Cases from cite.case.law:

PARROT HEADS, INC. d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 741 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . credit with such bank with which to pay the same upon presentation, contrary to Section 832.05, within 561.29 . . . Under section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, the Division has the authority to suspend or revoke the . . .

SILVER SHOW INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION OF STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 763 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Compare §§ 120.60(l)-(3) and 561.17, with §§ 120.60(5)-(6) and 561.29, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

MOREY S LOUNGE, INC. d b a s v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 673 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . This appeal challenges the constitutionality of section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), under . . . Section 561.29(l)(a) provides: The division is given full power and authority to revoke or suspend the . . . There is no question that section 561.29(l)(a) is penal in nature as it authorizes revocation of Morey . . .

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, v. J. DEAN,, 854 F. Supp. 626 (D. Ariz. 1994)

. . . . § 561.29 (1983); 12 C.F.R. § 563.41(b) (1979); 12 C.F.R. § 563.41(c)(ii) (1979); 12 C.F.R. § 536.17 . . .

PIC N SAVE CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. d b a N v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 601 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Although the statutory language in section 561.29(1) has since 1957 spoken in terms of the Division’s . . . The second district upheld the license revocation, stating: A literal reading of [section 561.29(1), . . . In view of these cases, we do not construe Section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1959), F.S.A., as . . . employees have violated state laws regarding the sale, service, or consumption of alcoholic beverages. § 561.29 . . . Ch. 561-562, Fla.Stat.), not to exceed $1,000 for violations arising out of a single transaction. § 561.29 . . .

PINACOTECA CORPORATION, d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 580 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Sections 561.29(l)(a) and (c), Florida Statutes (1989), provide in pertinent part that an alcoholic beverage . . .

McKESSON CORPORATION v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION OF FLORIDA,, 496 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1990)

. . . In addition, the Division may revoke, § 561.29(l)(a), or decline to renew, § 561.24(5), a distributor . . .

BAJRANGI, d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 561 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . A range of penalties is available in sections 561.29(1) and (3), Florida Statutes, and the recommendation . . .

FREEZE, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 556 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . by persons using, keeping or selling controlled substances contrary to sections 823.01, 823.10, and 561.29 . . . GOSHORN, J., dissents with opinion. . § 893.13(2)(a)(5), Fla.Stat. (1985). . §§ 823.01, 823.10, 561.29 . . .

R. REDNER, v. STATE, 532 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Petitioner contends that since section 561.29(6), Florida Statutes (1981), grants an automatic 15-day . . . Although the 1981 version and the current codification of section 561.29(6) provide for an automatic . . .

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO v. MORA ARISTIDES,, 31 Fla. Supp. 2d 235 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1988)

. . . Section 561.29(1), Florida Statutes, authorizes DABT to revoke or suspend a beverage license upon a showing . . .

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO v. ROGERS d b a CIRCUIT BAR, 21 Fla. Supp. 2d 267 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . substances, thereby constituting the maintenance of a public nuisance in violation of Sections 823.10 and 561.29 . . . substances or which were used for the keeping of such substances contrary to Section 893.13(2)(a)(5) and 561.29 . . . Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1983), contains the following relevant provisions: (1) The division . . . keeping or selling them in violation of Chapter 893, thereby violating Sections 893.13(2)(a)(5) and 561.29 . . . Respondent also is culpably responsible for those violations under Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes . . .

SURF ATTRACTIONS, INC. d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 480 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . (1), Florida Statutes (1983) and that the licensee was therefore subject to sanctions under section 561.29 . . . erred in imposing a strict liability standard on the licensee in penalizing it pursuant to section 561.29 . . . Schott and its pro-gency is applicable to imposition of fines by the agency under section 561.29(3). . . . Is that interpretation properly extended to imposition of fines pursuant to section 561.29(3)? . . . Schott was necessary to sustain section 561.29(l)(a) against constitutional attack. . . . State Beverage Department, 119 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), involved only a construction of Section 561.29 . . .

