Florida Statute 10.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

	The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
	The statute you have selected cannot be found.

F.S. 10.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 10.12 on Casetext
Amendments to 10.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 10.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 10.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:
MIRKIN, v. XOOM ENERGY, LLC XOOM LLC,, 931 F.3d 173 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . /11/2013-8/9/2013 15.05 12.36 21.76% 8/9/2013-9/10/2013 15.55 10.1 53.96% 9/10/2013-10/8/2013 14.79 10.12 . . .
IN RE VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONAL f k a Su v., 603 B.R. 538 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . (See Plan at §§ 5.3, 10.7 & 10.12). . . .
IN RE SPIECH FARMS, LLC,, 592 B.R. 152 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2018)

. . . (Id. at § 10.12). . . .
WTA TOUR, INC. v. SUPER SLAM LIMITED, 339 F. Supp. 3d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . Exh. 2 § 10.12(a), (c), ECF No. 1-2. . . .
SODEXOMAGIC, LLC v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, 333 F. Supp. 3d 426 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . This Agreement shall inure to and bind all parties, their successors and assigns. 10.12 Collection Costs . . . that Sodexo is not entitled to attorneys' fees, and certainly not on summary judgment, because section 10.12 . . . Item (5) pertains to attorneys' fees, and more specifically, § 10.12 of the Management Agreement, which . . . states: 10.12 Collection Costs and Costs to Enforce Indemnity Obligations. . . . (Sodexo SOF Ex. 1) Drexel contends that the language of § 10.12 only provides for fees in collections . . .
UNITED STATES v. OBENDORF,, 894 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 10.12.) . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 20.21 ; see also id. § 10.12 (defining "take"). . . .
BRANTA, LLC, a LLC, a US a a v. NEWFIELD PRODUCTION COMPANY, a, 310 F. Supp. 3d 1166 (D. Colo. 2018)

. . . Pursuant to Section 10.12(a) of the PSAs between Newfield and Harvest (US) and Branta E & P, respectively . . .
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, v. CLAY, In As A An An, 811 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 10.12 (2014). . . . .
IN RE LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., 544 B.R. 62 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . proposed that it should be permitted to file a summary judgment motion on the issue of whether section 10.12 . . . C § 10.12(e); Miller Decl. Ex. 4. . . . The Credit Agreement further provided, in section 10.12(e) (the “Damages Waiver”), that [Spanish Broadcasting . . . C § 10.12(e). B. . . . C § 10.12(e). . . .
IN RE TRANS- INDUSTRIES, INC. J. v. S., 538 B.R. 323 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . Paragraph 10.12 of the Plan provides that “[t]he ‘named Fiduciaries’ of this Plan are (1) the Employer . . .
J. O. C. FARMS, LLC. v. RURAL COMMUNITY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. d b a s J., 131 F. Supp. 3d 514 (E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . Moreover, the- 2009 rainfall in- Beaufort County for this four-month period was 10.12 inches less than . . .
UNITED STATES v. CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION CITGO L. P., 801 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 10.12 (“Take” means to “pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or collect.”) . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 10.12. . . . .
UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON,, 129 F. Supp. 3d 1069 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . Ex. 58(c) at pdf p. 90. 10.12. . . .
UNITED STATES v. VANCE CROOKED ARM, v. G., 788 F.3d 1065 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 10.12. The punishment scheme for violations of the MBTA has changed over time. . . . consists or is composed in whole or part, of any such bird or any part, nest, or egg thereof.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . .
BETHANY TRACE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. WHISPERING LAKES I, LLC, a a f k a, 155 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Additional Common Areas may be designated by the Developer pursuant to Section 10.12 hereof. . . . And this interpretation is further reinforced by section 10.12 of the Declaration, which permits the . . .
ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . Id., art. 10.12 (“Except as otherwise expressly provided in the [Plan], on the Effective Date, all of . . .
ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . Id., art. 10.12 (“Except as otherwise expressly provided in the [Plan], on the Effective Date, all of . . .
ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . ASARCO would be vested with “all of ASARCO’s and its Estate’s property and assets,” id. at 368 (section 10.12 . . . [citing plan sections 10.12 and 10.13] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized . . .
ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . ASARCO would be vested with “all of ASARCO’s and its Estate’s property and assets,” id. at 368 (section 10.12 . . . [citing plan sections 10.12 and 10.13] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized . . .
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. NETO,, 27 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . A § 10.12). . . .
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. P. BEAUDREAU, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. P. LLC,, 25 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 10.12. . . . .
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, v. GOLDMARK,, 994 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (W.D. Wash. 2014)

