Florida Statute 10.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 10
SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 10.11

¹10.11 Official census for apportionment; definitions.—

(1) In accordance with s. 8(a), Art. X of the State Constitution, the United States Decennial Census of 2010 is the official census of the state for the purposes of this joint resolution.

(2) The following delineation of representative and senatorial districts employs areas included within official county, voting tabulation district, tract, and block boundary descriptions used by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, in compiling the United States Decennial Census of 2010 in this state. The populations within these census geographic units are the population figures reported in the counts of the United States Decennial Census of 2010 provided to the state in accordance with Pub. L. No. 94-171.

(3) As used in this joint resolution, the term:

(a) “Block” describes the smallest geographic unit for which population was tabulated in the 2010 decennial census. Blocks are nested within tracts and within voting tabulation districts. A block is identified by a four-digit integer that is unique within a tract but is not necessarily unique within a voting tabulation district.

(b) “Tract” describes a relatively permanent statistical subdivision of a county updated by local participants prior to the 2010 decennial census. Tracts consist of whole blocks and are nested within counties. Tracts are identified uniquely within a county by an up to four-digit integer and may have an optional two-digit suffix.

(c) “Voting tabulation district” describes a subdivision of a county established in Phase 2 of the 2010 Census Redistricting Data Program. Voting tabulation districts consist of whole blocks and are nested within counties. Voting tabulation districts subdivide counties in ways supervisors of elections determined are efficient for conducting elections and keeping communities whole. Voting tabulation districts are identified uniquely within a county by an up to four-digit integer.

History.—s. 1, CS for SJR 1176, 2012 Regular Session.

¹Note.—Superseded by s. 10.201, created by s. 1, Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 100, 2022 Regular Session.

F.S. 10.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 10.11 on CourtListener

Amendments to 10.11

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 10.11

Total Results: 21

United States v. Chanthasouxat

342 F.3d 1271, 2003 WL 21994747

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 2003 | Docket: 1184872

Cited 219 times | Published

testified that he wrote the citation at issue under section 10-11-5 of the Birmingham City Code. That section

B.L. Harbert International, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co.

441 F.3d 905, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035, 2006 WL 462368

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 28, 2006 | Docket: 398510

Cited 83 times | Published

Federal Arbitration Act. See 9 U.S.C. § 10-11. The FAA presumes the confirmation of arbitration

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

789 F.3d 1206, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10036, 2015 WL 3653162

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2015 | Docket: 2664899

Cited 34 times | Published

first exception appears in H.R. 3556, 87th Cong. § 10-11 (as reported by S. Comm, on Interstate and Foreign

Board of Public Instruction v. Union School Furnishing Co.

129 So. 824, 100 Fla. 326

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1930 | Docket: 3275244

Cited 28 times | Published

the court say: "Under the provisions of section 10, 11 and 17 of Article XII of the State Constitution

Hale Container Line, Inc. v. Houston Sea Packing Co.

137 F.3d 1455, 1999 A.M.C. 607, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7097, 1998 WL 152602

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 3, 1998 | Docket: 422597

Cited 23 times | Published

its own form of bill of lading.” 2 Schoenbaum, § 10-11 at 44 (2nd ed.1994). 13 . Hale Trial

Raimbeault v. Accurate Machine & Tool, LLC

302 F.R.D. 675, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140318, 2014 WL 5795187

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2014 | Docket: 66053857

Cited 22 times | Published

Florida forum selection clauses in the APA (section 10.11), the Accurate Note (section 11.4) and the Sunbelt

City of Miami v. Perez

509 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1987 | Docket: 1715396

Cited 13 times | Published

the position of master. 41 Am.Jur.2d Ind.Contr. § 10. [11] In his testimony at trial, Lester Pancoast (architect)

Henry v. State

937 So. 2d 563, 2006 WL 1471004

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 459683

Cited 10 times | Published

Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases § 10.11 (rev. ed.2003) on counsel's duties mandate mitigation

Walker v. State

88 So. 3d 128, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 291, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 753, 2012 WL 1345408

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2012 | Docket: 60308166

Cited 9 times | Published

Performance of Counsel in *138Death Penalty Cases § 10.11 (rev. ed. 2003) on counsel’s duties mandate mitigation

Hale Container v. Houston Sea

137 F.3d 1455

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 3, 1998 | Docket: 211958

Cited 9 times | Published

its own form of bill of lading.” 2 Schoenbaum, § 10-11 at 44 (2nd ed. 1994).

In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.

414 So. 2d 1040

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1982 | Docket: 1706885

Cited 9 times | Published

67-479, section 6, Laws of Florida (codified as section 10.011(2), Florida Statutes (1967)), provided *1049

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Law Fabrication, LLC

459 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3171, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36445, 2006 WL 1895476

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2006 | Docket: 2481221

Cited 3 times | Published

under the Federal Arbitration Act. See 9 U.S.C. § 10-11. The FAA presumes the confirmation of arbitration

In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Contract Litigation

716 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 WL 2164183

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1929991

Cited 2 times | Published

March and April Notices of Borrowing. (Cr. Agr. § 10.11) (stating that "rights and obligations of the parties

Fontainebleau Las Vegas, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings, LLC)

417 B.R. 651, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 3, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94481, 2009 WL 3125548

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1449328

Cited 2 times | Published

interpretation of the Credit Agreement. [Cr. Agr. § 10.11]. [11] The outstanding amount of Revolving Loans

S & Davis International v. Republic of Yemen

218 F.3d 1292, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17614

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 21, 2000 | Docket: 212418

Cited 2 times | Published

or argue to vacate the award under 9 U.S.C. § 10. 11 . Section 1603 ''Definitions'1 states

Whitaker v. J R Produce Corp. (In Re Gulf Northern Transport, Inc.)

340 B.R. 111, 2006 WL 786963

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2006 | Docket: 1416162

Cited 1 times | Published

1462 n. 12 (11th Cir.1998)(quoting 2 Schoenbaum, § 10-11 at 44 (2d ed.1994)). The Florida Supreme Court

Berg, Berg v. Scurry

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2025 | Docket: 70186672

Published

subdivision, including the following: 41. Section 10.11 of the Declaration[] specifies in pertinent

In re Sagamore Partners, Ltd.

512 B.R. 296, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24499, 2014 WL 794333

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2014 | Docket: 65516811

Published

applicable law expressly require. Id. at 100, § 10.11. But Sagamore points to no provision of the Loan

Castelo Developments, LLC v. Rawls

118 So. 3d 831, 2012 WL 5870007, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60233435

Published

Philip J. Pada-vano, Florida Appellate Practice § 10.11-14 (2011 ed). We have found no case in which this

Smith v. Williams

819 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2011 | Docket: 2016079

Published

1(a)), is one of the "Named Fiduciaries," (id. at § 10.11), and "shall have the sole responsibility of management

Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. S. Diamond Associates, Inc.

911 F.2d 1548, 1990 WL 125510

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 18, 1990 | Docket: 66256429

Published

2d 1318 (5th Cir.1978); 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.11[A], at 10-94 (1987).) The court, however, held

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.