G. G. P. INC. a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TOBACCO,, 479 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . his conclusions of law he recited the power of DABT to suspend or revoke a beverage license (Section 561.29 . . . (1)(a), (b), and (e)) and to impose a civil penalty (Section 561.29(3)) for a violation of Chapter 561 . . . criteria of Section 561.20(2)(a)3., which failure entitled DABT to revoke appellant’s license pursuant to 561.29 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO v. PERRY d b a PERRY S PACKAGE STORE, 19 Fla. Supp. 2d 171 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . premises and implicitly alleges the Respondent’s culpable responsibility for the violations under Section 561.29 . . . Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1983), contains the following relevant provisions: (1) The division . . . Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), also prohibits a licensee from “permitting another [i.e . . . A literal reading of those statutes, like 561.29(1)(a), “would indicate that a liquor licensee is under . . . But, like Section 561.29(1)(a), those statutes must be read to require proof of culpable responsibility . . .

HEIFETZ, d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TOBACCO,, 475 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . beverage laws, by and through your agent, servant or employee, Lori Ann Hart, did violate Florida Statute 561.29 . . . the beverage laws, by and through your agent, servant or employee, Linda, did violate Florida Statute 561.29 . . . Florida Statute 823.10 and Florida Statute 561.29(l)(c); b. . . . Florida Statute 823.01 and Florida Statute 561.29(l)(a). . § 120.57, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . . Section 561.29(l)(a), provides: (1) The division is given full power and authority to revoke or suspend . . .

W. WHEELER, v. STATE, 472 So. 2d 847 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . contend that the statute before us should be interpreted in a manner similar to that placed upon Section 561.29 . . .

OLHAUSEN d a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TOBACCO,, 472 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco to . . . licensee, sold the controlled substance known as cocaine on the licensed premises in violation of Sections 561.29 . . .

FRESH START, INC. d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 469 So. 2d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . State, Department of Business Regulation, 411 So.2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 561.29(1)(a) and § 120.68 . . .

SIMMONS J. L. d b a v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 465 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Count 2 alleged that appellants, through their employees, violated section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes . . . The other 9 counts alleged, and the hearing officer found, single-date violations of section 561.29(l . . . Under section 561.29(1), the Division may revoke or suspend a beverage license upon sufficient cause . . . The two grounds involved in this case are section 561.29(l)(c), maintaining a nuisance on the licensed . . . Although a literal reading of section 561.29(l)(a) would seem to indicate that a license could be revoked . . .

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO v. HICKS d b a SANDSPUR SALOON, 12 Fla. Supp. 2d 199 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . against the alcoholic beverage license of respondent Clarece Hicks d/b/a Sandspur Saloon under Section 561.29 . . . undercover capacity for the Santa Rosa County Sheriffs Office, in violation of F.S. 812.019 within F.S. 561.29 . . . undercover capacity for the Santa Rosa County Sheriffs Office, in violation of F.S. 812.019 within F.S. 561.29 . . . undercover capacity for the Santa Rosa County Sheriffs Office, in violation of F.S. 812.019 within F.S. 561.29 . . . Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), states in pertinent part: (1) The Division is given full . . .

CHARLOTTE COUNTY LODGE, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATIONS, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 463 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . served upon appellant a show cause order on March 18, 1983, alleging appellant’s violation of Section 561.29 . . . concluded, the evidence presented failed to establish that a violation of Chapter 849, and hence Section 561.29 . . . As previously noted, appellant was charged with violating Section 561.29(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1981 . . . is generally true that a holder of a beverage license may suffer revocation by the DBR under Section 561.29 . . . officer, that appellant was guilty of “simple negligence” which would constitute a violation of Section 561.29 . . .

