Florida Appellate Rule 9.600 - JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL PENDING | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Appellate Rule 9.600

RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL PENDING
REVIEW


(a) Concurrent Jurisdiction. Only the court may grant an
extension of time for any act required by these rules. Before the
record is docketed, the lower tribunal shall have concurrent
jurisdiction with the court to render orders on any other procedural
matter relating to the cause, subject to the control of the court,
provided that clerical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or other
parts of the record arising from oversight or omission may be
corrected by the lower tribunal on its own initiative after notice or
on motion of any party before the record is docketed in the court,
and, thereafter with leave of the court.
(b) Further Proceedings. If the jurisdiction of the lower
tribunal has been divested by an appeal from a final order, the
court by order may permit the lower tribunal to proceed with
specifically stated matters during the pendency of the appeal.

(c) Family Law Matters. In family law matters:

(1) The lower tribunal shall retain jurisdiction to enter
and enforce orders awarding separate maintenance, child support,
alimony, attorneys’ fees and costs for services rendered in the lower
tribunal, temporary attorneys’ fees and costs reasonably necessary
to prosecute or defend an appeal, or other awards necessary to
protect the welfare and rights of any party pending appeal.

(2) The receipt, payment, or transfer of funds or
property under an order in a family law matter shall not prejudice
the rights of appeal of any party. The lower tribunal shall have the
jurisdiction to impose, modify, or dissolve conditions upon the
receipt or payment of such awards in order to protect the interests
of the parties during the appeal.

(3) Review of orders entered pursuant to this
subdivision shall be by motion filed in the court within 30 days of
rendition.

(d) Criminal Cases. The lower tribunal shall retain
jurisdiction to consider motions pursuant to Florida Rules of
Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) and in conjunction with post-trial
release pursuant to rule 9.140(h).

Committee Notes

1977 Amendment. This rule governs the jurisdiction of the
lower tribunal during the pendency of review proceedings, except
for interlocutory appeals. If an interlocutory appeal is taken, the
lower tribunal’s jurisdiction is governed by rule 9.130(f).

Subdivision (b) replaces former rule 3.8(a). It allows for
continuation of various aspects of the proceeding in the lower
tribunal, as may be allowed by the court, without a formal remand
of the cause. This rule is intended to prevent unnecessary delays in
the resolution of disputes.

Subdivision (c) is derived from former rule 3.8(b). It provides
for jurisdiction in the lower tribunal to enter and enforce orders
awarding separate maintenance, child support, alimony, temporary
suit money, and attorneys’ fees. Such orders may be reviewed by
motion.

1980 Amendment. Subdivision (a) was amended to clarify the
appellate court’s paramount control over the lower tribunal in the
exercise of its concurrent jurisdiction over procedural matters. This
amendment would allow the appellate court to limit the number of
extensions of time granted by a lower tribunal, for example.

1994 Amendment. Subdivision (c) was amended to conform
to and implement section 61.16(1), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.),
authorizing the lower tribunal to award temporary appellate
attorneys’ fees, suit money, and costs.

1996 Amendment. New rule 9.600(d) recognizes the
jurisdiction of the trial courts, while an appeal is pending, to rule
on motions for post-trial release, as authorized by rule 9.140(g), and
to decide motions pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.800(a), as authorized by case law such as Barber v. State, 590 So.
2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Cases Citing Rule 9.600

Total Results: 130

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

685 So. 2d 773, 1996 WL 673822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1414934

Cited 65 times | Published

lower tribunal or the court, in accordance with rule 9.600. 1980 Amendment. Subdivision (b) was amended

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Order on Prosecution of Cr. App.

