Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390 - JURY INSTRUCTIONS | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390

RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS

(a) Subject of Instructions. The Florida Standard Jury
Instructions in Criminal Cases appearing on the court’s website at
https://jury.flcourts.org may be used, as provided in Florida Rule
of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.570, by the
presiding judge in instructing the jury in a criminal case. The
presiding judge shall instruct the jury only on the law of the case
before or after the argument of counsel and may provide
appropriate instructions during the trial. If the instructions are
given prior to final argument, the presiding judge shall give the jury
final procedural instructions after final arguments are concluded
and prior to deliberations. Except in capital cases, the judge shall
not instruct the jury on the sentence that may be imposed for the
offense for which the accused is on trial.

(b) Form of Instructions. The instruction to a jury shall be
orally delivered and shall also be in writing. All written instructions
shall also be filed in the cause.

(c) Written Request. At the close of the evidence, or at such
earlier time during the trial as the court reasonably directs, any
party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on
the law as set forth in the requests. The court shall inform counsel
of its proposed action on the request and of the instructions that
will be given prior to their argument to the jury.

(d) Objections. No party may raise on appeal the giving or
failure to give an instruction unless the party objects thereto before
the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter
to which the party objects and the grounds of the objection.
Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the
presence of the jury.

(e) Transcript and Review. When an objection is made to
the giving of or failure to give an instruction, no exception need be
made to the court’s ruling thereon in order to have the ruling
reviewed, and the grounds of objection and ruling thereon shall be
taken by the court reporter and, if the jury returns a verdict of
guilty, transcribed by the court reporter and filed in the cause.

Committee Notes

1972 Adoption. The committee adopted section 918.10,
Florida Statutes, with only minor modification as to terminology.
1988 Amendment. To assist the jury in understanding the
jury instructions.

1992 Amendment. Suggested change in wording to make (d)
clearer and easier to understand and also so it more closely follows
its federal counterpart, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.

Cases Citing Rule 3.390

Total Results: 250

Ray v. State

403 So. 2d 956

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 2012

Cited 191 times | Published

Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Straight v. State

397 So. 2d 903

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1981 | Docket: 333460

Cited 172 times | Published

Williams v. State, 285 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1973); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Appellant's remaining arguments are:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Craig v. State

510 So. 2d 857, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 269

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1987 | Docket: 1592314

Cited 143 times | Published

preserved and is not properly before us. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). Moreover, even if the issue of the erroneous

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

762 So. 2d 879, 2000 WL 674581

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2000 | Docket: 57131

Cited 124 times | Published

State, 574 So.2d 1085, 1088 (Fla. 1991); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Furthermore, even if this claim had

Category: Criminal Procedure

James Adams v. Louie L. Wainwright

709 F.2d 1443

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 12, 1983 | Docket: 168374

Cited 122 times | Published

object to the instruction as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). In a case involving a virtually

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077

Cited 102 times | Published

number foreman. Committee Note: Same as former Rule 3.390. 3.400. MATERIALS TO THE JURY ROOM. The court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chamberlain v. State

881 So. 2d 1087, 2004 WL 1348732

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2004 | Docket: 1465878

Cited 87 times | Published

(first-degree murder constitutes capital felony). Under rule 3.390(a), jurors in such cases are instructed that

Category: Criminal Procedure

The Florida Bar Re: Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases

477 So. 2d 985, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 557, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3922

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1985 | Docket: 1320378

Cited 72 times | Published

publication for purposes of consistency. 11. In view of rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

407 So. 2d 894

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1981 | Docket: 1515382

Cited 66 times | Published

confessions. See § 918.10(1), Fla. Stat. (1977); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a); Harrison v. State, 149 Fla. 365, 5 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reynolds v. State

934 So. 2d 1128, 2006 WL 1381880

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2006 | Docket: 1460819

Cited 59 times | Published

upon which the objection is based. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert A. Sullivan v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.

695 F.2d 1306

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 1983 | Docket: 509527

Cited 57 times | Published

below. . Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) provided: No party may assign as error

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carpenter v. State

785 So. 2d 1182, 2001 WL 197003

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2001 | Docket: 450172

Cited 50 times | Published

appeal. [13] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(d) provides: No party may raise on appeal the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tascano v. State

393 So. 2d 540

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1980 | Docket: 384393

Cited 50 times | Published

or directory. Prior to its amendment in 1977, rule 3.390(a) read as follows: The presiding judge shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marvin Francois v. Louie L. Wainwright

741 F.2d 1275, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19030

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 1984 | Docket: 257924

Cited 47 times | Published

presence of the jury. Fla.Stat.Ann., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(c), (d) (West 1975). The Florida courts have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

522 So. 2d 802, 1988 WL 12544

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1988 | Docket: 1660913

Cited 38 times | Published

this issue was not preserved for appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Middleton v. State, 465 So.2d 1218, 1226

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

808 So. 2d 166, 2002 WL 5498

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2002 | Docket: 1473981

Cited 37 times | Published

562, 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(c). This was the assumption under which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Malloy v. State

382 So. 2d 1190

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1979 | Docket: 1255045

Cited 35 times | Published

Dorminey v. State, 314 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1975); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a). We find no error in the instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Arthur Frederick Goode, III v. Louie L. Wainwright

704 F.2d 593, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28365

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 1983 | Docket: 195564

Cited 33 times | Published

parties concede that Goode did not comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (West 1977), which requires a contemporaneous

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

425 So. 2d 36

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1982 | Docket: 1182148

Cited 33 times | Published

trial (at the close of all the evidence), Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), by a request that the court instruct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