VILLAGE SALOON, INC. d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, P. S. R. INVESTMENTS, INC. d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 463 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The Division filed charges against each appellant pursuant to section 561.29, Florida Statutes, alleging . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO v. CLUB INC., 7 Fla. Supp. 2d 176 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1984)

. . . licensed premises, while on duty, in violation of Florida Statute 893.13(l)(a) within Florida Statute 561.29 . . . licensed premises, while on duty, in violation of Florida Statute 893.13(l)(a), within Florida Statute 561.29 . . . licensed premises, while on duty, in violation of Florida Statute 893.13(l)(a), within Florida Statute 561.29 . . . licensed premises, while on duty, in violation of Florida Statute 893.13(l)(a), within Florida Statute 561.29 . . . under the Beverage Laws, your servant, agent, or employee, to wit: Don did violate Florida Statute 561.29 . . .

EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY,, 454 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Consistent with sections 561.18 and 561.19, section 561.29(1) empowers DABT to suspend or revoke a license . . .

JONES, t a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 448 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 561.29(1)(a), which the licensee is charged as having violated, provides: Violation by.the licensee . . . Neither § 561.29(1)(a), nor the case law cited in the recommended order supports a finding that Jones . . . There being no competent substantial evidence that the licensee was guilty of violating either § 561.29 . . . (l)(a) or § 561.29(l)(c), Fla.Stat., the order revoking Jones’s license is reversed and the cause is . . .

GERVAIS, d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 438 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Pursuant to section 561.29 and section 120.60(7), Florida Statutes (1981), the Division entered its order . . .

LASH, INC. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 411 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Florida Statute 561.29(1) grants the Division authority to revoke or suspend a beverage license when . . . evidence found sufficient to support a thirty-day suspension is, under the applicable statute [Sec. 561.29 . . . can be no doubt that Florida law expressly prohibits possession, use and sale of drugs, and Section 561.29 . . .

NW, INC. d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AND TOBACCO OF DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AND TOBACCO OF DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, v. NW, INC. d b a, 410 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Beverages & Tobacco, Department of Business Regulation, State of Florida (Division), pursuant to Sections 561.29 . . .

CORPORATION, d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AND TOBACCO OF DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, v. CORPORATION, d b a, 410 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Beverages & Tobacco, Department of Business Regulation/State of Florida (Division), pursuant to Sections 561.29 . . .

CELLERMASTER WINES, INC. Ho, v. R. CHASTAIN,, 530 F. Supp. 714 (S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . of state statutes authorizing inspections and searches to enforce beverage tax laws, see §§ 561.07, 561.29 . . .

PROGRESSIVE INVESTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. J. SHINGLES,, 405 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See § 561.29, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

GOLDEN DOLPHIN NO. INC. t a v. STATE DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TOBACCO,, 403 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . statutes of Florida, thereby placing the Golden Dolphin’s beverage license in jeopardy pursuant to section 561.29 . . .

AURORA ENTERPRISES, INC. a d b a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, A., 395 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . may say, however, that there is no discernible merit in the petitioner’s various claims (a) that Sec. 561.29 . . .

MIAMI- DADE WATER SEWER AUTHORITY, v. CORMIO, SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, v. ROLLINS,, 388 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . 1973); in the district court of the district where the disciplined liquor dealer did business, Section 561.29 . . .

S. BACH, D. D. S. R. D. H. v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF DENTISTRY,, 378 So. 2d 34 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Section 561.29(l)(a) authorizes the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco to revoke or suspend . . . The provisions of Section 466.38 and 561.29 are markedly different and must be construed differently. . . . Section 466.38 — unlike 561.29 — requires as a precondition to the suspension of a dentist’s license . . .

G B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. d b a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 382 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . one of G & B’s employees violated Section 798.02, Florida Statutes (1977), thereby violating Section 561.29 . . .

G B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. d b a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 371 So. 2d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . , servants or employees violated Section 798.02, Florida Statutes (1977), thereby violating Section 561.29 . . . Section 561.29 gives the Division authority to suspend a beverage license when the Division finds upon . . .

