Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852 - CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852

RULE 3.852. CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS
PRODUCTION


(a) Applicability and Scope.

(1) This rule is applicable only to the production of
public records for capital postconviction defendants and does not
change or alter the time periods specified in Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.851. Furthermore, this rule does not affect,
expand, or limit the production of public records for any purposes
other than use in a proceeding held pursuant to rule 3.850 or rule
3.851.

(2) This rule shall not be a basis for renewing requests
that have been initiated previously or for relitigating issues
pertaining to production of public records upon which a court has
ruled prior to October 1, 1998.

(3) This rule is to be used in conjunction with the forms
found at Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.993.

(b) Definitions.

(1) “Public records” has the meaning set forth in
section 119.011, Florida Statutes.

(2) “Trial court” means:

(A) the judge who entered the judgment and
imposed the sentence of death; or

(B) the judge assigned by the chief judge.

(3) “Records repository” means the location designated
by the secretary of state pursuant to section 27.7081, Florida
Statutes, for archiving capital postconviction public records.

(4) “Collateral counsel” means a capital collateral
regional counsel from one of the three regions in Florida; a private
attorney who has been appointed to represent a capital defendant
for postconviction litigation; or a private attorney who has been
hired by the capital defendant or who has agreed to work pro bono
for a capital defendant for postconviction litigation.

(5) “Agency” means an entity or individual as defined in
section 119.011, Florida Statutes, that is subject to the
requirements of producing public records for inspection under
section 119.07, Florida Statutes.
(6) “Index” means a list of the public records included
in each container of public records sent to the records repository.

(c) Filing and Service.

(1) The original of all notices, requests, or objections
filed under this rule must be filed with the clerk of the trial court.
Copies must be served on the trial court, the attorney general, the
state attorney, collateral counsel, and any affected person or
agency, unless otherwise required by this rule.

(2) Service shall be made pursuant to Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.030.

(3) In all instances requiring written notification or
request, the party who has the obligation of providing a notification
or request shall provide proof of receipt.

(4) Persons and agencies receiving postconviction
public records notifications or requests pursuant to this rule are
not required to furnish records filed in a trial court prior to the
receipt of the notice.

(d) Action Upon Issuance of Mandate.

(1) Within 15 days after receiving written notification of
the Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming the sentence of
death, the attorney general shall file with the trial court a written
notice of the mandate and serve a copy of it upon the state attorney
who prosecuted the case, the Department of Corrections, and the
defendant’s trial counsel. The notice to the state attorney shall
direct the state attorney to submit public records to the records
repository within 90 days after receipt of written notification and to
notify each law enforcement agency involved in the investigation of
the capital offense, with a copy to the trial court, to submit public
records to the records repository within 90 days after receipt of
written notification. The notice to the Department of Corrections
shall direct the department to submit public records to the records
repository within 90 days after receipt of written notification. The
attorney general shall make a good faith effort to assist in the timely
production of public records and written notices of compliance by
the state attorney and the Department of Corrections with copies to
the trial court.

(2) Within 90 days after receiving written notification of
issuance of the Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming a
death sentence, the state attorney shall provide written notification
to the attorney general and to the trial court of the name and
address of any additional person or agency that has public records
pertinent to the case.

(3) Within 90 days after receiving written notification of
issuance of the Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming a
death sentence, the defendant’s trial counsel shall provide written
notification to the attorney general and to the trial court of the
name and address of any person or agency with information
pertinent to the case which has not previously been provided to
collateral counsel.

(4) Within 15 days after receiving written notification of
any additional person or agency pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) or
(d)(3) of this rule, the attorney general shall notify all persons or
agencies identified pursuant to subdivisions (d)(2) or (d)(3), with a
copy to the trial court, that these persons or agencies are required
by law to copy, index, and deliver to the records repository all
public records pertaining to the case that are in their possession.
The person or agency shall bear the costs related to copying,
indexing, and delivering the records. The attorney general shall
make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production of public
records and a written notice of compliance by each additional
person or agency with a copy to the trial court.

(e) Action Upon Receipt of Notice of Mandate.

(1) Within 15 days after receipt of a written notice of
the mandate from the attorney general, the state attorney shall
provide written notification to each law enforcement agency involved
in the specific case to submit public records to the records
repository within 90 days after receipt of written notification. A copy
of the notice shall be served upon the defendant’s trial counsel and
the trial court. The state attorney shall make a good faith effort to
assist in the timely production of public records and a written
notice of compliance by each law enforcement agency with a copy to
the trial court.

