Cases from cite.case.law:

DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, v. R. MORGAN,, 890 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . held that the architect was precluded from, asserting a lien because it was in violation of section 713.03 . . .

NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, v. FORTUNE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 320 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 713.03. . . .

O. KELLER, v. NEWMAN SONS, INC,, 756 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . shall not pay any money on account of a direct contract prior to recording of the notice provided in s. 713.03 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. SPRINGS LAND INVESTMENTS LTD., 695 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . McIntosh and Associates filed a claim of lien on both parcels under § 713.03 for the amount Springs Land . . .

In CJW LIMITED, INC. W. GRANT, CJW v. I. B. DAVIS A., 172 B.R. 675 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Likewise, because § 713.03(4)(a) governs each item required for perfection, referring to a contract with . . .

ALFRED KARRAM, III, INC. a v. A. CANTOR,, 634 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . With regard to Appellant’s mechanic’s lien claim, section 713.03, Florida Statutes, provides: (1) Any . . . With respect to the judgment’s denial of the lien claim, subpart (2) of section 713.03 specifically limits . . .

J. CABARROCAS, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, 840 F. Supp. 888 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . Stat. 713.03 As support for its argument that Plaintiff had no contract or direct contract to perform . . . This, in turn, would trigger the application of Fla.Stat. 713.03(2), which would grant Plaintiff a lien . . . Stat. 713.03(1) is, again, a mixed question of law and fact.. . . . evidence that the services performed by Plaintiff improved the property within the meaning of Fla.Stat. 713.03 . . .

DUVAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS, INC. v. E. VAUGHN RIVERS, INC. a a, 620 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . owner, a contractor, a subcontractor or a sub-subcontractor; and professional lienors under section 713.03 . . .

In KECSKES, FAIRWAY GOLFVIEW HOMES, INC. v. KECSKES,, 136 B.R. 578 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . The Petition expressly alleged that Kecskes willfully violated Sections 713.31 and 713.03, Florida Statutes . . .

O KON AND COMPANY, INC. v. A. RIEDEL, C. Jr. G. d b a RSW a, 588 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . alternatively that with respect to O’Kon’s claim of lien, that the mechanic’s lien statute itself, section 713.03 . . .

MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. FIRST INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY CORP., 576 So. 2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . based on our conclusion that Miller does not have a valid mechanics’ lien pursuant to either section 713.03 . . . In construing section 713.03, Florida Statutes (1987), we find that it is not applicable to the instant . . . Section 713.03 provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) Any person who performs services as architect . . . Section 713.03 is not applicable for several reasons. . . . Second, section 713.03(1) requires that the real property be improved. . . .

In HOWE HOWE v. F. VAUGHAN,, 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Id. at ¶ 713.03, at 7-205. . D-1 Enterprises, Inc. v. . . .

In HOWE HOWE v. F. VAUGHAN,, 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Id. at ¶ 713.03, at 7-205. . D-1 Enterprises, Inc. v. . . .

ROBERT M. SWEDROE, ARCHITECT PLANNERS, A. I. A. P. A. v. FIRST AMERICAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION,, 565 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The applicable provision, section 713.03, Florida Statutes (1987), provides: (1)Any person who performs . . . intended use, such services were not related to improvement of real property within the intent of section 713.03 . . . arbitration proceeding is not a lienable contract item under the “direct contract” provisions of section 713.03 . . . Subsection (2) of section 713.03 authorizes an architect who has a direct contract with the owner to . . . services and report preparation were related to improvement of the property as contemplated by section 713.03 . . .

In H. LAWLER, H. LAWLER, v. GUILD, HAGEN CLARK, LTD., 106 B.R. 943 (N.D. Tex. 1989)

. . . Accord 13 Moore and King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶713.03[1] at 7-204 to 7-205 (14th ed. 1977); 9 King, . . .

MARKS LANDSCAPE PAVING CO. a v. R. P. B. INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. a, 552 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . separate and stands alone and only § 713.06(2) mandates a notice to owner, why did the legislature under § 713.03 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR In ADVISORY OPINION- NONLAWYER PREPARATION OF NOTICE TO OWNER AND NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR, 544 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1989)

. . . Lienors in privity (§ 713.05), professional lienors (§ 713.03), and lienors who make the site suitable . . .

