Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 679.625 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 679.625 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 679.625 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 679.625

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 679
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SECURED TRANSACTIONS
View Entire Chapter
679.625 Remedies for failure to comply with article.
(1) If it is established that a secured party is not proceeding in accordance with this chapter, a court may order or restrain collection, enforcement, or disposition of collateral on appropriate terms and conditions. This subsection does not preclude a debtor other than a consumer and a secured party, or two or more secured parties in other than a consumer transaction, from agreeing in a signed record that the debtor or secured party must first provide to the alleged offending secured party notice of a violation of this chapter and opportunity to cure before commencing any legal proceeding under this section.
(2) Subject to subsections (3), (4), and (6), a person is liable for damages in the amount of any loss caused by a failure to comply with this chapter, including damages suffered by the debtor resulting from the debtor’s inability to obtain, or increased costs of, alternative financing, but not including consequential, special, or penal damages, unless the conduct giving rise to the failure constitutes an independent claim under the laws of this state other than this chapter and then only to the extent otherwise recoverable under law.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. 679.628:
(a) A person who, at the time of the failure, was a debtor, was an obligor, or held a security interest in or other lien on the collateral may recover damages under subsection (2) for the person’s loss; and
(b) If the collateral is consumer goods, a person who was a debtor or a secondary obligor at the time a secured party failed to comply with this part may recover for that failure in any event an amount not less than the credit service charge plus 10 percent of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential plus 10 percent of the cash price.
(4) A debtor whose deficiency is eliminated under s. 679.626 may recover damages for the loss of any surplus. However, a debtor or secondary obligor whose deficiency is eliminated or reduced under s. 679.626 may not otherwise recover under subsection (2) for noncompliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance.
(5) In lieu of damages recoverable under subsection (2), the debtor, consumer obligor, or person named as a debtor in a filed record, as applicable, may recover $500 in each case from a person who:
(a) Fails to comply with s. 679.2081;
(b) Fails to comply with s. 679.209;
(c) Files a record that the person is not entitled to file under s. 679.509(1);
(d) Fails to cause the secured party of record to file or send a termination statement as required by s. 679.513(1) or (3) after receipt of a signed record notifying the person of such noncompliance;
(e) Fails to comply with s. 679.616(2)(a) and whose failure is part of a pattern, or consistent with a practice, of noncompliance; or
(f) Fails to comply with s. 679.616(2)(b).
(6) A debtor or consumer obligor may recover damages under subsection (2) and, in addition, $500 in each case from a person who, without reasonable cause, fails to comply with a request under s. 679.210. A recipient of a request under s. 679.210 which never claimed an interest in the collateral or obligations that are the subject of a request under that section has a reasonable excuse for failure to comply with the request within the meaning of this subsection.
(7) If a secured party fails to comply with a request regarding a list of collateral or a statement of account under s. 679.210, the secured party may claim a security interest only as shown in the list or statement included in the request as against a person who is reasonably misled by the failure.
History.s. 7, ch. 2001-198; s. 14, ch. 2002-242; s. 118, ch. 2025-92.

F.S. 679.625 on Google Scholar

F.S. 679.625 on CourtListener

Amendments to 679.625


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 679.625

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

S. Developers & Earthmoving, Inc. v. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp., 56 So. 3d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2216, 2011 WL 637332

...nts existed. First, Southern had not abused its privilege to amend because it had not sought leave to amend its answer at any time prior to the filing of the motion at issue. Second, Southern’s proposed amendment would not have been futile because section 679.625(4) specifically provides that “[a] debtor whose deficiency is eliminated under s....
Copy

United States v. Williams, 476 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15774, 2007 WL 685954

...Treasury Department on April 20, 2005. ( See id. at p. 17; Doc. No. 72-5, p. 3). [6] *1379 For these reasons, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff on the issue of whether the document labeled "Bill of Exchange" violates the False Claims Act. III. Section 679.625, Florida Statutes Count V of the Complaint states that Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages for a violation of Section 679.625, Florida Statutes....
...The Court finds that summary judgment must be granted on Plaintiff's claim. Florida law provides that a person named as a debtor in a filed record may recover damages from a person who, inter alia, "[f]iles a record that the person is not entitled to file under s[ection] 679.509(1)." § 679.625(5)(c), Fla....
...ming bound as a debtor in, a valid security agreement. § 679.509(1) & (2), Fla. Stat. (2004). The United States correctly contends that Document Number XXXXXXXXXXXX constitutes a record filed by Defendants which they were not entitled to file under Section 679.625....
...gistry and any other associated or linked databases or records; 4. Pursuant to Counts IV and V of the Complaint, the Court finds that Defendants David Williams and Janet Bridley are liable for the appropriate penalties under the False Claims Act and Section 679.625, Florida Statutes; and 5....
Copy

Muro v. Hermanos Auto Wholesalers, Inc., 514 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 64 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 24, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74418, 2007 WL 2729810

...Since Defendant's notification lacks some of the required elements of that section, it fails as a matter of law and Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages. D. Damages Under 679.614 Proof of a violation of § 679.614 entitles Plaintiff to recover damages in accordance with § 679.625(3)(b), which provides in pertinent part that "[I]f the collateral is consumer goods, a person who was a debtor ....
...charge plus 10 percent of the principal amount of the obligation. . . ." The Agreement and the RISC state that Plaintiff financed $15,761.83, and that Plaintiffs total finance charge equals $8,227.37. Accordingly, Plaintiffs statutory damages under § 679.625(3)(b) were $9,803.55....
Copy

Williams v. Delray Auto Mall, Inc., 916 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (S.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2013 WL 64616, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3505

...Defendants look to the previous counts pled by Williams in her Amended Complaint in determining that equitable relief should not be available. Williams contends that Revised Article 9 of the UCC provides for injunctive relief for failure to comply with the article. While Williams is correct in noting that Fla. Stat. § 679.625 provides for injunctive relief for UCC violations, the Court finds that Williams has not stated a valid claim....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.