561 So. 2d 1130

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 1480585

Cited 57 times | Published

circuit court to handle the motions. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b). As this Court noted in Behr, the county

Category: Appellate Procedure

Department of Revenue v. Kuhnlein

646 So. 2d 717, 1994 WL 525900

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1994 | Docket: 787

Cited 55 times | Published

al.'s Motion to Remand Pursuant to Appellate Rule 9.600(b), or in the Alternative to Stay Defendants

Category: Appellate Procedure

Allen v. Estate of Dutton

384 So. 2d 171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1980 | Docket: 1269468

Cited 55 times | Published

Inc., v. David, 369 So.2d 75 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Rule 9.600(b), Fla.R.App.P. However, it has been held that

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954

Cited 51 times | Published

lower tribunal or the court, in accordance with rule 9.600. 1980 Amendment. Subdivision (b) was amended

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954

Cited 51 times | Published

lower tribunal or the court, in accordance with rule 9.600. 1980 Amendment. Subdivision (b) was amended

Category: Appellate Procedure

McGurn v. Scott

596 So. 2d 1042, 1992 WL 63129

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1992 | Docket: 1707275

Cited 48 times | Published

it was not ruled on by the trial court. [3] Rule 9.600(b) provides that "[w]hen the jurisdiction of

Category: Appellate Procedure

Yurgel v. Yurgel

572 So. 2d 1327, 1990 WL 172775

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1990 | Docket: 1518942

Cited 41 times | Published

Is relinquishment of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.600(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hatten v. State

561 So. 2d 562, 1990 WL 59669

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 1480665

Cited 23 times | Published

order the circuit to handle the motions. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b). In re Order, at 1138. We recognize the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Blum v. Blum

382 So. 2d 52

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1980 | Docket: 1255120

Cited 23 times | Published

County, 347 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b), (c). Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Category: Appellate Procedure

Bailey v. Bailey

392 So. 2d 49

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1981 | Docket: 1268808

Cited 20 times | Published

subject matter on appeal. [8] Smith, holding that Rule 9.600(c) gives the trial court jurisdiction to make

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules

351 So. 2d 981

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1977 | Docket: 1247477

Cited 16 times | Published

lower tribunal or the court, in accordance with Rule 9.600. Rule 9.310 Stay Pending Review (a) Application

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hudson v. Hofmann

471 So. 2d 117, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1985 | Docket: 1396552

Cited 15 times | Published

jurisdiction when it acted after appeal was taken. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b); United Services Automobile Association

Category: Appellate Procedure

Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co.

374 So. 2d 572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 824409

Cited 15 times | Published

Kalmutz, 299 So.2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Fla.R.App.P. 9.600. The order complained of as to disposition

Category: Appellate Procedure

Denson v. State

711 So. 2d 1225, 1998 WL 235977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1700608

Cited 14 times | Published

pendency of this appeal in the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(d); Johnson v. State, 697 So.2d 1304 (Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp.

55 So. 3d 567, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 735, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2089, 2010 WL 5110237

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2010 | Docket: 2408713

Cited 13 times | Published

district court to direct the trial court under rule 9.600(b) to make a determination as to the amount of

Category: Appellate Procedure

Schultz v. Schickedanz

884 So. 2d 422, 2004 WL 2169174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2004 | Docket: 1683074

Cited 12 times | Published

record and transcript on appeal. Section (b) of Rule 9.600 provides, "If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Emerald Coast Communications, Inc. v. Carter

780 So. 2d 968, 2001 WL 208857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2001 | Docket: 2547333

Cited 11 times | Published

that this court may, within its discretion under rule 9.600(b), relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Grant v. Wester

679 So. 2d 1301, 1996 WL 549370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1996 | Docket: 1214552

Cited 10 times | Published

abolished in dissolution of marriage actions. Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(c) ("The receipt or payment of funds under

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wilson Realty, Inc. v. David

369 So. 2d 75

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1979 | Docket: 432721

Cited 10 times | Published

permission of the appellate court pursuant to Rule 9.600(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Stang v. State

24 So. 3d 566, 2009 WL 2342472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648543

Cited 9 times | Published

appeal is pending is limited to that provided by rule 9.600(d)). *570 Here, Stang's sentence was not "amended"

