Cases from cite.case.law:

A. ALLEN, v. STATE, 261 So. 3d 1255 (Fla. 2019)

. . . Bar Ass'n, Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11 . . .

SODEXOMAGIC, LLC v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, 333 F. Supp. 3d 426 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016) with projected growth of three percent (3%) annually thereafter. ... 10.11 . . . (Sodexo SOF, Ex. 1 § 10.11) Sodexo contends that the above language is not a merger clause because nothing . . . The fact that § 9.1 refers to "representations" while § 10.11 refers to "agreements" does not change . . .

LANG, v. BOBBY,, 889 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 2018)

. . . Bar Ass'n, Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11 . . . Bar Ass'n, Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11 . . .

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NELSON, INC. Sr., 276 F. Supp. 3d 762 (W.D. Tenn. 2017)

. . . Series, Contract Law and Practice § 10.11 (2011) .(citing cases). . . .

MANKES, v. FANDANGO, LLC, 238 F. Supp. 3d 751 (E.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . Id. at col. 10.11. 7-8. . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 565 B.R. 275 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . . § 10.11(a). . . . Id. § 10.11(b). . . . ECF No. 428-2 (Term Loan Agreement) at §§ 10.10, 10.11. . . .

NAVAJO NATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR USDOI B. O., 819 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 10.10(c)(2), 10.11(e),- 10.17. . . . Id. § 10.11(e)(3). . . . See 43 C.F.R. §§ 10.10(c)(2);- 10.11(e). . . . The majority mischaracterizes 43 C.F.R. § 10.11(e) by claiming that it "says nothing about when such . . . Maj. op. at 1094 n.- 12, By its own terms, § 10.11 applies to disputes "regarding the disposition of . . . . § 10.11(e), states that district courts may hear “any action brought that alleges a violation of [NAGPRA . . .

NAVAJO NATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR USDOI B. O., 819 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 10.10(c)(2), 10.11(e), 10.17. . . . Id. § 10.11(e)(3). . . . See 43 C.F.R. §§ 10.10(c)(2); 10.11(e). . . . The majority mischaracterizes 43 C.F.R. § 10.11(e) by claiming that it “says nothing about when such . . . By its own terms, § 10.11 applies to disputes "regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable . . . . § 10.11(e), states that district courts may hear “any action brought that alleges a violation of [NAGPRA . . .

BECKER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. J. P., 172 F. Supp. 3d 777 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . It is asserted that LBH’s default “triggered § 10.11,” and in the “scenario created by the LBH default . . . Instead, the first sentence of § 10.11 states: “Any moneys received by the Trustee under this -Article . . . Those words are not to be found in § 10.11. . . . Viewed in isolation, the “First” clause of § 10.11 facially lends support to Defendants’ position that . . . However, the proposed reading of § 10.11 violates fundamental rules — -again those rules are, that a . . .

MYERS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SCHOELLER ARCA SYSTEMS, INC. B. V. f k a N. V., 171 F. Supp. 3d 107 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . B § 10.11.) It also contained a choice-of-law clause in favor of New York law. (Id. Ex. C § 10.8.) . . . B § 10.11; id. Ex. C § 7.12.) B. . . . B § 10.11; id. Ex. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. LITVAK,, 808 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Ahern, III, Financial Handbook for Bankruptcy Professionals § 10.11 (2d ed. Westlaw 2015). . . .

OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA,, 311 F.R.D. 447 (E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . . § 10.11.) . . .

UNITED STATES, v. K. AKBAR, U. S., 74 M.J. 364 (C.A.A.F. 2015)

. . . Guideline 10.11 states that “it is critically important to construct a persuasive narrative in support . . . ABA Guideline 10.11, commentary, 31 Hofstra L.Rev. at 1061. . . . ABA Guideline 10.11, 31 Hofstra L.Rev. at 1056-57. . . . 2934; Eddings, 455 U.S. at 112, 102 S.Ct. 869; Porter, 558 U.S. at 41, 130 S.Ct. 447; ABA Guideline 10.11 . . . ABA Guideline 10.11, 31 Hofstra L.Rev. at 1058. .Strikingly, given defense counsel’s Herculean efforts . . . Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (ABA Guidelines) 10.11 . . .

ALLEN, v. STEPHENS,, 619 F. App'x 280 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Defense Teams in Death Penalty Cases, Guideline 10.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON,, 129 F. Supp. 3d 1069 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . Id. 10.11. . . .

R. WHINFIELD, v. CAPITAS DISTRIBUTORS, INC. LLC,, 111 F. Supp. 3d 177 (D. Conn. 2015)

. . . And Section 10.11 allows CDI to “withhold from any benefits payable under this Agreement all applicable . . .

ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC. a v. ADIPOGEN CORPORATION, a a a, 82 F. Supp. 3d 568 (D. Del. 2015)

. . . (PX5 at ¶ 10.11). The Court will take these counts in turn. . . .

In CAPITAL ONE BANK CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATE LITIGATION, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (N.D. Ga. 2014)

. . . rate of 9.88%; on April 18, 2008 to a fixed rate of 9.9%; and on June 18, 2008, to a variable rate of 10.11% . . .

RAIMBEAULT v. ACCURATE MACHINE TOOL, LLC, LLC, LLC, E. Jr. a k a, 302 F.R.D. 675 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . forum selection clause in that agreement, or the Florida forum selection clauses in the APA (section 10.11 . . .

WHITE L. v. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 765 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 10.11(b)(2)(ii). . . . See 43 C.F.R. § 10.11. . . . .” § 10.11(a). . . . See § 10.11(c)(l)(ii). . . . See 43 C.F.R. § 10.11(c)(l)(ii). . . . . § 10.11. . . .

WHITE L. v. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 765 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 10.11. . . . .” § 10.11(a). . . . See 43 C.F.R. § 10.11(c)(l)(ii). . . . It further stated, Pursuant to 43 C.F.R. 10.11(c)(1), and based upon request from the Kumeyaay Cultural . . . . § 10.11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. WITT,, 73 M.J. 738 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2014)

. . . Guideline 10.11 also sets forth an ongoing duty of counsel to “seek information that supports mitigation . . . See ABA Guideline 10.11. . . . Guideline 10.11 also sets forth an ongoing duty of counsel to “seek information that supports mitigation . . .

ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . Id., art. 10.11 (“Reorganized ASARCO shall continue its existence after the Effective date.”). • vest . . . Id., art. 10.11 (“The equity interests in Reorganized ASAR-CO shall continue to be held by ASAR-CO USA . . .

ASARCO LLC, v. R. GOODWIN, S. A. D. D., 756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . Id., art. 10.11 (“Reorganized ASARCO shall continue its existence after the Effective date.”). • vest . . . Id., art. 10.11 (“The equity interests in Reorganized ASAR-CO shall continue to be held by ASAR-CO USA . . .

ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . Section 10.11 stated that “Reorganized ASARCO shall continue its existence after the Effective Date,” . . . ] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized Asarco [citing plan section 10.11 . . .

ASARCO LLC, a v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a A Co. a LLC, a, 755 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . Section 10.11 stated that “Reorganized ASARCO shall continue its existence after the Effective Date,” . . . ] and (4) maintains the Debtor’s identical equity owners in Reorganized Asarco [citing plan section 10.11 . . .

SOURCE VAGABOND SYSTEMS LTD. LLP, v. HYDRAPAK, INC., 753 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . Id. col. 10.11. 20-42 (emphases added). . . .

HENDERSON, v. CARPENTER,, 21 F. Supp. 3d 927 (W.D. Tenn. 2014)

. . . See Guideline 10.11 and commentary, ABA Guidelines for Death Penalty Cases. (ECF No. 16 at 26.) . . .

In SAGAMORE PARTNERS, LTD. BANKRUPTCY APPEALS, 512 B.R. 296 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Id. at 100, § 10.11. . . . The Bankruptcy Court considered the Loan Agreement ambiguous and inconsistent because §§ 8.1 and 10.11 . . . Id. § § 8.1(b), 10.11. . . .

DIAZ, v. STATE v. D., 132 So. 3d 93 (Fla. 2013)

. . . the evidentiary hearing that he had no defense theory, and such a concession is contrary to guideline 10.11 . . .

In M. WILSON, a k a A. f k a A. v. C. c o M., 498 B.R. 913 (E.D. Wis. 2013)

. . . Ginsberg et al., Ginsberg and Martin on Bankruptcy § 10.11[A][3] (5th ed.); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ . . .

HONKEN, v. UNITED STATES, 42 F. Supp. 3d 937 (N.D. Iowa 2013)

. . . See ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11(G) (rev . . . See ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11(F)(2) . . . See ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11, comment . . . with counsel); ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11 . . . See ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11, comment . . .

W. FREY, v. UNITED STATES,, 112 Fed. Cl. 337 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . plaintiffs unit to determine his eligibility for Disability Evaluation System processing, AFI 41-210, ¶ 10.11 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. P. WITT,, 72 M.J. 727 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2013)

. . . Guideline 10.11 also sets forth an ongoing duty of counsel to “seek information that supports mitigation . . .

In INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION, 956 F. Supp. 2d 925 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . . § 10.11 (“Radio measurement procedures”). . . .

OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 291 F.R.D. 47 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . B (“Indenture”) § 10.11.) As trastee, U.S. . . . (PSA § 12.06; Indenture § 10.11; SSA § 7.03.) . . .

In WILLIAMS, v., 492 B.R. 79 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2013)

. . . She works 40 hours per week and earns $10.11 per hour. . . .

CLARK, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 933 F. Supp. 2d 862 (S.D.W. Va. 2013)

. . . Section 10.11 provides a three year limitations period: No action at law or in equity may begin prior . . . She adds that only section 10.11 was in effect when she initially applied for and received long term . . . It explains that section 10.11’s three-year period is “applicable to any type of claim,” whereas the . . . Nationwide’s attempted reconciliation of section 10.11 and section 10.13 is not convincing. . . . She is therefore bound only by the three-year provision of section 10.11. . . .

DORSEY, v. Dr. HOGAN, Ph. D. Dr., 511 F. App'x 96 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 10.11. 2. . . .

LITTLEJOHN, v. TRAMMELL,, 704 F.3d 817 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . Smith, 379 F.3d at 942 (quoting ABA Guidelines §§ 1.1, 4.1, 10.4, 10.7, and 10.11) (internal quotation . . .

CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, v. RAWLS,, 118 So. 3d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Pada-vano, Florida Appellate Practice § 10.11-14 (2011 ed). . . .

In ALT HOTEL, LLC, ALT LLC, LLC, v. LLC, LLC, v. N. A., 479 B.R. 781 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . Martin, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 10.11 [C] at 10-121 (Susan V. . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . {See Indenture § 10.11). . . .

WALKER, II, v. STATE, 88 So. 3d 128 (Fla. 2012)

. . . at 524,] and the ABA Guidelines for Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases § 10.11 . . .

JOHNSON, v. UNITED STATES, 860 F. Supp. 2d 663 (N.D. Iowa 2012)

. . . ABA Death Penalty Guidelines (2003), Guideline 10.11 K (The Defense Case Concerning Penalty) (“Trial . . .

AHLERS, v. SPITZER, Ex, 432 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Law §§ 10.09, 10.11. . . .

SMITH, v. J. WILLIAMS, P. W. J. C., 819 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . # 43-2, § 2.1(a)), is one of the “Named Fiduciaries,” (id. at § 10.11), and “shall have the sole responsibility . . .

KTV MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. GALAXY GROUP, LA LLC,, 812 F. Supp. 2d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Importantly, Paragraph 10.11 of the Galaxy Operating Agreement provides: Each Member hereby consents . . . Turning first to the relevant text, the broad language of Paragraph 10.11 of the Galaxy Operating Agreement . . .

BKB PROPERTIES, LLC, v. SUNTRUST BANK,, 453 F. App'x 582 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . SunTrust moved for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of $69,716.58, citing Section 10.11 . . . Section 10.11 of the Loan Agreement provides: In the event of any action at law or suit in equity in . . . The district court concluded that BKB was liable under Section 10.11 because it filed suit in connection . . . law, and the district court’s order granting SunTrust’s motion for attorneys fees pursuant to Section 10.11 . . .

In WACHOVIA EQUITY SECURITIES LITIGATION. ABP, v. FC AB, v. In Re, 753 F. Supp. 2d 326 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . separately allege that during 2006 and 2007, Wachovia created, structured, and underwrote approximately $10.11 . . . of their allegations is that Wachovia “created, structured and underwrote” subprime CDOs totaling $10.11 . . .

MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, v. CUOMO,, 785 F. Supp. 2d 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . MHL § 10.11. . . .

HOLT, J. S. H. a v. QUALITY EGG, L. L. C. d b a A. S. a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a v. L. L. C. d b a J. T. a v. L. L. C. d b a, 777 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (N.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . documenting .the washing and disinfection of the trailers used for the movement of pullets to laying houses. 10.11 . . .

In CROCS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 774 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (D. Colo. 2011)

. . . December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008 [id. at ¶¶ 57, 112], The price of Crocs common stock closed at $10.11 . . .

DIXON, v. C. HOUK,, 627 F.3d 553 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, § 10.11 (2003 rev . . .

WATTERS, v. TILDEN MINING COMPANY, L. C., 409 F. App'x 812 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . Subsection 10.11 provides that a person elected to office in government "shall be granted a leave of . . .

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ROBERT W. BAIRD CO. INC. v. W. Co., 756 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Ariz. 2010)

. . . Section 10.11 of the Indenture further does not limit the Trustee’s authority to contract-based rights . . . Under § 10.11, the Trustee is required to distribute the proceeds of any successful claims first to the . . .

A. PEASE v. BURNS,, 719 F. Supp. 2d 143 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . . § 10.11, and are afforded the opportunity to present and cross-examine witnesses, 110 C.M.R. § 10.22 . . .

PHILLIPS, v. BRADSHAW,, 607 F.3d 199 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . quoting ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11 . . .

In FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION, 716 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 10.11) (stating that “rights and obligations of the parties under this agreement shall be governed . . .

CELAYA, v. STEWART,, 691 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (D. Ariz. 2010)

. . . Ex. 10.11) The court of appeals denied the motion to accept the oversized petition, and withdrew the . . .

GLOVER, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . (Crim.) 10.11. It is clear that each crime has an element which the other does not. . . .

In ZYPREXA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. v., 671 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . ¶¶ 10.2-10.11; PL’s Response at 40-41 (asserting that the PLA claim is based on “physical injuries . . .

GUDMUNDSSON, A. v. UNITED STATES, 665 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Bloomenthal and Samuel Wolff, Securities and Federal Corporate Law § 10.11 at 10.73, 10.74 (1997)). . . . .

GARZA, v. THALER,, 585 F.3d 888 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Accordingly, the magistrate judge assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.11 and provided that . . .

In FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS HOLDINGS, LLC, LLC, v. N. A., 417 B.R. 651 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 10.11]. . . . .

In J. CAHILLANE, E. v. J. a k a, 408 B.R. 175 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2009)

. . . Cowans, 2 Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 10.11 (1986). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GILKERSON,, 556 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 10.11. “Person” is not otherwise defined in the applicable subchapters. . . .

JOHNSON, v. BAGLEY,, 544 F.3d 592 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 10.11(F) . . . The apparent goal was not only to humanize Johnson with Faulkner’s testimony, see ABA Guideline 10.11 . . . compelling witness who would suffer from a jury decision to impose a death sentence, see Guideline 10.11 . . . assuredly suggest a plausible theory for sparing a life at a mitigation hearing, see ABA Guideline 10.11 . . .

NEW FALLS CORPORATION, v. N. LERNER,, 579 F. Supp. 2d 282 (D. Conn. 2008)

. . . Section 10.11 of the Stornawaye-New Falls Loan Purchase Agreement states that “[t]his Agreement shall . . .

COVENANT MEDIA OF GEORGIA, LLC, v. CITY OF LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA, P., 580 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (N.D. Ga. 2008)

. . . In support of these claims, plaintiff cites §§ 10.11(A), (B),(D), and (E) of the ordinance. (Id.) . . . In support of its state claims, plaintiff cites §§ 10.9(F), 10.10(C), and 10.11(B) of the ordinance. . . . applications), and § 10.11(D)(giving City officials discretion to delay ruling on an application that . . . Instead, plaintiffs federal claims are based entirely on §§ 10.11(A), (B), (D), and (E). . . . Plaintiffs Alleged Injury Is Not Causally Related to 10.11(A), (D), or (E). . . .

REDDING, v. SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 531 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . Lafave, Search and Seizure § 10.11, at 501 (4th ed.2004) (noting with regret that “the reasonable suspicion . . .

RICHIE, v. SIRMONS,, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1250 (N.D. Okla. 2008)

. . . for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 1.1, 4.1, 10.4, 10.7, 10.11 . . .

E. JARMUTH, v. COX M. D., 278 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 10.11 (2007) (“All questions related to access/disclosure, and/or amendment of FECA records maintained . . . See 20 C.F.R. § 10.11 (2007). . . .

GLEASON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, Co., 559 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . Since Hardware maintained that HTS 8482. 10.11 was more specific to the housed bearings it used because . . . Commerce found “the size of the bearing to be more instructive,” reasoning that because “HTS 8482. 10.11 . . . Defendant argues that because HTS 8482. 10.11 complements HTS 8483.20.00, Commerce’s use of a weight-average . . . Commerce found the size of the bearing to be most informative, noting that “[t]he fact that HTS 8482. 10.11 . . . Defendant’s argument is misplaced, however, because Commerce’s partial use of HTS 8482. 10.11 to value . . .

M. FISHMAN, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 539 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . to a select group of management or highly compensated employees, Zurich and the Plan stress Plan § 10.11 . . . free-standing vacuum — -instead it must take its place in the context of its symbiotic relationship with Plan § 10.11 . . . As the overarching purpose provision, Plan § 10.11 infuses the top-hat standards for participation into . . . assistants were “direct reports” they were never placed in the Plan because of the purpose stated in Plan § 10.11 . . .