(2) Within 90 days after receipt of a written notice of
the mandate from the attorney general, the state attorney shall
copy, index, and deliver to the records repository all public records,
in a current, nonproprietary technology format, that were produced
in the state attorney’s investigation or prosecution of the case. The
state attorney shall bear the costs. The state attorney shall also
provide written notification to the attorney general and the trial
court of compliance with this section, including certifying that, to
the best of the state attorney’s knowledge or belief, all public
records in the state attorney’s possession have been copied,
indexed, and delivered to the records repository as required by this
rule.

(3) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of
the mandate from the attorney general, the Department of
Corrections shall copy, index, and deliver to the records repository
all public records, in a current, nonproprietary technology format,
determined by the department to be relevant to the subject matter
of a proceeding under rule 3.851, unless such copying, indexing,
and delivering would be unduly burdensome. To the extent that the
records determined by the department to be relevant to the subject
matter of a proceeding under rule 3.851 are the defendant’s
medical, psychological, substance abuse, or psychiatric records,
upon receipt of express consent by the defendant or pursuant to the
authority of a court of competent jurisdiction, the department shall
provide a copy of the defendant’s medical, psychological, substance
abuse, and psychiatric records to the defendant’s counsel of record.
The department shall bear the costs. The secretary of the
department shall provide written notification to the attorney general
and the trial court of compliance with this section certifying that, to
the best of the secretary of the department’s knowledge or belief, all
such public records in the possession of the secretary of the
department have been copied, indexed, and delivered to the records
repository.
(4) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of
the mandate from the state attorney, a law enforcement agency
shall copy, index, and deliver to the records repository all public
records, in a current, nonproprietary technology format, which were
produced in the investigation or prosecution of the case. Each
agency shall bear the costs. The chief law enforcement officer of
each law enforcement agency shall provide written notification to
the attorney general and the trial court of compliance with this
section including certifying that, to the best of the chief law
enforcement officer’s knowledge or belief, all such public records in
possession of the agency or in possession of any employee of the
agency, have been copied, indexed, and delivered to the records
repository.

(5) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of
the mandate from the attorney general, each additional person or
agency identified pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this rule
shall copy, index, and deliver to the records repository all public
records, in a current, nonproprietary technology format, which were
produced during the prosecution of the case. The person or agency
shall bear the costs. The person or agency shall provide written
notification to the attorney general and the trial court of compliance
with this subdivision and shall certify, to the best of the person or
agency’s knowledge and belief, all such public records in the
possession of the person or agency have been copied, indexed, and
delivered to the records repository.

(f) Exempt or Confidential Public Records.

(1) Any public records delivered to the records
repository pursuant to these rules that are confidential or exempt
from the requirements of section 119.07, Florida Statutes, or article
I, section 24(a), Florida Constitution, must be separately contained,
without being redacted, and sealed. The outside of the container
must clearly identify that the public record is confidential or exempt
and that the seal may not be broken without an order of the trial
court. The outside of the container must identify the nature of the
public records and the legal basis for the exemption.
(2) Upon the entry of an appropriate court order, sealed
containers subject to an inspection by the trial court shall be
shipped to the clerk of court. The containers may be opened only for
inspection by the trial court in camera. The moving party shall bear
all costs associated with the transportation and inspection of such
records by the trial court. The trial court shall perform the
unsealing and inspection without ex parte communications and in
accord with procedures for reviewing sealed documents.

(3) Collateral counsel must file a motion for in camera
inspection within 30 days of receipt of the notice of delivery of the
sealed records to the central records repository, or the in camera
inspection will be deemed waived.

(g) Demand for Additional Public Records.

(1) Within 240 days after collateral counsel is
appointed, retained, or appears pro bono, such counsel shall send a
written demand for additional public records to each person or
agency submitting public records or identified as having
information pertinent to the case under subdivision (d) of this rule,
with a copy to the trial court. However, if collateral counsel was
appointed prior to October 1, 2001, then within 90 days after
collateral counsel is appointed, retained, or appears pro bono, such
counsel shall send a written demand for additional public records
to each person or agency submitting public records or identified as
having information pertinent to the case under subdivision (d) of
this rule.