Category: Appellate Procedure

McGuire v. State

779 So. 2d 571, 2001 WL 98560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 420223

Cited 9 times | Published

motions filed under rule 3.800(b)(2). See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(a). Although this case is factually distinguishable

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules

609 So. 2d 516, 1992 WL 323929

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1992 | Docket: 1738396

Cited 8 times | Published

Subdivision (b) also was amended to correlate with rule 9.600(a), which provides that only an appellate court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Soles v. Soles

536 So. 2d 367, 1988 WL 139529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1988 | Docket: 1759591

Cited 8 times | Published

court's concurrent jurisdiction pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.600 and 9.130(f), as it directly addressed the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Luhrs v. State

394 So. 2d 137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1981 | Docket: 1315567

Cited 8 times | Published

procedural matter relating to the cause. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(a). The correction of an error or omission

Category: Appellate Procedure

White v. White

683 So. 2d 510, 1996 WL 71257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1996 | Docket: 2530327

Cited 7 times | Published

temporary attorney's fees to prosecute the appeal. Rule 9.600(c)[2] gives the lower tribunal jurisdiction to

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gieseke v. Gieseke

499 So. 2d 839, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1986 | Docket: 355574

Cited 7 times | Published

merit. The attorney's fees and costs discussed in rule 9.600(c) are limited to those incurred in the trial

Category: Appellate Procedure

Havens v. State

27 So. 3d 803, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2069, 2010 WL 624178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 2580598

Cited 6 times | Published

notice of appeal, albeit prematurely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(a); Zinnermon v. State, 685 So.2d 893 (Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hayes v. State

748 So. 2d 1042, 1999 WL 743519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 1750384

Cited 6 times | Published

though a direct appeal was pending. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(d). [4] The offense date was 1993. [5]

Category: Appellate Procedure

Starkey v. Linn

727 So. 2d 386, 1999 WL 111155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1438074

Cited 6 times | Published

sole support for her claim for fees. However, rule 9.600 does not provide a substantive basis for the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Boyer v. Boyer

588 So. 2d 615, 1991 WL 194176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1991 | Docket: 1708320

Cited 6 times | Published

appellate fees and costs, whether temporary or final. Rule 9.600(c) refers to the retention by the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

2 So. 3d 89, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 908, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2089, 2008 WL 4876766

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2008 | Docket: 1644022

Cited 5 times | Published

for Use by Clerks, 910 So.2d 194 (Fla.2005). RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL PENDING REVIEW

Category: Appellate Procedure

Carter v. State

929 So. 2d 1161, 2006 WL 1502459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2006 | Docket: 1726902

Cited 5 times | Published

matter was pending in this court.[1]See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600; Rivera v. State, 913 So.2d 769, 770 n.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Keitel v. Keitel

724 So. 2d 1255, 1999 WL 30596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 1734027

Cited 5 times | Published

because the trial court retained jurisdiction under rule 9.600(c), Fla. R. App. P., and the order does not interfere

Category: Appellate Procedure

Chapman v. Universal Underwriters Ins.

549 So. 2d 679, 1989 WL 74832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1989 | Docket: 1373558

Cited 5 times | Published

That holding, of course, is in line with modern rule 9.600, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rosasco v. Rosasco

641 So. 2d 493, 1994 WL 447287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1994 | Docket: 1648627

Cited 4 times | Published

post a bond. The court predicated its ruling on rule 9.600, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and explained

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dobbert v. Wainwright

593 F. Supp. 1418, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23922

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1984 | Docket: 2522108

Cited 4 times | Published

leave to assert three new issues, pursuant to Rule 9.600, the Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to

Category: Appellate Procedure

Campbell v. Campbell

436 So. 2d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1983 | Docket: 1340276

Cited 4 times | Published

review of the February 1, 1983, order, pursuant to Rule 9.600(c). The wife contends that the trial court had

Category: Appellate Procedure

Campbell v. Campbell

436 So. 2d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1983 | Docket: 1340276

Cited 4 times | Published

review of the February 1, 1983, order, pursuant to Rule 9.600(c). The wife contends that the trial court had