BOWLES, v. STATE v. A., 979 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Bowles also argues that guidelines 10.7(A), 10.11(A), and 10.11(F) of the ABA Guidelines for the Appointment . . .

In GLOBAL SHIP SYSTEMS, LLC,, 391 B.R. 193 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2007)

. . . See Loan Agreement, Joint Exhibit No. 1, § 10.11. 5) Creech, Drawbridge, and Holmes were among the parties . . .

MEYER, v. J. BRANKER,, 506 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . ABA Guideline 10.11.F.2. . . . See ABA Guidelines 10.11.L (“Counsel at every stage of the case should take advantage of all appropriate . . .

ANDERSON, v. SIRMONS,, 476 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . evidence “to the jury’s decision at the punishment phase” (quoting 2003 Guidelines 1.1, 4.1, 10.4, 10.7, 10.11 . . .

FALLON PAIUTE- SHOSHONE TRIBE, a v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,, 455 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Nev. 2006)

. . . . § 10.11 is finally promulgated, the affiliation inquiry continues in perpetuity without providing an . . . remains that continue to be classified as non-affiliated are subject to the provisions of 43 C.F.R. § 10.11 . . . References to (#XX) refer to the court's docket. . 43 C.F.R. § 10.11 has been reserved in the Code of . . .

WORLD WIDE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIALTY PROGRAMS, a v. PURE, INC., 450 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . See Model Utah Jury Instructions 10.11. . . .

L. HENRY, v. STATE L. v. R., 937 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 2006)

. . . Wiggins and the ABA Guidelines for Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases § 10.11 . . .

REMOI, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 175 F. App'x 580 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 39:3-10.11 (so defining “felony” for purposes of motor vehicle registration and licensing laws). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KARAKE,, 370 F. Supp. 2d 275 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . require counsel “to seek information that ... rebuts the prosecution’s case in aggravation,” Guideline 10.11 . . .

STECHLER Co. f k a Co. v. SIDLEY, AUSTIN BROWN WOOD, L. L. P. R. J. L. L. C. L. L. P. L. L. C., 382 F. Supp. 2d 580 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Bloomenthal and Samuel Wolff, Securities and Federal Corporate Law § 10.11 at 10.73 (1997)) (emphasis . . .

B. CANAAN, v. R. McBRIDE,, 395 F.3d 376 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Guideline 10.11 . . . The ABA’s Commentary to Guideline 10.11 reiterates this standard: “Counsel should also consider, in consultation . . . Guideline 10.11 cmt. . . .

HARTMAN, v. BAGLEY,, 333 F. Supp. 2d 632 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (rev. ed.2003), at Guideline 10.11 . . .

REYNOLDS, v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE,, 379 F.3d 358 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.11 (discussing three categories of cases). . . .

L. SMITH, v. MULLIN,, 379 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases 1.1, 4.1, 10.4, 10.7, 10.11 . . .

A. MYERS, v. D. BACA,, 325 F. Supp. 2d 1095 (C.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . LaFave, Search and Seizure §§ 10.11(a) & (b) (2004); T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 105 S.Ct. 733. . . . LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.11(c) (2004). . . .

MEZA, v. GALVIN,, 322 F. Supp. 2d 52 (D. Mass. 2004)

. . . the average of the East Boston precincts (1-4 (9.72%), 1-6 (11.37%), 1-7 (13.55%), 1-8(10%) and 1-9 (10.11% . . .

BRYAN, v. MULLIN,, 335 F.3d 1207 (10th Cir. 2003)

. . . also ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases § 10.11 . . . ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases § 10.11( . . . Id. § 10.11(D). . . . Id. § 10.11(E). . . .

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, a v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v., 330 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . 226 Cal.App.3d 1145, 1152, 277 Cal.Rptr. 349 (1991) (quoting Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes, § 10.11 . . .

In U. S. OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. v. U. S. Co. J., 251 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . .

In U. S. OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION. H. E. v. Co., 251 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11— 10.12. . . . Reorganization Agreement §§ 10.11-10.12. . . . .

MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL, 228 F. Supp. 2d 949 (S.D. Iowa 2002)

. . . Code r.199-10.11 (479) (2001). . . .

In AEROVOX, INC. v. LLC,, 281 B.R. 419 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2002)

. . . any such dispute brought in such court or any defense of inconvenient forum in connection therewith. 10.11 . . .

R. MILLSAP, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, a, 162 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (N.D. Okla. 2001)

. . . Charles 45.58 16.04 44.06 15.86 Mesa 44.55 6.55 43.85 9.95 Titusville 43.52 10.11 44.71 12.70 56. . . .