Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 605.04091 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 605.04091 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 605.04091 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 605.04091

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter 605
FLORIDA REVISED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT
View Entire Chapter
605.04091 Standards of conduct for members and managers.
(1) Each manager of a manager-managed limited liability company and member of a member-managed limited liability company owes fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the limited liability company and members of the limited liability company.
(2) The duty of loyalty includes:
(a) Accounting to the limited liability company and holding as trustee for it any property, profit, or benefit derived by the manager or member, as applicable:
1. In the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs;
2. From the use by the member or manager of the company’s property; or
3. From the appropriation of a company opportunity;
(b) Refraining from dealing with the company in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs as, or on behalf of, a person having an interest adverse to the company, except to the extent that a transaction satisfies the requirements of s. 605.04092; and
(c) Refraining from competing with the company in the conduct of the company’s activities and affairs before the dissolution of the company.
(3) The duty of care in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs is to refrain from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, willful or intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law.
(4) A manager of a manager-managed limited liability company and a member of a member-managed limited liability company shall discharge their duties and obligations under this chapter or under the operating agreement and exercise any rights consistently with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing.
(5) A manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or a member of a member-managed limited liability company does not violate a duty or obligation under this chapter or under the operating agreement solely because the manager’s or member’s conduct furthers the manager’s or member’s own interest.
(6) In discharging his, her, or its duties, a manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or a member of a member-managed limited liability company is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by any of the following:
(a) One or more members or employees of the limited liability company whom the manager or member reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented.
(b) Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the manager or member reasonably believes are within the persons’ professional or expert competence.
(c) A committee of managers or members of which the affected manager or member is not a participant, if the manager or member reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
(7) A manager or member, as applicable, is not acting in good faith if the manager or member has knowledge concerning the matter in question which makes reliance otherwise authorized under subsection (6) unwarranted.
(8) In discharging his, her, or its duties, a manager of a manager-managed limited liability company or member of a member-managed limited liability company may consider factors that the manager or member deems relevant, including the long-term prospects and interests of the limited liability company and its members, and the social, economic, legal, or other effects of any action on the employees, suppliers, and customers of the limited liability company, the communities and society in which the limited liability company operates, and the economy of this state and the nation.
(9) This section applies to a person winding up the limited liability company activities and affairs as the legal representative of the last surviving member as if such person were subject to this section.
History.s. 2, ch. 2013-180; ss. 5, 23, ch. 2015-148.

F.S. 605.04091 on Google Scholar

F.S. 605.04091 on CourtListener

Amendments to 605.04091


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 605.04091

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Silver Crown Invs., LLC v. Team Real Est. Mgmt., LLC, 349 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

...g that the individual Defendants had a valid contract with Plaintiffs. *1326 Accordingly, Plaintiffs did not sufficiently plead a breach of contract claim-and therefore, this Count is dismissed. b. Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Violation of Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (Count II) From the outset, Defendants assert that Plaintiffs' breach of fiduciary duty in violation of Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 is a derivative claim....
...Quiskeya Trading Corp. , No. 16-CV-23905, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141815 , at *10-11 (S.D. Fla. 2017) (Goodman, J.). Here, there is a statutory fiduciary relation between Defendants-as managers of Manor Glenn-and Plaintiffs-as members of Manor Glenn. Fla. Stat. 605.04091....
Copy

Am. Sales & Mgmt. Org. LLC d/b/a Eulen Am. v. Luis Rodriguez Lopez (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...care to ASMO, which the jury by its verdict found ASMO had in fact proven, even if the jury also determined that no damages should be awarded to ASMO for that breach. In light of the jury’s determination, the plain language of sections 605.0408, 605.04091, and 605.0105, Florida Statutes (2016) (the Revised Limited Liability Company Act)7 precluded the trial court from finding in favor 7 As an initial matter, Rodriguez contends that, because ASMO’s underlying lawsuit was filed in Jul...
...and a debt, obligation, or other liability incurred by the person by reason of the person's former or present capacity as a member or manager if the claim, demand, debt, obligation, or other liability does not arise from the person's breach of . . . 605.04091. (Emphasis added). In turn, section 605.04091(1), Florida Statutes, provides standards of conduct for members and managers: Each manager of a manager-managed limited liability company and member of a member-managed limited liability company owes fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the limited liability company and members of the limited liability company. Section 605.04091(2)(b)-(c) then further provides that this duty of loyalty includes: 1) “Refraining from dealing with the company in the conduct or winding up of the company's activities and affairs as, or on behalf of, a...
...conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs is to refrain from engaging 23 in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, willful or intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law.” § 605.04091(3)....
...indemnification pursuant to the above provision of the Operating Agreement was erroneous because Chapter 605 expressly prohibits an operating agreement from providing indemnification to a manager who has breached a duty of care or loyalty under section 605.04091. Further, sections 605.0105(3)(g) & (p) together provide: An operating agreement may not do any of the following: ....
...violation of law. 2. A transaction from which the member or manager derived an improper personal benefit. 3. A circumstance under which the liability provisions of s. 605.0406 are applicable. 4. A breach of duties or obligations under s. 605.04091, taking into account a restriction, an expansion, or an elimination of such duties and obligations provided for in the operating agreement to the extent allowed by subsection (4). (Emphasis added). As the plain...
...“circumstances of the case,” we are compelled to reverse its decision in favor of Rodriguez on his claim for indemnification. Instead, and given the jury’s verdict, which constituted a determination that Rodriguez violated his duty of care or duty of loyalty under section 605.04091, Rodriguez was statutorily precluded from entitlement to indemnification, notwithstanding the provision in the Operating Agreement purporting to confer discretion upon the trial court to do otherwise....
Copy

Brown v. Luboff (In re Sigma-Tech Sales, Inc.), 570 B.R. 408 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2017).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1888, 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 101

...Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count VII) The Trustee seeks judgment against Mr. Luboff because he breached' his fiduciary duty to the Debtor, and is an *418 alter ego of the Debtor 1 . Under applicable Florida law, each manager owes fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to his or her limited liability company. Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (1). “The duty of care in the conduct or winding up of the company’s activities and affairs is to refrain from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, willful or intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law.” Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (3)....
...The duty of loyalty includes inter alia properly -winding up a company’s activities and affairs, refraining from improper use of a company’s property and competing with the company before dissolution, and not appropriating a company opportunity. See Fla. Stat. § 605.04091 (2)(a)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.