Category: Appellate Procedure

Winner v. Winner

376 So. 2d 924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1979 | Docket: 1411923

Cited 4 times | Published

relations matter and they are provided for in Rule 9.600(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We

Category: Appellate Procedure

Escobar v. State

189 So. 3d 1029, 2016 WL 1445593, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 60254387

Cited 3 times | Published

restitution, affecting the scope of the sentence. Rule 9.600(a) provides in part: “Before the record is docketed

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rogers v. State

33 So. 3d 805, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5532, 2010 WL 1641488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 1649374

Cited 3 times | Published

"collateral, ministerial and procedural matter" under rule 9.600(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hankerson v. State

879 So. 2d 71, 2004 WL 1697716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2004 | Docket: 2518875

Cited 3 times | Published

of court to enter an amended order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600. As the trial court was without jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

McPherson v. McPherson

775 So. 2d 973, 2000 WL 1532795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1667846

Cited 3 times | Published

4th DCA 1995), where we recognized that under Rule 9.600(c) a court might properly award temporary alimony

Category: Appellate Procedure

Taylor v. Taylor

734 So. 2d 473, 1999 WL 308812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 1441730

Cited 3 times | Published

000 for this appeal. The father, pursuant to rule 9.600(c)(3), seeks review of that order by motion.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Johnson v. State

697 So. 2d 1304, 1997 WL 471482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1997 | Docket: 1777254

Cited 3 times | Published

illegal sentence may be filed "at any time." Rule 9.600(d) was added to the appellate rules to give the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Johnson v. Johnson

663 So. 2d 663, 1995 WL 621556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 1313771

Cited 3 times | Published

despite the pendency of the main appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(c); Smith v. Smith, 382 So.2d 1242 (Fla.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ash v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES

649 So. 2d 305, 1995 WL 23564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1995 | Docket: 2378051

Cited 3 times | Published

by the filing of the notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b); Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So.2d 374 (Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Weider v. Weider

402 So. 2d 66

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1981 | Docket: 1313158

Cited 3 times | Published

whichever occurs latest in point of time." Fla.R.App.P. 9.600 allows the trial court to enter and enforce

Category: Appellate Procedure

Johnson v. Ferguson

383 So. 2d 715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1980 | Docket: 1512452

Cited 3 times | Published

242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Respondent relies upon rule 9.600(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp.

16 So. 3d 855, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13741, 2009 WL 1531670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2009 | Docket: 1640996

Cited 2 times | Published

Carter, 780 So.2d 968, 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Rule 9.600(b) provides: “If the jurisdiction of the lower

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rivera v. State

913 So. 2d 769, 2005 WL 3001552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2005 | Docket: 117331

Cited 2 times | Published

original order was pending in this court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600; Hankerson v. State, 879 So.2d 71 (Fla.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Merian v. Merhige

690 So. 2d 678, 1997 WL 133931

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1997 | Docket: 436890

Cited 2 times | Published

while the appeal is pending. Rule 9.600(c) currently provides: RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL

Category: Appellate Procedure

Merian v. Merhige

690 So. 2d 678, 1997 WL 133931

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1997 | Docket: 436890

Cited 2 times | Published

while the appeal is pending. Rule 9.600(c) currently provides: RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL

Category: Appellate Procedure

STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Loveday

659 So. 2d 1239, 1995 WL 502154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 1748213

Cited 2 times | Published

the pendency of the motion to vacate. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(c). In this case, the judgment is not for

Category: Appellate Procedure

Miller v. Miller

586 So. 2d 1315, 1991 WL 194168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1991 | Docket: 1742426

Cited 2 times | Published

Despite the unqualified language in the statute and rule 9.600(c), case law has established that the trial court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Salerno v. State

567 So. 2d 503, 1990 WL 134769

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1990 | Docket: 1381580

Cited 2 times | Published

trial court of jurisdiction to impose sentence. Rule 9.600, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Fla. Wkrs.'compensation Rules, Etc.

