Cases Citing Rule 3.390
Total Results: 250
403 So. 2d 956
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 2012
Cited 191 times | Published
Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the
Category: Criminal Procedure
397 So. 2d 903
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1981 | Docket: 333460
Cited 172 times | Published
Williams v. State, 285 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1973); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Appellant's remaining arguments are:
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 857, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 269
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1987 | Docket: 1592314
Cited 143 times | Published
preserved and is not properly before us. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Moreover, even if the issue of the erroneous
Category: Criminal Procedure
762 So. 2d 879, 2000 WL 674581
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2000 | Docket: 57131
Cited 124 times | Published
State, 574 So.2d 1085, 1088 (Fla. 1991); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Furthermore, even if this claim had
Category: Criminal Procedure
709 F.2d 1443
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 12, 1983 | Docket: 168374
Cited 122 times | Published
object to the instruction as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
In a case involving a virtually
Category: Criminal Procedure
272 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077
Cited 102 times | Published
number foreman.
Committee Note: Same as former Rule 3.390.
3.400. MATERIALS TO THE JURY ROOM.
The court
Category: Criminal Procedure
881 So. 2d 1087, 2004 WL 1348732
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2004 | Docket: 1465878
Cited 87 times | Published
(first-degree murder constitutes capital felony). Under rule 3.390(a), jurors in such cases are instructed that
Category: Criminal Procedure
477 So. 2d 985, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 557, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3922
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 1320378
Cited 72 times | Published
publication for purposes of consistency.
11. In view of rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
407 So. 2d 894
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1981 | Docket: 1515382
Cited 66 times | Published
confessions. See § 918.10(1), Fla. Stat. (1977); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a); Harrison v. State, 149 Fla. 365, 5 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
934 So. 2d 1128, 2006 WL 1381880
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2006 | Docket: 1460819
Cited 59 times | Published
upon which the objection is based. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving
Category: Criminal Procedure
695 F.2d 1306
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 1983 | Docket: 509527
Cited 57 times | Published
below.
. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) provided:
No party may assign as error
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 1182, 2001 WL 197003
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2001 | Docket: 450172
Cited 50 times | Published
appeal.
[13] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(d) provides:
No party may raise on appeal the
Category: Criminal Procedure
393 So. 2d 540
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1980 | Docket: 384393
Cited 50 times | Published
or directory.
Prior to its amendment in 1977, rule 3.390(a) read as follows:
The presiding judge shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
741 F.2d 1275, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19030
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 1984 | Docket: 257924
Cited 47 times | Published
presence of the jury.
Fla.Stat.Ann., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(c), (d) (West 1975). The Florida courts have
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 802, 1988 WL 12544
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1988 | Docket: 1660913
Cited 38 times | Published
this issue was not preserved for appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Middleton v. State, 465 So.2d 1218, 1226
Category: Criminal Procedure
808 So. 2d 166, 2002 WL 5498
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2002 | Docket: 1473981
Cited 37 times | Published
562, 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(c). This was the assumption under which
Category: Criminal Procedure
382 So. 2d 1190
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1979 | Docket: 1255045
Cited 35 times | Published
Dorminey v. State, 314 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1975); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a). We find no error in the instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
704 F.2d 593, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28365
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 1983 | Docket: 195564
Cited 33 times | Published
parties concede that Goode did not comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (West 1977), which requires a contemporaneous
Category: Criminal Procedure
425 So. 2d 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1982 | Docket: 1182148
Cited 33 times | Published
trial (at the close of all the evidence), Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), by a request that the court instruct
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 347, 2005 WL 2782589
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 1269629
Cited 30 times | Published
to the jury retiring to deliberate. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
jury on the applicable penalties as provided by Rule 3.390(a), F.R.Cr.P. The District Court held that it
Category: Criminal Procedure
410 So. 2d 147
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1982 | Docket: 1518484
Cited 28 times | Published
this point may not be raised on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246
Cited 27 times | Published
found in Section
916.13(1), Florida Statutes.
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(b) Every charge to a jury
Category: Criminal Procedure
377 So. 2d 1163
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1979 | Docket: 423289
Cited 27 times | Published
matter raised for the first time on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). In Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
335 So. 2d 285
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1976 | Docket: 1306343
Cited 25 times | Published
loses much of its force when it is realized that Rule 3.390(a), Fla.R.Cr.P., states:
"The presiding judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
423 So. 2d 562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1982 | Docket: 544777
Cited 24 times | Published
self-defense. The defense fully complied with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) in that defense counsel objected to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 638, 1990 WL 57808
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1990 | Docket: 1740340
Cited 23 times | Published
particular jury instruction for appellate review. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); City of Orlando v. Birmingham, 539 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 1367, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1987 | Docket: 1295072
Cited 23 times | Published
do so.