919 So. 2d 347, 2005 WL 2782589

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 1269629

Cited 30 times | Published

to the jury retiring to deliberate. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

jury on the applicable penalties as provided by Rule 3.390(a), F.R.Cr.P. The District Court held that it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vaught v. State

410 So. 2d 147

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1982 | Docket: 1518484

Cited 28 times | Published

this point may not be raised on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246

Cited 27 times | Published

found in Section 916.13(1), Florida Statutes. RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (b) Every charge to a jury

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Jones

377 So. 2d 1163

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1979 | Docket: 423289

Cited 27 times | Published

matter raised for the first time on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). In Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

335 So. 2d 285

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1976 | Docket: 1306343

Cited 25 times | Published

loses much of its force when it is realized that Rule 3.390(a), Fla.R.Cr.P., states: "The presiding judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holley v. State

423 So. 2d 562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1982 | Docket: 544777

Cited 24 times | Published

self-defense. The defense fully complied with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) in that defense counsel objected to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steele v. State

561 So. 2d 638, 1990 WL 57808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1990 | Docket: 1740340

Cited 23 times | Published

particular jury instruction for appellate review. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); City of Orlando v. Birmingham, 539 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ortagus v. State

500 So. 2d 1367, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1987 | Docket: 1295072

Cited 23 times | Published

do so. *1371 Turning to the next issue, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a) provides that a trial judge shall not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norman v. Gloria Farms, Inc.

668 So. 2d 1016, 1996 WL 46883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1996 | Docket: 1290266

Cited 21 times | Published

Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torrence v. State

440 So. 2d 392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1983 | Docket: 1728455

Cited 20 times | Published

the contemporaneous objection rule embodied in Rule 3.390(d). Wilson relied on Carter and on remarks of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

396 So. 2d 798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1981 | Docket: 1732274

Cited 20 times | Published

refusal to give the requested instruction. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). We do not agree. In Bagley v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

854 So. 2d 709, 2003 WL 21946444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2003 | Docket: 1747436

Cited 19 times | Published

issue for the first time on appeal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685, 694

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lenson A. Hargrave v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida

832 F.2d 1528

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 4, 1988 | Docket: 977899

Cited 19 times | Published

jury retires to consider its verdict." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1975) Florida appellate courts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carl Ray Songer v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., and Richard L. Dugger, Etc.

733 F.2d 788, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 18, 1984 | Docket: 217546

Cited 19 times | Published

the time they were issued as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). In fact, defense counsel specifically

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rigdon v. State

621 So. 2d 475, 1993 WL 174881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1993 | Docket: 1265405

Cited 18 times | Published

the Supreme Court stated that to satisfy the rule [3.390(d)], "... an objection must be sufficiently specific

Category: Criminal Procedure

Antone v. Strickland

706 F.2d 1534

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 6, 1983 | Docket: 482708

Cited 18 times | Published

appeal. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) specifically provided that jury instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

419 So. 2d 634

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1982 | Docket: 1585934

Cited 18 times | Published

that giving an instruction requested pursuant to rule 3.390(a) is mandatory. Tascano's holding was prospective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dorminey v. State

314 So. 2d 134

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1975 | Docket: 1420571

Cited 18 times | Published

Issue II, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a) directs that the presiding judge shall include

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

414 So. 2d 1025

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1982 | Docket: 1707068

Cited 17 times | Published

Williams v. State, 285 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1973); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). As in Castor, the jury had already once

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coleman v. State

484 So. 2d 624, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1986 | Docket: 1343893

Cited 16 times | Published

the capital sexual battery charge pursuant to rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final Arguments

957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1679417

Cited 14 times | Published

the Steering Committee proposed an amendment to rule 3.390 (Final Instructions Before Closing Arguments)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spurlock v. State

420 So. 2d 875

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1982 | Docket: 1306942

Cited 14 times | Published

jury instruction question for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d) provides: No party may assign as error grounds

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

410 So. 2d 1358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1982 | Docket: 477802

Cited 14 times | Published

requested the instruction in the present case. Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

389 So. 2d 250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1980 | Docket: 1683066

Cited 14 times | Published

objection in order to protect the record. However, Rule 3.390(d) is quite specific, and the supreme court held

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

378 So. 2d 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1980 | Docket: 1795681

Cited 14 times | Published

basis of that denial. Previous to amendment of Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in 1977

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zuberi v. State

343 So. 2d 664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1977 | Docket: 1710555

Cited 13 times | Published

Blatch v. State, 216 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. As to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seese v. State

955 So. 2d 1145, 2007 WL 911774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2007 | Docket: 2530518

Cited 12 times | Published

propose the instruction not given. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal the giving

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pieczynski v. State

516 So. 2d 1048, 1987 WL 2679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1678039

Cited 12 times | Published

and stated the grounds for his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Contrary to the state's assertion that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Songer v. Wainwright

571 F. Supp. 1384, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15442

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1983 | Docket: 980858

Cited 12 times | Published

to the court's instructions at trial, as Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d) requires. Indeed, petitioner's counsel

Category: Criminal Procedure

Courson v. State

414 So. 2d 207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1982 | Docket: 1707313

Cited 12 times | Published

objects and the grounds of his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. See Williams v. State, 399 So.2d 999 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

395 So. 2d 1236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 1317360

Cited 12 times | Published

point for appeal pursuant to the requirements of Rule 3.390(d) Fla.R.Crim.P. During the jury instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gibbs v. State

394 So. 2d 231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1981 | Docket: 1692210

Cited 12 times | Published

Opinion filed June 5, 1980. The court held that Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure is mandatory;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tascano v. State