374 So. 2d 981

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1979 | Docket: 1523329

Cited 2 times | Published

Appellate Procedure. Subsection (b)(2) is similar to Rule 9.600(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. RULE

Category: Appellate Procedure

SSA SECURITY INC. v. Pierre

44 So. 3d 1272, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15064, 2010 WL 3909466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2010 | Docket: 2400295

Cited 1 times | Published

2003). We deny as moot "Appellee's Motion Under Rule 9.600(b)," served on June 11, 2010; "Appellee's Motion

Category: Appellate Procedure

BYRD-GREEN v. State

40 So. 3d 848, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10332, 2010 WL 2756975

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2010 | Docket: 323343

Cited 1 times | Published

579 So.2d 200, 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); cf. Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b). A petition for writ of mandamus, together

Category: Appellate Procedure

Raynor v. Florida State Lodge

987 So. 2d 152, 2008 WL 2725835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2008 | Docket: 1723955

Cited 1 times | Published

matters; this matter was not procedural. And Rule 9.600(b) provides that this Court "by order may permit

Category: Appellate Procedure

Kasm v. Lynnel

975 So. 2d 560, 2008 WL 373618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 1727189

Cited 1 times | Published

for fees pursuant to rule 9.400(b). Although rule 9.600(c)(1) is undoubtedly an invaluable tool in a

Category: Appellate Procedure

First Union National Bank v. Turney

832 So. 2d 768, 2002 WL 214967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2002 | Docket: 1336055

Cited 1 times | Published

to the control of the [supreme] court." Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(a). See also Fla. R.App. P. 9.310(a). First

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800

761 So. 2d 1015, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 530, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1989, 1999 WL 1029285

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1999 | Docket: 64798487

Cited 1 times | Published

the transcript within 5 days of its receipt. Rule 9.600 Jurisdiction of Lower Tribunal Pending Review

Category: Appellate Procedure

Swartz v. Swartz

691 So. 2d 2, 1996 WL 637664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 1727254

Cited 1 times | Published

The amended rule states, in pertinent part: RULE 9.600 JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL PENDING REVIEW

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wood v. Manatee Bay Corp.

386 So. 2d 320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1980 | Docket: 477524

Cited 1 times | Published

no jurisdiction to proceed with the case.[1] Rule 9.600 of Florida Appellate Procedure; State ex rel

Category: Appellate Procedure

Pablo Alfonso v. Jessica Gordon Alfonso

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2025 | Docket: 70186676

Published

where court retained jurisdiction under Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(c)). Treating this case as “pending”

Category: Appellate Procedure

FQS Enterprise, LLC v. B & K Factor, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2025 | Docket: 69833933

Published

See generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(f); Fla. R. App. P. 9.600.

Category: Appellate Procedure

State of Florida v. Peter Washington, Jr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2025 | Docket: 69660853

Published

enough for the trial court to rule. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b). The OSP could have preserved the issue

Category: Appellate Procedure

State of Florida v. Peter Washington, Jr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2025 | Docket: 69660853

Published

enough for the trial court to rule. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b). The OSP could have preserved the issue

Category: Appellate Procedure

Joshua Alexis Justiniano-Nazario v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2025 | Docket: 69574751

Published

matters relating to these appeals. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a). It also urged us to certify conflict

Category: Appellate Procedure

Edmond Weeks and Tamara Casey v. Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2024 | Docket: 69234348

Published

we were to relinquish jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.600(b), as we are permitted to do, giving the trial

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Miami Beach v. Victor Guyton

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2024 | Docket: 68530213

Published

jurisdiction for such a stated purpose); Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b) (“If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Fabiola Ramirez v. Dominick Marzano

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2024 | Docket: 68403492

Published

despite the mother’s pending appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(c)(1) (“In family law matters … [t]he lower

Category: Appellate Procedure

JUSTIN VON RAMPE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2024 | Docket: 68321816