(2) Within 90 days of receipt of the written demand,
each person or agency notified under this subdivision shall deliver
to the records repository any additional public records in the
possession of the person or agency that pertain to the case and
shall certify to the best of the person or agency’s knowledge and
belief that all additional public records have been delivered to the
records repository or, if no additional public records are found,
shall recertify that the public records previously delivered are
complete. To the extent that the additional public records are the
defendant’s Department of Corrections’ medical, psychological,
substance abuse, or psychiatric records, upon receipt of express
consent by the defendant or pursuant to the authority of a court of
competent jurisdiction, the department shall provide a copy of the
defendant’s medical, psychological, substance abuse, and
psychiatric records to the defendant’s counsel of record. A copy of
each person’s or agency’s certification shall be provided to the trial
court.

(3) Within 60 days of receipt of the written demand,
any person or agency may file with the trial court an objection to
the written demand described in subdivision (g)(1). The trial court
shall hear and rule on any objection no later than the next 90-day
status conference after the filing of the objection, ordering a person
or agency to produce additional public records if the court
determines each of the following exists:

(A) Collateral counsel has made a timely and
diligent search as provided in this rule.

(B) Collateral counsel’s written demand identifies,
with specificity, those additional public records that are not at the
records repository.

(C) The additional public records sought are
relevant to the subject matter of a proceeding under rule 3.851, or
appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence.

(D) The additional public records request is not
overly broad or unduly burdensome.

(h) Cases in Which Mandate was Issued Prior to Effective
Date of Rule.

(1) If the mandate affirming a defendant’s conviction
and sentence of death was issued prior to October 1, 1998, and no
initial public records requests have been made by collateral counsel
by that date, the attorney general and the state attorney shall file
notifications with the trial court as required by subdivisions (d) and
(e) of this rule.
(2) If on October 1, 1998, a defendant is represented by
collateral counsel and has initiated the public records process,
collateral counsel shall, within 90 days after October 1, 1998, or
within 90 days after the production of records which were requested
prior to October 1, 1998, whichever is later, file with the trial court
and serve a written demand for any additional public records that
have not previously been the subject of a request for public records.
The request for these records shall be treated the same as a request
pursuant to subdivisions (d)(3) and (d)(4) of this rule, and the
records shall be copied, indexed, and delivered to the repository as
required in subdivision (e)(5) of this rule.

(3) Within 10 days of the signing of a defendant’s death
warrant, collateral counsel may request in writing the production of
public records from a person or agency from which collateral
counsel has previously requested public records. A person or
agency shall copy, index, and deliver to the repository any public
record:

(A) that was not previously the subject of an
objection;

(B) that was received or produced since the
previous request; or

(C) that was, for any reason, not produced
previously.

The person or agency providing the records shall bear the costs of
copying, indexing, and delivering such records. If none of these
circumstances exist, the person or agency shall file with the trial
court and the parties an affidavit stating that no other records exist
and that all public records have been produced previously. A person
or agency shall comply with this subdivision within 10 days from
the date of the written request or such shorter time period as is
ordered by the court.

(4) In all instances in subdivision (h) which require
written notification the receiving party shall provide proof of receipt
by return mail or other carrier.
(i) Limitation on Postproduction Request for Additional
Records.

(1) In order to obtain public records in addition to
those provided under subdivisions (e), (f), (g), and (h) of this rule,
collateral counsel shall file an affidavit in the trial court which:

(A) attests that collateral counsel has made a
timely and diligent search of the records repository; and

(B) identifies with specificity those public records
not at the records repository; and

(C) establishes that the additional public records
are either relevant to the subject matter of the postconviction
proceeding or are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence; and

(D) shall be served in accord with subdivision (c)(1)
of this rule.

(2) Within 30 days after the affidavit of collateral
counsel is filed, the trial court may order a person or agency to
produce additional public records only upon finding each of the
following:

(A) collateral counsel has made a timely and
diligent search of the records repository;

(B) collateral counsel’s affidavit identifies with
specificity those additional public records that are not at the
records repository;

(C) the additional public records sought are either
relevant to the subject matter of a proceeding under rule 3.851 or
appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence; and

(D) the additional records request is not overly
broad or unduly burdensome.
(j) Authority of the Court. In proceedings under this rule
the trial court may:

(1) compel or deny disclosure of records;

(2) conduct an in-camera inspection;

(3) extend the times in this rule upon a showing of
good cause;

(4) require representatives from government agencies to
appear at status conferences to address public records issues;

(5) impose sanctions upon any party, person, or agency
affected by this rule including initiating contempt proceedings,
taxing expenses, extending time, ordering facts to be established,
and granting other relief; and

(6) resolve any dispute arising under this rule unless
jurisdiction is in an appellate court.

