CopyCited 28 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
...ssion by permission of the owner of the property on which it was located. After a lengthy trial, the jury found each boy 30 percent, and Marks Brothers 70 percent negligent in the causation of the accident. In the separate verdicts required by Section 768.22 Florida Statutes (1977), it awarded damages, as reduced by the 30 percent comparative negligence, of $980,000 to the mother and father $245,000 to each parent for the death of each child and a total of $206,500 to the decedents' estates, $105,000 to Jorge's and $101,500 to Martin's....
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 2013 WL 535417, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 249
...§
768.20, Fla. Stat. (2008). The Act also provides for damages that may be recovered by the survivors, see §
768.21, Fla. Stat. (2008), and requires that “[t]he amounts awarded to each survivor and to the estate shall be stated separately in the verdict.” §
768.22, Fla....
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...othing as survivors. The repeated instructions indicated to the jury that it may award the total damages to the decedent's personal representative for the benefit of his estate and survivors. These charges conflicted with the instruction [as well as Section 768.22, Florida Statutes (1975)] that the jury should separately state the award for each survivor....
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2003 WL 21196836
...4-1.5 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar [1] and *448 ignores the potential conflict of interest that is created when separate survivors hire separate counsel to prosecute a claim for the damages that each is entitled to under the statute. See § 768.22, Fla....
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 46704
...urvivor's claims is the provision of section
768.20 which states: "A defense that would bar or reduce a survivor's recovery if he were the plaintiff may *898 be asserted against him, but shall not affect the recovery of any other survivor." Finally, section
768.22 provides: "The amounts awarded to each survivor and to the estate shall be stated separately in the verdict." The personal nature of the survivor's cause of action was recognized in Rimer v....
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...Section
768.18 specifies that the definitions contained therein shall be applicable throughout the Wrongful Death Act. The word "survivors" is defined therein and is used throughout the balance of the act. Thus, Section
768.20 requires the complaint to be brought for the benefit of the decedent's "survivors" and estate, and Section
768.22 envisions a verdict in separate amounts for each "survivor" and the estate....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 667741
...laims is the provision of section
768.20 which states, "A defense that would bar or reduce a survivor's recovery if she or he were the plaintiff may be asserted against the survivor, but shall not affect the recovery of any other survivor." Finally, section
768.22 provides, "The amounts awarded to each survivor and to the estate shall be stated separately...." [2] Rule 5.120(a), Florida Probate Rules, permits the appointment of an administrator ad litem in the following circumstances: When it is necessary that the estate of a decedent ......
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239
...First, Petitioners claim that by granting the motion to amend without holding a hearing, the trial court failed to provide the procedural due process required by rule 1.190(f). Second, Petitioners assert that Respondent failed to comply with rule 1.190(f), section
429.297(1), Florida Statutes (2015), and section
768.22, Florida Statutes (2015)....
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9739, 2015 WL 3903536
...Requiring production of privileged materials may result in “irreparable harm such as might be occasioned by an order that would let the ‘cat out of the bag.’” Id.; see also Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage,
509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987), superseded by statute on other grounds, §
768.22, Fla....
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...questions presented by the facts at hand. There may be cases in
which summary dismissal would be proper based on different
facts”).
The current version of section
768.28(9)(d) was enacted in
2006. Ch. 2006-234, Laws of Fla. No appellate court has
interpreted that section. Section
768.22(9)(a), a similar provision,
grants immunity from liability and suit to individual state officers,
agents, and employees acting within the scope of employment if,
inter alia, they do not act “in a manner exhibiting wanton and
willful...