Published

336 So. 3d 738, 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022); Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a). The motion to supplement the record

Category: Appellate Procedure

Haslauer v. Haslauer

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68313502

Published

the award separately reviewable by motion under Rule 9.600(c)(3). See generally Nolan v. Nolan, 188 So.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Michael Johnson v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2024 | Docket: 68290246

Published

written order of revocation.”). 2 See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a) (providing the trial court with concurrent

Category: Appellate Procedure

R.M.A., a Juvenile v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2024 | Docket: 68238493

Published

and conditions of probation.”); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b) (“If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

JACQUELINE RIVERA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2022 | Docket: 63198515

Published

reentry of the written order of probation. Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a); Escobar v. State, 189 So. 3d 1029, 1031

Category: Appellate Procedure

CHARLES MARIE WITHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2021 | Docket: 45654210

Published

have jurisdiction to enter the order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a); cf., Escobar v. State, 189 So. 3d 1029

Category: Appellate Procedure

Michael A. Hardy, Former Husband v. Kimberly Hardy, Former Wife

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2019 | Docket: 16168745

Published

2d 715, 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (noting Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(c) authorizes entry of orders necessary

Category: Appellate Procedure

Moody v. Moody

250 So. 3d 770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2018 | Docket: 64684252

Published

which is also part of this review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(c)(3). II. We review the trial court's adoption

Category: Appellate Procedure

DAVID STEPHEN REIDY v. LIUDMYLA Y. REIDY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2017 | Docket: 6244890

Published

4th DCA 1995), which “recognized that under rule 9.600(c), a court might properly award temporary alimony

Category: Appellate Procedure

Department of Revenue v. Vanamburg

174 So. 3d 640, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13989, 2015 WL 5512955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2015 | Docket: 60250448

Published

clerical errors in the original FAPSO. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(a). The fact that the ALJ was likely unaware

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616692

Published

- 41 - RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL

Category: Appellate Procedure

Fallon Rahima Jallali v. Knightsbridge Village Homeowners' Association, Inc.

152 So. 3d 808, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20089, 2014 WL 6910686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2014 | Docket: 2613287

Published

(citations omitted); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.600. A pending appeal does not entirely

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

183 So. 3d 245, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3296, 2014 WL 5714099

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2014 | Docket: 2593366

Published

contrary. Committee Notes [No Change] RULE 9.600. JURISDICTION OF LOWER TRIBUNAL PENDING REVIEW

Category: Appellate Procedure

Beliveau v. State

144 So. 3d 634, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12215, 2014 WL 3882457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2014 | Docket: 839426

Published

court under the supervisory control provided in rule 9.600(a). 5 . The Public Defender for

Category: Appellate Procedure

Yampol v. Turnberry Isle South Condominium Association Inc., Etc.

143 So. 3d 1144, 2014 WL 3844028, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 761298

Published

the relinquishment, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.600, this Court ultimately denied further relinquishment

Category: Appellate Procedure

Horowitz v. Horowitz

139 So. 3d 929, 2014 WL 1908927, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2014 | Docket: 60241238

Published

modification petition and issue orders consistent with Rule 9.600(c). It may not, however, enter a final judgment

Category: Appellate Procedure

Yampol v. Turnberry Isle South Condominium Ass'n

137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257525, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 60240180

Published

enter the November 19, 2013, order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600 (“If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hash v. Moore

122 So. 3d 1004, 2013 WL 5630036, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16491

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2013 | Docket: 60234536

Published

order, the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(c)(3); Carrithers v. Cornett’s Spirit of

Category: Appellate Procedure

Williams v. State

98 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 4748161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2012 | Docket: 60312265

Published

aspects of Williams’ underlying appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(a) (granting lower tribunal concurrent jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bonura

95 So. 3d 262, 2012 WL 2120923, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2012 | Docket: 60311164

Published

Second Order and the original final judgment. Rule 9.600(a) provides that the trial court shall have concurrent