. . . In addition, Skokomish Indian Tribe asserts that it received a copy of Chapter 10.12 of the Kitsap County . . . initiate proceedings against members of the Tribe found gathering on county lands in violation of Chapter 10.12 . . .
In LaMONT, 740 F.3d 397 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . See Real Estate Taxation §§ 10.12, 11.8. Here, the property owners paid their subsequent taxes. . . . .
In LaMONT, 740 F.3d 397 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . See Real Estate Taxation §§ 10.12, 11.8. Here, the property owners paid their subsequent taxes. . . . .
BRYANT L. Jr. v. SOUTHLAND TUBE,, 294 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . He received a $.50 raise after 90 days and an annual raise to $10.12 on May 22, 2006. (Id.) . . .
ASARCO, LLC, a a v. MONTANA RESOURCES, INC. a LLP, a, 514 B.R. 168 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . Absent any provision to the contrary, however, sections 10.12 and 10.13 of Parent’s Plan appear to establish . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND J. v. CAPITAL RESTORATION PAINTING CO., 919 F. Supp. 2d 680 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . See Pension Plan § 10.12(b)(2) (providing that interest on unpaid contributions is determined “at the . . . C.Liquidated Damages Section 10.12 of the Pension Plan mirrors the language of section 515 of ERISA, . . . See Pension Plan, § 10.12(b)(3); 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(C). . . .
In TP, INC. TP, INC. v. N. A. P., 479 B.R. 373 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . determined by binding arbitration in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act Master Loan Agreement, ¶ 10.12 . . . Master Loan Agreement, ¶ 10.12(b). . . .
MIDMOUNTAIN CONTRACTORS INC. v. AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 893 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (W.D. Wash. 2012)

. . . . ¶ 10.12.) On April 12, 2011, MidMountain tendered the Counterclaim to ASIC. (Id. Ex. G.) . . . installation was determined to have been faulty causing the product to fail in its essential purpose.... ”), 10.12 . . .
UNITED STATES v. BRIGHAM OIL AND GAS, L. P. v. v., 840 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (D.N.D. 2012)

. . . According to 50 C.F.R. 10.12, “take” means “to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect . . . Further, the words of the regulation defining “take” at 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 (“pursue,” “hunt,” “capture . . .
HOLT, J. S. H. a v. QUALITY EGG, L. L. C. d b a A. S. a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a J. T. a v. L. L. C. d b a, 777 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (N.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . material was observed in the feed mill closed mixing system, ingredient storage and truck filling areas. 10.12 . . .
In SOPOREX, INC. G. Of v. LLC, B. R. W. M. F., 446 B.R. 750 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Section 10.12 of the Contract provides: “This agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. ROSE CITY GLASS CO. INC., 729 F. Supp. 2d 336 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . VI, § 6; Compl., Ex. 3 (“Pension Plan”), §§ 10.07, 10.12. . . . See Pension Plan § 10.12. . . . VI, § 6; Pension Plan, §§ 10.07, 10.12. . . .
UNITED STATES v. APOLLO ENERGIES, INC. v., 611 F.3d 679 (10th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 10.12. . . . define “possession” as “detention and control,” and “to take” as to “capture, or collect.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 10.12. . . .
MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED v. D. KNICKEL L. P. L. P. KHL, v. LLC,, 723 F. Supp. 2d 1161 (D.N.D. 2010)

