Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.07 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.07

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
7.07 Calhoun County.—The boundary lines of Calhoun County are as follows: Beginning at a point in the thread of the Apalachicola River where the northern boundary of township two north, range seven west, crosses said river; thence west on said township line to the thread of the Chipola River; thence southerly down the thread of the stream of the said Chipola River to a point where a line drawn through the center of township two north, crosses said river; thence west on said middle township line to the range line between ranges eleven and twelve west; thence south on said range line, concurrent with the east boundary of Bay County, to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township three south, range eleven west; thence east on the south line of said section nineteen and other sections across ranges eleven west, ten west and a portion of nine west to where said section line intersects the thread of the Apalachicola River between sections twenty-three and twenty-six, township three south, range nine west; thence follow the thread of said river to the place of beginning.
History.—s. 1, Jan. 26, 1838; s. 1, ch. 1850, 1873; s. 1, ch. 2061, 1875; RS 17; ss. 1, chs. 4576, 4577, 1897; GS 15; s. 1, ch. 6506, 1913; RGS 17; s. 1, ch. 10132, 1925; CGL 19.

F.S. 7.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.07 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.07


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.07

Total Results: 29  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Johnson Enter. of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Grp., Inc., 162 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 255 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 244, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31647, 1998 WL 886794

party. See id.; Williston on Contracts § 7:7, at 88-89 (“Where an illusory promise is made, that
Copy

Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc., 610 F.3d 628 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 127 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 WL 2594844

Hazen, Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation § 7(7) (6th ed.) ("The issuer will not ordinarily be a
Copy

Brooks Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania Corp., Plaintiff v. Suave Shoe Corp., a Florida Corp., 716 F.2d 854 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 68 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 536, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16209

cf. 1 J.T. McCarthy, supra, § 7:7, at 164^66 (discussing the Adidas case and other
Copy

Williams v. State, 710 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Cited 31 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 116170

behavioral impairment."); The Florida Bar, supra note 3, § 7.7, at 7-6 ("Detecting the presence of a substance
Copy

In Re LaPlana, 363 B.R. 259 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 26 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 230, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 329, 2007 WL 431627

...g the date of petition. Thus, CMI is actually a compilation of historical income data, reaching back six months prior to the petition date. Again, after CMI is computed, reasonably necessary expenditures calculated in accordance with Bankruptcy Code Section 7.07(b)(2) are subtracted, and the total yields a debtor's disposable income....
Copy

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, 136 F.3d 1443 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 46 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1138, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026, 1998 WL 119796

Rights of Privacy and Publicity at § 7.7[E]; cf. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n
Copy

Retail Credit Co. v. Dade Cnty., Florida, 393 F. Supp. 577 (S.D. Fla. 1975).

Cited 14 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

...Starling, 121 So.2d 172 (2 D.C.A.Fla.App.1960). City of Miami Beach v. Fleetwood Hotel, Inc., 261 So.2d 801 (Fla.1972) is not contra in view of the powers exercisable by Dade County expressed in the Home Rule Charter of 1957. See Home Rule Charter Dade County, Florida, art. 1, § 7.07(A) (12) (21)-(23), (B) (1957)....
Copy

Lomelo v. Mayo, 204 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

595, 42 So. 206. [6] 30 Fla.Jur. 98, Statutes, § 7. [7] Neal v. Bryant, (Fla. 1963) 149 So.2d 529, 97
Copy

Brooks v. Miller, 158 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 10 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27881, 1998 WL 758365

Ala. Code § 17-16-36 (1995); Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-102 (Michie 1993); Fla. Slat. Ann. § 100.061 (West
Copy

Bush v. Holmes, 886 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2566078

...The center provided "subsidized child care services including infant nursery care, pre-school and after school programs and summer programs for disadvantaged children." Id. The respondents brought suit against Boca Raton to enjoin its contribution to the center on the basis that it violated Section 7.07 of the city's charter, stating: "No city funds shall be expended in any manner whatsoever to accrue either directly or indirectly to the benefit of any religious, charitable, benevolent, civic or service organization." Id....
Copy

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, 136 F.3d 1443 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

1996); McCarthy, Rights of Privacy and Publicity at § 7.7[E]; cf. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n v.
Copy

United States v. Pizdrint, 983 F. Supp. 1110 (M.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18514, 1997 WL 722048

DENIED. NOTES [1] The Government cites 18 U.S.C. § 7(7); however, it quotes the language from § 7(8). Therefore
Copy

Cedar Cove Efficiency Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. CEDAR COVE PROP. INC., 558 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

within the vertical boundaries of a "unit". Section 7.7 requires, as a prerequisite, a clear line of
Copy

Stickney v. Stickney, 377 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

circumstances ..." See, Trawick, Practice and Procedure § 7-7 (1975): "Many actions have proceedings subsequent
Copy

Joanne Kong v. Allied Prof'l Ins. Co., 750 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2014 WL 1870615, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8762

...the damages for which the tortfeasor was adjudicated liable, such action is not a direct action within the meaning of the proviso to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(c)(1).”); 1 Barry R. Ostrager & Thomas R. Newman, Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes, § 7.07, at 664 (16th ed....
Copy

Est. of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46444

...When an agent acts with either type of authority, the principal may be contractually bound by the agent's dealings. Id. §§ 6.01-.03. Respondeat superior is a doctrine that dictates when the principal is liable for its agent's torts. See id. §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07.08....
...§ 2.04. The use of the term "employee," or "servant" in previous Restatements, is notable because an "employee" is a subspecies of agent "whose principal controls or has the right to control the manner and means of the agent's performance of work." Id. § 7.07(3)(a)....
...As explained above, the common law rule of respondeat superior applied so that a principal is vicariously liable for the acts of its "employees," or "servants," within the scope of their employment. E.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07-.08....
...At the same time, the franchisor may still be liable when it "has participated in some substantial way in directing or managing acts of the franchisee," Bransford, 648 So.2d at 120, a standard similar in substance to the traditional respondeat superior test. See, e.g., Restatement (Third) Agency § 7.07(3)(a)....
Copy

Pier 1 Cruise Experts, Corp. v. Revelex Corp., 929 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

serve as consideration." 3 Williston on Contracts § 7:7 (4th ed. 2010). So, when is a contract illusory
Copy

Brooks v. Miller, 158 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See Ala. Code § 17-16-36 (1995); Ark. Code Ann. § 7-7-102 (Michie 1993); Fla. Stat. Ann. § 100.061 (West
Copy

MAVERICK MEDIA Grp. v. Hillsborough Cnty., Fla., 508 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

...at § 7.02.02(J), but billboards are not listed as such. [13] On-premises signs are permitted, but there are maximum sign areas for building signs and maximum height requirements for ground signs. See id. at § 7.03.00(A), (B). Permits for signs must still be obtained from the Administrator. See id. at § 7.07.01(A). Permit application review and time limits are set forth within the new sign regulations. See id. at § 7.07.01(D), (E)....
...The Administrator must grant or deny a permit application within thirty days from the date the completed application was submitted for approval, and any person denied a permit for a sign may submit a written appeal of the denial within thirty days of the denial. See id. at § 7.07.01(D), (G)....
Copy

Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. Zell Miller, 992 F.2d 1548 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13641

primary elections). See, e.g., Ark.Code Ann. § 7-7-304 (1987); Fla.Stat. § 100.061 (1991); Ga.Code
Copy

State of Georgia v. Shawn Micah Tresher Still (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

enacted prior to election day.” 3 U.S.C. § 7. 7 As Congress has recognized, the Vice President
Copy

Hester v. Florida Capital Grp., Inc., 189 So. 3d 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4834, 2016 WL 1238596

the pre-determined schedule set' forth in Section 7. 7. In the event that the necessary federal
Copy

Richard F. Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc. (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Hazen, Treatise on the Law of Securities Regulation § 7(7) (6th ed.) (“The issuer will not ordinarily be a
Copy

Jacob Zowie Thomas Rensel v. Centra Tech, Inc. (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

absence of a deadline, but there weren’t. See Newberg § 7:7 (in deciding whether to accept a late certification
Copy

Mishiyev v. Davis, Beasley Media Grp., LLC (Fla. 2d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

suffices to observe that the media defense under section 7[7]0.01 is not typically available for 'hyperbole
Copy

United States v. Forest Hill Gardens East Condo. Ass'n, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 WL 28723, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 488

purchasers and lenders could rely upon it.9 Section 7.7 of the Forest Hill Gardens East’s declaration
Copy

Deltona Utils. v. Edwards, 502 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 542, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6764

compensation. Florida Workers’ Compensation Practice, section 7.7 (3d ed. 1986); section 440.-49(2)(b)2.b., Florida
Copy

Johnson v. Telesat Cablevision, 162 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

either party. See id.; Williston on Contracts § 7:7, at 88-89 (“Where an illusory promise is made,
Copy

City of Miami Beach v. Austin Burke, Inc., 185 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280

any previous holder of the goods to he sold.” Section 7.7 of the ordinance set out matter pertinent to