*1371 Turning to the next issue, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a) provides that a trial judge shall not
Category: Criminal Procedure
668 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 46883
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 1290266
Cited 21 times | Published
Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the
Category: Criminal Procedure
440 So. 2d 392
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1983 | Docket: 1728455
Cited 20 times | Published
the contemporaneous objection rule embodied in Rule 3.390(d). Wilson relied on Carter and on remarks of
Category: Criminal Procedure
396 So. 2d 798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1981 | Docket: 1732274
Cited 20 times | Published
refusal to give the requested instruction. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). We do not agree. In Bagley v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
854 So. 2d 709, 2003 WL 21946444
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2003 | Docket: 1747436
Cited 19 times | Published
issue for the first time on appeal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685, 694
Category: Criminal Procedure
832 F.2d 1528
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 1988 | Docket: 977899
Cited 19 times | Published
jury retires to consider its verdict." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1975)
Florida appellate courts
Category: Criminal Procedure
733 F.2d 788, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 18, 1984 | Docket: 217546
Cited 19 times | Published
the time they were issued as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). In fact, defense counsel specifically
Category: Criminal Procedure
621 So. 2d 475, 1993 WL 174881
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 1265405
Cited 18 times | Published
the Supreme Court stated that to satisfy the rule [3.390(d)], "... an objection must be sufficiently specific
Category: Criminal Procedure
706 F.2d 1534
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 6, 1983 | Docket: 482708
Cited 18 times | Published
appeal. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) specifically provided that jury instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
419 So. 2d 634
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1982 | Docket: 1585934
Cited 18 times | Published
that giving an instruction requested pursuant to rule 3.390(a) is mandatory. Tascano's holding was prospective
Category: Criminal Procedure
314 So. 2d 134
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1975 | Docket: 1420571
Cited 18 times | Published
Issue II, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a) directs that the presiding judge shall include
Category: Criminal Procedure
414 So. 2d 1025
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1982 | Docket: 1707068
Cited 17 times | Published
Williams v. State, 285 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1973); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). As in Castor, the jury had already once
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 624, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1986 | Docket: 1343893
Cited 16 times | Published
the capital sexual battery charge pursuant to rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1679417
Cited 14 times | Published
the Steering Committee proposed an amendment to rule 3.390 (Final Instructions Before Closing Arguments)
Category: Criminal Procedure
420 So. 2d 875
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1982 | Docket: 1306942
Cited 14 times | Published
jury instruction question for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d) provides:
No party may assign as error grounds
Category: Criminal Procedure
410 So. 2d 1358
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1982 | Docket: 477802
Cited 14 times | Published
requested the instruction in the present case. Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
389 So. 2d 250
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1980 | Docket: 1683066
Cited 14 times | Published
objection in order to protect the record. However, Rule 3.390(d) is quite specific, and the supreme court held
Category: Criminal Procedure
378 So. 2d 111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1980 | Docket: 1795681
Cited 14 times | Published
basis of that denial.
Previous to amendment of Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in 1977
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 664
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1977 | Docket: 1710555
Cited 13 times | Published
Blatch v. State, 216 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
As to
Category: Criminal Procedure
955 So. 2d 1145, 2007 WL 911774
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2007 | Docket: 2530518
Cited 12 times | Published
propose the instruction not given. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 1048, 1987 WL 2679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1678039
Cited 12 times | Published
and stated the grounds for his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Contrary to the state's assertion that
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 F. Supp. 1384, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15442
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1983 | Docket: 980858
Cited 12 times | Published
to the court's instructions at trial, as Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d) requires. Indeed, petitioner's counsel
Category: Criminal Procedure
414 So. 2d 207
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1982 | Docket: 1707313
Cited 12 times | Published
objects and the grounds of his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. See Williams v. State, 399 So.2d 999 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
395 So. 2d 1236
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 1317360
Cited 12 times | Published
point for appeal pursuant to the requirements of Rule 3.390(d) Fla.R.Crim.P.
During the jury instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
394 So. 2d 231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1981 | Docket: 1692210
Cited 12 times | Published
Opinion filed June 5, 1980. The court held that Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure is mandatory;
Category: Criminal Procedure
363 So. 2d 405
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1978 | Docket: 461074
Cited 12 times | Published
the jury be instructed in accordance with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a) [as amended, effective July 1, 1977] as
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 38
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1974 | Docket: 1251740
Cited 12 times | Published
maximum penalty for the offense in accordance with Rule 3.390(a), Fla.Rules of Criminal Procedure. This requested
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 38
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1974 | Docket: 1251740
Cited 12 times | Published
maximum penalty for the offense in accordance with Rule 3.390(a), Fla.Rules of Criminal Procedure. This requested
Category: Criminal Procedure
116 So. 3d 394, 2012 WL 10846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 37
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2012 | Docket: 60232350
Cited 11 times | Published
preserve an issue for appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417
Category: Criminal Procedure
1 So. 3d 1209, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 793, 2009 WL 277439
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2009 | Docket: 1653760
Cited 11 times | Published
orally deliver its charge to the jury. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(b).[6]See generally Haynes v. State, 946
Category: Criminal Procedure
447 So. 2d 424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1984 | Docket: 1311774
Cited 11 times | Published
So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
The charges arose out of an incident
Category: Criminal Procedure
428 So. 2d 1389
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1983 | Docket: 1720088
Cited 11 times | Published
instruction on principals and accessories. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Rule 3.390(d) reads:
No party may assign as
Category: Criminal Procedure
403 So. 2d 417
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 479154
Cited 11 times | Published
the district court of appeal held that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390 mandated an instruction on the applicable
Category: Criminal Procedure
414 So. 2d 621
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1982 | Docket: 1706912
Cited 10 times | Published
now raised for the first time on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); State v. Jones, 377 So.2d 1163 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
402 So. 2d 1176
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1313316
Cited 10 times | Published
663 (Fla. 1981), is inapplicable.