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. v. MAGNAVOX COMPANY, 707 F. Supp. 717 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . to first official action not permitted unless for limited purpose of discovering field of search); § 713.03 . . .

O KON AND COMPANY, INC. v. A. RIEDEL, C. Jr. G. d b a RSW, 540 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . To interpret the phrase “[a]ny person who performs services as architect ...” in section 713.03, Florida . . . We agree with appellees that section 713.03(2) should be read in pari materia with section 481.-203, . . . Also, as appel-lees argue, section 713.03(2) provides that only an architect with a direct contract ( . . . Neither the provisions in section 713.03(1) nor section 713.03(2) allow O’Kon to file a mechanic’s lien . . . (Emphasis supplied.) 713.03 Liens for professional services.— (1) Any person who performs services as . . .

SEWER VIEWER, INC. v. SHAWNEE SUNSET DEVELOPERS, INC. a d b a, 454 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . confusion inherent in the mechanic's lien statutes, our sister court concluded that each of sections 713.03 . . .

PEMBROKE VILLAS OF BROWARD, INC. a v. RAYMUNDO,, 447 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . owner, a contractor, a subcontractor, or a sub-subcontractor, or a professional lienor under Section 713.03 . . .

BRACCO, v. CARDOZO G., 434 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . owner, a contractor, a subcontractor or a sub-subcontractor; or (f) A professional lienor under s. 713.03 . . .

HUTTON, v. L ENTERPRISES, INC., 431 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . professional engineer, he is exempt from the requirements of furnishing the affidavit by virtue of section 713.03 . . .

CANTERINO, v. WILSON,, 562 F. Supp. 106 (C.C.W.D. Ky. 1983)

. . . This Court, in its Memorandum Opinion, interpreted Internal Management Directive (IMD) 713.03(D)(1) as . . . IMD 713.03(D)(1), Exhibit PX — 22, specifically limits the issuance of incident reports to “... only . . . In this action, the record reflects that the Kentucky Department of Corrections, through IMD 713.03(D . . . officer may only issue an incident report if he or she personally witnessed the incident pursuant to IMD 713.03 . . .

GRINDLAYS BANK LIMITED, v. CHARLES BASSETT ASSOCIATES, INC., 378 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Compare Section 5355, C.G.L. (1927), with Sections 713.01(4), (12), 713.03, Florida Statutes (1977). . . .

In LOWERY BROTHERS, INC. a S. AVDOYAN, v. DAVIS WATER WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 589 F.2d 851 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . owner, a contractor, a subcontractor, or a subsubcontractor, or (f) A professional lienor under s. 713.03 . . .

AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. DAVIS WATER WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. d b a a J. Jr. E. J. d b a a J., 358 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Thus, § 713.03 concerns itself with liens for professional services, § 713.04 applies to subdivision . . . Thus we see that: (1) § 713.03 specifically states that no notice is required. (2) § 713.04 is silent . . . The appellant also argues that since both § 713.03 and § 713.05 specifically state that no notice is . . . and stands alone and only § 713.-06(2) mandates a notice to owner, why did the legislature under § 713.03 . . .

ARCHITECTONICS, INC. v. SALEM- AMERICAN VENTURES, INC., 350 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 713.03, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. PUTNAM, 335 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Florida Statutes, by virtue of an exemption granted for professional services as set forth in section 713.03 . . .

C. DYKEMA, v. TRANS STATE INDUSTRIES, INC., 303 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . The appellant was not paid in full and, on December 7, 1972, as provided by Section 713.03(3), Florida . . .

S. WARSHAW, v. PYMS, 266 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Section 713.03 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. entitled: “Liens for professional services,” in subsection (1) provides . . . Subsection (2) of § 713.03, on which the plaintiff is proceeding in this case, is applicable where services . . . plaintiff was not entitled to a lien because he did not have a “direct contract” within the meaning of § 713.03 . . .

KOHLER- CAMPBELL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, 189 F. Supp. 818 (W.D.N.C. 1960)

. . . Department assessed an additional tax in the amount of $4,500, and this amount together with interest of $713.03 . . .