(k) Scope of Production and Resolution of Production
Issues.

(1) Unless otherwise limited, the scope of production
under any part of this rule shall be that the public records sought
are not privileged or immune from production and are either
relevant to the subject matter of the proceeding under rule 3.851 or
are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence.

(2) Any objections or motions to compel production of
public records pursuant to this rule shall be filed within 30 days
after the end of the production time period provided by this rule.
Counsel for the party objecting or moving to compel shall file a copy
of the objection or motion directly with the trial court. The trial
court shall hold a hearing on the objection or motion on an
expedited basis.
(l) Destruction of Records Repository Records. Sixty days
after a capital sentence is carried out, after a defendant is released
from incarceration following the granting of a pardon or reversal of
the sentence, or after a defendant has been resentenced to a term of
years, the attorney general shall provide written notification of this
occurrence to the secretary of state with service in accord with
subdivision (c)(1). After the expiration of the 60 days, the secretary
of state may then destroy the copies of the records held by the
records repository that pertain to that case, unless an objection to
the destruction is filed in the trial court and served upon the
secretary of state and in accord with subdivision (c)(1). If no
objection has been served within the 60–day period, the records
may then be destroyed. If an objection is served, the records shall
not be destroyed until a final disposition of the objection.

Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

2014 Amendment. The rule is amended to require the state
attorney and attorney general to manage compliance with the public
records process.

Cases Citing Rule 3.852

Total Results: 97

Thompson v. State

759 So. 2d 650, 2000 WL 373757

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2000 | Docket: 1421331

Cited 201 times | Published

public records. Prior to the promulgation of rule 3.852 in 1996, it was clear that in postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Muhammad v. State

782 So. 2d 343, 2001 WL 40365

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2001 | Docket: 2000672

Cited 152 times | Published

proceedings. See Amendments to Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro.—Rule 3.852, 723 So.2d 163 (Fla.1998). By a subsequent order

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

866 So. 2d 1, 2003 WL 22207901

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 1680168

Cited 133 times | Published

private counsel for appointment and implement new rule 3.852 consistent with this legislation). CCRC counsel

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sims v. State

754 So. 2d 657, 2000 WL 193226

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1523509

Cited 128 times | Published

sought disclosure of public records pursuant to rule 3.852(h)(3) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Valle v. State

705 So. 2d 1331, 1997 WL 759365

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1997 | Docket: 1576718

Cited 66 times | Published

was voluntarily dismissed in anticipation of rule 3.852, which gives a 3.850 court jurisdiction over

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tompkins v. State

994 So. 2d 1072, 2008 WL 4824085

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2008 | Docket: 2452464

Cited 64 times | Published

admissible evidence in this case, as required by rule 3.852(i)(2)(C).[15] The trial court had already rejected

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parker v. State

904 So. 2d 370, 2005 WL 673686

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2005 | Docket: 1365343

Cited 64 times | Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.852(h)(2) was enacted. Rule 3.852(h)(2) permitted capital defendants who were represented

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. Butterworth

756 So. 2d 52, 2000 WL 381484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 471304

Cited 53 times | Published

section 119.19, Florida Statutes, which repealed rule 3.852 and established a procedure for the production

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wyatt v. State

71 So. 3d 86, 2011 WL 2652195

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2011 | Docket: 1164518

Cited 51 times | Published

for records. We disagree. Section 27.7081 and rule 3.852 pertain only to the production of records for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dennis v. State

109 So. 3d 680, 2012 WL 6619282

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 60229784

Cited 50 times | Published

scope of requests made pursuant to rule 3.852(g) is governed by rule 3.852(Z), which provides that the records

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pardo v. State

108 So. 3d 558, 2012 WL 6935117, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2570

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2012 | Docket: 60229182

Cited 42 times | Published

not overly broad or unduly burdensome. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(i)(2). This Court reviews the circuit court’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. State

921 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 91302

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2006 | Docket: 479547

Cited 39 times | Published

an evidentiary hearing in this case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(i); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.851(f)(5)(A)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diaz v. State

945 So. 2d 1136, 2006 WL 3530471

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2006 | Docket: 2451610

Cited 38 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852(i). Rule 3.852(i) deals with the limitation on postproduction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Glock v. Moore

776 So. 2d 243, 2001 WL 10604

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 422041

Cited 37 times | Published

signed: The language of section 119.19 and of rule 3.852 clearly provides for the production of public

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mann v. State

112 So. 3d 1158, 2013 WL 1760908

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2013 | Docket: 60230979

Cited 36 times | Published

burdensome. See Valle, 70 So.3d at 549 (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(i)(2)). We have stated that “a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

820 So. 2d 199, 2002 WL 348205

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2002 | Docket: 1715617

Cited 35 times | Published

So.2d at 552. Moreover, this Court has stated, rule 3.852 "is not intended to be a procedure authorizing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

804 So. 2d 1218, 2001 WL 1285006

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2001 | Docket: 1334473

Cited 29 times | Published

subject to the ninety-day limitation of amended rule 3.852. This included three public requests in Johnson's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dane P. Abdool v. Pam Bondi, etc.