[3] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390.
Category: Criminal Procedure
658 So. 2d 1074, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1555
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1995 | Docket: 439639
Cited 9 times | Published
penalty attached to any of these offenses, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), nor was the jury instructed on any "pardon
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
additional peremptory challenges. Subdivision (d) of rule 3.390, Jury Instructions, is amended to clarify its
Category: Criminal Procedure
804 F.2d 1182
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 1987 | Docket: 966918
Cited 9 times | Published
See supra
note 5.
10
. Rule 3.390(d) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
411 So. 2d 1345
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1982 | Docket: 1327421
Cited 9 times | Published
retired to consider its verdict, as required by Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellate
Category: Criminal Procedure
404 So. 2d 167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1981 | Docket: 1782317
Cited 9 times | Published
minimum and maximum penalties, as required by Rule 3.390(a), Fla.R.Crim.P., this issue was adequately
Category: Criminal Procedure
383 So. 2d 670
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1980 | Docket: 362804
Cited 9 times | Published
state the grounds of his objection as required by Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 182
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1975 | Docket: 1251383
Cited 9 times | Published
penalties as provided by Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a). The trial judge's refusal to give such an
Category: Criminal Procedure
889 So. 2d 801, 2004 WL 2815609
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2004 | Docket: 1742900
Cited 8 times | Published
to preserve that issue for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d) provides:
(d) Objections. No party may raise
Category: Criminal Procedure
425 So. 2d 101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 1182014
Cited 8 times | Published
jury instruction. Hubbard held that the rule (Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure), does
Category: Criminal Procedure
411 So. 2d 1312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1982 | Docket: 1327342
Cited 8 times | Published
this statement best describes the objective of Rule 3.390(d). The primary thrust of the rule is to insure
Category: Criminal Procedure
288 So. 2d 511
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1974 | Docket: 1696465
Cited 8 times | Published
offenses included within the offense charged. Rule 3.390(a), 33 F.S.A., provides that:
"The presiding
Category: Criminal Procedure
76 So. 3d 379, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20857, 2011 WL 6847813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 2354446
Cited 7 times | Published
"contemporaneous, specific objection" rule. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Olivera v. State, 58 So.3d 352, 353
Category: Criminal Procedure
854 So. 2d 758, 2003 WL 22047227
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 1747227
Cited 7 times | Published
constitute fundamental error.
See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Garcia neither requested an instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 1373, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 883
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1986 | Docket: 1406880
Cited 7 times | Published
the judge instruct as to the penalty, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a); the right to have the jury instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
470 So. 2d 703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1985 | Docket: 1241540
Cited 7 times | Published
statute would now appear to have been superseded by rule 3.390, which went into effect in 1973, In re Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
473 So. 2d 694, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 2469905
Cited 7 times | Published
the grounds of his objection, as required by rule 3.390(d) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Thomas
Category: Criminal Procedure
440 So. 2d 657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1983 | Docket: 1454375
Cited 7 times | Published
issue is to be preserved for appellate review. Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Holley
Category: Criminal Procedure
433 So. 2d 1352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1983 | Docket: 1425951
Cited 7 times | Published
(Fla. 1980), the supreme court held that under Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (as amended
Category: Criminal Procedure
430 So. 2d 945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 1508789
Cited 7 times | Published
390(d).[2]
If Kelly is still good law, and if rule 3.390(d) is read literally, the appellant has failed
Category: Criminal Procedure
414 So. 2d 288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1982 | Docket: 1707350
Cited 7 times | Published
the court erred in failing to give it.[6] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). However, Carron did submit a proposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
398 So. 2d 1017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1981 | Docket: 175183
Cited 7 times | Published
give the penalties instruction as required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Tascano
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 428272
Cited 7 times | Published
statement of grounds is inadequate compliance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.[3] In
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 471
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 1677144
Cited 7 times | Published
COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
378 So. 2d 902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 1794331
Cited 7 times | Published
refuse to give the instruction as required under Rule 3.390(a) and because we must reverse the conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
338 So. 2d 1309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1976 | Docket: 161132
Cited 7 times | Published
2d DCA 1974), wherein the court held that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), which requires the trial court to inform
Category: Criminal Procedure
324 So. 2d 115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1279523
Cited 7 times | Published
the charges given by the court. Thereby, under Rule 3.390(d) RCrP, the contention on appeal of error for
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 So. 2d 178, 2007 WL 2873349
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2007 | Docket: 1733593
Cited 6 times | Published
trial to aid them in performing their duties.
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(a) Subject of Instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
482 So. 2d 530, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1986 | Docket: 1769408
Cited 6 times | Published
recently led the Supreme Court to amend Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a) by specifically prohibiting the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
392 So. 2d 599
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 1678370
Cited 6 times | Published
might be well-taken except for the fact that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), in no uncertain terms, requires such
Category: Criminal Procedure
363 So. 2d 16
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1978 | Docket: 1453981
Cited 6 times | Published
State, 320 So.2d 428 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a).
