Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 272 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 2019)

. . . CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WAS LAWFULLY OBTAINED FROM A PRACTITIONER OR PURSUANT TO A VALID PRESCRIPTION §§ 499.03 . . . Stats. 893.10(1), 893.13(6)(a), and 499.03(1) are silent, however, as to the burden of persuasion for . . .

STATE v. VINCI,, 146 So. 3d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 499.03(1), 893.13(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012); O’Hara v. . . . Section 499.03(2) further provides that “possession of a drug under subsection (1) by any person not . . . The Smith case did not mention section 499.03(2). . . . The Deaton case also did not mention section 499.03(2). . . . Based on section 499.03(2) and the facts relied upon by the trial court, we determine that the trial . . .

DAY, v. STATE, 119 So. 3d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . trial by the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the “prescription defense” under sections 499.03 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 141 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2013)

. . . CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WAS LAWFULLY OBTAINED FROM A PRACTITIONER OR PURSUANT TO A VALID PRESCRIPTION §§ 499.03 . . .

FILPPULA, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . following crimes: (1) possession of a prescription drug without a prescription in violation of section 499.03 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 84 So. 3d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 499.03(1), Florida Statutes (2009), provides in part: A person may not possess, or possess with . . .

WAGNER, II, v. STATE, 88 So. 3d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . )(a)8., Knipp did not possess a valid prescription as a matter of law: [NJothing in either sections 499.03 . . .

KNIPP, v. STATE v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . violation of the doctor shopping statute, they are invalid and not within the exception of section 499.03 . . . See § 499.03, Florida Statutes (2008). . . . also known as the “doctor shopping” statute, vitiates the valid prescription defense found in section 499.03 . . . We reject this argument because nothing in either sections 499.03(2) or 893.13(7)(a)8., Florida Statutes . . . The Legislature may well want to consider amending section 499.03 or 893.13(7)(a)8. to address this issue . . .

AYOTTE, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Sections 499.03 and 893.13(6), Florida Statutes, each provide exceptions to the prohibition on possession . . .

PENNINGTON, v. STATE, 34 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . §§ 499.03(3), 775.082(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . .

O HARA, v. STATE, 964 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . O’Hara contends that section 499.03(1), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 893.13(6) each provide a . . . Section 499.03 is part of the chapter addressing Drug, Cosmetic, and Household Products. . . . . § 499.03(1) (emphasis supplied). . . . We begin with section 499.03. . . . Therefore, hydrocodone is a “legend drug” for purposes of section 499.03(1). . . .

R. WITMER, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING,, 631 So. 2d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . United States and that it is an illegal substance under 1992 Fla.Laws ch. 69 (reenacted as section 499.03 . . .

WRIGHT, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 857 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . appropriate charge would be possession of a medicinal drug without a prescription, pursuant to section 499.03 . . .

SCULLY v. FOSTER- WHEELER CORPORATION, 178 F.2d 170 (7th Cir. 1949)

. . . 47 .......................... 4,093.99 10% Commission received by The Cook Company ................. 499.03 . . .