Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.04 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.04

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
7.04 Bradford County.—The county lines of Bradford County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the thread of New River intersects the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northeasterly concurrent with the east boundary of Union County following the meanderings of the said New River to where same is intersected by the middle township line of township four south, range twenty-two east; thence east on said middle township line to the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the southeast corner of section twelve, township nine south, range twenty-two east; thence west on the section line between section twelve and thirteen, township nine south, range twenty-two east to Santa Fe Lake; thence northwesterly following the northeast shore of Santa Fe Lake to its westernmost intersection with a line which is the prolongation of the north line of McManus Subdivision as per plat book “A,” page 117 of the public records of Alachua County; thence west along the north line of said subdivision to its intersection with the east line of government lot three of section twenty-one, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence north along said east line to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one; thence north along the lines between the east half and the west half of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one to the north line of said section twenty-one; thence west along the north line of said section twenty-one to the southeast corner of section seventeen, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the half-mile corner on the south line of section eight, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northeast corner of the west half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section five, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section five; thence north along the west line of said section five to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section six, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence west along the north line of said section six to the northwest corner of said section six; thence north along the east line of section one, township eight south, range twenty-one east to the southeast corner of section thirty-six, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north along the east line of said section thirty-six to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-six; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section thirty-six; thence north along the west line of said section thirty-six to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of the Santa Fe River to its intersection with the east line of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section thirty-three, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-three; thence west to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-two, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-two; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-one, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section thirty-one; thence west to the half-mile corner on the south line of section thirty, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north on the quarter section line of said section thirty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence southerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to its intersection with the south line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section twenty-eight, township seven south, range twenty east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence west to the northwest corner of said section twenty-eight; thence north along the east line of section twenty, township seven south, range twenty east to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty; thence west on the quarter section line of said section twenty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to the point of beginning.
History.—s. 1, Mar. 15, 1844; s. 3, ch. 895, 1858; s. 1, ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1185, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1300, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1765, 1870; RS 30; GS 28; RGS 20; s. 1, ch. 8516, 1921; CGL 32; s. 2, ch. 28312, 1953.

F.S. 7.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.04 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.04


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.04

Total Results: 79  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

George B. Buchanan, Jr. v. Hugh E. Bowman, II, 820 F.2d 359 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 244 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 20, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7920

plaintiffs’ investment losses. According to O.C. G. A. § 7-4-15, recovery of pre-judgment interest on liquidated
Copy

Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees, 711 F.2d 1455 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 90 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28911

and commentator. See Davis Supp. § 7.4, at 166. (Brown Express is a gold
Copy

Cmty. State Bank v. Strong, 651 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17767, 2011 WL 3715769

Ann. § 7-4-1 et seq., by charging more than 16% per annum on a loan of $3,000 or less, id. § 7-4-2(a)(2)
Copy

Robert Barnett, Cross-Appellant v. The Hous. Auth. of the City of Atlanta, Mrs. Dorothy L. Kelly, Cross-Appellees, 707 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 84 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26375

defendants to rely upon the grievance procedures of Section 7.4 of the Personnel Policy? Yes. 7
Copy

Am. Fam. Life Assurance Co. of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Co., & Boston Old Colony Ins. Co., 885 F.2d 826 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 65 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15341, 1989 WL 108478

not award prejudgment interest. Under O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15, a claimant is entitled to statutory interest
Copy

Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc. v. M. Vincent Murphy, III, 924 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 63 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

interest from the time of the demand." O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 (2018). "[T]he sole prerequisite for an award
Copy

In Re Patterson, 967 F.2d 505 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 58 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 475, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17448, 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 407

day after it receives the check. See Ala.Code § 7-4-104(1)(h) (1975) (the "midnight deadline rule")
Copy

Watts v. Singletary, 87 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17840

acquittal. ABA Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards § 7-4.1(c) & commentary (2d ed. 1986). . Both of these
Copy

Alphamed, Inc. v. B. Braun Med., Inc., 367 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2004).