In the light of this determination, calling
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 628, 2006 WL 167988
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1678724
Cited 5 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) (2002). Rule 3.390(a) states, "[e]xcept in capital cases, the judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 1286, 2005 WL 2897052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2005 | Docket: 1755557
Cited 5 times | Published
might impose based on their verdict. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a). Admittedly, Florida Standard Jury Instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
916 So. 2d 828, 2005 WL 1704833
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2005 | Docket: 1659488
Cited 5 times | Published
the jury instructions in their entirety. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(b) ("Every charge to a jury shall be orally
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 623, 2004 WL 534624
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 1175167
Cited 5 times | Published
defendant may receive if convicted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a); Legette v. State, 718 So.2d 878 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
766 So. 2d 364, 2000 WL 1021575
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 1329888
Cited 5 times | Published
preserved for our appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). See also Irving v. State, 627 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
626 So. 2d 339, 1993 WL 469791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1993 | Docket: 2549585
Cited 5 times | Published
give the lesser-included instruction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390; Thomas v. State, 591 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 384, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 1680289
Cited 5 times | Published
Criminal Procedure 3.390(a).[1]
On the basis of Rule 3.390(a) as it existed at trial, the defendant would
Category: Criminal Procedure
420 So. 2d 877
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1982 | Docket: 358248
Cited 5 times | Published
record contains no objection in accordance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure." 400
Category: Criminal Procedure
411 So. 2d 363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 1327139
Cited 5 times | Published
State, 308 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1974) which held that Rule 3.390(a) as it pertained to penalties was directory
Category: Criminal Procedure
396 So. 2d 1153
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 1732297
Cited 5 times | Published
and state the grounds for his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. The record does not reveal any objection
Category: Criminal Procedure
393 So. 2d 1138
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1981 | Docket: 1372186
Cited 5 times | Published
lesser-included offenses. Under pre-Tascano cases holding Rule 3.390(a) mandatory, the trial court was obliged to
Category: Criminal Procedure
322 So. 2d 620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1975 | Docket: 1734689
Cited 5 times | Published
1968, 214 So.2d 887; § 918.10(3), Fla. Stat., Rule 3.390(c), RCrP.
Therefore, the convictions, adjudications
Category: Criminal Procedure
313 So. 2d 130
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1975 | Docket: 1511032
Cited 5 times | Published
directory, rather than mandatory, provision of Rule 3.390(a), RCrP.
The other points on appeal are without
Category: Criminal Procedure
121 So. 3d 524, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 605, 2013 WL 4555586, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1864
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2013 | Docket: 60234444
Cited 4 times | Published
respective penalties is impermissible. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a) ("Except in capital cases, the judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
66 So. 3d 360, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11409, 2011 WL 2936748
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2011 | Docket: 2564581
Cited 4 times | Published
State, 754 So.2d 731, 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("[Rule] 3.390(a) overrides section 918.10(1) ... and precludes
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 878, 1998 WL 567954
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1515066
Cited 4 times | Published
jury's consideration. Prior to January 1, 1985, Rule 3.390(a) provided that upon the request of either the
Category: Criminal Procedure
668 So. 2d 596, 1996 WL 73783
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1996 | Docket: 429265
Cited 4 times | Published
the drugs, it certified the foregoing question.
Rule 3.390(a) states: "Except in capital cases, the judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
664 So. 2d 1106, 1995 WL 732841
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1995 | Docket: 1230262
Cited 4 times | Published
it came before the jury had retired. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Rogers v. State, 626 So.2d 339, 340
Category: Criminal Procedure
651 So. 2d 1169, 1995 WL 81876
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1995 | Docket: 1518223
Cited 4 times | Published
those instructions as allowed by rule 3.400(c). Rule 3.390(b) provides, in part:
Every charge to a jury
Category: Criminal Procedure
591 So. 2d 259, 1991 WL 199946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1991 | Docket: 541543
Cited 4 times | Published
already retired to consider its verdict. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Yet, this case presents a novel scenario
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 1161
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 1509975
Cited 4 times | Published
usually merely a rule provision, see, e.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) and waivers implied for failure to object
Category: Criminal Procedure
406 So. 2d 1128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1981 | Docket: 449734
Cited 4 times | Published
for that is Murray versus State, 378 So.2d 111; Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
In response
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 466
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1981 | Docket: 1263680
Cited 4 times | Published
if requested by either trial counsel. Quoting Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, our
Category: Criminal Procedure
378 So. 2d 117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1980 | Docket: 2573669
Cited 4 times | Published
instruction. We conclude that the requirements of Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. were not met, and consequently
Category: Criminal Procedure
304 So. 2d 466
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1974 | Docket: 1437435
Cited 4 times | Published
296 So.2d 549, for the proposition that under Rule 3.390(a) the trial court must instruct the jury with
Category: Criminal Procedure
302 So. 2d 142
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1974 | Docket: 1758686
Cited 4 times | Published
the jury could have returned a guilty verdict, Rule 3.390(a), F.R.Cr.P., provides:
"(a) The presiding judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
297 So. 2d 35
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510396
Cited 4 times | Published
penalty for the crime with which he was charged.
Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
943 So. 2d 919, 2006 WL 3498319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 1526771
Cited 3 times | Published
defendant would receive upon conviction. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a). This rule forecloses any chance of a
Category: Criminal Procedure
740 So. 2d 1212, 1999 WL 596953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1999 | Docket: 1456560
Cited 3 times | Published
the special instructions requested. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(c). Absent special or extenuating circumstances
Category: Criminal Procedure
615 So. 2d 806, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 748
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1993 | Docket: 1185060
Cited 3 times | Published
room while the jury deliberated.
We note that Rule 3.390(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, does
Category: Criminal Procedure
562 So. 2d 434, 1990 WL 82447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1990 | Docket: 1175163
Cited 3 times | Published
properly preserved for appellate review. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
We find no merit in the defendant's first
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 760, 1988 WL 8435
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 1332655
Cited 3 times | Published
furnished to the court in writing as required by Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; and
Category: Criminal Procedure
446 So. 2d 248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1780071
Cited 3 times | Published
instruction contemporaneous objection rule (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) relied on by the majority in Torrence
Category: Criminal Procedure
403 So. 2d 956, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2819
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 64585091
Cited 3 times | Published
Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 797
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1677025
Cited 3 times | Published
record contains no objection in accordance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly
Category: Criminal Procedure
396 So. 2d 232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1981 | Docket: 1447263
Cited 3 times | Published
has not been preserved for appeal. While Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) requires a specific objection to preserve
Category: Criminal Procedure
396 So. 2d 206
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1981 | Docket: 1732280
Cited 3 times | Published
constituted a waiver of this objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Febre v. State, 158 Fla. 853, 30 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
368 So. 2d 437
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1979 | Docket: 1723142
Cited 3 times | Published
error for the first time on appeal. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d); McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
346 So. 2d 554
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1977 | Docket: 1734132
Cited 3 times | Published
desired. See: Fla. App. Rule 6.7g. Pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), it is incumbent upon the defendant to
Category: Criminal Procedure
323 So. 2d 318
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1258210
Cited 3 times | Published
instructions were properly given pursuant to Rule 3.390, RCrP, and were correct statements of the law
Category: Criminal Procedure
318 So. 2d 468
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1975 | Docket: 1739209
Cited 3 times | Published
even though no such instruction was requested. Rule 3.390, F.R.Cr.P., provides in pertinent part as follows:
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 261
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1975 | Docket: 167876
Cited 3 times | Published
of great public interest, specifically whether Rule 3.390, FRCrP, mandatorily requires a trial judge to
Category: Criminal Procedure
317 So. 2d 445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1975 | Docket: 1316291
Cited 3 times | Published
instruct the jury on penalties as required by Rule 3.390(a) RCrP. That rule provides as follows:
"The
Category: Criminal Procedure
305 So. 2d 831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1975 | Docket: 2507065
Cited 3 times | Published
held that the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a), requiring the trial judge to charge the jury
Category: Criminal Procedure
180 So. 3d 1023, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 509, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2033, 2015 WL 5601524
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2015 | Docket: 2851201
Cited 2 times | Published
object. Such gamesmanship defeats the purpose
of Rule 3.390(d), which is to put the trial court on notice
Category: Criminal Procedure
957 So. 2d 53, 2007 WL 1264013
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 1678803
Cited 2 times | Published
414 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1982); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("[n]o party may raise on appeal the
Category: Criminal Procedure
672 So. 2d 650, 1996 WL 210144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1996 | Docket: 1764131
Cited 2 times | Published
to give an instruction in criminal cases. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
656 So. 2d 947, 1995 WL 358050
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 1283510
Cited 2 times | Published
cogent reasons for eliminating this portion of rule 3.390(a). It explains that the penalty is irrelevant
Category: Criminal Procedure
650 So. 2d 688, 1995 WL 67077
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1995 | Docket: 471255
Cited 2 times | Published
1090, 106 S.Ct. 1480, 89 L.Ed.2d 734 (1986); Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED
Category: Criminal Procedure
583 So. 2d 412, 1991 WL 138891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 2569979
Cited 2 times | Published
failing to object to the court's charge. Fla.R.Civ.P. 3.390(d); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309
Cited 2 times | Published
opportunity to object, in possible violation of Rule 3.390(d), no notice in violation of Rule 3.410, or
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1984 | Docket: 474413
Cited 2 times | Published
issue may therefore not be raised on appeal. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). Nor does the exception to this rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
436 So. 2d 56
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1983 | Docket: 1701288
Cited 2 times | Published
before us, and we will not consider it. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); see Jones v. State, 411 So.2d 165 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
428 So. 2d 746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1983 | Docket: 1374920
Cited 2 times | Published
court violated the holding of Tascano[5] and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). The rule provides that upon the request
Category: Criminal Procedure
419 So. 2d 337
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1982 | Docket: 1585294
Cited 2 times | Published
instruct the jury pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 251
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1981 | Docket: 1703693
Cited 2 times | Published
not be considered by us on this appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); North v. State, 65 So.2d 77 (Fla. 1952)
Category: Criminal Procedure
401 So. 2d 1333
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1686731
Cited 2 times | Published
penalties mandatory under the provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390.
The defendant Allen, (petitioner here),
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 1652354
Cited 2 times | Published
request for an instruction on penalties under Rule 3.390(a) and his objection to the trial court's failure
Category: Criminal Procedure
401 So. 2d 819
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 1686550
Cited 2 times | Published
(Fla. 1980), ruled that pursuant to aforesaid Rule 3.390(a), it is mandatory that instruction be given
Category: Criminal Procedure
392 So. 2d 1025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 2572224
Cited 2 times | Published
instruction, another subsection of the same rule, 3.390(d), prohibits the appeal of a failure to give
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850
Cited 2 times | Published
that the State would otherwise be prejudiced.
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(a) The presiding judge shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
296 So. 2d 549
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1974 | Docket: 1613407
Cited 2 times | Published
lesser included offenses, and, as required by Rule 3.390(a) CrPR, 33 F.S.A., charged as to the penalties
Category: Criminal Procedure
274 So. 3d 537
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2019 | Docket: 64718356
Cited 1 times | Published
sentence a defendant faces if convicted. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(a). This is to minimize the possibility
Category: Criminal Procedure
147 So. 3d 7, 2013 WL 1458683, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2013 | Docket: 60243373
Cited 1 times | Published
for which the accused is then on trial.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390 (1983). It was changed to state: "Except
Category: Criminal Procedure
58 So. 3d 352, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4428, 2011 WL 1167215
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2011 | Docket: 60299327
Cited 1 times | Published
the contemporaneous objection rule, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390, unpre-served error in a jury instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
908 So. 2d 1114, 2005 WL 1682322
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1724866
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 641 So.2d 381, 387 (Fla.1994); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Rivers v. State, 307 So.2d 826 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 744, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1986 | Docket: 478313
Cited 1 times | Published
"capital felony," appellant was entitled, under Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to a
Category: Criminal Procedure
570 F. Supp. 766, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10203
District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1982 | Docket: 914100
Cited 1 times | Published
death.
The State correctly notes that under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)
No party may assign as error grounds of
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 324554
Cited 1 times | Published
COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(A), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
285 So. 2d 61
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1973 | Docket: 2560175
Cited 1 times | Published
trial. Such provision however was re-adopted as Rule 3.390, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., but did not become effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2024 | Docket: 65346502
Published
discussion of this one instruction. See Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.390(c) which states that parties should submit
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2023 | Docket: 68012028
Published
which the objection is based.” (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d))).
Thus, we address only whether the
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60688689
Published
Commentary
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(a) Subject of
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60680655
Published
Commentary
[NO CHANGE]
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(a) Subject of
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2021 | Docket: 50037873
Published
-9-
(c) [No Change]
RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
(a) Subject
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2020 | Docket: 17036579
Published
changed to “RULE 2.580.”
On p. 19, line 3 of Rule 3.390(a), “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”
SIGNED:
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2020 | Docket: 17036580
Published
adoption of new rule 2.580 and the amendment to rule 3.390.
The Court anticipates that these new
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2020 | Docket: 16931268
Published
adoption of new rule 2.570 and the amendment to rule 3.390.
The Court anticipates that these new
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2019 | Docket: 16400360
Published
So. 2d 935, 940 (Fla.
2005)); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal
Category: Criminal Procedure
274 So. 3d 537
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2019 | Docket: 64718357
Published
sentence a defendant faces if convicted. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(a). This is to minimize the possibility
Category: Criminal Procedure
212 So. 3d 351, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 250, 2017 WL 823611, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 424
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2017 | Docket: 4612630
Published
objection out of the presence of the jury.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d). This rule has been the subject of many
Category: Criminal Procedure
207 So. 3d 310, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4544029
Published
said instruction below.
See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d);
see also Hood v. State,
Category: Criminal Procedure
180 So. 3d 1201, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18554, 2015 WL 8519504
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2015 | Docket: 60252297
Published
sufficiently proved the charged offenses. Thus, rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
131 So. 3d 10, 2012 WL 6097978, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2012 | Docket: 60237986
Published
Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, particularly rule 3.390. We cannot agree. The rules of criminal procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
2 So. 3d 1090, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2914, 2009 WL 347774
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2009 | Docket: 1137648
Published
rendered this error, if any, unpreserved. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); State v. Delva, 575 So.2d 643, 644 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
972 So. 2d 233, 2007 WL 4404291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2007 | Docket: 1160674
Published
the contemporaneous objection rule, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d), and in the absence of a contemporaneous
Category: Criminal Procedure
965 So. 2d 176, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 2007 WL 2317298
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2007 | Docket: 64852528
Published
amount of the illegal drug.