363 So. 2d 405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1978 | Docket: 461074

Cited 12 times | Published

the jury be instructed in accordance with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a) [as amended, effective July 1, 1977] as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

308 So. 2d 38

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1974 | Docket: 1251740

Cited 12 times | Published

maximum penalty for the offense in accordance with Rule 3.390(a), Fla.Rules of Criminal Procedure. This requested

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

308 So. 2d 38

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1974 | Docket: 1251740

Cited 12 times | Published

maximum penalty for the offense in accordance with Rule 3.390(a), Fla.Rules of Criminal Procedure. This requested

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cliff Berry, Inc. v. State

116 So. 3d 394, 2012 WL 10846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 37

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2012 | Docket: 60232350

Cited 11 times | Published

preserve an issue for appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barrientos v. State

1 So. 3d 1209, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 793, 2009 WL 277439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2009 | Docket: 1653760

Cited 11 times | Published

orally deliver its charge to the jury. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(b).[6]See generally Haynes v. State, 946

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blackburn v. State

447 So. 2d 424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1984 | Docket: 1311774

Cited 11 times | Published

So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). The charges arose out of an incident

Category: Criminal Procedure

Buford v. Wainwright

428 So. 2d 1389

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1983 | Docket: 1720088

Cited 11 times | Published

instruction on principals and accessories. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Rule 3.390(d) reads: No party may assign as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

403 So. 2d 417

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 479154

Cited 11 times | Published

the district court of appeal held that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390 mandated an instruction on the applicable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grala v. State

414 So. 2d 621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1982 | Docket: 1706912

Cited 10 times | Published

now raised for the first time on appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); State v. Jones, 377 So.2d 1163 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Borden v. State

402 So. 2d 1176

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1313316

Cited 10 times | Published

663 (Fla. 1981), is inapplicable. [3] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nurse v. State

658 So. 2d 1074, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1995 | Docket: 439639

Cited 9 times | Published

penalty attached to any of these offenses, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), nor was the jury instructed on any "pardon

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

additional peremptory challenges. Subdivision (d) of rule 3.390, Jury Instructions, is amended to clarify its

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lenson A. Hargrave v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida

804 F.2d 1182

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 1987 | Docket: 966918

Cited 9 times | Published

See supra note 5. 10 . Rule 3.390(d) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boston v. State

411 So. 2d 1345

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1982 | Docket: 1327421

Cited 9 times | Published

retired to consider its verdict, as required by Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

404 So. 2d 167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1981 | Docket: 1782317

Cited 9 times | Published

minimum and maximum penalties, as required by Rule 3.390(a), Fla.R.Crim.P., this issue was adequately

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

383 So. 2d 670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1980 | Docket: 362804

Cited 9 times | Published

state the grounds of his objection as required by Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cooper v. Wainwright

308 So. 2d 182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1975 | Docket: 1251383

Cited 9 times | Published

penalties as provided by Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a). The trial judge's refusal to give such an

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nesbitt v. State

889 So. 2d 801, 2004 WL 2815609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2004 | Docket: 1742900

Cited 8 times | Published

to preserve that issue for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d) provides: (d) Objections. No party may raise

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivers v. State

425 So. 2d 101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1982 | Docket: 1182014

Cited 8 times | Published

jury instruction. Hubbard held that the rule (Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure), does

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hubbard v. State

411 So. 2d 1312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1982 | Docket: 1327342

Cited 8 times | Published

this statement best describes the objective of Rule 3.390(d). The primary thrust of the rule is to insure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Settle v. State

288 So. 2d 511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1974 | Docket: 1696465

Cited 8 times | Published

offenses included within the offense charged. Rule 3.390(a), 33 F.S.A., provides that: "The presiding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

76 So. 3d 379, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20857, 2011 WL 6847813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 2354446

Cited 7 times | Published

"contemporaneous, specific objection" rule. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Olivera v. State, 58 So.3d 352, 353

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

854 So. 2d 758, 2003 WL 22047227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 1747227

Cited 7 times | Published

constitute fundamental error. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Garcia neither requested an instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ulloa v. State

486 So. 2d 1373, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1986 | Docket: 1406880

Cited 7 times | Published

the judge instruct as to the penalty, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a); the right to have the jury instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marr v. State

470 So. 2d 703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1985 | Docket: 1241540

Cited 7 times | Published

statute would now appear to have been superseded by rule 3.390, which went into effect in 1973, In re Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

473 So. 2d 694, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 2469905

Cited 7 times | Published

the grounds of his objection, as required by rule 3.390(d) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Thomas

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pittman v. State

440 So. 2d 657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1983 | Docket: 1454375

Cited 7 times | Published

issue is to be preserved for appellate review. Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Holley

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitaker v. State

433 So. 2d 1352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1983 | Docket: 1425951

Cited 7 times | Published

(Fla. 1980), the supreme court held that under Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (as amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Heathcoat v. State

430 So. 2d 945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 1508789

Cited 7 times | Published

390(d).[2] If Kelly is still good law, and if rule 3.390(d) is read literally, the appellant has failed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carron v. State

414 So. 2d 288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1982 | Docket: 1707350

Cited 7 times | Published

the court erred in failing to give it.[6] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). However, Carron did submit a proposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saulsberry v. State

398 So. 2d 1017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1981 | Docket: 175183

Cited 7 times | Published

give the penalties instruction as required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Tascano

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

399 So. 2d 999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 428272

Cited 7 times | Published

statement of grounds is inadequate compliance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.[3] In