G B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. d b a Of v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 371 So. 2d 139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . , servants or employees violated Section 798.02, Florida Statutes (1977), thereby violating Section 561.29 . . . Section 561.29 gives the Division authority to suspend a beverage license when the Division finds upon . . .

G B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. d b a v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 362 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . petition for review pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and F.S. 561.29 . . .

G B OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. d b a Of v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 362 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . petition for review pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and F.S. 561.29 . . . F.S. 561.29 provides, inter alia, that the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco is given full . . . F.S. 561.29(3) further provides: “ * * * If a hearing is required, the licensee shall be entitled to . . . The size of the penalties, the maximum allowed by F.S. 561.29(4), together with statements made by the . . .

CORPORATION, s III, v. DIVISION OF BEVERAGE,, 371 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . and 561.11, Florida Statutes (1977), quoted in the majority opinion, and more particularly in Section 561.29 . . . invalidating this rule as without legislative authority, notwithstanding its relationship to Section 561.29 . . .

BELK- JAMES, INC. a v. A. NUZUM,, 358 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1978)

. . . See, for example, §§ 561.29 (license revocation), 562.32 (criminal penalties), 562.28 (seizure), and . . .

HARVEY, d b a Hi v. A NUZUM,, 345 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . adjudicated guilty of same, and such conduct was grounds for revoking his license pursuant to Section 561.29 . . . convicted of a felony in Case No. 74-730, in Marion County, Florida,"in violation of Florida Statutes 561.29 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES v. C. WILLIS, R. Co., 344 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Although support for the court’s action was found in § 561.29, Fla.Stat. (1973), a special statute pertaining . . .

ROBBIE S YUM YUM TREE WEST, INC. v. DIVISION OF BEVERAGE, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 330 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Director were pursuant' to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes 1973 (the old Administrative Procedure Act) and § 561.29 . . . charged and found to have employed said Robert Llewellyn, a convicted felon in violation of Sections 561.29 . . .

STREET, INC. d b a v. BOARD OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF BEVERAGE OF DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 330 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Supreme Court in its Treasure, Inc. decision discussed the power of the beverage director under F.S. 561.29 . . . F.S. 561.29 was amended in 1969 so that the Division of Beverage rather than the beverage director now . . .

CENTRAL FLORIDA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, v. JACKSON, B., 324 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Under the provisions of Section 561.29(4), Florida Statutes, the Division could have assessed a civil . . .

DEEP SOUTH PLANTATION FOODS, INC. a v. W. WYNNE,, 317 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . authority for the revocation of an alcoholic beverage license is found in Florida Statutes, Section 561.29 . . . of petitioner’s licenses was based on-the violation of the provisions of Florida Statutes, Section 561.29 . . . convicted of a misdemeanor under state law would be subject to revocation under Florida Statutes, Section 561.29 . . . In construing Florida Statutes, Section 561.29(1) (b) as we do the end result is logical and comports . . .

W. ALEXANDER, d b a s v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 308 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Section 561.29(7) (b), Florida Statutes, provides: “Application to the court for relief from an order . . .

HUBER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. a Co. a v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. a, 307 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1974)

. . . monopolistic practices stood as grounds for immediate revocation of any beverage license under Section 561.29 . . .

CHARBONIER Jr. v. W. WYNNE,, 282 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 561.29(5), (6), Fla.Stat.1971, F. . . . compel the full knockdown, drag-out quasi-judicial proceeding contemplated by the provisions of Section 561.29 . . . . § 561.29, F.S.A., whereby it may suspend or revoke the license of any licensee violating any laws of . . . Under F.S. § 561.29(5) & (6), F.S.A., an alternative revocation procedure is available to the beverage . . . the A.P.A., have rather closely followed the method of review set out in the beverage law in F.S. §§ 561.29 . . . They have sought review before the Board of Business Regulation as set out in F.S. § 561.29(7) (a), F.S.A . . . F.S. § 561.29, F.S. . . .