. . . Section 10.12 of the NPORIC provides: "THIS CONVEYANCE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED UNDER THE LAWS . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. EXECUTIVE PAINTING, INC., 719 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . ¶ 17, Ex. 2 at 16 & Ex. 3 §§ 10.07, 10.12. . . . Section 10.12 of the Pension Plan parallels the relief outlined in ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2). . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, J. a v. LASALLE GLASS MIRROR CO. d b a d b a La Co., 267 F.R.D. 430 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . Compk, Ex. 3 (copy of plan document for the Pension Plan) § 10.12(b). . . . Compk, Ex. 3 (copy of plan document for the Pension Plan) § 10.12(b). . . . . § 1132(g)(2) and section 10.12 of the plan documents, which both permit an award of “other legal or . . . Compk, Ex. 3 (copy of plan document for the Pension Plan) § 10.12(b). . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, v. BRIGHTON PAINTING COMPANY, d b a Co., 267 F.R.D. 426 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . .; see also Plan Agreement, §§ 10.12(b)(2) & (3). . . . Defendant is also obligated under Section 10.12 of the Plan Agreement to pay “reasonable attorneys’ fees . . . Plan Agreement, § 10.12(b)(5). As set forth in the Declaration of Jerome A. . . . See Plan Agreement, § 10.12(b); Trust Agreement, Article VI, § 6. . . .
DULTZ, v. VELEZ,, 726 F. Supp. 2d 480 (D.N.J. 2010)

. . . N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.6; N.J.A.C. 10:49-10.12. . . .
ASTRA OIL TRADING NV, GP, LP LLC, v. PETROBRAS AMERICA INC. LLC, LLC,, 718 F. Supp. 2d 805 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Paragraph 10.12 of the Shareholders Agreement provides: Recovery of Litigation Costs. . . .
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, v. NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, AFSCME a a v. AFSCME a a v. Of AFSCME a a v. AFSCME a a, 582 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . 390 U.S. 102, 110, 88 S.Ct. 733, 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968); see also James & Hazard, Civil Procedure § 10.12 . . .
D. v., 132 T.C. 368 (T.C. 2009)

. . . addition to their interests in the holding L.L.C.s, a 16.66-percent interest in one L.L.C. directly and a 10.12 . . .
UNITED STATES v. GILKERSON,, 556 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 10.12 as “any individual, firm, corporation, association, partnership, club, or private body, any . . .
THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, W. v. KEMPTHORNE, H. DALE HALL,, 538 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 10.12. . . .
GERALD CHAMALES CORPORATION, v. OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. L. v., 557 F. Supp. 2d 494 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . E, ¶ 10.12. . . .
E. JARMUTH, v. COX M. D., 278 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 10.12(a) (2007). . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, v. AUXIER DRYWALL, LLC a k a a k a, 531 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . § 1132(g)(2) and section 10.12 of plaintiffs Industry Pension Plan, the Court shall award plaintiff . . .
E. MUKAMAL, v. BAKES, C. LLC, LLC, M. S. C. B. LLP., 383 B.R. 798 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . G (Plan) at 21, § 10.12 (emphasis added). The key phrase is the “Creditor D & O Claims.” . . . The Plan at 21, § 10.12, provides: "[u]pon entry of the Confirmation Order, the D & O Trustee is authorized . . .
APPLIED ELASTOMERICS, INCORPORATED, a v. Z- MAN FISHING PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, a, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1031 (N.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . A, § 10.12 (“this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its . . .
KOYO CORPORATION OF U. S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 497 F.3d 1231 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . administrative review and litigation concluded in 1998 and resulted in final assessment rates of 9.92%, 10.12% . . .
In ENRON CORP. v. No., 364 B.R. 489 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . The arbitration clause contained in section 10.12 of the Master Agreement provides, in relevant part, . . . Agreement, involving the Parties and/or their respective representatives (for purposes of this Section 10.12 . . .
KEITH, v. MITCHELL,, 466 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . ABA Guidelines, Death Penalty Cases, Guideline 10.12(A)(1); Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052 . . . The commentary following Guideline 10.12 expressly notes that requesting such a report in Ohio may amount . . . Additionally, Guideline 10.12 states that “counsel should ... provide to the report preparer information . . . Banks’ conduct fell well below the standards set forth in ABA Guideline 10.12. . . . See ABA Guideline 10.12 and accompanying commentary. . . .
In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Section 10.12 of the Agreement (entitled “Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Succession to Business . . . Section 10.12 unambiguously expressed the will of the Agreement’s creator, the Debt- or, that the entity . . . Section 10.12 could not bind BONY as a matter of contract law. . . . The expression of will contained in Section 10.12 did have effect as a matter of trust law, however, . . . "shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida.” .Section 10.12 . . .
In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Section 10.12 of the Agreement (entitled “Merger, Conversion, Consolidation or Succession to Business . . . Section 10.12 unambiguously expressed the will of the Agreement’s creator, the Debt- or, that the entity . . . Section 10.12 could not bind BONY as a matter of contract law. . . . The expression of will contained in Section 10.12 did have effect as a matter of trust law, however, . . . "shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida." .Section 10.12 . . .
KEITH, v. MITCHELL,, 455 F.3d 662 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . ABA Guidelines, Death Penalty Cases, Guideline 10.12(A)(1); Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052 . . . The commentary following Guideline 10.12 expressly notes that requesting such a report in Ohio may amount . . . Additionally, Guideline 10.12 states that “counsel should ... provide to the report preparer information . . . Banks conduct fell well below the standards set forth in ABA Guideline 10.12. . . . See ABA Guideline 10.12 and accompanying commentary. . . .
In UAL CORPORATION,, 346 B.R. 783 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . TIA, § 11; Lease, § 28; Indenture, § 10.12. . . .
UNITED STATES v. J. ABBATE, Jr., 439 F. Supp. 2d 625 (E.D. La. 2006)

. . . . § 10.12 defines "take” as “to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt . . .
IZZO, v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY,, 235 F.R.D. 177 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Section 10.12 of the same agreement states: Cooperation and Coordination. . . . phrase “as is necessary and appropriate to effect the transactions contemplated hereby” in Section 10.12 . . .
UNITED STATES v. J. PENA,, 61 M.J. 776 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2005)

. . . See AFI 31-205, ¶ 10.12. In execution, MSR is virtually identical to parole. . . .
UNITED STATES v. R. KAPP,, 419 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 10.12. . . .
THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON,, 374 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . . § 10.12 (2003). . . . .
FUND FOR ANIMALS, W. v. NORTON, U. S. U. S., 365 F. Supp. 2d 394 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 10.12: “Take means to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to . . .
DUKES, v. WAL- MART STORES, INC., 222 F.R.D. 137 (N.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . It took 10.12 years for women to reach Store Manager, compared with 8.64 years for men. . . .
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES UNION AND INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, v. H. W. ELLIS PAINTING COMPANY, INC. a k a HW Co., 288 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . The default judgment was granted pursuant to section 10.12 of the Pension Plan, to which Ellis is bound . . . Section 10.12 contains a provision providing for judgment of liquidated damages, as well as unpaid contributions . . . Ex. 2 § 10.12(b)(3).) . . .
FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON, v., 281 F. Supp. 2d 209 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . § 10.12 (2003). . . . .
In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet's Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and . . .
In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet’s Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and . . .
In SYNTHROID MARKETING LITIGATION, 325 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . disbursements to consumer class counsel are $13.6 million, while TPP class counsel receive fees of $10.12 . . .
In U. S. OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. v. U. S. Co. J., 251 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . .
In U. S. OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. H. E. v. Co., 251 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11— 10.12. . . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . .
THOMPSON, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 240 F. Supp. 2d 562 (W.D. Va. 2003)

. . . The Commissioner would have the court bifurcate counsel’s court-related services (10.12 hours) from his . . .
PETIT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 239 F. Supp. 2d 761 (N.D. Ill. 2002)

. . . JR8 _17 10.12 Ail 3341 402 12.03% 80% of the White selection rate is 9.80%. . . .
DYNCORP, v. GTE CORPORATION,, 215 F. Supp. 2d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Thus, Section 10.12 provided: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary elsewhere in [the Purchase] Agreement . . . (Id., § 10.12). . . . DynCorp agreed, pursuant to Section 10.12 of the Purchase Agreement: Notwithstanding anything to the . . .
UNITED STATES, v. M. BIGELOW, U. S., 57 M.J. 64 (C.A.A.F. 2002)

. . . See AFI 51-205, The Ah* Force Corrections System, ¶ 10.12 (9 Apr 2001). . . .
WOOTTON ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, a v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a a a a, 34 F. App'x 57 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . Id. at 706; see Standard Provisions § 10.12. . . .
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. B. PIRIE, Jr. H., 191 F. Supp. 2d 161 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . . § 10.12. . . .
M. HILL, v. A. NORTON,, 275 F.3d 98 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 10.12. . . .
WALES, v. JACK M. BERRY, INC., 192 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Katz Chili’s Lunch 1.33 6/2/98 Airside F Gifts: Newspapers 29.78 5/22/98 Bryan Katz — Office Supplies 10.12 . . .
BANK UNITED OF TEXAS FSB, USAT L. P. v. UNITED STATES, 50 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . equity capital through the issuance of 3,420,000 shares of noncumulative preferred stock at a rate of 10.12 . . .
EDWARDSEN, Jr. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BP, 268 F.3d 781 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . See Mandelker, NEPA Law and Litigation § 10.12, at 10-80. . . .
JKC HOLDING COMPANY LLC, v. WASHINGTON SPORTS VENTURES, INCORPORATED, WFI R. B., 264 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2001)

. . . X, § 10.12. . . . .
UNITED STATES v. RED FRAME PARASAIL, VIN, 160 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D. Ariz. 2001)

. . . . § 10.12. . . . The applicable regulations echo the statutory language. 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 (“... any contrivance used . . . who is armed and actively pursuing wildlife with the intent to "take” it as defined in 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . .
FIFTH STREET ASSOCIATES, LP, v. U- HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 148 F. Supp. 2d 50 (D.D.C. 2001)

. . . (Compl., Ex. 3 ¶ 10.12.) . . . (See Compl. at Ex. 3 ¶ 10.12 (providing that the Option Agreement “shall be construed in accordance with . . .
GATEWAY, INC. v. VITECH AMERICA, INC. E. S. A. C. St. C. St., 143 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . .” (§ 10.12). By agreement of September 16, 1999, William C. St. Laurent and Georges C. St. . . .
UNITED STATES v. M. BIGELOW,, 55 M.J. 531 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2001)

. . . See AFI 51-205, The Air Force Corrections System, IT 10.12 (9 Apr 2001). . . .
In LOIS USA, INC. USA USA USA USA v. f k a, 264 B.R. 69 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . See Agreement § 10.12 (notices to Green Tree also to go to Winston & Strawn). . Cmplt. ¶ 35. . . . (Agreement § 10.12). . Agreement § 10.7. . . . . immediately available in Chicago, Illinois to the Agent at its address specified pursuant to subsection 10.12 . . .
VERMONT PURE HOLDINGS, LTD. v. DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. f k a DSD, 140 F. Supp. 2d 331 (D. Vt. 2001)

. . . . § 10.12 (“Dispute Resolution”) (emphasis added). . . . arising out of or relating to [the SLA]” which cannot be resolved by good faith negotiations, SLA, § 10.12 . . .
WOOTTON ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., 134 F. Supp. 2d 698 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . addressing delivery is the “exculpatory clause,” see id. at 596-97, of the “Standard Provisions,” section 10.12 . . . Standard Provisions § 10.12 (emphases added). This provision is very broad. . . .
SANKEY, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (M.D. Ala. 2000)

. . . Sears charged Sankey in 1999 for the "Credit Protection Plan” as follows: January, $9.68; February, $10.12 . . .
R. BERGAMO, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,, 192 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 10.12, by mailing the order to Bergamo at the post office address provided by him. . . .
JONES v. FILER, INC. d b a, 43 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (W.D. Ark. 1999)

. . . Franchise Agreement, at § 10.12 at 16. Thus, Arkansas substantive law will be applied in this case. . . .
UNITED STATES v. MOON LAKE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., 45 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (D. Colo. 1999)

. . . . § 10.12 (1997). . . . , defines “taking” as to “pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . .
H. WILLIAMS, As v. CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER TRUST COMPANY,, 1 F. Supp. 2d 836 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . As to later incurred fees, the only section that mentions survival upon termination is Section 10.12. . . .
In LOMAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, USA,, 212 B.R. 46 (Bankr. D. Del. 1997)

. . . . # 1459 at 9) According to Debtor, since section 10.12 of the Plan “provides that notice to claims holders . . . MRPC 4.2. .Section 10.12 of the Plan, in pertinent part, provides as follows: On and after the Effective . . .
MAHLER, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE E., 927 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Ind. 1996)

. . . . § 10.12. Mahler’s “indirect taking” argument has been addressed by other courts. . . . or collect, or attempt to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect. 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . or collect, or attempt to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . .
T. STRAUSS, SERVICO, INC. v. AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC., 902 F. Supp. 475 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . 36,800 0.56% 697,941 10.68% 8/30/93 661,141 10.12% ( 3,200) 32,400 0.50% 693,541 10.61% 8/31/93 661,141 . . . 10.12% ( 4,400) 30,000 0.46% 691.141 10.57% 9/2/93 661,141 10.12% ( 2,400) 22.500 0.34% 683.641 10.46% . . . 9/3/93 661,141 10.12% ( 7,500) 21.500 0.33% 682.641 10.44% 9/7/93 661,141 10.12% ( 1,000) 20,000 0.31% . . . 681.141 10.42% 9/10/93 661,141 10.12% ( 1,500) 18.500 0.28% 679.641 10.40% 9/16/93 661,141 10.12% ( . . . 1,500) 13,600 0.21% 674,741 10.32% 9/17/93 661,141 10.12% ( 4,900) 13,600 0.21% 683.600 10.46% 9/28/93 . . .
FLORSHEIM SHOE CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 880 F. Supp. 848 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1995)

. . . Proclamation slights the existence of the initial phrase, “as defined in 16 U.S.C. 3371 and 50 CFR 10.12 . . . incorporation by reference of the definition of “wildlife” in 16 U.S.C. § 3371 (1988), and 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . in 50 C.F.R. § 14.61 requires application of the definition of “country of origin” from 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . where the animal was taken from the wild, or the country of natal origin of the animal.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . and including any part, product, egg, or offspring thereof. 16 U.S.C. § 3371(a); see also 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . .
Co. v., 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 295 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1995)

. . . Proclamation slights the existence of the initial phrase, “as defined in 16 U.S.C. 3371 and 50 CFR 10.12 . . . incorporation by reference of the definition of “wildlife” in 16 U.S.C. § 3371 (1988), and 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . in 50 C.F.R. § 14.61 requires application of the definition of “country of origin” from 50 C.F.R. §10.12 . . . where the animal was taken from the wild, or the country of natal origin of the animal.” 50 C.F.R. § 10.12 . . . and including any part, product, egg, or offspring thereof. 16 U.S.C. § 3371(a); see also 50 C.ER. § 10.12 . . .
NRG COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 31 Fed. Cl. 659 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . % (1/1-6/30) 12.26% 1989 9%% (1/1-6/30) 8.50% 14%% (7/1-12/31) 9%% (7/1-12/31) 1985 12%% (1/1-6/30) 10.12% . . .
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT, INC. v. SHEPARD NILES, INC., 11 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 1993)

. . . Hazard, Civil Procedure § 10.12, at 534 (3d ed. 1985)). That holding is unremarkable. But cf. . . .

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law: