Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 918.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 918.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 918.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 918
CONDUCT OF TRIAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 918.10
918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.
(1) At the conclusion of argument of counsel, the court shall charge the jury. The charge shall be only on the law of the case and must include the penalty for the offense for which the accused is being charged.
(2) All charges to the jury shall be delivered orally and shall be taken by the court reporter, transcribed, and filed.
(3) At or after the close of the evidence, a party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as stated in the requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action on the requests before their arguments to the jury.
History.s. 215, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(223); s. 1, ch. 22775, 1945; s. 117, ch. 70-339.

F.S. 918.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 918.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 918.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 918.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 918.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

K. DAWSON, v. STATE, 268 So. 3d 1018 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 918.10(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

WONG, v. STATE, 212 So. 3d 351 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Requests for jury instructions in a criminal trial are governed by section 918.10, Florida Statutes, . . . which provides: 918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions.— (1) At the conclusion of argument of . . . court shall inform counsel of its proposed action on the requests before their arguments to the jury. § 918.10 . . .

D. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 66 So. 3d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . This rule of procedure essentially overrides the language of section 918.10, Florida Statutes (2008), . . . State, 754 So.2d 731, 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“[Rule] 3.390(a) overrides section 918.10(1) ... and precludes . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 986 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Stat, and § 918.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

HAYNES, v. STATE, 946 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . himself, and this was a clear violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) and section 918.10 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 842 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 918.10(1), Fla. . . .

PALAZZOLO, v. STATE, 754 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . He also recognizes that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) overrides section 918.10(1), Florida . . . instruction on the penalty comparable to the instruction that the legislature attempted to mandate in section 918.10 . . .

A. NORMAN, Jr. v. GLORIA FARMS, INC., 668 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . with such basic invalidity as to lead to a reversal regardless of a timely objection under Section 918.10 . . .

KNIGHT, v. STATE, 653 So. 2d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . This rule abrogates the legislature’s grant of discretion to the trial judge given in section 918.10( . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The Ccommittee adopted Fla.Statute ⅜ section 918.10, Florida Statutes, with only minor modification as . . .

LIVINGSTON, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Sec. 918.10(2), Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A. . . .

MARR, v. STATE, 470 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Compare Section 918.10, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390, requiring that . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO RULES- CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 462 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1984)

. . . trial judge to give such instructions upon request of either party is based upon case law and section 918.10 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 407 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1981)

. . . See § 918.10(1), Fla.Stat. (1977); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.390(a); Harrison v. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 378 So. 2d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Criminal Procedure 3.390(a) after the Simmons decision and in the same language as the statute, Section 918.10 . . .

MURRAY, v. STATE, 378 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in 1977, the rule and its predecessor statute (Section 918.10 . . .

L. BRYAN, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 588 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 918.10(4) (1970). See Fla.R.Crim.Pro. 3.390; Fla.App.R. 6.7g. . . .

TASCANO, v. STATE, 363 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The court stated: It will be observed that statute 918.10, in directing the court to charge upon the . . . adopted former Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(a), the verbiage of which was virtually identical to that of F.S. 918.10 . . . See also, § 918.10(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). . See also, McBride v. . . .

STATE v. TERRY,, 336 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1976)

. . . . § 918.10(1) (1973), the statute provides: At the conclusion of argument of counsel, the court shall . . .

STATE v. RATLIFF,, 329 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1976)

. . . Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. . 131 So.2d 7 (Fla.1961). .Section 918.10, Florida . . .

WILKINSON, H. v. STATE, 322 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . State, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 887; § 918.10(3), Fla.Stat., Rule 3.390(c), RCrP. . . .

TERRY, v. STATE, 302 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . (Emphasis supplied) The above rule was adopted from § 918.10, Florida Statutes, with “only minor modification . . .

GORDAN, v. STATE, 288 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . See. 918.10(1), F.S.A., limits trial judges to instruction of the jury only after final argument of counsel . . .

RAYNER, v. STATE, 286 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 918.10(4) F.S.A., which was in effect when Rayner was tried and convicted, provided: “No party . . . Rayner failed to meet the requirements of F.S. § 918.10(4) F.S.A. and Rule 6.7(g) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., . . . Specifically, the District Court may wish to consider the applicability of Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4) and/ . . . Stat. § 918.10(4) was repealed by Chapter 70-339, Laws of Florida, which took effect some months after . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 285 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1973)

. . . . § 918.10(4) provided: “No party may assign as error or grounds of appeal, the giving or failure to . . . The Legislature, in Chapter 70-339, Laws of Florida, repealed Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4) F.S.A., and provided . . . Stat. § 918.10(4), F.S.A., and/or F.A.E.. 6.7(g), 32 F.S.A., both relating to the necessity of objections . . . In this regard, we note that Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4), F.S.A., was repealed by Chapter 70-339, Laws of Florida . . .

