Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.08 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.08 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.08

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
7.08 Charlotte County.—The boundary lines of Charlotte County are as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of township forty south, range twenty-seven east; thence south on range line dividing ranges twenty-seven and twenty-eight east, to the township line dividing townships forty-two and forty-three south, and Lee County; thence west on said township line to the waters of the Gulf of America; thence northerly and westerly along said Gulf of America, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the intersection therewith of the township line dividing townships forty and forty-one south; thence east on said township line to the southeast corner of township forty south, range twenty east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges twenty and twenty-one east to the northwest corner of township forty south, range twenty-one east; thence east on township line dividing townships thirty-nine and forty south to the place of beginning.
History.—s. 3, ch. 3770, 1887; s. 1, ch. 8513, 1921; CGL 62; s. 2, ch. 2025-8.

F.S. 7.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.08 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.08


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.08

Total Results: 32  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State v. Hagan, 387 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 63 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...State, 347 So.2d 419 (Fla. 1977); Goldstein v. Acme Concrete Corp., 103 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1958). The prohibited netting area encompassed by the Charlotte County waters of Charlotte Harbor may be ascertained with particular exactitude by resort to pertinent Florida law. See § 7.08, Fla....
Copy

Ranger Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem., 389 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 34 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 A.L.R. 4th 870, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17844

insurer is involved." R. Keeton, Insurance Law, § 7.8(d). When there is no excess insurer, the insured
Copy

Alphamed Pharm. Corp. v. Arriva Pharm., Inc., 432 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 26 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222

338, 129 So. 748 (1930) and 9A Fla. Jur., Damages § 7-8). The FUTSA, however, is not a common law cause
Copy

Brand v. Florida Power Corp., 633 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 26 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 102, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1695, 1994 WL 64952

handicaps[[4]] in the United States, as defined in section 7(8) [29 U.S.C.S. § 706(8)], shall, solely by reason
Copy

Prescott v. Bd. Pub. Instruction, Hardee Cnty., 32 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1947).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 159 Fla. 663, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 924

distributed or appropriated by authority of said Section 7, 8 and 9 (supra). It is a general rule of law that
Copy

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. James D. Watkins, 934 F.2d 1180 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 19 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13217

instruction here 2 Section 7-8-317(1) reads: "No attachment or levy upon a
Copy

State v. Stepansky, 761 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 422872

...[2] The term "nautical mile" is often used interchangeably with the term "geographic mile," although a geographic mile is actually slightly longer than a nautical mile. See Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 95-51 n. 14 (1995) (explaining that a "`geographic' mile is the length of one minute of the arc of the equator, or 6,087.08 feet," a "`nautical' mile is 6,076.11549 feet," and a "`statute' or `English' mile (used on land) is 5,280 feet")....
Copy

Swamy v. Caduceus Self Ins. Fund, Inc., 648 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 502767

contract. See R. Keeton and A. Widiss, Insurance Law, § 7.8(a), n. 9 (1988). Because it is a contract claim
Copy

Dept. of Revenue v. Morganwoods Greentree, Inc., 341 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Review and Reduction of Real Property Assessments, § 7:08 (1960).
Copy

United States v. Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) in United States Currency, 590 F. Supp. 866 (S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15054

process. K. Davis, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE § 7:8 at 36 (1979 & Supp.1982). Under these criteria,
Copy

White Constr. Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., 633 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

equipment. [38] The Court also finds persuasive Section 7.8 of the MSA, which mandates that "no act or failure
Copy

United States v. Pizdrint, 983 F. Supp. 1110 (M.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18514, 1997 WL 722048

makes other persuasive arguments under 18 U.S.C. § 7(8). That subsection provides that the term special
Copy

D & T Props. v. Marina Grande Assoc., 985 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2356855

budget estimates under Chapter 718. See Ch. 2007-80, § 7-8, Laws of Fla. Section 8 of Chapter 2007-80 added
Copy

Chino Elec., Inc. v. US Fid. & Guar. Co., 578 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 40069

F. Harper, F. James & O. Gray, The Law of Torts § 7.8 (2d ed. 1986); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 542
Copy

In Re Est. of Kavcic, 341 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...tion 731.07(2), Florida Statutes (1973), and former Section 5460, C.G.L. 1927, which required witness subscription in the testator's presence, but only for wills disposing of real estate. Redfearn, Wills and Administration *281 of Estates in Florida § 7.08 (4th ed....
Copy

US Fire Ins. v. Morrison Assur., 600 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 102456

2d 862 (1976), citing, R. Keeton Insurance Law, § 7.8(d). In the decision by the Minnesota court, upon
Copy

Est. of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 609 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56446, 2009 WL 975570

for doing so.[7]See 9 Oklahoma Practice Series § 7:8 (2008). C. Ohio Law Under Ohio law, tort liability
Copy

In Re Bauknight, 14 F.2d 674 (S.D. Fla. 1926).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1390

within 10 days after adjudication, as required by section 7 (8), being Comp. St. § 9591. I do not find this
Copy

Lloyd v. Prof'l Realty Servs., Inc., 734 F.2d 1428 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207

until the actual delivery of the security. Ala.Code § 7-8-301(1) (1977). . It is undisputed that the Lloyds
Copy

Est. of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46444

...When an agent acts with either type of authority, the principal may be contractually bound by the agent's dealings. Id. §§ 6.01-.03. Respondeat superior is a doctrine that dictates when the principal is liable for its agent's torts. See id. §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07.08....
...[6] This Court's previous choice of law analysis considered the law of Ohio based on several Plaintiffs' residence there at the time of the accident. (Doc. No. 190 at 8-9.) Neither party asserts that Ohio law should be applied to the current issue. [7] Section 7.08 of the Restatement (Third) deals specifically with tortious liability for acts of agents cloaked with apparent authority....
...it a tort or conceal its commission. Such torts include fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations, defamation, tortious institution of legal proceedings, and conversion of property obtained by an agent purportedly at the principal's direction. Id. § 7.08 cmt....
Copy

Rectory Park, L.C. v. City of Delray Beach, 208 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10770, 2002 WL 1292016

damage. Douglas W. Kmiec, ZONING & PLANNING DESKBOOK § 7.8 (2d ed.2001). According to Professor Kmiec, "surrounding
Copy

MAVERICK MEDIA Grp. v. Hillsborough Cnty., Fla., 508 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

...itten appeal of the denial within thirty days of the denial. See id. at § 7.07.01(D), (G). The new sign regulations also include a provision that states "Any sign permitted by these Sign Regulations may display a non-commercial message." See id. at § 7.08.00....
Copy

Stepansky v. State, 707 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 95280

the United States Congress enacted 18 U.S.C.A. § 7(8), which purported to extend the country's maritime
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

authority not pertinent to the questions at hand. 11 Section 7(8), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida. 12 Section 8(2)
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2005).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

to a showing of good faith under Article X, section 7[.]"8 In a 1964 Attorney General's Opinion released
Copy

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins, 934 F.2d 1178 (11th Cir. 1991).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

certificates as required under Alabama Code § 7-8-317.2 The policy behind § 7-8-317, protecting good faith purchasers
Copy

United States v. Corrine Brown (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Judicial Ctr., Benchbook for U.S. District Judges § 7.08, at 269 (6th ed. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 453
Copy

United States v. Corrine Brown (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Judicial Ctr., Benchbook for U.S. District Judges § 7.08, at 269 (6th ed. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 453
Copy

Jones v. Hendrickson, 341 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15076

Wills and Administration *281of Estates in Florida § 7.08 (4th ed. 1968). And American Law Reports states
Copy

Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

agent “defrauds a third party.” See id. § 7.08 cmt. c(2); see also id. § 6.11(1) (“When
Copy

Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners re Amendment of Rules Relating to Admissions to the Bar (25-Month Rule), 462 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 53, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 2851

5. .... Section §,6. .... Section 6, 7. .... Section 7, 8. .... Section 8, 9. .... Section 9, 10. ...
Copy

Wade v. Murrhee, 75 Fla. 494 (Fla. 1918).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 78 So. 536

of the erroneous leaving off of the figures Section 7, 8 & 17, which said omission does not affect the

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.