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

400 So. 2d 471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 1677144

Cited 7 times | Published

COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

378 So. 2d 902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 1794331

Cited 7 times | Published

refuse to give the instruction as required under Rule 3.390(a) and because we must reverse the conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

338 So. 2d 1309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1976 | Docket: 161132

Cited 7 times | Published

2d DCA 1974), wherein the court held that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), which requires the trial court to inform

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

324 So. 2d 115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1279523

Cited 7 times | Published

the charges given by the court. Thereby, under Rule 3.390(d) RCrP, the contention on appeal of error for

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to Rules of Civ. Procedure

967 So. 2d 178, 2007 WL 2873349

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2007 | Docket: 1733593

Cited 6 times | Published

trial to aid them in performing their duties. RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (a) Subject of Instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mosley v. State

482 So. 2d 530, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1986 | Docket: 1769408

Cited 6 times | Published

recently led the Supreme Court to amend Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a) by specifically prohibiting the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Washington v. State

392 So. 2d 599

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 1678370

Cited 6 times | Published

might be well-taken except for the fact that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), in no uncertain terms, requires such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bunn v. State

363 So. 2d 16

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 1978 | Docket: 1453981

Cited 6 times | Published

State, 320 So.2d 428 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). In the light of this determination, calling

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

919 So. 2d 628, 2006 WL 167988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1678724

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) (2002). Rule 3.390(a) states, "[e]xcept in capital cases, the judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

912 So. 2d 1286, 2005 WL 2897052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2005 | Docket: 1755557

Cited 5 times | Published

might impose based on their verdict. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a). Admittedly, Florida Standard Jury Instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pizzo v. State

916 So. 2d 828, 2005 WL 1704833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2005 | Docket: 1659488

Cited 5 times | Published

the jury instructions in their entirety. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(b) ("Every charge to a jury shall be orally

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vickery v. State

869 So. 2d 623, 2004 WL 534624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 1175167

Cited 5 times | Published

defendant may receive if convicted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a); Legette v. State, 718 So.2d 878 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wallace v. State

766 So. 2d 364, 2000 WL 1021575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 1329888

Cited 5 times | Published

preserved for our appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). See also Irving v. State, 627 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rogers v. State

626 So. 2d 339, 1993 WL 469791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1993 | Docket: 2549585

Cited 5 times | Published

give the lesser-included instruction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390; Thomas v. State, 591 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kocsis v. State

467 So. 2d 384, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1985 | Docket: 1680289

Cited 5 times | Published

Criminal Procedure 3.390(a).[1] On the basis of Rule 3.390(a) as it existed at trial, the defendant would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Skipper v. State

420 So. 2d 877

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1982 | Docket: 358248

Cited 5 times | Published

record contains no objection in accordance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure." 400

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sapp v. State

411 So. 2d 363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1982 | Docket: 1327139

Cited 5 times | Published

State, 308 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1974) which held that Rule 3.390(a) as it pertained to penalties was directory

Category: Criminal Procedure

Worley v. State

396 So. 2d 1153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 1732297

Cited 5 times | Published

and state the grounds for his objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. The record does not reveal any objection

Category: Criminal Procedure

James v. State

393 So. 2d 1138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1981 | Docket: 1372186

Cited 5 times | Published

lesser-included offenses. Under pre-Tascano cases holding Rule 3.390(a) mandatory, the trial court was obliged to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkinson v. State

322 So. 2d 620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1975 | Docket: 1734689

Cited 5 times | Published

1968, 214 So.2d 887; § 918.10(3), Fla. Stat., Rule 3.390(c), RCrP. Therefore, the convictions, adjudications

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sweet v. State

313 So. 2d 130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1975 | Docket: 1511032

Cited 5 times | Published

directory, rather than mandatory, provision of Rule 3.390(a), RCrP. The other points on appeal are without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

121 So. 3d 524, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 605, 2013 WL 4555586, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1864

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2013 | Docket: 60234444

Cited 4 times | Published

respective penalties is impermissible. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a) ("Except in capital cases, the judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

66 So. 3d 360, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11409, 2011 WL 2936748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2011 | Docket: 2564581

Cited 4 times | Published

State, 754 So.2d 731, 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("[Rule] 3.390(a) overrides section 918.10(1) ... and precludes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Legette v. State

718 So. 2d 878, 1998 WL 567954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1515066

Cited 4 times | Published

jury's consideration. Prior to January 1, 1985, Rule 3.390(a) provided that upon the request of either the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

668 So. 2d 596, 1996 WL 73783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1996 | Docket: 429265

Cited 4 times | Published

the drugs, it certified the foregoing question. Rule 3.390(a) states: "Except in capital cases, the judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramsaran v. State

664 So. 2d 1106, 1995 WL 732841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1995 | Docket: 1230262

Cited 4 times | Published

it came before the jury had retired. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Rogers v. State, 626 So.2d 339, 340

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chaky v. State

651 So. 2d 1169, 1995 WL 81876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1995 | Docket: 1518223

Cited 4 times | Published

those instructions as allowed by rule 3.400(c). Rule 3.390(b) provides, in part: Every charge to a jury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

591 So. 2d 259, 1991 WL 199946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1991 | Docket: 541543

Cited 4 times | Published

already retired to consider its verdict. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Yet, this case presents a novel scenario

Category: Criminal Procedure

Akins v. State

462 So. 2d 1161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 1509975

Cited 4 times | Published

usually merely a rule provision, see, e.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) and waivers implied for failure to object

Category: Criminal Procedure

Austin v. State

406 So. 2d 1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1981 | Docket: 449734

Cited 4 times | Published

for that is Murray versus State, 378 So.2d 111; Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In response

