The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 479.13(a), § 479.15, § 479.3, § 479.5)). . . .
. . . Id. at § 479.15. . . .
. . . As was said in Elliott, 425 F.2d at 1150, which dealt with billboard regulations: Section 479.15 ... . . .
. . . District Court cannot logically invalidate the Chapter 479 permit program, but leave in place section 479.15 . . . Section 479.15 may be a dead letter, but that does not mean that its subject matter must be treated as . . . Iowa is free to amend Section 479.15 (or to take some other legislative approach) to provide an enforcement . . .
. . . Appellant also contends in all six cases that it is entitled to just compensation pursuant to Section 479.15 . . . Sections 479.15(2) and 479.24(1) provide for just compensation for the removal of a “lawful nonconforming . . .
. . . The court cited section 479.15(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which provided that “no zoning board or commission . . .
. . . Section 479.15(2), Florida Statutes, provides: No municipality, county, local zoning authority, or other . . . question because the signs there were located on a federal aid primary highway and hence under sections 479.15 . . .
. . . favor of the appellants that the enforcement remedy sought by the City had been preempted by section 479.15 . . . In addition section 479.15(2) provides: No municipality, county, local zoning authority, or other political . . . Section 479.15(1) provides: No zoning board or commission nor any other public officer or agency shall . . . It relied on the wording of section 479.15(3) which provides: (3) The removal of outdoor advertisements . . . Section 479.15(1) refers to signs “prohibited by” cities or other public bodies, and section 479.15(2 . . .
. . . Section 479.15, supra, clearly indicates that Chapter 479 was designed to establish minimum regulations . . . Section 479.15(1), Florida Statutes (1979), provides: No zoning board or commission nor any other public . . . In fact, section 479.15(1) indicates the opposite. . . . Such cannot be the case here, however, since the legislature provided in section 479.15(2), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . recorded a judgment in the office of the Register of Deeds against Tennessee, Inc. in the amount of $479.15 . . .
. . . Section 479.15(1), Florida Statutes (1977), provides: “no zoning board or commission nor any other public . . .
. . . the owners of such off-premise advertising structures (billboards), violates the provisions of: F.S. 479.15 . . .
. . . S. 479.15(2); F. S. 479.24(1); F. . . .
. . . In the Elliott case, the court pointed out, at 425 F.2d 1150: “Section 479.15, supra, clearly indicates . . .
. . . (V) DOES SECTION 479.15, FLORIDA STATUTES, INVALIDATE THE SIGN CODE? . . . The two sections áppear to be inconsistent as it applies to this case but, even though §479.15(2) was . . . Accordingly, the court finds that section §479.15(2) does not require compensation in accordance with . . . On the Other hand, §479.15(3), in my opinion, clearly provides that the state has pre-empted the area . . . The city need not provide compensation under provisions of §479.15(2), Florida Statutes, with regard . . .
. . . (Emphasis added.) and further § 479.15. . . . Section 479.15, supra, clearly indicates that Chapter 479 was designed to establish minimum regulations . . .