In accordance with rule 3.390(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
961 So. 2d 1042, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11018, 2007 WL 2065780
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2007 | Docket: 64851615
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a) (stating that except in capital cases judge shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
877 So. 2d 933, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11016, 2004 WL 1646304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2004 | Docket: 64831866
Published
the issue was not properly preserved, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) (“No party may raise on appeal the giving
Category: Criminal Procedure
857 So. 2d 356, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15860, 2003 WL 22415127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2003 | Docket: 64825899
Published
the jury retired to deliberate and thus, under Rule 3.390(d), preserved for review the failure of the court
Category: Criminal Procedure
776 So. 2d 1012, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 349, 2001 WL 43083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2001 | Docket: 64803359
Published
objection and state its specific grounds. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
756 So. 2d 169, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 2000 WL 313573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 64796892
Published
The alleged error was not preserved. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Manka v. State, 720 So.2d 1109 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
748 So. 2d 316, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14630, 1999 WL 999994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1999 | Docket: 64793799
Published
107 S.Ct. 2203, 95 L.Ed.2d 858 (1987); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a).
DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ.
Category: Criminal Procedure
727 So. 2d 1012, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 1999 WL 77724
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1999 | Docket: 64786625
Published
Ct. 183, 102 L.Ed.2d 153 (1988); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). My review of the record indicates that
Category: Criminal Procedure
671 So. 2d 817, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3271, 1996 WL 135448
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 64763864
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1995); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993);
Category: Criminal Procedure
654 So. 2d 306, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5011, 1995 WL 271456
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1995 | Docket: 64755919
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991); Castor
Category: Criminal Procedure
653 So. 2d 457, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3574, 1995 WL 150243
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1995 | Docket: 64755478
Published
instruct the jury on the penalties in the ease. Rule 3.390(a) provides:
The presiding judge shall charge
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 561, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11022, 1994 WL 637730
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752246
Published
fundamental error. § 836.05, Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). See Smith v. State, 532 So.2d 50, 52
Category: Criminal Procedure
637 So. 2d 953, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 1994 WL 234346
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1994 | Docket: 64748847
Published
objection under rule 3.390(d). Id.
As in Thomas the same exception to the rule 3.390(d) waiver provision
Category: Criminal Procedure
626 So. 2d 285, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11122, 1993 WL 442473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1993 | Docket: 64743902
Published
and in total conformity with the provisions of Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
622 So. 2d 14, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6731, 1993 WL 221393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1993 | Docket: 64697977
Published
to consider its verdict.
The State relies on Rule 3.390(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure:
No party may
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 847, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1993 WL 141259
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1993 | Docket: 64695904
Published
state argues that Weller is in conflict with rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
613 So. 2d 610, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2226, 1993 WL 45209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1993 | Docket: 64694023
Published
State, 505 So.2d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
601 So. 2d 1269, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115, 1992 WL 147160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1992 | Docket: 64668787
Published
1986) (citation omitted); see generally Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). For what appear to have been perfectly
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 456, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 229, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 749, 1992 WL 68961
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1992 | Docket: 64666368
Published
clause of the rule.
Prior to the amendment of rule 3.390 in 1985, we held that a penalty instruction was
Category: Criminal Procedure
585 So. 2d 321, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7065, 1991 WL 134868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1991 | Docket: 64661329
Published
application of amended rule 3.390(a). However, the most logical interpretation of rule 3.390(a) is that the penalty
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 52, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1750, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4235, 1989 WL 81625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1989 | Docket: 64648376
Published
contemporaneous objection to jury instructions, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), but “[t]he failure to object is a strong
Category: Criminal Procedure
832 F.2d 1528
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 66230335
Published
the jury retires to consider its verdict." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1975).
Florida appellate courts do not
Category: Criminal Procedure
505 So. 2d 685, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1084, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 64626471
Published
1981), dismissed, 419 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Standard Jury Instruction notes indicate
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 492, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1987 | Docket: 64625037
Published
behavior for failing to raise such issues. See rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
495 So. 2d 926, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2196, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 64622249
Published
to this issue we affirm as to both counts.
III
Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of. Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1224, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619085
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Kocsis v. State, 467 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699
Published
103 S.Ct. 189, 74 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 1013, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16263
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1984 | Docket: 64608794
Published
cert. dismissed, 339 So.2d 1173 (Fla.1976); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
462 So. 2d 386, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3747
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1984 | Docket: 64609423
Published
Procedure except that I would reject the amendment of Rule 3.390 regarding jury instructions. The former rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
446 So. 2d 248, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 64603287
Published
instruction contemporaneous objection rule (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) relied on by the majority in Tor-rence
Category: Criminal Procedure
446 So. 2d 86, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2622
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1984 | Docket: 64603249
Published
such instruction is requested pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390[ (a) ].
Id. at 748. We have jurisdiction
Category: Criminal Procedure
436 So. 2d 253, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22663
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1983 | Docket: 64599035
Published
State, 346 So.2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d); Compare: State v. Farrugia, 419 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
706 F.2d 1534
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 1983 | Docket: 66193336
Published
appeal. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) specifically provided that jury instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
429 So. 2d 1352, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19161
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 64596485
Published
Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
We believe that the offense of battery
Category: Criminal Procedure
425 So. 2d 88, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1982 | Docket: 64594629
Published
So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), holding that under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), “upon request of either the state or
Category: Criminal Procedure
416 So. 2d 1126, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2453
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1982 | Docket: 64591250
Published
consideration of changes to the criminal rules.