Category: Appellate Procedure

Reyes v. State

83 So. 3d 974, 2012 WL 934123, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 2413730

Published

jurisdiction. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a); Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b); Liranzo-Cruzata v. State, 6 So.3d 114

Category: Appellate Procedure

Mansuri-Mason v. State

98 So. 3d 68, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5961, 2010 WL 1728921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2010 | Docket: 60312523

Published

1981). In Taylor, the Fifth District relied on rule 9.600(a)2 to hold that the trial court’s concurrent

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hernandez v. Hernandez

924 So. 2d 853, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1799, 2006 WL 335026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 64843249

Published

child support pending appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b) (“If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Pace v. State

919 So. 2d 545, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20149, 2005 WL 3500030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2005 | Docket: 64842029

Published

So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b). PETITION DENIED. SHARP, W. and GRIFFIN

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hilton v. State

919 So. 2d 520, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19777, 2005 WL 3409583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 64842023

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(a); Denson v. State, 775 So.2d 288 (Fla.2000).

Category: Appellate Procedure

Carneal v. Carneal

873 So. 2d 562, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7071, 2004 WL 1124922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2004 | Docket: 64830702

Published

court jurisdiction pending an appeal provides: Rule 9.600. Jurisdiction of Lower Tribunal Pending Review

Category: Appellate Procedure

Berger v. Berger

813 So. 2d 233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4477, 2002 WL 506867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2002 | Docket: 64814149

Published

Campbell, 436 So.2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (under Rule 9.600(c), the trial court has “a limited jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Peacock v. State

798 So. 2d 909, 2001 WL 1386088

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2001 | Docket: 1668235

Published

the trial court would be appropriate. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. Robert P. Kaye

256 F.3d 1251, 29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2107, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15543

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 396919

Published

(Fla. 4th D.C.A.1999); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b). Although the gag order, on its face

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. Robert P. Kaye

256 F.3d 1251

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 396920

Published

839, 840 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1999); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b). Although the gag order, on its face

Category: Appellate Procedure

Davenport v. State

751 So. 2d 141, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 453, 2000 WL 51884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2000 | Docket: 64794970

Published

576 So.2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). And see Fla. R.App. P. 9.600. ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY

Category: Appellate Procedure

Nixon v. State

748 So. 2d 376, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 350, 2000 WL 35858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64793838

Published

immediately, to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800 and Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(d), and explaining that “under the new rule

Category: Appellate Procedure

Landa v. Landa

740 So. 2d 601, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12509, 1999 WL 743751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1999 | Docket: 64790687

Published

even if those services relate to an appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(c)(1). GROSS, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur

Category: Appellate Procedure

Carter v. State

739 So. 2d 730, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12095, 1999 WL 770235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 64790328

Published

3.800(a) while an appeal is pending. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(d); Johnson v. State, 697 So.2d 1304 (Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Washington v. State

734 So. 2d 1085, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4618, 1999 WL 71390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1999 | Docket: 64788724

Published

v. State, 697 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Rule 9.600(d) specifically states that a trial court retains

Category: Appellate Procedure

Smallwood v. Perez

735 So. 2d 490, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 17274, 1998 WL 1083620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1998 | Docket: 64788843

Published

Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added); see Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(c)(1); Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate

Category: Appellate Procedure

L.G. v. State

702 So. 2d 1337, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13961, 1997 WL 761933

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1997 | Docket: 64777412

Published

before the November 27th order was rendered. Fla. R.App. P. 9.600; Britt v. State, 687 So.2d 930 (Fla. 5th

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rodriquez v. State

700 So. 2d 79, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845, 1997 WL 593940

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776075

Published

circuit court to handle the motions. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b)_ [T]he county need not be given an opportunity

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments To Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.140 & 9.600

657 So. 2d 897, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 283, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 982, 1995 WL 355581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1995 | Docket: 64757627

Published

order of the Court that the proposed amendment to Rule 9.600 should be adopted at this time, effective upon

Category: Appellate Procedure

State v. Soles

661 So. 2d 62, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6108, 1995 WL 334330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 64759150

Published

though the state had filed its notice of appeal. Rule 9.600(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides

Category: Appellate Procedure

Randolph v. Randolph

618 So. 2d 770, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5346, 1993 WL 153761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 64696433

Published

orders and judgments in the present case. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(c).1 Jurisdiction to enforce the fees award

Category: Appellate Procedure

Lurie v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

605 So. 2d 1023, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10891, 1992 WL 282100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1992 | Docket: 64670150

Published

proceed with specifically stated matters.” See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b); Palma Sola Habour Condominium, Inc. v

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

603 So. 2d 425, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 296, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1054, 1992 WL 99236

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1992 | Docket: 64669263

Published

Appellate-Procedure. Subsection — (b)(2)—is—similar—to—Rule 9.600(b), Florida Rules-of-Appellate Procedure. RULE

Category: Appellate Procedure

Russell v. Scott

579 So. 2d 881, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4753, 1991 WL 85539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658822

Published

jurisdiction to a trial court for such a purpose. Fla.R. App.P. 9.600(b). Because this court entered an order authorizing

Category: Appellate Procedure

Yurgel v. Yurgel

546 So. 2d 746, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1609, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3797, 1989 WL 73851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1989 | Docket: 64643830

Published

relinquishing jurisdiction for a particular purpose. Fla. R.App.P. 9.600 & 9.130(f). Wife’s petition to modify, although

Category: Appellate Procedure

Florida Bar re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure & Rules of Judicial Administration

509 So. 2d 276, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2684, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 286

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1987 | Docket: 64628186

Published

prescribed period. [[Image here]] Rule 9.600 is amended to read as follows: Rule 9.600. Jurisdiction of Lower Tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Palm Beach County v. Boca Development Associates, Ltd.

485 So. 2d 449, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 533, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1986 | Docket: 64618182

Published

judgment. We agree. *451Our starting point is Rule 9.600(b), Fla.R. App.P, which provides: Further Proceedings

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gulley v. State

436 So. 2d 1042, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1983 | Docket: 64599236

Published

the case and enter the amended final order. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600. Our awareness of the further proceedings

Category: Appellate Procedure

Calehuff v. Calehuff

433 So. 2d 1021, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1983 | Docket: 64597988

Published

jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees and costs. See Rule 9.600(c), Fla.R.App.P. Turning to the merits of the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hilsman v. Hilsman

421 So. 2d 770, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1982 | Docket: 64593161

Published

providing for family support. However, pursuant to Rule 9.600, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the trial

Category: Appellate Procedure

Whitehead v. Linkous

395 So. 2d 301, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64581037

Published

Extend Time for Filing of Appellant’s Reply Brief. Rule 9.600(a), Fla.R. App.P., provides that the lower tribunal

Category: Appellate Procedure

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Smolensky ex rel. Smolensky

391 So. 2d 355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1980 | Docket: 64579270

Published

procedural matters; therefore, rule 9.600(a) does not apply here. Rule 9.600(b) provides that when the lower

Category: Appellate Procedure

Admiral Insurance Co. v. Palmer

390 So. 2d 122, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1980 | Docket: 64578796

Published

earlier ruling as to the coverage issue. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600; Waltham A. Condominium Association v. Village

Category: Appellate Procedure

Florida Bar

387 So. 2d 920, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1980 | Docket: 64577996

Published

appellate court is a factor to be considered. 6. Rule 9.600(a) is amended as follows: (a) Concurrent Jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Laurich v. State

376 So. 2d 408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1979 | Docket: 64572598

Published

revoking appellants’ supersedeas bond. Cf. Fla.R.App.P. 9.600. The cause is reversed and remanded for proceedings

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Florida Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure

374 So. 2d 981, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4794

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1979 | Docket: 64571875

Published

Appellate Procedure. Subsection (b)(2) is similar to Rule 9.600(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. RULE

Category: Appellate Procedure