Cited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8555, 2004 WL 916005

885 F.2d 826, 835-36 (11th Cir.1989). Section 7-4-2(a)(l)(A) fixes the legal rate of interest for
Copy

Byars v. Coca-Cola Co., 517 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3750, 2008 WL 466403

"own occupation" *1270 benefits. See Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-12 (establishing Georgia's post-judgment interest
Copy

GMAC Com. Mortg. Corp. v. Maitland Hotel Assocs., 218 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 42 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861, 2002 WL 596216

enforceable. C. Late Charges and Interest Ga.Code § 7-4-18(a) sets out the criminal penalty for usury and
Copy

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Adler, 137 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 34 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6002

Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud, § 7.4(600), at 7:159, 7:160.14 (1996) (ultimately concluding
Copy

Smith v. Am. Int'l Life Assurance Co. of New York, 50 F.3d 956 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 28 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9443, 1995 WL 152680

interest rate of 12% per annum based on O.C.G.A. § 7-4-12, which establishes Georgia’s post-judgment interest
Copy

Kenneth M. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co., 770 F.2d 1566 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23187

1(a), recodified at Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-3 (repealed 1983). 2 . Section 57-119
Copy

Johnnie L. Johnson, Barbara Ann Johnson, William L. Mance, Mary L. Mance, Waralene Hopkins & All Persons Similarly Situated v. Fleet Fin., Inc., Fleet Fin., Inc. Of Ga., Tower Fin. Servs., Inc., Mortg. Equity Servs. & Donnetta Lowe, D/B/A Lowe & Assocs., Johnnie J. Johnson, Barbara Ann Johnson, William L. Mance, Mary L. Mance, John Mance, Waralene Hopkins & All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fleet Fin., Inc., Fleet Fin., Inc. Of Georgia, Mortg. Equity Servs., & Donnetta Lowe, D/B/A Lowe & Assocs., Tower Fin. Servs., Inc., 4 F.3d 946 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 25 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27069

of Georgia adopted the same construction of section 7-4-18 as did the district court in this case. We
Copy

Garcia v. Stewart, 906 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 24 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1226127

redemption. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROP.: MORTGAGES § 7.4 (1997). A comment to this section explains that
Copy

Ray Shipes v. The Hanover Ins. Co., Ray Shipes v. Hanover Ins. Co., 884 F.2d 1357 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14690

23) plus 7% annual interest pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2. 2 . On July 11, 1988, the district
Copy

Bates v. Cook, Inc., 615 F. Supp. 662 (M.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 14 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21060

...preceeding the bringing of the action."). A leading commentator in the trade secrets field has indicated that publication of a trade secret should commence the running of the statute of limitations. 12A Business Organizations, MILGRIM, TRADE SECRETS § 7.04[2] at 7-36, 7-37....
Copy

Milton Wolfe v. Gerald Coleman, Sheriff Pinellas Cnty. Florida & Jim Smith, Attorney Gen. of the State of Florida, 681 F.2d 1302 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16920

...In 1980 the state attorney’s office for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Clearwater, Florida began investigating possible criminal violations by members of the Church of Scientology. The charges included alleged harassment and intimidation of newspaper reporters. Pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 27.04, the office issued an investigative subpoena to Wolfe, who was a public relations official for the Church....
Copy

Richard M. Hanley v. Nicholas Daniel Roy, 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9894, 2007 WL 1238537

guardianship rights. Guardianship of Infants Act of 1964, § 7(4), (5). As noted by the district court, in Ireland
Copy

Lewis J. McDermott III & Criterion Mills, Inc. v. Middle East Carpet Co., Associated, 811 F.2d 1422 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 11 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2906

percent interest rate provided by Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-2 (Supp.1985). This error was not corrected by the
Copy

City of Winter Park v. Jones, 392 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17292

to register his boat annually with the City. Section 7-4 of the ordinances provides for annual registration
Copy

Walton Motor Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. F.H. Ross, Jr., & Ernest Schleussener, Sr., Cross-Appellees, 736 F.2d 1449 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1937, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20368

bound to pay them ____” Off. Code Ga. Ann. § 7-4-15 (1982). A debt is “liquidated” if it is
Copy

Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc., 799 F.2d 1445 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

required by section 501(c) of DIDM-CA. O.C.G.A. § 7-4-3 (Supp.1985). If the contract does not include
Copy

In Re Wheat, 149 B.R. 1003 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 7 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 345, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2104

