Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.780 - SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.780

RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES

(a) Evidence. In capital sentence proceedings the state and
defendant will be permitted to present evidence of an aggravating or
mitigating nature, consistent with the requirements of the statute
and the notice requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.181. Each side will be permitted to cross-examine the witnesses
presented by the other side. The state will present evidence first.
(b) Rebuttal. The trial judge shall permit rebuttal testimony.

(c) Opening Statement and Closing Argument. Both the
state and the defendant will be given an equal opportunity for one
opening statement and one closing argument. The state will proceed
first.

Committee Notes

1977 Adoption. This is a new rule designed to create a
uniform procedure that will be consistent with both section
921.141, Florida Statutes, and State v. Dixon, 283 So. 2d 1 (Fla.
1973).

Cases Citing Rule 3.780

Total Results: 17

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

685 So. 2d 1253

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082

Cited 22 times | Published

subpoena. The amendment to subdivision (c) of rule 3.780, Sentencing Hearing for Capital Cases, clarifies

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Baker

267 So. 2d 331

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1972 | Docket: 1740625

Cited 14 times | Published

hearing thereon may thereafter be held under F.R.P. Rule 3.780 to determine first the date of the crime for

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

matters. 1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule. RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES (a) Evidence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cole v. State

262 So. 2d 902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1972 | Docket: 429180

Cited 9 times | Published

sentence are under consideration by the court. Rule 3.780 CrPR relating to inquiry into mitigating or aggravating

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wike v. State

648 So. 2d 683, 1994 WL 656640

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1701790

Cited 7 times | Published

Neither the State nor defense counsel cited [rule 3.780(c)] to the Court at the time the Pretrial Motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hernandez

645 So. 2d 432, 1994 WL 656605

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1168919

Cited 4 times | Published

purpose, unless waived by the defendant. [2] Rule 3.780 provides: (a) Evidence. In all proceedings based

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mask v. State

289 So. 2d 385

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1973 | Docket: 1322234

Cited 3 times | Published

S.A., which has since been repealed. However, Rule 3.780, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ferguson

556 So. 2d 462, 1990 WL 7542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 1528352

Cited 2 times | Published

Statutes (1987), during the penalty phase. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.780. Thus, so long as death is a legally available

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850

Cited 2 times | Published

Benyard v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 473 (Fla.1975). RULE 3.780. SENTENCING HEARING FOR CAPITAL CASES (a) In

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2023 Legislation

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029139

Published

amendments to rule 3.780 (Sentencing Hearing for Capital Cases). However, we amend rule 3.780(a) to generally

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2016 | Docket: 4553213

Published

and adding a reference to new rule 3.181 to rule 3.780(a). According to the report, the amendments

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

200 So. 3d 758, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 381, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2036, 2016 WL 4916758

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2016 | Docket: 4422157

Published

and adding a reference to new rule 3.181 to rule 3.780(a). According to the. report, the amendments

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hernandez

633 So. 2d 24, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1994 WL 7688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1994 | Docket: 64746787

Published

such consent. But the provisions of Chapter XIV Rule 3.780, entitled “Sentencing Hearing For Capital Cases”

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ashwood v. State

405 So. 2d 991, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586036

Published

State, 306 So.2d 142 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.780(b). REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDole v. Wainwright

293 So. 2d 35, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4183

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1974 | Docket: 64538302

Published

pursuant to our decision in In re Baker,1 and Rule 3.780, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

296 So. 2d 27, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3814

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1974 | Docket: 64539613

Published

04(1), 775.082(1) and (2), 921.141, F.S.A., or Rule 3.780 Cr.P.R., 33 F.S.A. As decided in Donaldson v

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

284 So. 2d 448, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1973 | Docket: 64535124

Published

082(2), F.S.A. No hearing was held pursuant to Rule 3.780, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., because the statute made a

Category: Criminal Procedure