STEVENSON, Jr. v. STATE, 285 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Sec. 918.10(4), F.S.A., relating to the necessity of objecting to the giving or failure to give an instruction . . .

COWART v. STATE, 277 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . because of the failure of the trial court to instruct on the lesser included offenses, although F.S. 918.10 . . . court pointed out that the appellate court might wish to consider the applicability of Fla.Stat. § 918.10 . . .

B. HENRY, v. STATE, 277 So. 2d 78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 918.10(4) (now F.A.R. 6.7(g) 32 F.S.A.). . . .

RAYNER, v. STATE, 273 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1973)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A., and/or F.A.R. 6.7 (g), 32 F.S.A., both relating to the necessity of objections . . . In this regard, we note that Fla.Stat. § 918.10(4), F.S.A., was repealed by Chapter 70-339, Laws of Florida . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 272 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1972)

. . . Committee Note: The Committee adopted Fla.Statute 918.10 with only minor modification as to terminology . . .

BRANAM, v. STATE, 265 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 919.16, F.S.A., should be construed in pari materia with § 918.10. . . . It is to be noted that 918.10 was amended effective January 1971, materially changing the old Section . . . 918.10. . . . Laws of Florida, Chapter 70-339, § 117, [1970], comments that sub-sections (4) and (5) of 918.10 are . . . We do not here comment on the reasons the Legislature changed 918.10 which, in our opinion, was clear . . .

ASHLEY, v. STATE, 265 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1972)

. . . State (Fla.) 247 So.2d 425; Fla.Stat., Section 918.10(4), F.S.A. . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 255 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Ordinarily, of course, a jury charge not objected to cannot be the basis of an appeal, see, F.S.1969, § 918.10 . . .

CONNER, v. STATE, 253 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . § 918.10, F.S. . . . F.S. section 918.10, F.S.A. provides that the trial Judge shall charge the jury “on the law of the case . . . But while said quoted portion of the provisions of § 918.10 appears on its face to be mandatory, yet . . . Referring to F.S. § 918.10, F.S.A. the Court in Simmons said: “The provision of the statute in question . . .

SCHROEDER, v. STATE, 252 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . the penalty to which defendant might be subject upon conviction in compliance with F.S.1969, section 918.10 . . .

NORRIS, v. STATE, 249 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 213; F.S. section 918.10(4), F. S.A.; Grace v. . . .

BAKER, v. STATE, 247 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . that the court erred in not reducing its entire charge to the jury in writing as required by Section 918.10 . . . determine the guilt or innocence of appellant was included, thereby satisfying the requirements of Section 918.10 . . .

G. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 247 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A. provides that a party may not complain on appeal about a failure to give an instruction . . .

IRVIN, v. STATE, 246 So. 2d 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Section 918.10(4), F.S.A. and by case law, Grace v. . . .

ROBERTSON S. v. STATE, 245 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 16; § 918.10(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and Rule 6.16(a), F.A.R. . . .

PINKNEY, v. STATE, 241 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1970)

. . . Section 918.10(1) reads as follows: ‘The presiding judge shall charge the jury only upon the law of the . . .

STATE v. SMITH,, 240 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1970)

. . . . § 918.10(4) F.S.A., which reads as follows: “No party may assign as error or grounds of appeal the . . .

A. CLARK, v. STATE, 239 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A. requires, the failure to give the instruction shall not be assigned as error on . . .

TAMAYO, v. STATE, 237 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Reversed and remanded, with directions. . “918.10 Charge to jury; request for instruction.— “(4) No party . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 233 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Section 918.10(4), F.S.1967, F.S.A.: “No party may assign as error or grounds of appeal, the giving or . . .

MATIRE, v. STATE, 232 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The appellant contends that the provisions of Section 918.10(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., make it mandatory . . . Section 918.10(2), F.S.A., provides as follows: “Every charge to a jury shall be orally delivered, and . . . Section 918.10(2), as now written requires charges in capital cases to be in writing, but the statute . . .

M. YORK, v. STATE, 232 So. 2d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Section 918.10(4), F.S.A., provides: “(4). . . .

ROBY, v. STATE, 229 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . The written instruction, required by Florida Statutes § 918.10(2), F.S.A., states: “When two or more . . .

O. TAMAYO, v. STATE, 226 So. 2d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 798; Section 918.10, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; and Garcia v. . . .

