2010 Georgia Code 9-11-118 Case Law
Home
Menu


Jacksonville Attorney
Graham W. Syfert, Esq.

1650 Margaret St, Ste. 302, PMB#264
Jacksonville, FL 32204


Phone: 904-383-7448
E-mail: graham@syfert.com
Fax: 904-638-4726

Enter Code Number:
16-14-4 or 16-13-32

One Click Case Law for § 9-11-118
O.C.G.A. § 9-11-115 <-- --> O.C.G.A. §9-11-119



2010 Georgia Code

TITLE 9 - CIVIL PRACTICE

CHAPTER 11 - CIVIL PRACTICE ACT
ARTICLE 10 - FORMS
§ 9-11-118 - Form of complaint for interpleader and declaratory relief

O.C.G.A. 9-11-118 (2010)
9-11-118. Form of complaint for interpleader and declaratory relief




IN THE COURT OF COUNTY


STATE OF GEORGIA






A.B., )
Plaintiff )

)
v. ) Civil action

) File no.

C.D., E.F., and X.Y., ) (Clerk will insert
Defendants ) number.)


COMPLAINT


The defendant C.D., herein named, is a resident of (street),
(city), County, Georgia, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this
court. (Add appropriate statement about domicile of remaining defendants.)


1.


On or about June 1, 1965, plaintiff issued to G.H. a policy of life
insurance whereby plaintiff promised to pay to K.L. as beneficiary the sum of
$10,000.00 upon the death of G.H. The policy required the payment by G.H. of a
stipulated premium on June 1, 1966, and annually thereafter as a condition
precedent to its continuance in force.


2.


No part of the premium due June 1, 1966, was ever paid and the policy
ceased to have any force or effect after July 1, 1966.


3.


Thereafter, on September 1, 1966, G.H. and K.L. died as the result of a
collision between a locomotive and the automobile in which G.H. and K.L. were
riding.


4.


Defendant C.D. is the duly appointed and acting executor of the will of
G.H., defendant E.F. is the duly appointed and acting executor of the will of
K.L., and defendant X.Y. claims to have been duly designated as beneficiary of
said policy in place of K.L.


5.


Each of the defendants, C.D., E.F., and X.Y., is claiming that the
above-mentioned policy was in full force and effect at the time of the death
of G.H.; each of them is claiming to be the only person entitled to receive
payment of the amount of the policy and has made demand for payment thereof.


6.


By reason of these conflicting claims of the defendants, plaintiff is in
great doubt as to which defendant is entitled to be paid the amount of the
policy if it was in force at the time of death of G.H.

Wherefore, plaintiff demands that the court adjudge:

(1) That none of the defendants is entitled to recover from plaintiff
the amount of said policy or any part thereof.

(2) That each of the defendants be restrained from instituting any
action against plaintiff for the recovery of the amount of said policy or any
part thereof.

(3) That, if the court shall determine that said policy was in force at
the death of G.H., the defendants be required to interplead and settle between
themselves their rights to the money due under said policy and that plaintiff
be discharged from all liability in the premises except to the person whom the
court shall adjudge entitled to the amount of said policy.

(4) That plaintiff recover its costs.





Attorney for plaintiff

Address

Georgia Caselaw Research

Google Scholar

Graham Syfert - Jacksonville Lawyer

Home * About Graham Syfert * Contact Us * Map and Location
Graham's Personal Blog


Graham W. Syfert, Esq., P.A.
Phone: 904-383-7448
Fax: 904-638-4726

graham@syfert.com