141 So. 3d 529, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 421, 2014 WL 2609154, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1887

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2014 | Docket: 58814

Cited 28 times | Published

not contain the language in subdivision (h) of rule 3.852, which is titled “Cases in Which Mandate was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rutherford v. State

926 So. 2d 1100, 2006 WL 204838

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 1515329

Cited 28 times | Published

records.[9] The circuit court explained that rule 3.852(h)(3), which governs requests for production

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mills v. State

786 So. 2d 547, 2001 WL 418952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 1278807

Cited 28 times | Published

stated: The language of section 119.19 and of rule 3.852 clearly provides for the production of public

Category: Criminal Procedure

Valle v. State

70 So. 3d 530, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 461, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1951, 2011 WL 3667696

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2011 | Docket: 2353197

Cited 27 times | Published

204 (Fla. 2002). As this Court has emphasized, rule 3.852 "is not intended to be a procedure authorizing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Buenoano v. State

708 So. 2d 941, 1998 WL 133991

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1998 | Docket: 542128

Cited 22 times | Published

requests were treated as motions to compel under rule 3.852 and transferred to the trial court that would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walton v. State

3 So. 3d 1000, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 89, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 136, 2009 WL 196320

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2009 | Docket: 1652784

Cited 21 times | Published

119, Florida Statutes (1995). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(l)(1) (limiting the scope of production

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rolling v. State

944 So. 2d 176, 2006 WL 2956382

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 1156205

Cited 20 times | Published

for any reason, not produced previously. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(h)(3) (emphasis added). Because there is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tompkins v. State

872 So. 2d 230, 2003 WL 22304578

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2004 | Docket: 1356912

Cited 19 times | Published

signed: *244 The language of section 119.19 and of rule 3.852 clearly provides for the production of public

Category: Criminal Procedure

Juan Chavez v. Florida SP Warden, etal

742 F.3d 1267, 2014 WL 552856, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2700

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 2014 | Docket: 89839

Cited 17 times | Published

Florida Department of Corrections Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(f),” in which Chavez stated: In 2010, international

Category: Criminal Procedure

Phillips v. State

894 So. 2d 28, 2004 WL 2297824

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2004 | Docket: 1148022

Cited 17 times | Published

violation of chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 3.852 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; (3)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sims v. State

753 So. 2d 66, 2000 WL 137087

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2000 | Docket: 1729116

Cited 16 times | Published

proceedings." Id. at 476. The 1998 Legislature repealed rule 3.852 and enacted section 119.19, Florida Statutes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kearse v. State

969 So. 2d 976, 2007 WL 2438371

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2007 | Docket: 44724

Cited 15 times | Published

circuit court did not timely deny the request. Rule 3.852(g)(3) provides that the trial court "shall hold

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert Joe Long v. State of Florida

271 So. 3d 938

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2019 | Docket: 15638163

Cited 12 times | Published

repository or state, in an affidavit pursuant to rule 3.852(h), that the requested items do not exist; (2)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rimmer v. State

59 So. 3d 763, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 745, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2091, 2010 WL 5110212

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2010 | Docket: 2364884

Cited 12 times | Published

Postconviction Public Records Production). Under rule 3.852(g)(3), additional public records are to be produced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wyatt v. State

78 So. 3d 512, 2011 WL 5864826

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2011 | Docket: 768674

Cited 10 times | Published

without discussion Wyatt's challenge pertaining to rule 3.852, based on the reasoning we employed in ruling

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lambrix v. State

124 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 3214465

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2013 | Docket: 60235575

Cited 8 times | Published

19 and rule 3.852, we deny Lambrix’s constitutional challenge to section 119.19 and rule 3.852 without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lambrix v. State

124 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 3214465

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2013 | Docket: 60235575

Cited 8 times | Published

19 and rule 3.852, we deny Lambrix’s constitutional challenge to section 119.19 and rule 3.852 without