T. I. COLLINS, d b a v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT A. R., 239 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . obscene magazine entitled “Foxy-Lady” for the price of $5.00, in violation of Sections 847.011(1) and 561.29 . . . the said date he was in possession of certain obscene materials in violation of Sections 847.011 and 561.29 . . .

TREASURE, INC. d b a v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT TREASURE, INC. d b a v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT, 238 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1970)

. . . Section 561.29 sets forth the power and authority of the Beverage Director in connection with revocation . . .

J. H. TAYLOR Y. d b a v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT, 194 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . hearing before the Director, said : “At a hearing held by the beverage director pursuant to Section 561.29 . . . Section 561.29(1) (a) F.S.A., viz: “(1) The director is given full power and authority to revoke or suspend . . . Sec. 561.29, F.S.A.; F.S. § 120.31, F.S.A.; Art. 5, Sec. 5(3), Fla.Const., F.S.A. . F.S. . . .

M. C. BIDDLE E. d b a v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT, 187 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . . § 561.29(3) is limited to the beverage director and cannot be delegated. . . . comprehensive and lengthy step-by-step procedure to be followed in such instances is found in F.S.A. § 561.29 . . . The part of the statute under direct consideration is found in F.S.A. § 561.29(3) which provides: “Before . . . . § 561.29(4). . . .

H. GUTHERY, v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT, 179 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . A petition for certiorari was filed, as provided for in Section 561.29(7), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., . . .

TORCH CLUB, INC. a v. B. KEATING,, 174 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . petition for writ of certiorari has been filed by Torch Club, Inc., a corporation, pursuant to Section 561.29 . . . or assignation with one of the agents of the Beverage Department in violation of Sections 796.07 and 561.29 . . .

E. KEATING, v. STATE AUSEBEL,, 173 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1965)

. . . . — When a license is revoked by the director under the authority granted in § 561.29, it shall be within . . . Where a beverage license is revoked by the Director pursuant to' F.S. § 561.29, F.S.A., covering a landlord . . .

B. KEATING, v. STATE AUSEBEL, s, 167 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . “The power of the Director to issue post-final revocation orders must he found, if at all, in F.S. 561.29 . . .

PAULINE, s L. v. B. KEATING,, 162 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1964)

. . . dismissing a bill of complaint in which the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of Florida Statute § 561.29 . . . this court whether or not in his decision he passed upon the constitutionality of Florida Statute § 561.29 . . .

DAMAR CORPORATION, a v. E. LEE, Jr., 155 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Section 561.29, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides with respect to revocation and ■suspension of license . . .

RONTA, INC. a v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a W. Jr. E., 153 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Maleszewski, 160 Fla. 291, 34 So.2d 436; § 561.29, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

DeJORIS, v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT, 145 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . . § 561.29 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

PAULINE, d b a s v. E. LEE, Jr., 147 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . On April 13, 1961, pursuant to Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1959), F.S.A., the Director of the State . . . place for the purpose of lewdness, assignation or prostitution, in violation of Sections 796.07 and 561.29 . . . , to commit or engage in prostitution, lewdness or assignation, in violation of Sections 796.07 and 561.29 . . . Section 561.29 F.S.A. provides as follows: “‘(1) The director is given full power and authority to revoke . . . In view of these cases, we do not construe Section 561.29(1) (a), Florida Statutes (1959), F.S.A., as . . .

FIVE O CLOCK CLUB v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT,, 18 Fla. Supp. 28 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1961)

. . . The petitioner then, pursuant to provisions of §561.29, Florida Statutes, requested a hearing before . . . justified in revoking petitioner’s license had the respondent proceeded legally in accordance with §561.29 . . . He is, therefore, a creature of statute and has only such powers as the statute confers on him. §561.29 . . . As material here, §561.29 (3) provides — “Before the director shall revoke or suspend the license of . . . It is not without force to note that §561.29 requires a licensee to request a hearing within ten days . . .

BERMAN, v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 17 Fla. Supp. 72 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1960)

. . . It appears that under FSA 561.29 (1) (a) & (c) the municipality might seek a revocation by the state . . .

G. A. CRONE, s v. L. PEEPLES,, 124 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . circuit court, of whether the notice to show •cause as given herein to the licensee pursuant to Section 561.29 . . .

TRADER JON, INC. v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT H. G. Jr., 119 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . . § 561.29, F.S.A., is vested with authority to take such action after, affording the licensee “a fair . . .

MARIAGO INCORPORATED v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 15 Fla. Supp. 140 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1959)

. . . involved is as follows — “When a'license is revoked by the director under the authority granted in section 561.29 . . .

STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT H. G. Jr. v. ERNAL, INC. a d b a, 115 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . Liberty City Amusement Park, was proceeded against by the State Beverage Department of Florida, under § 561.29 . . .

FUTCH v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 13 Fla. Supp. 198 (Volusia Cty. Cir. Ct. 1959)

. . . This case involves the construction of section 562.41, subsections 3 and 4, and section 561.29, Florida . . . Section 561.29 provides in effect that the State Beverage Director may suspend or revoke a license where . . . Section 561.29(1) specifically gives the State Beverage Director power to proceed administratively against . . .

STATE v. ALTMAN,, 106 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 1958)

. . . “An Act Amending Sections 561.05, 561.20, 561.29, 561.32, 561.34, 561.42, 561.43, 561.44, 561.45, 561.47 . . .

GLICKMAN, d b a v. J. D. WILLIAMSON,, 100 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . suspension order was reviewed by the circuit court, on common law writ of certiorari under section 561.29 . . . Section 561.29 (3), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which requires a hearing before the director may revoke or suspend . . .

KLINE v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, J. D., 77 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 1955)

. . . Cotton, Fla., 52 So.2d 340, and subsections (1), (3) and (4) of Section 561.29, F.S.A., requiring notice . . .

STATE v. ELLIS, 6 Fla. Supp. 151 (Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct. 1955)

. . . . §§ 561.01, 561.06, 561.09, 561.29, 561.35, enacted subsequent to the decision in Brown v. . . .

PETERS v. THOMPSON, 68 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1953)

. . . On August 13, 1951, a notice under Section 561.29(3), Florida Statutes 1951, and F.S.A. was served on . . .

CITY OF HIALEAH v. JUSTINGER, 4 Fla. Supp. 118 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1953)

. . . Section 561.29, Florida Statutes 1951; Singer, et al v. Scarborough (Fla. 1944), 20 So. 2d 126. . . . confer upon the trial magistrate herein the power to revoke appellant’s beverage license under section 561.29 . . .

CHAUFFEUR S CLUB, v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 3 Fla. Supp. 137 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1953)

. . . In section 561.29(4), Florida Statutes 1951, it is provided that a beverage licensee may make application . . .

BOYNTON v. STATE, 64 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1953)

. . . Section 561.29, F.S.A. makes the maintenance of a nuisance or unsanitary premises or permitting disorderly . . . The appellee places great reliance upon Section 561.29, F.S.A. with reference to the revocation or suspension . . . Although Section 561.29, F.S.A. purports to give the director of the Beverage Department full power to . . .

STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA JAMES T. VOCELLE, v. J. C. WILLIS,, 159 Fla. 698 (Fla. 1947)

. . . Section 561.29 F.S.A. authorized the direction to revoke a liquor license for violation by any licensee . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, DAVID J. HOFFMAN, v. JAMES T. VOCELLE,, 159 Fla. 88 (Fla. 1947)

. . . Section 561.29, Fla. . . . Section 7 of Chapter 22663, Acts of 1945, amending Section 561.29, Fla. . . . It is contended that the following provisions of Section 561.29 (FSA), as amended, violates relator’s . . .