SLOAN, v. STATE, 226 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Section 918.10, F.S.A., provides that: “(3) At the close of the evidence, or at such earlier time during . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 226 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . In opposition to this attack on the instruction, the ap-pellee contends that Section 918.10(4), Florida . . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., reads as follows: “(4) No party may assign as error or grounds . . . Section 918.10(4) requires that an objection to a jury instruction be not only seasonable but also that . . .

GERTMAN, a k a v. STATE, 223 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . But the court also held that under iji >{c ‡ "* * * § 918.10, the failure to give an instruction is of . . . that the trial judge ‘shall’ charge the jury, must be applied in the light of the requirements of § 918.10 . . .

MIMS, v. STATE, 222 So. 2d 221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Clearly, as we shall see, the quoted charge is erroneous; and § 918.10(4), F.S.A., provides that, “No . . .

A. P. DUNLEAVY, v. STATE, 216 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10(3); Johnson v. State, 157 Fla. 328, 25 So.2d 801 (1946); Moore v. . . .

BLATCH, v. STATE, 216 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . either object to the charge in question or submit a written requested instruction, as required by § 918.10 . . .

OWENS, v. STATE, 215 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., clearly states that the giving or failure to give an instruction . . .

PEARSALL, Jr. Jr. v. STATE, 215 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10(3), (4), F.S.A.; Miller v. State (Fla.App.1958), 102 So.2d 737. . . .

JERRY, v. STATE, 213 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 918.10, F.S.A., is particularly applicable to the present case. . . . Further, under § 918.10, the failure to give an instruction is of no avail on appeal unless it is requested . . . that the trial judge ‘shall’ charge the jury, must be applied in the light of the requirements of § 918.10 . . .

TURNER, Jr. v. STATE, 212 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Sec. 918.10(4) and (5) F.S.A. provides inter alia as follows: “(4) No party may assign as error or grounds . . .

REILLY, v. STATE, 212 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10, F.S.A., and that no error was committed. Fla.Stat. § 919.05, F.S.A., Lutins v. . . .

SIMPSON, a k a v. STATE, 211 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A.; Siekman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 352. . . .

B. HOSKINS, v. STATE, 208 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A. See also Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 793. . . .

BRIDGES, v. STATE, 207 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 918.10, F.S.A., wherein it is declared that “the presiding judge shall charge the jury only upon . . . Section 918.10, F.S.A. and even intimate that some significance should be given to the fact that the . . .

BURKHEAD, v. STATE, 206 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . timely objection was made by defendant to the absence of the charge, as provided for and required by § 918.10 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 206 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1968)

. . . . § 918.10 (1965), F.S.A., infra. . . . Fla.Stat., § 918.10, F.S.A., reads in part as follows: “(3) At the close of the evidence, or at such . . . Further, under § 918.10, the failure to give an instruction is of no avail on appeal unless it is requested . . . that the trial judge “shall” charge the jury, must be applied in the light of the requirements of § 918.10 . . .

C. GRACE, v. STATE, 206 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . See Section 918.10(4), F.S.1965, F.S.A.; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1959, 109 So.2d 379; Miller v. . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 197 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . See Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Foreman v. . . .

McBRIDE, v. STATE, 197 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Appellant directs our attention to-the provisions of section 918.10(1), Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A . . . State, 36 So.2d 207, reasoned as follows: “It will be observed that statute 918.10, in directing the . . . In view of the reasoning upon which the construction of the penalty provision of Section 918.10(1), Florida . . .

DUPREE v. STATE, 195 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . See also Fla.Stat., Sec. 918.10(4), F.S.A., and Forceier v. State, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 336. . . .

GIBSON, v. STATE, 194 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 918.10, F.S.A. provides: “918.10 Charge to jury; request for instructions ****** “(4) No party . . .

TOLER, v. STATE, 193 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.” . . .

CONEY, v. STATE, 193 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . See Section 918.10, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The judgment of conviction is hereby Affirmed. . . .

PRUITT, v. STATE, 194 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . make any complaint regarding the-■charges given by the court, as required by subsection (4) of Section 918.10 . . .

JOERGER, v. STATE, 191 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . Sec. 918.10(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

BRADY, v. STATE, 190 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . appellant now says should have been given, was not submitted to the trial court in writing as required by § 918.10 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 191 So. 2d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . appellee contends in this appeal that the appellant failed to comply with the provisions of Section 918.10 . . . administration of criminal justice is the apparent requirement in paragraphs (3) and (4) of Section 918.10 . . . opinion we discussed ’ the appellee’s contention in this appeal that the appellant violated Section 918.10 . . .