...restriction on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2). In addition, although not expressed as clearly or forcefully as the language in the Patterson plan (see footnote *1006 # 4), § 7.04 of the Debtor's Plan also imposes "[a] restriction on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2). [5] Section 7.04 the Debtor's Plan provides, with emphasis added: 7.04....
...ain (until made available to the participant or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the employer (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the employer's general creditors. Section 7.04 of the Debtor's Plan, contains language virtually identical to I.R.C. § 457(b)(6). Consequently, the Debtor argues that this language is enforceable under applicable federal law. The Court agrees. Section 7.04 of the Debtor's Plan was obviously drafted pursuant to federal law, I.R.C....
...rizes. However, where there is a right there is a remedy for a right without a remedy is not a right. Furthermore, were the Court to hold unenforceable the language contained in I.R.C. § 457(b)(6) and the corresponding section of the Debtor's Plan, § 7.04, the Debtor's Plan would not qualify under I.R.C. § 457. This would nullify I.R.C. § 457. Thus, the Court holds that I.R.C. § 457(b)(6) and the corresponding section of the Debtor's Plan, § 7.04, imposes "[a] restriction on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust that is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law ....
Copy

SEC v. Adler, 137 F.3d 1325 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 WL 138770

Lowenfels, Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud, § 7.4(600), at 7:159, 7:160.14 (1996) (ultimately concluding
Copy

Richard Doyle v. S. Guar. Corp., Jimmy E. Wood v. Fort Wayne Mortg. Co., 795 F.2d 907 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27236

...Sales Center. Family Homes assigned the retail sales installment contract, dated January 25, 1983, to Southern Guaranty Corporation.. The amount financed was $11,474.76, and the total finance charge over the contract’s 15-year term was to be $17,507.04....
Copy

State v. Francois, 863 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 299

the array." LA-FAVE, ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 7.4(e) (2d ed.1999) (quoting ALI Model Code of Pre Arraignment
Copy

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. LITTLE RIVER BANK & TR. CO., 228 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 4954

...On page 30 it states: "and similarly, if defendant, X, pleads a cross-claim against his co-party, defendant Y, the latter must plead as a counterclaim any claim which he (Y) has against X that arises out of the transaction or occurrence which has made the basis of X's cross-claim." In 2A Moore's Federal Practice § 7.04, at 1539 it is reported: "No reply is mandatory to an answer made to a cross-claim unless it contains a counterclaim denominated as such.[4]" "[4] See Rule 13(a), (g), which authorizes a counterclaim in such a situation as this: defendant A c...
Copy

Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Sw. Life Ins. Co., Cross-Appellee, 946 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26135, 1991 WL 208975

granted prejudgment interest pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 (1989), which provides that all liquidated demands
Copy

Miller v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12808

the Secretary. See 16 U.S.C. § 590h(b); 7 C.F.R. § 7.4. These state committees are “responsible for carrying
Copy

Sterling Crest, Ltd. v. Blue Rock Partners Realty Grp., LLC, 164 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8924, 2015 WL 3631608

Partnership Agreement (particularly noted in Section 7.4), and also without giving me, the representative
Copy

Moore v. Comfed Sav. Bank, 908 F.2d 834 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 102861

by the borrowers and were authorized by O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2. B. Appellees (1) Appellees contend that the trial
Copy

In Re Today's Woman of Florida, Inc., 195 B.R. 506 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 368, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 536, 1996 WL 268095

...1992); In re Communicall Cent., Inc., 106 B.R. 540, 544 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1989); In re McLean Enterprises, Inc., 105 B.R. 928, 936-37 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1989). This view is also supported by respected treatises. E.g. 1 Robert E. Ginsberg & Robert D. Martin, Bankruptcy: Text, Statutes, Rules § 7.04[a] (1994); Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice 2d § 41.24 (1994)....
Copy

Premier Med. Mgmt., Ltd. v. Salas, 830 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31641528

created hereby shall be unwound pursuant to Section 7.4 hereof. If the parties cannot agree whether this
Copy

Knight v. State, 398 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, § 7.4 at 86 (Supp. 1981), where the author recognizes
Copy

Bankwest, Inc. v. Thurbert E. Baker, 411 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2005).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

loans of $8,000 or less is 16%. See Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-2(a)(2).2 This means that a payday store is' limited
Copy

Bar-Ram Irrigation Prods. v. Phenix-Girard Bank, Shalom Irrigation, Inc., 779 F.2d 1501 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 937, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741

