Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 702.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 702.11 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 702.11

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 702
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND STATUTORY LIENS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 702.11
702.11 Adequate protections for lost, destroyed, or stolen notes in mortgage foreclosure.
(1) In connection with a mortgage foreclosure, the following constitute reasonable means of providing adequate protection under s. 673.3091, if so found by the court:
(a) A written indemnification agreement by a person reasonably believed sufficiently solvent to honor such an obligation;
(b) A surety bond;
(c) A letter of credit issued by a financial institution;
(d) A deposit of cash collateral with the clerk of the court; or
(e) Such other security as the court may deem appropriate under the circumstances.

Any security given shall be on terms and in amounts set by the court, for a time period through the running of the statute of limitations for enforcement of the underlying note, and conditioned to indemnify and hold harmless the maker of the note against any loss or damage, including principal, interest, and attorney fees and costs, that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the note.

(2) Any person who wrongly claims to be the holder of or pursuant to s. 673.3011 to be entitled to enforce a lost, stolen, or destroyed note and causes the mortgage secured thereby to be foreclosed is liable to the actual holder of the note, without limitation to any adequate protections given, for actual damages suffered together with attorney fees and costs of the actual holder of the note in enforcing rights under this subsection. In addition, the actual holder of the note may pursue recovery directly against any adequate protections given.
(a) The actual holder of the note is not required to pursue recovery against the maker of the note or any guarantor thereof as a condition precedent to pursuing remedies under this section.
(b) This section does not limit or restrict the ability of the actual holder of the note to pursue any other claims or remedies it may have against the maker, the person who wrongly claimed to be the holder, or any person who facilitated or participated in the claim to the note or enforcement thereof.
History.s. 7, ch. 2013-137.

F.S. 702.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 702.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 702.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 702.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 702.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DEBISH, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. ON BEHALF OF REGISTERED HOLDERS OF FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,, 240 So. 3d 16 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . (quoting § 702.11(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JEPSEN,, 289 F. Supp. 3d 971 (N.D. Iowa 2018)

. . . Opinion of Iowa Court of Appeals, Defendant's Exhibit E, 3 (citing IOWA CODE § 702.11 ). . . .

IN RE A. FAILLA, N. A. N. v. N. A., 838 F.3d 1170 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 702.01-702.11. . . .

IN RE A. FAILLA, N. A. N. v. N. A., 838 F.3d 1170 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 702.01-702.11. . . .

U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N. A. GSAMP v. V. ANGELONI,, 199 So. 3d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We do not consider the application, if any, of section 702.11, Florida Statutes (2014), because the homeowners . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CSAB v. BENOIT,, 190 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .; see also § 702.11, Fla. . . .

BLITCH v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 185 So. 3d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 702.11(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 190 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2016)

. . . with comments suggesting that subdivision (d) of the rule be amended to add a reference to section 702.11 . . . Section 702.11, Florida Statutes, also addresses adequate protection for lost, destroyed, or stolen notes . . . Stat. (2015)., Accordingly, because both sections 673.3091(2) and 702.11(1) are important provisions . . . Adequate protection as required and identified under sections 673.3091(2) and 702.11(1), Florida Statutes . . . Adequate protection as required by sections' 702.11 (2013) and 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes (2013), . . .

G. REID, v. COMPASS BANK,, 164 So. 3d 49 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . after July 1, 2013; however, the amendments to s. 702.10, Florida Statutes, and the creation of s. 702.11 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 153 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Adequate protection as required by sections 702.11 (2013) and 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes (2013), must . . .

DELIA, v. GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 161 So. 3d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 702.11(1), Florida Statutes (2013), explains the concept of adequate protection: 702.11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LYNCH,, 611 F.3d 932 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . Iowa Code §§ 702.11(1); 708.2(4). . . .

ASARCO LLC, LLC, v. AMERICAS MINING CORPORATION,, 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . This reduced Navigant’s conclusion to a range of $611.21 and $702.11. Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOBBS, v. Jr., 449 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . Compare Iowa Code § 711.2 (robbery in the first degree), § 724.26 (possession of a firearm by felon), § 702.11 . . .

PHILLIPS, v. IOWA, Mt., 185 F. Supp. 2d 992 (N.D. Iowa 2002)

. . . Id. at 196-97 (citing Iowa Code § 702.11). . . . Iowa Code § 702.11. . . . Instead, the forcible felonies provided in section 702.11 are capable of being categorized as either . . . Compare id. § 902.12 (listing offenses subject to 100% provision), with id. § 702.11 (defining forcible . . .

CEASER, v. AULT,, 169 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Iowa 2001)

. . . See Iowa Code §§ 702.11 (classifying certain offenses as forcible felonies), 708.4 (willful injury), . . . Id. at 196-97 (citing Iowa Code § 702.11). . . . Iowa Code § 702.11. . . . Instead, the forcible felonies provided in section 702.11 are capable of being categorized as either . . . Compare id. § 902.12 (listing offenses subject to 85% rule), with id. § 702.11 (defining forcible felony . . .

S. SEILER, v. A. THALACKER,, 101 F.3d 536 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . Iowa Code § 702.11. . . . Iowa Code § 702.11. . . .

K. RAGLAND, v. E. HUNDLEY,, 79 F.3d 702 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 702.11; 707.2 (West 1993). . . . Iowa Code Ann. § 702.11 (West 1993). . . .

J. VERDERANE, v. JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, In-, 772 F.2d 775 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 702.11 to .394 (1985). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ELADE REALTY CORPORATION, 157 F.2d 979 (2d Cir. 1946)

. . . Reg. pp. 1830, 1831. 702.11(a) (2) (i). § 702.11(c) (1). . . .