HAND, v STATE, 188 So. 2d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . because the appellant failed to request in writing that such a charge be given, as required by Section 918.10 . . .

JONES S. v. STATE, 187 So. 2d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . this charge was not assigned as error and the appellants failed to object thereto as required by F.S. 918.10 . . . This falls far short of the requirements of F.S. 918.10(4) F.S.A.; see Hamilton v. . . . State, supra, after construing F.S. 918.10(4) F.S.A. points out that, with respect to jury instructions . . .

E. J. CARLISLE, v. STATE, 186 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . before us shows; so in the absence of such a fundamental error as to adversely affect justice, Section 918.10 . . .

HOLMES, v. STATE, 181 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . court erred in not instructing the jury-as to the penalty for the crime informed against, citing § 918.10 . . . The Supreme Court of Florida has specifically held that notwithstanding the language of § 918.10 (1), . . .

BELL, v. STATE, 178 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . See § 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The judgment of the lower Court is affirmed. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 173 So. 2d 487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F. . . .

SILVER, v. STATE, 174 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F. S.A.” Mr. Justice Drew filed a dissent in Brown v. . . .

D. C. DARTY, v. STATE, 161 So. 2d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . See Fla.Stat. 918.10(4), F.S.A.; Winnemore v. State, Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 277, 280. . . . .

LIPFORD, v. STATE, 161 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . No specific objection was made to the complained of charge in the trial court, in accordance with § 918.10 . . .

CARSWELL, a k a v. STATE, 154 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1963)

. . . Then it does not appear that appellant attempted to save his alleged errors by compliance with § 918.10 . . . In this respect it should be noted that § 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides: “No party may . . .

G. SAN FRATELLO, v. STATE, 154 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . It is provided in § 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., that the defendant may not assign as error the . . .

A. PEEL, Jr. v. STATE, 154 So. 2d 910 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . . § 918.10(4) F.S.A., which provides that “No party may assign as error or grounds of appeal, the giving . . .

AI WINMEMORE, a k a E. v. STATE, 150 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . State, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 82; § 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

D. HAMILTON, v. STATE, 152 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . State, 1918, 76 Fla. 518, 80 So. 314; 32 Fla.Jur., section 142, pages 388-389; section 918.10(3), Florida . . .

H. CANADA, v. STATE, 139 So. 2d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Sec. 918.10(4) provides that “[n]o party may assign as error or grounds of appeal, the giving or the . . .

DAWSON, v. STATE, 139 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1962)

. . . State, Fla., 124 So.2d 481, citing Sec. 918.10(4), F.S., and earlier decisions on the point. . . . .

GOSWICK, a k a v. STATE, 137 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . one year or by fine not exceeding three thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment.” .“918.10 . . .

M. FORCEIER, v. STATE, 133 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that in a criminal case no party may assign as . . .

A. DIECIDUE, v. STATE, 131 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1961)

. . . Section 918.10, F.S.A., wherein it is declared that “the presiding judge shall charge the jury only upon . . . Section 918.10, F.S.A. and even intimate that some significance should be given to the fact that the . . . Section 918.10, F.S.A. . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 124 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1960)

. . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . . with such basic invalidity as to lead to a reversal regardless of a timely objection under Section 918.10 . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 122 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . of the failure of the defendant below to raise such objections as required under Florida Statutes, § 918.10 . . . Florida Statutes, § 918.10, F.S.A.— Charge to jury; request for instructions, provides: “(1) The presiding . . . such is required when an objection is made to the giving or failure to give an instruction, F.S.A. § 918.10 . . . this-matter because he did not obj ect to the trial court’s action as he was required to do by section 918.10 . . .

H. P. GORDON, v. STATE, 119 So. 2d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . . § 918.10(4), F.S.A., he may not now complain. . . .

STATE v. BROWN,, 118 So. 2d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . Florida Statutes, § 918.10, F.S.A., Charge to jury; request for instructions, provides: “(1) The presiding . . . appeal complain of instructions given or refused where no objections were made pursuant to F.S.A. § 918.10 . . . Section 918.10(4), Florida Statutes, F. S.A. . . . That there is no obligation to consider this point is obvious from an examination of Sec. 918.10(4), . . . State, 1948, 160 Fla. 626, 36 So.2d 207, in construing Section 918.10, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which . . .

HOYT, v. STATE, 119 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1959)

. . . Sec. 918.10(4), F.S.A. Brunke v. State, 100 Fla. 43, 33 So.2d 226. . . .