IFTRIC. In so doing, the court relied on Ala.Code § 7-4-103(5) (1975), which.provides that: The measure
Copy

Billie v. State, 963 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2254517

Supreme Court Comm. On Standard Jury Instructions, § 7.4 (May 2006). Billie argues that the trial court erred
Copy

Glinton v. & R, Inc., 173 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Georgia's criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints
Copy

Glinton v. & R, Inc., 173 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8228

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Copy

Cmty. State Bank v. Strong, 651 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 WL 3715769

Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2(a)(2); the Georgia Criminal Usury Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a); the Georgia
Copy

Johnson v. Fleet Fin., Inc., 4 F.3d 946 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 WL 387239

the Georgia criminal usury statute, Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-18 (Case No. 92-8352); and whether a loan broker’s
Copy

Goodman v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 240 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2552, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5601

interest of his employer (except as modified by Section 7.4 below) the amount then standing to the credit
Copy

Adderly v. Wainwright, 58 F.R.D. 389 (M.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 845, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11164

257, 5 Stat. 539; Act of March 2, 1833, ch. 57, § 7, 4 Stat. 634. When several of the earlier habeas corpus
Copy

Hanley v. Roy, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30924, 2006 WL 1302449

the surviving parent does object, then under section 7(4), it is up the testamentary guardian to go to
Copy

MAVERICK MEDIA Grp. v. Hillsborough Cnty., Fla., 508 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

...The ordinance set forth regulations governing four categories of signs: (1) signs exempt from the permit requirement; (2) signs expressly prohibited; (3) permitted temporary signs; and (4) permitted permanent signs. See, e.g., §§ 7.01.00, 7.02.00, 7.03.00, 7.04.00....
...the purpose of public service to indicate the direction or location of a major tourist destination, historic district, public institution, hospital, college, unique geographic area, or non-profit public service institution; and on-site signs. See §§ 7.04.01, 7.04.02, 7.04.03....
...ridled discretion in determining whether or not a sign permit will issue. The allegations would appear directed at provisions such as the following which permit impermissible discretion to County official in determining whether an exemption applies: § 7.04.02(A) (permitting the County Administrator to determine whether an offsite directional sign is exempted from the general off-site ban); § 7.01.00(D) (which fails to include objective standards to determine what content qualifies as holiday,...
...idewalk or curbside signs, balloons or other gas-filled figures, or other inflatable signs), § 7.02.02(D) (prohibiting flags, except those of any nation, state, political subdivision, or corporate flag when not used for a commercial purpose), and §§ 7.04.03(A), (B)(1)-(3) (setting forth general regulations applying to on-site signs)....
...al topics while prohibiting other legal and truthful commercial information. (Doc. 84 at 29-30, ¶ 95). Thus, Plaintiff appears to complain that County officials have the discretion to allow signs for favored businesses or causes, and they cite to §§ 7.04.02(A)(1) (generally allowing "offsite directional signs" but only if content "indicate[s] the direction or location of a major tourist destination, historic district, public institution, hospital, college, unique geographic area or non-profit public service institution"); 7.04.02(B) (off-site directional ground signs); and 7.04.02(C) (off-site directional pole signs). See (Doc. 93 at 12-13). All such off-site directional ground and pole signs are restricted as to size. See §§ 7.04.02(B)(6) (off-site directional ground signs may have an aggregate sign surface area of 72 square feet, but no single sign face may exceed 36 square feet in aggregate sign surface area); 7.04.02(C)(6) (total height of any off-site directional pole sign and the sign structure upon which it is mounted shall not exceed 16 feet, as measured from the pavement edge to the highest point of the sign structure)....
...As for the equal protection claims, Plaintiff argues in its motion that certain provisions in the old sign regulations favored certain charities, organizations and businesses such as tourist destinations by permitting their posting of offsite signs (e.g., § 7.04.02) while at the same time denying other commercial businesses the same opportunity....
...However, nothing in the evidentiary record establishes that Plaintiff was a person subject to or affected by the allegedly offensive provisions of the regulations. Notably, Maverick was not subject to the exceptions, to the prohibitions on off-site signs found in § 7.04.02 of the old regulations because the evidence submitted by Maverick reveals that it sought permits for signs measuring 14' × 48', the size of which clearly exceeds the size limitations contained in the excepted off-site directional signs provisions. See, e.g., §§ 7.04.02(B) (6), (C)(6), (D)(2), (E)(2), and (F)(2)....
Copy