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gee v. State

400 So. 2d 466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1981 | Docket: 1263680

Cited 4 times | Published

if requested by either trial counsel. Quoting Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, our

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

378 So. 2d 117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1980 | Docket: 2573669

Cited 4 times | Published

instruction. We conclude that the requirements of Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. were not met, and consequently

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

304 So. 2d 466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1974 | Docket: 1437435

Cited 4 times | Published

296 So.2d 549, for the proposition that under Rule 3.390(a) the trial court must instruct the jury with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Terry v. State

302 So. 2d 142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1974 | Docket: 1758686

Cited 4 times | Published

the jury could have returned a guilty verdict, Rule 3.390(a), F.R.Cr.P., provides: "(a) The presiding judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

297 So. 2d 35

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510396

Cited 4 times | Published

penalty for the crime with which he was charged. Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paey v. State

943 So. 2d 919, 2006 WL 3498319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 1526771

Cited 3 times | Published

defendant would receive upon conviction. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a). This rule forecloses any chance of a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gavlick v. State

740 So. 2d 1212, 1999 WL 596953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1999 | Docket: 1456560

Cited 3 times | Published

the special instructions requested. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(c). Absent special or extenuating circumstances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trinidad v. State

615 So. 2d 806, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1993 | Docket: 1185060

Cited 3 times | Published

room while the jury deliberated. We note that Rule 3.390(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, does

Category: Criminal Procedure

PARIAS v. State

562 So. 2d 434, 1990 WL 82447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1990 | Docket: 1175163

Cited 3 times | Published

properly preserved for appellate review. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). We find no merit in the defendant's first

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watkins v. State

519 So. 2d 760, 1988 WL 8435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 1332655

Cited 3 times | Published

furnished to the court in writing as required by Rule 3.390(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; and

Category: Criminal Procedure

WJW v. State

446 So. 2d 248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1780071

Cited 3 times | Published

instruction contemporaneous objection rule (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) relied on by the majority in Torrence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ray v. State

403 So. 2d 956, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2819

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 64585091

Cited 3 times | Published

Procedure 3.390(d). This Court has long applied rule 3.390(d) and its statutory predecessors to bar the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Skipper v. State

400 So. 2d 797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1677025

Cited 3 times | Published

record contains no objection in accordance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davenport v. State

396 So. 2d 232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1981 | Docket: 1447263

Cited 3 times | Published

has not been preserved for appeal. While Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) requires a specific objection to preserve

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

396 So. 2d 206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1981 | Docket: 1732280

Cited 3 times | Published

constituted a waiver of this objection. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Febre v. State, 158 Fla. 853, 30 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hudson v. State

368 So. 2d 437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1979 | Docket: 1723142

Cited 3 times | Published

error for the first time on appeal. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d); McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

346 So. 2d 554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1977 | Docket: 1734132

Cited 3 times | Published

desired. See: Fla. App. Rule 6.7g. Pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), it is incumbent upon the defendant to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

323 So. 2d 318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1975 | Docket: 1258210

Cited 3 times | Published

instructions were properly given pursuant to Rule 3.390, RCrP, and were correct statements of the law

Category: Criminal Procedure

Price v. State

318 So. 2d 468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1975 | Docket: 1739209

Cited 3 times | Published

even though no such instruction was requested. Rule 3.390, F.R.Cr.P., provides in pertinent part as follows:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lavatt v. State

316 So. 2d 261

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1975 | Docket: 167876

Cited 3 times | Published

of great public interest, specifically whether Rule 3.390, FRCrP, mandatorily requires a trial judge to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelsey v. State

317 So. 2d 445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1975 | Docket: 1316291

Cited 3 times | Published

instruct the jury on penalties as required by Rule 3.390(a) RCrP. That rule provides as follows: "The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boykin v. State

305 So. 2d 831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1975 | Docket: 2507065

Cited 3 times | Published

held that the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.390(a), requiring the trial judge to charge the jury

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marvin Cannon v. State of Florida

180 So. 3d 1023, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 509, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2033, 2015 WL 5601524

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2015 | Docket: 2851201

Cited 2 times | Published

object. Such gamesmanship defeats the purpose of Rule 3.390(d), which is to put the trial court on notice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coissy v. State

957 So. 2d 53, 2007 WL 1264013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 1678803

Cited 2 times | Published

414 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1982); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("[n]o party may raise on appeal the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Luthi v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.

672 So. 2d 650, 1996 WL 210144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1996 | Docket: 1764131

Cited 2 times | Published

to give an instruction in criminal cases. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Limose v. State

656 So. 2d 947, 1995 WL 358050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 1283510

Cited 2 times | Published

cogent reasons for eliminating this portion of rule 3.390(a). It explains that the penalty is irrelevant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Benton v. State

650 So. 2d 688, 1995 WL 67077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1995 | Docket: 471255

Cited 2 times | Published

1090, 106 S.Ct. 1480, 89 L.Ed.2d 734 (1986); Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oliverio v. State

583 So. 2d 412, 1991 WL 138891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 2569979

Cited 2 times | Published

failing to object to the court's charge. Fla.R.Civ.P. 3.390(d); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309

Cited 2 times | Published

opportunity to object, in possible violation of Rule 3.390(d), no notice in violation of Rule 3.410, or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Evans v. State

452 So. 2d 987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1984 | Docket: 474413

Cited 2 times | Published

issue may therefore not be raised on appeal. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d). Nor does the exception to this rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foster v. State

