Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 631.271 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 631.271 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 631.271 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 631.271

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE
Chapter 631
INSURER INSOLVENCY; GUARANTY OF PAYMENT
View Entire Chapter
631.271 Priority of claims.
(1) The priority of distribution of claims from the insurer’s estate shall be in accordance with the order in which each class of claims is set forth in this subsection. Every claim in each class shall be paid in full or adequate funds shall be retained for such payment before the members of the next class may receive any payment. No subclasses may be established within any class. The order of distribution of claims shall be:
(a) Class 1.
1. All of the receiver’s costs and expenses of administration.
2. All of the expenses of a guaranty association or foreign guaranty association in handling claims.
3. All of the deputy supervisor’s costs and expenses of administration incurred as a result of administrative supervision under part VI of chapter 624.
(b) Class 2.All claims under policies for losses incurred, including third-party claims, all claims against the insurer for liability for bodily injury or for injury to or destruction of tangible property which claims are not under policies, all claims of a guaranty association or foreign guaranty association, and all claims related to a patient’s health care coverage by physicians, hospitals, and other providers of a health insurer or health maintenance organization. All claims under life insurance and annuity policies, whether for death proceeds, annuity proceeds, or investment values, shall be treated as loss claims. That portion of any loss, indemnification for which is provided by other benefits or advantages recovered by the claimant, may not be included in this class, other than benefits or advantages recovered or recoverable in discharge of familial obligations of support or by way of succession at death or as proceeds of life insurance, or as gratuities. No payment by an employer to her or his employee may be treated as a gratuity.
(c) Class 3.Claims under nonassessable policies for unearned premiums or premium refunds.
(d) Class 4.Claims of the Federal Government.
(e) Class 5.Debts due to employees for services performed, to the extent that the debts do not exceed $2,000 for each employee and represent payment for services performed within 6 months before the filing of the petition for liquidation. Officers and directors are not entitled to the benefit of this priority. This priority is in lieu of any other similar priority that is authorized by law as to wages or compensation of employees.
(f) Class 6.Claims of general creditors.
(g) Class 7.Claims of any state or local government. Claims, including those of any state or local government for a penalty or forfeiture, shall be allowed in this class, but only to the extent of the pecuniary loss sustained from the act, transaction, or proceeding out of which the penalty or forfeiture arose, with reasonable and actual costs occasioned thereby. The remainder of such claims shall be postponed to the class of claims under paragraph (k).
(h) Class 8.Claims filed after the time specified in s. 631.181(3), except when ordered otherwise by the court to prevent manifest injustice, or any claims other than claims under paragraph (i) or under paragraph (k).
(i) Class 9.Surplus or contribution notes, or similar obligations, and premium refunds on assessable policies. Payments to members of domestic mutual insurance companies shall be limited in accordance with law.
(j) Class 10.Interest on allowed claims of Classes 1 through 9. The rate of interest payable on an allowed claim must accrue from the date the court enters the order of liquidation until such time as the receivership court approves the distribution. The interest rate must be calculated in accordance with s. 55.03.
(k) Class 11.The claims of shareholders or other owners.
(2) In a liquidation proceeding involving one or more reciprocal states, the order of distribution of the domiciliary state shall control as to all claims of residents of this and reciprocal states. All claims of residents of reciprocal states shall be given equal priority of payment from general assets regardless of where such assets are located.
History.s. 743, ch. 59-205; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 13, ch. 70-27; s. 1, ch. 70-439; s. 809(1st), ch. 82-243; s. 21, ch. 83-38; s. 7, ch. 85-63; s. 40, ch. 88-166; ss. 94, 187, 188, ch. 91-108; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 1, ch. 95-213; s. 405, ch. 97-102; s. 37, ch. 2012-151; s. 12, ch. 2017-143.

F.S. 631.271 on Google Scholar

F.S. 631.271 on CourtListener

Amendments to 631.271


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 631.271

Total Results: 5  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Barnett Bank v. State, Dept. of Ins., 507 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1146

...ccount." The court noted that Barnett had apparently not accepted the indemnification agreement. The court also reasoned that allowing the offset would create an unlawful preference for Barnett over Midland's other creditors, and stated that neither section 631.271 nor section 631.281, Florida Statutes (1985), permits the creation of a preference for a creditor who claims an offset....
...Thus, the $10,000 account was subject to a setoff by Barnett on April 3, the day it accepted the checks. The Department also argues that, even if Barnett is entitled to an offset within the meaning of section 631.281, that section has been impliedly limited by the 1983 enactment of section 631.271. [2] Section 631.271 created priorities for the distribution of claims....
...Under this section Barnett has a class 4 claim. The Department notes that, if Barnett is allowed an offset, their claim will be satisfied up to the amount of Midland's deposit before the claims of creditors who would normally be given priority under section 631.271. The Department argues that this result was not intended by the legislature and that section 631.271 should be read to limit the amount of offset allowed under section 631.281. We find, however, that section 631.281 was amended at the same time section 631.271 was enacted and can be applied in this case without violating the intent of section 631.271....
...The offset permitted by 631.281 is, by its very nature, a specie of preference. It requires that qualifying mutual obligations be set off against each other and that "the balance only shall be allowed or paid." Its purpose is to provide a preference to this limited extent. This is consistent with 631.271 because that section, by creating priorities of claims, also prefers some creditors over others....
Copy

Sunset Com. Bk. v. Fla. Dept. of Ins., 509 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1494

...Although Sunset Commercial Bank was thus not entitled to a self-executing offset, upon presentment of its claim to the receivership court the offset should have been allowed as a specie of preference before the general distribution of claims classified under section 631.271, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Lidsky v. Florida Dep't of Ins., 643 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8785, 1994 WL 496879

...31.001(4)(d) and dictates that few exceptions should be made to the rule that all creditors must file their claims with the receiver and share in the distribution of the assets of the estate according to the statutory priorities of distribution. See § 631.271....
Copy

First Am. Bank v. Int'l Med. Centers, Inc., 565 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5319, 1990 WL 103690

...epurchase obligation ... is unenforceable under Section 607.017(4), Florida Statutes.” The court further ruled that, even if the repurchase obligation were enforceable, “the $4.29 million claim would be limited to a class 8 priority, pursuant to Section 631.271(l)(h), Florida Statutes, as the ‘claim of a shareholder’.” (R....
...e issue of criminal usury. We express no opinion on the validity of the claimed liens. Last, the trial court says that “even if the repurchase obligation were enforceable, the $4.29 million claim would be limited to a class 8 priority, pursuant to Section 631.271(l)(h), Florida Statutes, as the ‘claim of a shareholder.’ ” Once again, this finding relates to the enforceability of the agreement to repurchase the stock and First American’s unsecured interest in IMC as a preferred stockholder....
Copy

In re the Receivership of Syndicate Two, Inc., 538 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 471, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 807

...Rather, the law firm should abide by the provisions of section 631.181, requiring it to file a proof of claim in the delinquency proceedings, and authorizing the circuit court, which has exclusive original jurisdiction over such matters, to adjudicate the validity of the claim and its priority under section 631.271....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.