Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.780
RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES
(a) Evidence. In capital sentence proceedings the state and
defendant will be permitted to present evidence of an aggravating or
mitigating nature, consistent with the requirements of the statute
and the notice requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.181. Each side will be permitted to cross-examine the witnesses
presented by the other side. The state will present evidence first.
(b) Rebuttal. The trial judge shall permit rebuttal testimony.
(c) Opening Statement and Closing Argument. Both the
state and the defendant will be given an equal opportunity for one
opening statement and one closing argument. The state will proceed
first.
Committee Notes
1977 Adoption. This is a new rule designed to create a
uniform procedure that will be consistent with both section
921.141, Florida Statutes, and State v. Dixon, 283 So. 2d 1 (Fla.
1973).
Cases Citing Rule 3.780
Total Results: 17
685 So. 2d 1253
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082
Cited 22 times | Published
subpoena.
The amendment to subdivision (c) of rule 3.780, Sentencing Hearing for Capital Cases, clarifies
Category: Criminal Procedure
267 So. 2d 331
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1972 | Docket: 1740625
Cited 14 times | Published
hearing thereon may thereafter be held under F.R.P. Rule 3.780 to determine first the date of the crime for
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
matters.
1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule.
RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES
(a) Evidence
Category: Criminal Procedure
262 So. 2d 902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1972 | Docket: 429180
Cited 9 times | Published
sentence are under consideration by the court.
Rule 3.780 CrPR relating to inquiry into mitigating or aggravating
Category: Criminal Procedure
648 So. 2d 683, 1994 WL 656640
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1701790
Cited 7 times | Published
Neither the State nor defense counsel cited [rule 3.780(c)] to the Court at the time the Pretrial Motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 432, 1994 WL 656605
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1168919
Cited 4 times | Published
purpose, unless waived by the defendant.
[2] Rule 3.780 provides:
(a) Evidence. In all proceedings based
Category: Criminal Procedure
289 So. 2d 385
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1973 | Docket: 1322234
Cited 3 times | Published
S.A., which has since been repealed. However, Rule 3.780, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S
Category: Criminal Procedure
556 So. 2d 462, 1990 WL 7542
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 1528352
Cited 2 times | Published
Statutes (1987), during the penalty phase. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.780. Thus, so long as death is a legally available
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850
Cited 2 times | Published
Benyard v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 473 (Fla.1975).
RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES
(a) In
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029139
Published
amendments
to rule 3.780 (Sentencing Hearing for Capital Cases). However, we
amend rule 3.780(a) to generally
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2016 | Docket: 4553213
Published
and adding a reference to
new rule 3.181 to rule 3.780(a).
According to the report, the amendments
Category: Criminal Procedure
200 So. 3d 758, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 381, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2036, 2016 WL 4916758
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2016 | Docket: 4422157
Published
and adding a reference to new rule 3.181 to rule 3.780(a).
According to the. report, the amendments
Category: Criminal Procedure
633 So. 2d 24, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1994 WL 7688
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1994 | Docket: 64746787
Published
such consent. But the provisions of Chapter XIV Rule 3.780, entitled “Sentencing Hearing For Capital Cases”
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 991, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586036
Published
State, 306 So.2d 142 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.780(b).
REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
293 So. 2d 35, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4183
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1974 | Docket: 64538302
Published
pursuant to our decision in In re Baker,1 and Rule 3.780, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S
Category: Criminal Procedure
296 So. 2d 27, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3814
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1974 | Docket: 64539613
Published
04(1), 775.082(1) and (2), 921.141, F.S.A., or Rule 3.780 Cr.P.R., 33 F.S.A. As decided in Donaldson v
Category: Criminal Procedure
284 So. 2d 448, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1973 | Docket: 64535124
Published
082(2), F.S.A. No hearing was held pursuant to Rule 3.780, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., because the statute made a
Category: Criminal Procedure