In Re Turner, 261 B.R. 767 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 390, 2001 WL 455580

...There is no question that even a cursory reading of the Plan submitted leaves no doubt that the Plan is not an ERISA qualified Plan at all but established pursuant to Section 457(g) of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C.A. § 457(g). See Article VII, Section 7.04 of the Deferred Compensation Plan provided by Debtor, and Article X, Section 10.07 of same....
...deferred compensation program and the Plan was maintained pursuant to Section 457(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 457(g)). In attempting to distinguish the instant matter from the holding of this Court in Handshaw, the Debtor relies on Section 7.04 of the Plan involved here, which provides the following: All assets of the PLAN, including all deferred amounts, property and rights purchased with deferred amounts, and all income attributable to such deferred amounts, property or right...
Copy

Duke's Steakhouse Ft. Myers, Inc. v. G5 Props., LLC, 106 So. 3d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 191922, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 755

this rule.) SFWMD correctly concluded that BOR section 7.4 did not apply because the G5 project included
Copy

Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Ltd. Ex Rel. Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Inc. v. Miami Sports & Exhibition Auth., 939 F. Supp. 855 (S.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14233, 1996 WL 550103

and limited under the Miami Arena Contract. Section 7.4 of the Miami Arena Contract provides, in pertinent
Copy

Bird v. Eastman Kodak Co., 390 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28415, 2005 WL 1054450

...e monthly payments equal to 50 percent of the amount formerly payable to him for her lifetime. However, "[i]f the spouse is not alive when the Participant dies, no further payments are made." (KRIP (Mar. 31, 1997), vol. II, tab 3 ("1997 Plan Doc."), § 7.04(b) [EK00116].) The Plan also allowed John Bird to elect to receive his benefits in one of several "optional forms of payment" instead of the 50% Contingent Annuitant annuity....
...John Bird received Plan benefits from his 1979 retirement until his death in September 2002. His wife, Jean Bird, predeceased him in 1993. Therefore, when John Bird died in September 2002, because "the spouse [was] not alive when the Participant die [d], no further payments [were] made" under the Plan. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04(b) [EK 00116].) It is this determination that is challenged by Plaintiff in this action....
...ath had she not predeceased him. Therefore, although John would continue to receive his monthly benefit throughout his life, because his contingent annuitant did not survive him, "no further payments [would be] made" after his death. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04(b) [EK00116].) Finally, in response to an inquiry from the court-appointed guardian on March 24, 1998 (tab 18 to Denial Letter [EK00661]), Kodak provided a "Benefits Affidavit" to the guardian dated April 16, 1998....
Copy

Marquis Valentine v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

4th DCA 2004) (quoting LaFave, et al., Crim. P. § 7.4(e) (2d ed. 1999)). “Photographs used in lineups
Copy

Malleiro v. Mori, 182 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14475, 2015 WL 5714701

...manner that has no counterpart in common law jurisdictions and which should not 7 be confused with the ministerial functions of a common law notary public. See Thomas A. Thomas & David T. Smith, Florida Estates Practice Guide, § 7.04(5) (2015). A treatise that surveyed the practices of different countries concerning notarial wills noted four stages commonly involved in the creation of a notarial will: First, the testator makes an oral declaration of the will to the notary and two witnesses....
Copy

The Macdougald Fam. Ltd. P'ship, LLP v. Rays Baseball Club, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 [Resignation, Removal, Death, or Disability
Copy

State of Georgia v. Shawn Micah Tresher Still (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the 1st Monday in November . . . .” 2 U.S.C. § 7. 4 The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential
Copy

In Re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 356 B.R. 813 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 202, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3260, 2006 WL 3543154

(xii) Cure of Defaults. (11 U.S.C. § 1123(d)). Section 7.4 of the Plan provides for the satisfaction of
Copy

Marquis Valentine v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

4th DCA 2004) (quoting LaFave, et al., Crim. P. § 7.4(e) (2d ed. 1999)). “Photographs used in lineups
Copy

McCurry v. Eppolito, 506 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1166, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8169

06(1), Florida Statutes. See also Leiby, supra, § 7.04; and 2 Rakusin, supra, Ch. 14, p. 4. Thus, as long
Copy

Glinton v. & R, Inc., 211 F.3d 586 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 WL 524826

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints
Copy

Ohunene O. Lawal Glinton v. & R, Inc., a Georgia Corp., Michael Darby, & Those Persons Similarly Situated With Mr. Darby, Plaintiff v. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc., a Georgia Corp., N.Y. Diamond Corp., Etc., Susan Walker, & All Persons Similarly Situated With Walker v. Mike Horton Cash Express, Inc., 211 F.3d 586 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8611

violated Georgia's criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints
Copy

Sam Shrivastava, Venn Therapeutics, LLC & Sandip Patel v. Cac Pharma Investments LLC, & C & J Healthcare Investments, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 . . . or Section 10.3 . . . shall arise between
Copy

Sam Shrivastava, Venn Therapeutics, LLC & Sandip Patel v. Cac Pharma Investments LLC, & C & J Healthcare Investments, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

determination of whether cause exists under Section 7.4 . . . or Section 10.3 . . . shall arise between
Copy

Hill v. Virgin, 359 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16111

amended by Laws of Florida, Chapter 74-382, Section 7(4)(a), which provided that in an action for professional
Copy

Miller v. USDA Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the Secretary. See 16 U.S.C. § 590h(b); 7 C.F.R. § 7.4. These state committees are “responsible for carrying
Copy

B.F. Goodrich Employees Fed. Credit Union v. Patterson (In re Patterson), 141 B.R. 505 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 967 F.2d 505

banking day after it receives the check. See Ala.Code § 7-4-104(l)(h) (1975) (the “midnight deadline rule”)
Copy

Fretwell v. Kansas City Life Ins., 643 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68685

before the date of death. Policy 2597589 at 10 § 7.4 (document 94-2 at 11). 5. Applying the Misstated-Age
Copy

Harris v. Sklarew, 166 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3945

Boyer in “Florida Real Estate Transactions” at § 7.04 dealing with deeds of the type here discussed says:
Copy

Caradigm USA LLC v. Pruithealth, Inc. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

borrower or debtor. Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-2 (emphasis added). Section 7-4-2 suggests that compound contractual
Copy

Thompson v. State, 944 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 3780742

an evil intent." Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) § 7.4 (5th ed. 2005). Here, there was competent substantial
Copy

Payne v. Block, 721 F.2d 741 (11th Cir. 1983).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

States, supra. Cf. K. Davis, Administrative Law, § 7:4, p. 167 (1982 Supp.) (legal effect of a Treasury
Copy

Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Sw. Life Ins. Co., Cross-Appellee, 967 F.2d 536 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17558, 1992 WL 164852

prejudgment interest be determined pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 7-4-15 in that circumstance? The Supreme Court
Copy

Lizzie Davis v. Oasis Legal Fin. Operating Co., LLC (11th Cir. 2019).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

G.A. § 7-3-1 et seq., and usury laws, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The Oasis lenders removed the suit to federal
Copy

Cmty. State Bank v. James Strong (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Ann. § 7-4-1 et seq., by charging more than 16% per annum on a loan of $3,000 or less, id. § 7-4-2(a)(2)
Copy

Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

interest from the time of the demand. O.C.G.A. § 7–4–15. This law compensates the creditor for the de-
Copy

Nat'l Companies Health Benefit Plan v. St. Joseph's Hosp. of Atlanta, Inc., 929 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1991).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

one-half percent per month, pursuant to Ga. Code Ann. § 7-4-16 (1989), for their unpaid bills; this equals eighteen
Copy

Glinton v. & R, Inc., 173 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

2 statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints
Copy

Glinton v. & R, Inc., 173 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

violated Georgia’s criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Copy

Cmty. State Bank v. Strong, 485 F.3d 597 (11th Cir. 2007).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9577, 2007 WL 1225343

Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-2(a)(2); the Georgia Criminal Usury Statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18(a); the Georgia
Copy

horizon/cms Healthcare v. S. Oaks, 732 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 218410

shall be dissolved and terminated pursuant to Section 7.4 of this Agreement by written notice to the Defaulter

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.