Rule 3.390(a) currently provides:
(a) The presiding judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
407 So. 2d 1074, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22068
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1981 | Docket: 64587113
Published
393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980). The provisions of Rule 3.390 Fla.R.Crim.P. are mandatory. It also seems clear
Category: Criminal Procedure
404 So. 2d 1184, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21503
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1981 | Docket: 64585597
Published
alleged Tas-ca no error for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P., explicitly requires that a
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 1005, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1981 | Docket: 64586044
Published
393 So.2d 540, *1007541 (Fla.1980). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). Although the court indicated that Tascano
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 423, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 64583021
Published
TO *424GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 994, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19962
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1981 | Docket: 64586038
Published
court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 35, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64582920
Published
State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 999, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64583312
Published
statement of grounds is inadequate compliance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.3 In
Category: Criminal Procedure
397 So. 2d 753, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19675
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1981 | Docket: 64582203
Published
court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the
Category: Criminal Procedure
397 So. 2d 369, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 64582116
Published
give the jury an instruction on penalties (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a); Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
397 So. 2d 372, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 64582117
Published
give a requested instruction on penalties (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a)) and the point was preserved by proper
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 767, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19116
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 64583686
Published
(Fla.1980), ruled that pursuant to the aforesaid Rule 3.390(a), it is mandatory that instruction be given
Category: Criminal Procedure
396 So. 2d 270, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1981 | Docket: 64581476
Published
1980) because he did not, as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), either make any objection to the refusal
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 991, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586036
Published
court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 990, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586035
Published
court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 468, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64583569
Published
COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
394 So. 2d 1121, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 64580838
Published
COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE
Category: Criminal Procedure
394 So. 2d 548, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18799
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 64580639
Published
concurs.
DAUKSCH, C. J., dissents with opinion.
. Rule 3.390(d) reads:
No party may assign as error grounds
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 465, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18763
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 64583568
Published
for the trial judge not to so instruct. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). There was a timely objection made to
Category: Criminal Procedure
392 So. 2d 599, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 64579643
Published
might be well-taken except for the fact that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), in no uncertain terms, requires such
Category: Criminal Procedure
385 So. 2d 1019, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17183
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1980 | Docket: 64577282
Published
the defendant was charged as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a). Tascano v. State (Fla.1980) (case no
Category: Criminal Procedure
378 So. 2d 324
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1980 | Docket: 64573550
Published
issue on appeal for the first time. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) and Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
376 So. 2d 289
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1979 | Docket: 64572529
Published
preserved for appeal in the manner required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. Zuberi v. State, 343 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d
Category: Criminal Procedure
374 So. 2d 567, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15700
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 64571678
Published
172 *568So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
372 So. 2d 991, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15395
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64570974
Published
specific enough to preserve the point for appeal. Rule 3.390, Pla.R.Crim.P.
Furthermore, we hold that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
360 So. 2d 59, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22422
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1978 | Docket: 64565125
Published
Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685 (Fla.1972); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Crim.) 2.16.
Category: Criminal Procedure
359 So. 2d 43, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564633
Published
appropriate request, as contemplated by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390, was made to the trial judge to instruct
Category: Criminal Procedure
361 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16370
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1978 | Docket: 64565545
Published
accord with defendant’s asserted theory. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390.
We hold that the request for an instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
358 So. 2d 114, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15830
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564253
Published
v. Young, 217 So.2d 567 (Fla.1968), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Accordingly, appellant’s convictions
Category: Criminal Procedure
348 So. 2d 1233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1977 | Docket: 64559779
Published
243 So.2d 469, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).
Category: Criminal Procedure
335 So. 2d 1, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4249
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1976 | Docket: 64554462
Published
1974); Rigot v. Bucci, 245 So.2d 51 (Fla.1971), Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
OVERTON
Category: Criminal Procedure
330 So. 2d 65, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1976 | Docket: 64553219
Published
Roberts v. State, Fla.App.1975, 320 So.2d 832; Rule 3.390(d), RCrP.
Therefore, for the reasons above stated
Category: Criminal Procedure
328 So. 2d 571, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14926
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1976 | Docket: 64552881
Published
Sections 59.-041 and 924.33, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and Rule 3.390(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F
Category: Criminal Procedure
329 So. 2d 285, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4291
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1976 | Docket: 64552980
Published
(Fla.1961).
.Section 918.10, Florida Statutes; Rule 3.390, R.Cr.P.
Category: Criminal Procedure
311 So. 2d 171, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13879
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1975 | Docket: 64545751
Published
Jones v. State, Fla.App.1974, 293 So.2d 116; Rule 3.390(d), CrPR.
Category: Criminal Procedure
309 So. 2d 56, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14336
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 64544778
Published
by law for the offense charged as required by Rule 3.-390(a) RCrP. Said rule is not mandatory, only directory
Category: Criminal Procedure
287 So. 2d 107, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1973 | Docket: 64536110
Published
v. State (1947), 158 Fla. 853, 30 So.2d 367; Rule 3.390 (d), (e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure