Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 489.532 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 489.532 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 489.532 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 489.532

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 489
CONTRACTING
View Entire Chapter
489.532 Contracts entered into by unlicensed contractors unenforceable.
(1) As a matter of public policy, contracts entered into on or after October 1, 1990, by an unlicensed contractor shall be unenforceable in law or in equity by the unlicensed contractor.
(a) For purposes of this section, an individual is unlicensed if the individual does not have a license required by this part concerning the scope of the work to be performed under the contract. A business organization is unlicensed if the business organization does not have a primary or secondary qualifying agent in accordance with this part concerning the scope of the work to be performed under the contract. For purposes of this section, if a state license is not required for the scope of work to be performed under the contract, the individual performing that work is not considered unlicensed.
(b) For purposes of this section, an individual or business organization shall not be considered unlicensed for failing to have a business tax receipt issued under the authority of chapter 205.
(c) For purposes of this section, a contractor shall be considered unlicensed only if the contractor was unlicensed on the effective date of the original contract for the work, if stated therein, or, if not stated, the date the last party to the contract executed it, if stated therein. If the contract does not establish such a date, the contractor shall be considered unlicensed only if the contractor was unlicensed on the first date upon which the contractor provided labor, services, or materials under the contract.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a contract is rendered unenforceable under this section, no lien or bond claim shall exist in favor of the unlicensed contractor for any labor, services, or materials provided under the contract or any amendment thereto.
(3) This section shall not affect the rights of parties other than the unlicensed contractor to enforce contract, lien, or bond remedies. This section shall not affect the obligations of a surety that has provided a bond on behalf of an unlicensed contractor. It shall not be a defense to any claim on a bond or indemnity agreement that the principal or indemnitor is unlicensed for purposes of this section.
History.s. 31, ch. 90-228; s. 12, ch. 91-201; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 499, ch. 97-103; s. 43, ch. 2000-372; s. 2, ch. 2003-257; s. 8, ch. 2006-154; s. 120, ch. 2007-5; s. 44, ch. 2009-195.

F.S. 489.532 on Google Scholar

F.S. 489.532 on CourtListener

Amendments to 489.532


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 489.532

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Earth Trades, Inc. v. T & G Corp., 108 So. 3d 580 (Fla. 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 35, 2013 WL 264440, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 87

...contracts and obligations; clarify[ ] that unlicensed contractors have no lien or bond rights; [and] clarify[ ] that sureties of unlicensed contractors have continuing bond obligations”); see also id. at 1291-92 (making nearly identical changes to section 489.532)....
...that has provided a bond on behalf of the unlicensed contractor, subcontractor, or sub-subcontractor. It shall not be a defense to any claim on a bond or indemnity agreement that the principal or indemnitor is unlicensed as provided in s. 489.128 or s. 489.532....
Copy

MMII, INC. v. Silvester, 42 So. 3d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12171, 2010 WL 3239066

...difficult to imagine a trade not covered by this provision. Certainly nothing in the text of the statute so indicates with any clarity. We hold that MMII does not meet the statutory definition of electrical contractor such that it must be licensed. Section 489.532(1)(a) provides that "if a state license is not required for the scope of work to be performed under the contract, the individual performing that work is not considered unlicensed." Because MMII is not required to obtain a contractor o...
Copy

Master Tech Satellite, Inc. v. Mastec North Am., Inc., 49 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16283, 2010 WL 4226500

... Satellite did some work installing satellite equipment and subsequently sued for payment. During discovery, Mastec learned that Satellite was neither licensed nor certified to install satellite equipment. Mastec moved for summary judgment based on section 489.532, Florida Statutes (2004), which makes an unlicensed contractor’s contracts unenforceable. Mastec also amended its answer to include an affirmative defense based on section 489.532....
...to establish Satellite’s status as an unlicensed contractor. On the other hand, Mastec asserts that the trial court, upon being presented with unrebutted evidence that Satellite was an unlicensed contractor, properly granted summary judgment under section 489.532....
...add to, or design ... electrical wiring, fixtures, appliances, apparatus, raceways, conduit, or any part thereof, which generates, transmits, transforms, or utilizes electrical energy in any form.” § 489.505(12), Fla. Stat. (2004). Additionally, section 489.532 states that, “As a matter of public policy, contracts entered into ......
...Mastec’s SVP expressly stated that installation of LBNs included wiring to an electrical source and grounding. The parties’ contract also required Satellite to obtain a low-voltage electricity license. 1 Satellite’s conclusory affidavits were insufficient to create a disputed issue of fact. Accordingly, because section 489.532 proscribes court enforcement of an unlicensed contractor’s contract, the trial court correctly entered summary judgment in favor of Mastec....
Copy

Austin Bldg. Co. v. Rago, Ltd., 63 So. 3d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5974

...The trial court, in granting final summary judgment, applied a prior version of the statute and determined Rago to be unlicensed and unable to enforce its contract against ABC and its surety, Federal. We note that "[e]ffective [June 16, 2009], the amendments made . . . to ss. 489.128(1)(a) and 489.532(1)(a), Florida Statutes, shall apply retroactively to contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2000, and shall apply retroactively to all actions pending when this act becomes law." Ch....
...In reversing, the Fourth District held that the business organization did not meet the statutory definition of an electrical contractor mandating licensure, and therefore, absent the requirement of a state license, could not be deemed unlicensed under section 489.532(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). [4] MMII, Inc., 42 So.3d at 878. We note that although MMII, Inc. involved the application of a different a section of Chapter 489 to a business organization, the language in section 489.532(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), is identical to the pertinent language in section 489.128(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). We agree with the Fourth District in its application of section 489.128(1)(a), and the similar provision of 489.532(1)(a), to the issue of licensure as it relates to business organizations....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.