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422

Cited 7 times | Published

in Death Penalty Postconviction Proceedings). Rule 3.852 (Capital Postconviction Public Records Production)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida & SC18-1321 Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida

265 So. 3d 462

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982205

Cited 5 times | Published

additional records pursuant to rule 3.852(h)(3). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.852(h)(3) ; see also Hannon v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. McDonough

452 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68770, 2006 WL 2729646

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2006 | Docket: 2269348

Cited 5 times | Published

Amended Motion to Toll and Schedule Operation of Rule 3.852" (hereinafter Motion to Clarify) in the Supreme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amend. to Rules of App. Proc., Civ. Proc.

887 So. 2d 1090, 2004 WL 2201732

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2004 | Docket: 1515169

Cited 5 times | Published

Henderson v. State, 745 So.2d 319 (Fla.1999). RULE 3.852. CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS PRODUCTION

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendment to Fla. Rules of Crim.

683 So. 2d 475, 1996 WL 629322

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1996 | Docket: 466119

Cited 5 times | Published

new rule of criminal procedure to be known as rule 3.852. In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Askari Abdullah Muhammad f/k/a Thomas Knight v. State of Florida

132 So. 3d 176

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2014 | Docket: 400989

Cited 4 times | Published

violation of chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.852; (2) the current, revised procedure that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Correll v. State

184 So. 3d 478, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 531, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2152, 2015 WL 5771838

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2015 | Docket: 60253320

Cited 3 times | Published

We have noted that requests for records under rule 3.852(h)(3) may be denied as far exceeding the scope

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Buenoano

707 So. 2d 714, 1998 WL 103004

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1998 | Docket: 1675946

Cited 3 times | Published

or complaints in the trial court pursuant to rule 3.852(f). The governor signed a warrant setting Buenoano's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patrick C. Hannon v. State of Florida and

228 So. 3d 505

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6184003

Cited 2 times | Published

State v. Coney, 845 So.2d 120, 137 (Fla. 2003)). Rule. 3.852 is “not intended to be a procedure authorizing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richard Eugene Hamilton v. State of Florida

236 So. 3d 276

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2018 | Docket: 6299400

Cited 1 times | Published

filed demands for additional public records under rule 3.852(i) relating to his representation by predecessor

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ronnie Keith Williams v. State of Florida

226 So. 3d 758, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 706, 2017 WL 2806711, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1432

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2017 | Docket: 6082143

Cited 1 times | Published

constitutional challenges that assert section 27.7081 and rule 3.852 impermissi-bly restrict a capital defendant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC16-481 Harrel Franklin Braddy v. State of Florida and Harrel Franklin Braddy v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

219 So. 3d 803

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2017 | Docket: 6074672

Cited 1 times | Published

access to public records under section 119.19 and rule 3.852, namely: (1) certain materials in sealed box

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC16-56 Cary Michael Lambrix v. State of Florida and Cary Michael Lambrix v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

217 So. 3d 977

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2017 | Docket: 4615976

Cited 1 times | Published

constitutionality of section 119.19, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.852, he has previously raised this same challenge

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC14-881 Charles L. Anderson v. State of Florida and Charles L. Anderson v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

220 So. 3d 1133

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2017 | Docket: 4615977

Cited 1 times | Published

2. The postconviction claims were: (1) rule 3.852 is unconstitutional; (2) the one-year time limit

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

185 So. 3d 1169

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 60294128

Cited 1 times | Published

follows: [list public records requested] 3. Under rule 3.852, any objection to production, including any claim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Juan Carlos Chavez v. State of Florida

132 So. 3d 826, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 73, 2014 WL 346026, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 436

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2014 | Docket: 401473

Cited 1 times | Published

overly broad or unduly burdensome. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(i)(2). Further, a defendant bears the burden

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richard Allen Johnson v. State of Florida

135 So. 3d 1002, 2014 WL 68134

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2014 | Docket: 400987

Cited 1 times | Published

the following claims: section 119.19 and rule 3.852 are unconstitutional (Claim (1)); requiring Johnson

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

132 So. 3d 123, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 890, 2013 WL 6500885, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2685

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238356

Cited 1 times | Published

(h)-(i) [No Change] Court Commentary [No Change] RULE 3.852. CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS PRODUCTION

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

102 So. 3d 505, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2064, 2012 WL 4936305

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2012 | Docket: 60226684

Cited 1 times | Published

prescribed period. Committee Notes [No Change] RULE 3.852. CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS PRODUCTION

Category: Criminal Procedure

Omar Blanco v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

688 F.3d 1211, 2012 WL 3081313, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15806

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 31, 2012 | Docket: 404351

Cited 1 times | Published

included in public records. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852. While Rule 3.852 did not exist at the time, Blanco

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seibert v. State

64 So. 3d 67, 2010 WL 2680239

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2011 | Docket: 2364569

Cited 1 times | Published

properly sealed. Defendant also contends that Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852 is unconstitutional. This claim has been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. Butterworth

133 F.3d 783, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35100

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 15, 1997 | Docket: 211848

Cited 1 times | Published

Capital Post-conviction Public Records Production-Rule 3.852, 700 So.2d 680 (Fla.1997) (granting CCRCs’

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendment to Rules of Crim. Proced.

700 So. 2d 680, 1997 WL 652141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1997 | Docket: 2517152

Cited 1 times | Published

CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS PRODUCTION-RULE 3.852. No. 87688. Supreme Court of Florida. October

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edward J. Zakrzewski, II v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2025 | Docket: 70881048

Published

of discretion. See Tanzi, 407 So. 3d at 391. Rule 3.852(i)(2) limits the production of additional public

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scottie D. Allen v. State of Florida & Scottie D. Allen v. Secretary, Dept. of Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2025 | Docket: 70700497

Published

for certain additional public records under rule 3.852(g). Allen acknowledges that he bears the burden

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas Lee Gudinas v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2025 | Docket: 70562418

Published

demand for public records, which was made under rule 3.852. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. State of Florida & Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2025 | Docket: 69942878

Published

Hutchinson now claims that the operation of rule 3.852 violates due process and equal protection, at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. State of Florida & Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2025 | Docket: 69942878

Published

Hutchinson now claims that the operation of rule 3.852 violates due process and equal protection, at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael A. Tanzi v. State of Florida; Michael A. Tanzi v. Secretary, Department of Corrections & Michael A. Tanzi v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2025 | Docket: 69830889

Published

1054, 1065 (Fla. 2024). The “discovery tool” of rule 3.852 “is not intended to be a procedure authorizing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Loran Cole v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2024 | Docket: 69074625

Published

denying his public records requests made under rule 3.852. 1 For the reasons that follow, we 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnny Mack Sketo Calhoun v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2023 | Docket: 67561783

Published

request for additional public records under rule 3.852(i). As we will explain later in more detail,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2023 | Docket: 67288392

Published

public records requests, which were made under rule 3.852. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Darryl Brian Barwick v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2023 | Docket: 67288392

Published

public records requests, which were made under rule 3.852. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1)

Category: Criminal Procedure

William Earl Sweet v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2020 | Docket: 16897137

Published

(Fla. 2014) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.852(i)(2)). We review denials of rule 3.852(i) public records requests

Category: Criminal Procedure

James Milton Dailey v. State of Florida & James Milton Dailey v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2019 | Docket: 68539964

Published

As we have recently explained: Rule 3.852 is “not intended to be a procedure authorizing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gary Ray Bowles v. State of Florida and Gary Ray Bowles v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2019 | Docket: 16049587

Published

regarding records requests under rule 3.852: Rule 3.852 is “not intended to be a procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jose Antonio Jimenez v. Pamela Jo Bondi

259 So. 3d 722

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2018 | Docket: 8397775

Published

Court"). Two of these requests were filed under rule 3.852(h)(3). As we cautioned in our November 21 order

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida & Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

212 So. 3d 982

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2017 | Docket: 4577417

Published

sections 27.7081 and 119.19, Florida Statutes, and rule 3.852 in the postconviction proceeding, these constitutional

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037340

Published

- 36 - Under the provisions of rule 3.852(e)(5), you must: 1. Within 90 days

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029855

Published

- 36 - Under the provisions of rule 3.852(e)(5), you must: 1. Within 90 days

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

185 So. 3d 1169, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 593, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2948, 2015 WL 10490031

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008265

Published

- 36 - Under the provisions of rule 3.852(e)(5), you must: 1. Within 90 days

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida and Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2015 | Docket: 2699988

Published

claims: (1) section 119.19, Florida Statutes, and rule 3.852 are unconstitutional facially and as applied

Category: Criminal Procedure

State of Florida v. Lawrence Andrew Ingram

170 So. 3d 727, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1433, 2015 WL 3999167

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2015 | Docket: 2670745

Published

members of the general public. See, e.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.852(k)(l) (limiting the scope of capital postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.852

163 So. 3d 476, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 924, 2015 WL 1932163

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2015 | Docket: 2653676

Published

required by subdivisions (e)(3) and (g)(2) of rule 3.852. In re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Crim. Pro

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to The Florida Rules of Judicial Administration The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and The Florida Rules Of Appellate Procedure—Capital Postconviction Rules

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2014 | Docket: 1364106

Published

production of public records. Also in rule 3.852, new subdivision (f)(3) (Exempt or Confidential

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

148 So. 3d 1171, 2014 WL 3555967

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2014 | Docket: 60243444

Published

timely production of public records. Also in rule 3.852, new subdivision (f)(3) (Exempt or Confidential

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure—Capital Postconviction Rules.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2014 | Docket: 798055

Published

production of public records. Also in rule 3.852, new subdivision (f)(3) (Exempt or Confidential

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.852

140 So. 3d 507, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 272, 2014 WL 1722473, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1386

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2014 | Docket: 57173

Published

required by subdivisions (e)(3) and (g)(2) of rule 3.852. This amendment is necessary because the current

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richard Allen Johnson v. Michael D. Crews, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2014 | Docket: 400986

Published

except the following claims: section 119.19 and rule 3.852 are unconstitutional (Claim (1)); requiring Johnson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Areizaga v. Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County

935 So. 2d 640, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672, 2006 WL 2355985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2006 | Docket: 64846124

Published

section 44.102, but that statute, similar to rule 3.852(Z )(3), states that “[cjourt-ordered mediation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852 & 3.993

802 So. 2d 298, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 644, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1911, 2001 WL 1155090

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 64810943

Published

3.851(c)(4) conflicts with the time period in rule 3.852. Rule 3.851(c)(4), as amended in our July 2001

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments To Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993

797 So. 2d 1213, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 494, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1408, 2001 WL 776678

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 64809659

Published

handling capital cases, the Court’s adoption of rule 3.852 (“Capital Posteonviction Public Records Production”)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 64808411

Published

this case. Pursuant — toUnder the provisions of rule 3.852(e)(5), you must: 1. Within 90 days of receipt

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852 & 3.993

772 So. 2d 532, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 569, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1422, 2000 WL 966724

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2000 | Docket: 64802043

Published

of public records would begin under proposed rule 3.852. This design was meant to allow postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993

772 So. 2d 512, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 395, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2566, 2000 WL 718451

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64802042

Published

become final. The original proposed amendment to rule 3.852 is altered to: (1) require records that are exempt

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852 & 3.993

772 So. 2d 488, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 774, 2000 WL 381496

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 64802041

Published

amendments to rule 3.851, as well as amendments to rule 3.852, rule 3.993, and the Rules of Judicial Administration

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.852

754 So. 2d 640, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 328, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2370, 1999 WL 462631

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1999 | Docket: 64796286

Published

conform to subdivisions (e)(2) and (e)(4) in rule 3.852, and we have made technical corrections in several

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 10, 1998 | Docket: 3257555

Published

You also inquire about the interpretation of Rule 3.852, Fla.R.Crim.P. While questions involving the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Rule 3.852 (Capital Postconviction Public Records Production) & Rule 3.993 (Related Forms)

723 So. 2d 163, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 478, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1813, 1998 WL 681305

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1998 | Docket: 64785071

Published

Because of the 1998 Legislature’s repeal of rule 3.852, this Court expanded the Committee’s charge to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Capital Postconviction Public Records Production

719 So. 2d 869, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 363, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1239, 1998 WL 333542

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1998 | Docket: 64783804

Published

contention that additional funding is needed before rule 3.852 can be implemented. Motions for rehearing and/or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Capital Postconviction Public Records Production

708 So. 2d 913, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 37, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 5, 1998 WL 19211

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1998 | Docket: 64780011

Published

688 So.2d 475 (Fla.1996). Among other things, rule 3.852 requires that disputes regarding public records

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. Butterworth

133 F.3d 783

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 15, 1997 | Docket: 422126

Published

Capital Postconviction Public Records Production- Rule 3.852, No. 87688, — So. 2d —, — (Fla. Oct. 20, 1997)

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure-Capital Postconviction Public Records Production

673 So. 2d 483, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 187, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 728, 1996 WL 196697

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1996 | Docket: 64764577

Published

the attached appendix. We direct that proposed rule 3.852 be published in the next issue of The Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure