING MISSILES IN DWELLING A [MISSILE] [STONE] [HARD SUBSTANCE] [AT] [WITHIN . . .

IN RE PARAGON OFFSHORE PLC, v. PLC, S. A. R. I. FDR H. T. A. A P. J., 588 B.R. 735 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . See generally Glen Blanks, New York Contract Law § 10.13 [West's N.Y. Prac. Series 2018]. . . .

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, U. S. NGN W. v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA, 898 F.3d 243 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Id. at 34, § 10.13. Del. Code Ann. tit. 12, § 3801(g). Trust Agreement at 4, § 2.04. . . .

FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC, v. TVEYES, INC., 883 F.3d 169 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Patry, Patry on Copyright § 10.13, at 10-47 to 10-49 (2012). Op. at 176 (emphasis in original). . . .

ZOHAR CDO LTD. v. PATRIARCH PARTNERS, LLC,, 286 F. Supp. 3d 634 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . (See Shapiro Decl., Ex. 1, § 10.13.) . . .

IN RE LINN ENERGY, LLC,, 576 B.R. 532 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . interpretation of contracts, supports this conclusion (see generally Glen Banks, New York Contract Law § 10.13 . . .

BLACKROCK ALLOCATION TARGET SHARES SERIES S. PORTFOLIO, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SA NV, v. N. A. U. S. v. NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA SF v. N. A. AG, v. N. A., 247 F. Supp. 3d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Moreover, Section 10.13 of the Trust Agreement specifies that it "shall be governed by and construed . . .

IN RE RELATIVITY FASHION, LLC,, 565 B.R. 50 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Docket No. 1997, at 5 (citing Hearing Ex. 43-A, at § 10.13); see also Sessions Payroll Management v. . . .

DASH, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,, 238 F. Supp. 3d 375 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Id. at ¶ 10.13. • She discussed the book “Fifty Shades of Grey,” a sexually charged novel, with her colleagues . . . she shared with plaintiff “her sexual activities for the weekend with two different men.”); id. at ¶ 10.13 . . . Id. at ¶¶ 10.13-10.15. . . .

IN RE WYLY,, 552 B.R. 338 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . .) § 10.13. . Id. § 2.2; Joint Stipulations ¶ 162. . Wyly Ex. . . .

BECKER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. J. P., 172 F. Supp. 3d 777 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Trustee and Owners of Bonds as may be lawfully granted under the provisions of the Act ,... ” Indenture § 10.13 . . .

MYERS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SCHOELLER ARCA SYSTEMS, INC. B. V. f k a N. V., 171 F. Supp. 3d 107 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . B pmbl., § 10.13.) . . .

EQUITRANS SERVICES, LLC, LLC, LP, v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC,, 154 F. Supp. 3d 189 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . namely, the Watson West slide at Milepost 8.57-8,64 (“Watson West”) and the Marisa sinkhole at Milepost 10.13 . . .

LNV CORP. v. HARRISON FAMILY BUSINESS, LLC,, 132 F. Supp. 3d 683 (D. Md. 2015)

. . . ECF 17-2 § 10.13 at 13, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 10.13 at 14, Deed of Trust for HFB . . . The Contract Documents As noted, both deeds of trust (ECF 17-2 § 10.13 at 13; ECF 17-7 § 10.13 at 14) . . . ECF 17-2, § 10.13 at 13, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7, § 10.13 at 14, Deed of Trust for . . . ECF 17-2 § 10.13 at 13, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 10.13 at 14, Deed of Trust for HFB . . .

UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON,, 129 F. Supp. 3d 1069 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . Ex. 299 at p. 243. 10.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CATHEY,, 619 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 10.13. 50 C.F.R. § 20.11(a). . . . . § 10.13(c)(1) (2013); see id. § 10.13(b) (“The purpose [of this list] is to inform the public of the . . .

UNITED STATES v. VANCE CROOKED ARM, v. G., 788 F.3d 1065 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 10.13. . . . FWS regulations also state that a “Migratory bird” for MBTA purposes means any species listed in § 10.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOUNTS, RUGS AND HORNS PROTECTED BY THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT,, 124 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . . § 10.13; 16 U.S.C. § 712(2). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESTRELLA, a. k. a., 758 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . (Crim.) 10.13; Paul, 129 So.3d at 1062 (noting that Fla. . . . (Crim.) 10.13 (emphasis added). . . .

ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . .”); id., art. 10.13 (“Any and all claims and causes of action that were owned by ASARCO or its Estate . . .

ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . .”); id., art. 10.13 (“Any and all claims and causes of action that were owned by ASARCO or its Estate . . .

ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . causes of action that were owned by ASARCO or its Estate as of the Effective Date,” id. at 369 (section 10.13 . . . [citing plan sections 10.12 and 10.13] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized . . .

ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . causes of action that were owned by ASARCO or its Estate as of the Effective Date,” id. at 369 (section 10.13 . . . [citing plan sections 10.12 and 10.13] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized . . .

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. P. BEAUDREAU, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. P. LLC,, 25 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 10.13. . . . Russia, each concerning the protection of migratory birds. 16 U.S.C. § 703(a); see also 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 . . .

ASARCO, LLC, a a v. MONTANA RESOURCES, INC. a LLP, a, 514 B.R. 168 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . Article 10.13, titled “Vesting and Enforcement of Causes of Action,” states, again in relevant part: . . . [Id. art. 10.13]. . . . A review of the Schedules attached to both Articles 10.5 and 10.13 of the Plan, and to the Confirmation . . . evident from the text quoted above, claims against MRI were not specifically referenced in Article 10.13 . . . In the instant case, if Section 7.10 of the Disclosure Statement is read together with Article 10.13 . . .

CLARK, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 933 F. Supp. 2d 862 (S.D.W. Va. 2013)

. . . Effective October 12, 2009, the Plan was amended to include Section 10.13, which contains a limitations . . . Clark argues that section 10.13 should be voided because it conflicts with the three-year provision of . . . Nationwide’s attempted reconciliation of section 10.11 and section 10.13 is not convincing. . . . Even if, as Nationwide argues, section 10.13 applies only to legal actions related to benefits, nothing . . . Section 10.11 does not direct the reader to section 10.13 or otherwise indicate that other provisions . . .

CINOTTO, v. DELTA AIR LINES INC. A., 674 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . Early Retirement Date up to the date specified in Section 10.13 [of the Plan].” . . .

BAZILE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON,, 858 F. Supp. 2d 718 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . The raw data for the PDRFs showed a mean score of 79.35, with a 10.13 standard deviation, for the 438 . . .

BURDEN, v. SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE SERVICES, a, 848 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . Burden concedes that his compensation under the 2005 Plan was effectively $10.13 per hour for 2006 and . . .

UNITED STATES v. BRIGHAM OIL AND GAS, L. P. v. v., 840 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (D.N.D. 2012)

. . . . § 10.13. There are approximately 836 species of birds protected under the Act. The U.S. . . .

ELLINGTON CREDIT FUND, LTD. v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 837 F. Supp. 2d 162 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . (Compare PSA § 10.13 (describing the Trustee’s liability under the PSA and noting that this section “ . . .

SKF USA INC. SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF S. p. A. S. p. A. SKF U. K. SKF v. UNITED STATES,, 800 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . On August 31, 2009, Commerce published the Final Results, which assigned dumping margins of 10.13% to . . .

KORTLANDER, v. CORNELL,, 816 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Mont. 2011)

. . . . § 10.13. . . .

In GSC, INC., 453 B.R. 132 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . (Prepetition Credit Agreement, § 10.13.) . . .

MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, v. CUOMO,, 785 F. Supp. 2d 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . . §§ 10.03(d), 10.06(c), 10.13(c), 47.01, and 47.03(f). . . .

HOLT, J. S. H. a v. QUALITY EGG, L. L. C. d b a A. S. a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a J. T. a v. L. L. C. d b a, 777 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (N.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . Birds were also observed sitting/flying around and over the openings. 10.13.Samples collected during . . .

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ROBERT W. BAIRD CO. INC. v. W. Co., 756 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Ariz. 2010)

. . . Similarly, § 10.13 adds that “[i]t is the purpose of this Article to provide such remedies to the Trustee . . .

EREH PHASE I LLC, v. UNITED STATES, GBA, 95 Fed. Cl. 108 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . 10.1 that certain security standards will be based on the “configuration of the site and lot” and in ¶ 10.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. UMANZOR, v., 617 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . determined the drugs from this second transaction were 19% pure, weighed 53.31 grams, and contained 10.13 . . .

SHELDEN, v. STATE, 38 So. 3d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . (Crim.) 10.13). . . .

In ASARCO LLC,, 420 B.R. 314 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . federal law), and the Asbestos Insurance Actions, shall continue and be pursued as provided in Article 10.13 . . .

DOW CHEMICAL CANADA INC. v. HRD CORPORATION d b a v., 656 F. Supp. 2d 427 (D. Del. 2009)

. . . (D.I. 240, Exh. 1 ¶ 10.13.) . . . homopolymers and co-polymers having a number average molecular weight (‘Mn’).... ” (See D.I. 240, Exh. 1 ¶ 10.13 . . . (D.I. 240 at Exh. 1, ¶ 10.13 (emphasis added).) . . .

v., 133 T.C. 136 (T.C. 2009)

. . . 11.58 9.98 10.96 11.29 11.21 11.48 11.12 11.98 10.48 11.36 12.05 11.22 1999 11.29 10.65 9.08 10.06 9.33 10.13 . . .

In H. VANDENBOSCH M. A. v., 405 B.R. 253 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . The Law of Property § 10.13 (3d ed.2000). . . .

In MORTENSEN, v., 415 B.R. 383 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa 2009)

. . . Restaurant expenses ranged from $10.13 at McDonald’s to $91.03 at a Japanese restaurant. . . .

M. HILL, v. W. GOULD, Et Al., 555 F.3d 1003 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . . § 10.13 (1999). The list did not include the mute swan. . . .

SAVOY SENIOR HOUSING CORPORATION LLC, v. TRBC MINISTRIES, LLC,, 401 B.R. 589 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . § 10.13.) . . .

FLATHEAD CONTRACTORS, LLC, v. Ed SCHAFER,, 298 F. App'x 988 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . For the excavated rock used in lieu of Grading A material, the Board established a price of $10.13 per . . . As for the Board’s decision to award $10.13 per cubic yard for use of the excavated material, that award . . .

KROUPA, LLC, v. D. GARBUS,, 583 F. Supp. 2d 949 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . This side letter agreement is expressly referenced in Section 10.13 of the LLC Agreement, but unbeknownst . . . (R. 18-3, Def.’s Opp., Ex. 1(A), LLC Agreement § 10.13; R. 1, Not. of Removal, Ex. . . .

STATE v. A. KETTELL, Sr., 980 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 2008)

. . . (Crim.) 10.13. . . . (Crim.) 10.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 516 F. Supp. 2d 770 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 10.13. . . . .

In McLANEY P. P. v., 375 B.R. 666 (M.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . graduation, he took a job with Five Star Federal Credit Union as a network administrator earning about $10.13 . . .

DIAMOND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. v. AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS B. V. v., 517 F. Supp. 2d 212 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions §§ 10.13 to 10.25 (4th ed.2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. ZAK, Jr., 486 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . . § 10.13 (2007) (listing the bald eagle among birds protected by the Act). 2. . . . asked the court to take judicial notice of the bald eagle’s protected status pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 . . .

In W. HOVIS, W. v., 396 B.R. 895 (D.S.C. 2007)

. . . Ex. 11 ¶ 10.13.) In Glaesner v. . . .

SEESE, III, v. STATE, 955 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . (Crim.) 10.13 (§ 790.19, shooting or throwing missiles in a dwelling); 12.4 (§ 806.13, criminal mischief . . .

A. KETTELL, Sr. v. STATE, 950 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . (Crim.) 10.13. . . . (Crim.) 10.13. The State, however, requested two additional instructions based on Holtsdaw v. . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A. LP, W., 362 B.R. 149 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007)

. . . In this regard, section 10.13 of the Servicing Agreement provides: “The parties agree that each of the . . . (Servicing Agreement at § 10.13.) . . .

AMIE, v. CITY OF JENNINGS,, 217 F. App'x 338 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶10.13[8], at 183 (2d ed.1972)); Metalock Repair Serv. v. . . .

JACKSON- SHAW COMPANY, v. JACKSONVILLE AVIATION AUTHORITY, a, 510 F. Supp. 2d 691 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Using Majestic’s numbers, which show a total projected return on the first building of 10.13 percent, . . .

In INTERNATIONAL ZINC COATINGS CHEMICAL CORP., 355 B.R. 76 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organizations § 10.13 at 10-40 (2002) (asserting . . .

In PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE PPA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, v. Jr. v. v. v. v. v. v. IDE v. v. K. v. v. v. v., 460 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . Manual For Complex Litigation § 10.13 at 13.” . . .

In MIRANT CORPORATION,, 348 B.R. 725 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . common stock and would be entitled to a share in litigation proceeds pursuant to Plan §§ 5.1(c) and 10.13 . . . Under the Settlement, however, Pepeo will receive no distributions pursuant to Plan § 10.13. . . . Plan could not transfer their interest in litigation proceeds to be distributed pursuant to Plan § 10.13 . . .

In MARINE ENERGY SYSTEMS CORPORATION, W. v., 362 B.R. 247 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2006)

. . . Section 10.13 of the APA, titled as “Governing Law,” provides that Delaware law governs “all questions . . .

L. HA MIN, v. s, LEWIS, Lt., 440 F. Supp. 2d 715 (M.D. Tenn. 2006)

. . . Similarly, the Magistrate Judge quoted Defendant’s Policy Number 10.13, governing nondenominational inmate . . . (See Policy 10.13 at “Exhibit C.”) Denny Aff., ¶ 8 (emphasis added.) . . . volunteer is located and obtained to lead, conduct, and supervise such services pursuant to Policy 10.13 . . . As discussed above, however, there is no requirement in Policy 10.13 that Muslim services are “allowed . . . While it might be argued that Policy No. 10.13 applies only to "nondenominational” religious services . . .

In ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., 342 B.R. 142 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., XJCA Facility Credit Agreement § 10.13; Parnassos Facility Credit Agreement § X.13; HVA Facility . . . Credit Agreement (Joint Exh. 26) § 10.13; Century-TCI Facility Credit Agreement § 10.15; Olympus Facility . . .

MIRANT CORPORATION, v. THE SOUTHERN COMPANY,, 337 B.R. 107 (N.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Id. at 15, ¶ 40; Plan at 31-32, § 10.13. E. The Grounds of the Motion for Withdrawal. . . .

UNITED STATES v. STEPHANS,, 142 F. App'x 821 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 10.13 (2005). . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,, 537 F. Supp. 2d 700 (M.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . Intervenor would have owed an estimated $7,074 in taxes and would have an effective tax rate of $10.13% . . .

In McLANEY, P. P. v., 314 B.R. 228 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2004)

. . . August 1999 he took a job with Five Star Federal Credit Union as a network administrator earning around $10.13 . . .

E. RATHBUN, v. AUTOZONE, INC., 361 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . example (again using the 1999 table), if a new PSM were placed in Quartile No. 4, she would earn between $10.13 . . .

In CRICHLOW,, 322 B.R. 229 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2004)

. . . Id. at § 10.13. . . .

In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet's Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and . . .

In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet’s Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANTOINE,, 318 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 10.13, so trafficking in Canada necessarily affects the American population. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. HARDMAN, In v. v. Jr., 297 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 10.13. . . .

In AEROVOX, INC. v. LLC,, 281 B.R. 419 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2002)

. . . provisions set forth in this Section 9.2 and in Sections 9.1(b) (Termination Fee), 3.3 (expenses), 10.13 . . .

M. HILL, v. A. NORTON,, 275 F.3d 98 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 10.13 (2000). . . . judgment for appellant, and vacate the Secretary’s List of Migratory Birds, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 . . . Section 10.13, in turn, lists “all species of migratory birds protected by the [MBTA].” 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 . . . The only swans on the List of Migratory Birds in § 10.13 are trumpeter, tundra, and whooper swans. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 (1973). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARSTON, Jr. IV, 175 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . migratory birds protected by the international conventions and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act appears in § 10.13 . . . Mourning doves are included in the dove species of migratory birds. 50 C.F.R. § 10.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HUTSON,, 19 F. App'x 466 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . . §§ 20.11(a)(l)-(2), 10.13, 20.103, 20.105. The government proved that Mr. . . .

In MOTORSPORTS MERCHANDISE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 160 F. Supp. 2d 1392 (N.D. Ga. 2001)

. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions §§ 10.13 to 10.25 (3d ed.1992). . . .

JACKSON, v. HOCHADEL ROOFING CO., 794 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . benefits accordingly: $202.69 for permanent total disability plus supplemental benefits in the amount of $10.13 . . . Jackson advocated: $165.23 Social Security Disability $202.69 Permanent Total Disability + $ 10.13 Supplemental . . .

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY d b a v. MCI METRO ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES, INC. G. B. A. In, 128 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . by MCImetro and provisioned by Ameritech in accordance with the procedures described in this Section 10.13 . . . by MCIm’ is a mandatory provision and requires MCI to place MACD orders in accordance with Section 10.13 . . .

HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, v. GLICKMAN, U. S., 217 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 10.13. Protected from whom? . . .

B. GLICK K. v. UNITED STATES, 96 F. Supp. 2d 850 (S.D. Ind. 2000)

. . . Partnerships $111,300,571 $115,419,009 GBG_$12,681,134_$13,010,769 Percentage of 7.62% to 10.15% 7.17% to 10.13% . . .

SUGAR BUSTERS LLC, v. C. BRENNAN M., 177 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . Tour 18 I Ltd., 155 F.3d 526, 541 (5th Cir.1998); Thompson Med., 753 F.2d at 217; 2 McCarthy § 10.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOON LAKE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., 45 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (D. Colo. 1999)

. . . . § 10.13 (listing approximately 925 protected bird species, many of which are not game birds and have . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 809 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . . § 10.13 (1987). . . .

H. WILLIAMS, As v. CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER TRUST COMPANY,, 1 F. Supp. 2d 836 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . . § 10.13. . . .

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. v. E. SHALALA,, 131 F.3d 1050 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

. . . charge ratio, and would deduct the product — $9.87—from the $20 PPS payment, leaving a PPS payment of $10.13 . . . Under its method, then, Appalachian would be reimbursed $10.13 -1- $15 = $25.13, placing them in “substantially . . .

POWELL, AFL- CIO, CLC v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION, INTERNATIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO, CLC, Jr. v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION,, 119 F.3d 703 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 10.13 at 10-35 (3d ed.1992) (defining “unclaimed funds” as the balance . . .

M. RHOADS, v. JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES,, 957 F. Supp. 1102 (E.D. Mo. 1997)

. . . X§ 10.13.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALES,, 957 F. Supp. 1225 (D.N.M. 1997)

. . . . §§ 10.13 and 17.11 list the protected species while section 21.11 requires a permit in order to take . . .

DAVIS OIL COMPANY v. TS, INC., 962 F. Supp. 872 (E.D. La. 1997)

. . . 31:129 (West 1989); see also Saúl Litvinoff, Law of Obligations, 5 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise §§ 10.13 . . .

ALTAMONT GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 92 F.3d 1239 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . subsequently authorized PGT to begin construction but lowered the pipeline’s allowed rate of return to 10.13% . . . approved rate structure that included a return on equity of 12.75%—not far from the midpoint of the 10.13 . . . go forward in order to satisfy the growing demand for gas but it reduced PGT’s return on equity to 10.13% . . . by conditioning PGT’s certificate upon the pipeline earning the minimum reasonable rate of return, 10.13% . . .

MAHLER, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE E., 927 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Ind. 1996)

. . . . § 10.13. See also United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. RUFF,, 179 B.R. 967 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Paragraph 10.13 of the Agreement eondi-tioned payment of brokers’ commissions upon approval of the Bankruptcy . . .

In CF I FABRICATORS OF UTAH, INC. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA COMBINED FUND, v. CF I FABRICATORS OF UTAH, INC., 169 B.R. 984 (D. Utah 1994)

. . . See, e.g., Confirmation Order, Exhibit IB, Asset Purchase Agreement, ¶¶ 2.3, 10.4, 10.13, & 12.1, In . . . See, e.g., Confirmation Order, Exhibit IB, Asset Purchase Agreement, ¶¶ 2.3, 10.4, 10.13, & 12.1, In . . .