436 So. 2d 56

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1983 | Docket: 1701288

Cited 2 times | Published

before us, and we will not consider it. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); see Jones v. State, 411 So.2d 165 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

428 So. 2d 746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1983 | Docket: 1374920

Cited 2 times | Published

court violated the holding of Tascano[5] and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). The rule provides that upon the request

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

419 So. 2d 337

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1982 | Docket: 1585294

Cited 2 times | Published

instruct the jury pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kujawa v. State

405 So. 2d 251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1981 | Docket: 1703693

Cited 2 times | Published

not be considered by us on this appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); North v. State, 65 So.2d 77 (Fla. 1952)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

401 So. 2d 1333

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1686731

Cited 2 times | Published

penalties mandatory under the provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. The defendant Allen, (petitioner here),

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewis v. State

399 So. 2d 473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 1652354

Cited 2 times | Published

request for an instruction on penalties under Rule 3.390(a) and his objection to the trial court's failure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dawson v. State

401 So. 2d 819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 1686550

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 1980), ruled that pursuant to aforesaid Rule 3.390(a), it is mandatory that instruction be given

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bassett v. State

392 So. 2d 1025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 2572224

Cited 2 times | Published

instruction, another subsection of the same rule, 3.390(d), prohibits the appeal of a failure to give

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850

Cited 2 times | Published

that the State would otherwise be prejudiced. RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (a) The presiding judge shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stern v. State

296 So. 2d 549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1974 | Docket: 1613407

Cited 2 times | Published

lesser included offenses, and, as required by Rule 3.390(a) CrPR, 33 F.S.A., charged as to the penalties

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivera v. State

274 So. 3d 537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2019 | Docket: 64718356

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence a defendant faces if convicted. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(a). This is to minimize the possibility

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Davis

147 So. 3d 7, 2013 WL 1458683, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2013 | Docket: 60243373

Cited 1 times | Published

for which the accused is then on trial. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390 (1983). It was changed to state: "Except

Category: Criminal Procedure

Olivera v. State

58 So. 3d 352, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4428, 2011 WL 1167215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2011 | Docket: 60299327

Cited 1 times | Published

the contemporaneous objection rule, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390, unpre-served error in a jury instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gresham v. State

908 So. 2d 1114, 2005 WL 1682322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1724866

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 641 So.2d 381, 387 (Fla.1994); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Rivers v. State, 307 So.2d 826 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hickox v. State

492 So. 2d 744, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1986 | Docket: 478313

Cited 1 times | Published

"capital felony," appellant was entitled, under Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shriner v. Wainwright

570 F. Supp. 766, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10203

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1982 | Docket: 914100

Cited 1 times | Published

death. The State correctly notes that under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) No party may assign as error grounds of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haislip v. State

400 So. 2d 473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1981 | Docket: 324554

Cited 1 times | Published

COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(A), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stevenson v. State

285 So. 2d 61

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1973 | Docket: 2560175

Cited 1 times | Published

trial. Such provision however was re-adopted as Rule 3.390, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., but did not become effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

CHARLES EVERETT ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2024 | Docket: 65346502

Published

discussion of this one instruction. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(c) which states that parties should submit

Category: Criminal Procedure

Markeith D. Loyd v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2023 | Docket: 68012028

Published

which the objection is based.” (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d))). Thus, we address only whether the

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60688689

Published

Commentary [NO CHANGE] RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (a) Subject of

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2021 | Docket: 60680655

Published

Commentary [NO CHANGE] RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (a) Subject of

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Standard Jury Instructions

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2021 | Docket: 50037873

Published

-9- (c) [No Change] RULE 3.390. JURY INSTRUCTIONS (a) Subject

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Standard Jury Instructions

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2020 | Docket: 17036579

Published

changed to “RULE 2.580.” On p. 19, line 3 of Rule 3.390(a), “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.” SIGNED:

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Standard Jury Instructions

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2020 | Docket: 17036580

Published

adoption of new rule 2.580 and the amendment to rule 3.390. The Court anticipates that these new

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Standard Jury Instructions

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2020 | Docket: 16931268

Published

adoption of new rule 2.570 and the amendment to rule 3.390. The Court anticipates that these new

Category: Criminal Procedure

HERBERT REESE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2019 | Docket: 16400360

Published

So. 2d 935, 940 (Fla. 2005)); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d) ("No party may raise on appeal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivera v. State

274 So. 3d 537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2019 | Docket: 64718357

Published

sentence a defendant faces if convicted. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(a). This is to minimize the possibility

Category: Criminal Procedure

Francis Wong v. State of Florida

212 So. 3d 351, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 250, 2017 WL 823611, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 424

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2017 | Docket: 4612630

Published

objection out of the presence of the jury. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d). This rule has been the subject of many

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dante Martin v. State

207 So. 3d 310, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4544029

Published

said instruction below. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d); see also Hood v. State,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Abaunza v. State

180 So. 3d 1201, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18554, 2015 WL 8519504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2015 | Docket: 60252297

Published

sufficiently proved the charged offenses. Thus, rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Covington

131 So. 3d 10, 2012 WL 6097978, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2012 | Docket: 60237986

Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, particularly rule 3.390. We cannot agree. The rules of criminal procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lain v. State

2 So. 3d 1090, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2914, 2009 WL 347774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2009 | Docket: 1137648

Published

rendered this error, if any, unpreserved. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); State v. Delva, 575 So.2d 643, 644 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Phillips v. State

972 So. 2d 233, 2007 WL 4404291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2007 | Docket: 1160674

Published

the contemporaneous objection rule, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d), and in the absence of a contemporaneous

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

965 So. 2d 176, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 2007 WL 2317298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2007 | Docket: 64852528

Published

amount of the illegal drug. In accordance with rule 3.390(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burgues v. State

961 So. 2d 1042, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11018, 2007 WL 2065780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2007 | Docket: 64851615

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a) (stating that except in capital cases judge shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cross v. State

877 So. 2d 933, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11016, 2004 WL 1646304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2004 | Docket: 64831866

Published

the issue was not properly preserved, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d) (“No party may raise on appeal the giving

Category: Criminal Procedure

Glasgow v. State

857 So. 2d 356, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15860, 2003 WL 22415127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2003 | Docket: 64825899

Published

the jury retired to deliberate and thus, under Rule 3.390(d), preserved for review the failure of the court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byers v. State

776 So. 2d 1012, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 349, 2001 WL 43083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2001 | Docket: 64803359

Published

objection and state its specific grounds. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d). Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Many v. State

756 So. 2d 169, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 2000 WL 313573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 64796892

Published

The alleged error was not preserved. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(d); Manka v. State, 720 So.2d 1109 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

748 So. 2d 316, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14630, 1999 WL 999994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1999 | Docket: 64793799

Published

107 S.Ct. 2203, 95 L.Ed.2d 858 (1987); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.390(a). DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Battle v. State

727 So. 2d 1012, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 1999 WL 77724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1999 | Docket: 64786625

Published

Ct. 183, 102 L.Ed.2d 153 (1988); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). My review of the record indicates that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

671 So. 2d 817, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3271, 1996 WL 135448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 64763864

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1995); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilder v. State

654 So. 2d 306, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5011, 1995 WL 271456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1995 | Docket: 64755919

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991); Castor

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

653 So. 2d 457, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3574, 1995 WL 150243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1995 | Docket: 64755478

Published

instruct the jury on the penalties in the ease. Rule 3.390(a) provides: The presiding judge shall charge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castaline v. State

645 So. 2d 561, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11022, 1994 WL 637730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752246

Published

fundamental error. § 836.05, Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). See Smith v. State, 532 So.2d 50, 52

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weyrauch v. State

637 So. 2d 953, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 1994 WL 234346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1994 | Docket: 64748847

Published

objection under rule 3.390(d). Id. As in Thomas the same exception to the rule 3.390(d) waiver provision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez-Gonzalez v. State

626 So. 2d 285, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11122, 1993 WL 442473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1993 | Docket: 64743902

Published

and in total conformity with the provisions of Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hicks v. State

622 So. 2d 14, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6731, 1993 WL 221393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1993 | Docket: 64697977

Published

to consider its verdict. The State relies on Rule 3.390(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure: No party may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

617 So. 2d 847, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1993 WL 141259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1993 | Docket: 64695904

Published

state argues that Weller is in conflict with rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pachon v. State

613 So. 2d 610, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2226, 1993 WL 45209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1993 | Docket: 64694023

Published

State, 505 So.2d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diaz v. State

601 So. 2d 1269, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115, 1992 WL 147160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1992 | Docket: 64668787

Published

1986) (citation omitted); see generally Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). For what appear to have been perfectly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

596 So. 2d 456, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 229, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 749, 1992 WL 68961

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1992 | Docket: 64666368

Published

clause of the rule. Prior to the amendment of rule 3.390 in 1985, we held that a penalty instruction was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

585 So. 2d 321, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7065, 1991 WL 134868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1991 | Docket: 64661329

Published

application of amended rule 3.390(a). However, the most logical interpretation of rule 3.390(a) is that the penalty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Delva v. State

557 So. 2d 52, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1750, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4235, 1989 WL 81625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1989 | Docket: 64648376

Published

contemporaneous objection to jury instructions, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), but “[t]he failure to object is a strong

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hargrave v. Dugger

832 F.2d 1528

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 66230335

Published

the jury retires to consider its verdict." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1975). Florida appellate courts do not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crespo v. State

505 So. 2d 685, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1084, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1987 | Docket: 64626471

Published

1981), dismissed, 419 So.2d 1200 (Fla.1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Standard Jury Instruction notes indicate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

502 So. 2d 492, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1987 | Docket: 64625037

Published

behavior for failing to raise such issues. See rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Croney v. State

495 So. 2d 926, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2196, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1986 | Docket: 64622249

Published

to this issue we affirm as to both counts. III Rule 3.390(a) of the Florida Rules of. Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caravello v. State

487 So. 2d 1224, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64619085

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Kocsis v. State, 467 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699

Published

103 S.Ct. 189, 74 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edwards v. State

460 So. 2d 1013, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1984 | Docket: 64608794

Published

cert. dismissed, 339 So.2d 1173 (Fla.1976); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules—Criminal Procedure

462 So. 2d 386, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3747

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1984 | Docket: 64609423

Published

Procedure except that I would reject the amendment of Rule 3.390 regarding jury instructions. The former rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

W.J.W. v. State

446 So. 2d 248, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 64603287

Published

instruction contemporaneous objection rule (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d)) relied on by the majority in Tor-rence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

446 So. 2d 86, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2622

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1984 | Docket: 64603249

Published

such instruction is requested pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390[ (a) ]. Id. at 748. We have jurisdiction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

436 So. 2d 253, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1983 | Docket: 64599035

Published

State, 346 So.2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(d); Compare: State v. Farrugia, 419 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Antone v. Strickland

706 F.2d 1534

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 1983 | Docket: 66193336

Published

appeal. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.390(d) (1973) specifically provided that jury instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davenport v. State

429 So. 2d 1352, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 64596485

Published

Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). We believe that the offense of battery

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brayton v. State

425 So. 2d 88, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1982 | Docket: 64594629

Published

So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), holding that under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), “upon request of either the state or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

416 So. 2d 1126, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2453

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1982 | Docket: 64591250

Published

consideration of changes to the criminal rules. Rule 3.390(a) currently provides: (a) The presiding judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

407 So. 2d 1074, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1981 | Docket: 64587113

Published

393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980). The provisions of Rule 3.390 Fla.R.Crim.P. are mandatory. It also seems clear

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kemper v. State

404 So. 2d 1184, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1981 | Docket: 64585597

Published

alleged Tas-ca no error for appellate review. Rule 3.390(d), Fla.R.Crim.P., explicitly requires that a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

405 So. 2d 1005, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1981 | Docket: 64586044

Published

393 So.2d 540, *1007541 (Fla.1980). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). Although the court indicated that Tascano

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ranney v. State

399 So. 2d 423, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 64583021

Published

TO *424GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Doe v. State

405 So. 2d 994, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1981 | Docket: 64586038

Published

court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

399 So. 2d 35, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64582920

Published

State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

399 So. 2d 999, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1981 | Docket: 64583312

Published

statement of grounds is inadequate compliance with Rule 3.390(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.3 In

Category: Criminal Procedure

Studstill v. State

397 So. 2d 753, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1981 | Docket: 64582203

Published

court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Heggs v. State

397 So. 2d 369, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 64582116

Published

give the jury an instruction on penalties (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a); Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelms v. State

397 So. 2d 372, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 64582117

Published

give a requested instruction on penalties (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a)) and the point was preserved by proper

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holland v. State

400 So. 2d 767, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1981 | Docket: 64583686

Published

(Fla.1980), ruled that pursuant to the aforesaid Rule 3.390(a), it is mandatory that instruction be given

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bell v. State

396 So. 2d 270, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1981 | Docket: 64581476

Published

1980) because he did not, as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), either make any objection to the refusal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ashwood v. State

405 So. 2d 991, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586036

Published

court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

405 So. 2d 990, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1981 | Docket: 64586035

Published

court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gray v. State

400 So. 2d 468, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64583569

Published

COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

394 So. 2d 1121, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 64580838

Published

COURT TO GIVE THE JURY INSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY RULE 3.390(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IF THE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

394 So. 2d 548, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 64580639

Published

concurs. DAUKSCH, C. J., dissents with opinion. . Rule 3.390(d) reads: No party may assign as error grounds

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meeks v. State

400 So. 2d 465, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1981 | Docket: 64583568

Published

for the trial judge not to so instruct. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a). There was a timely objection made to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Washington v. State

392 So. 2d 599, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1981 | Docket: 64579643

Published

might be well-taken except for the fact that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d), in no uncertain terms, requires such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

385 So. 2d 1019, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1980 | Docket: 64577282

Published

the defendant was charged as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a). Tascano v. State (Fla.1980) (case no

Category: Criminal Procedure

Atkinson v. State

378 So. 2d 324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1980 | Docket: 64573550

Published

issue on appeal for the first time. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) and Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burch v. State

376 So. 2d 289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1979 | Docket: 64572529

Published

preserved for appeal in the manner required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390. Zuberi v. State, 343 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d

Category: Criminal Procedure

McEachin v. State

374 So. 2d 567, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 64571678

Published

172 *568So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

372 So. 2d 991, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 64570974

Published

specific enough to preserve the point for appeal. Rule 3.390, Pla.R.Crim.P. Furthermore, we hold that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

360 So. 2d 59, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1978 | Docket: 64565125

Published

Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685 (Fla.1972); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Crim.) 2.16.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deal v. State

359 So. 2d 43, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564633

Published

appropriate request, as contemplated by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390, was made to the trial judge to instruct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pani v. State

361 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1978 | Docket: 64565545

Published

accord with defendant’s asserted theory. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390. We hold that the request for an instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flowers v. State

358 So. 2d 114, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564253

Published

v. Young, 217 So.2d 567 (Fla.1968), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d). Accordingly, appellant’s convictions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dearing v. State

348 So. 2d 1233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1977 | Docket: 64559779

Published

243 So.2d 469, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Isom v. State

335 So. 2d 1, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4249

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1976 | Docket: 64554462

Published

1974); Rigot v. Bucci, 245 So.2d 51 (Fla.1971), Rule 3.390, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. OVERTON

Category: Criminal Procedure

Albury v. State

330 So. 2d 65, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1976 | Docket: 64553219

Published

Roberts v. State, Fla.App.1975, 320 So.2d 832; Rule 3.390(d), RCrP. Therefore, for the reasons above stated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

328 So. 2d 571, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14926

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1976 | Docket: 64552881

Published

Sections 59.-041 and 924.33, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and Rule 3.390(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ratliff

329 So. 2d 285, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4291

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1976 | Docket: 64552980

Published

(Fla.1961). .Section 918.10, Florida Statutes; Rule 3.390, R.Cr.P.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bondu v. State

311 So. 2d 171, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1975 | Docket: 64545751

Published

Jones v. State, Fla.App.1974, 293 So.2d 116; Rule 3.390(d), CrPR.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gomez v. State

309 So. 2d 56, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 64544778

Published

by law for the offense charged as required by Rule 3.-390(a) RCrP. Said rule is not mandatory, only directory

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

287 So. 2d 107, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1973 | Docket: 64536110

Published

v. State (1947), 158 Fla. 853, 30 So.2d 367; Rule 3.390 (d), (e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure