377.2425 Manner of providing security for geophysical exploration, drilling, and production.—
(1) Prior to granting a permit to conduct geophysical operations; drilling of exploratory, injection, or production wells; producing oil and gas from a wellhead; or transporting oil and gas through a field-gathering system, the department shall require the applicant or operator to provide surety that these operations will be conducted in a safe and environmentally compatible manner.
(a) The applicant for a drilling, production, or injection well permit or a geophysical permit may provide the following types of surety to the department for this purpose:
1. A deposit of cash or other securities made payable to the Minerals Trust Fund. Such cash or securities so deposited shall be held at interest by the Chief Financial Officer to satisfy safety and environmental performance provisions of this chapter. The interest shall be credited to the Minerals Trust Fund. Such cash or other securities shall be released by the Chief Financial Officer upon request of the applicant and certification by the department that all safety and environmental performance provisions established by the department for permitted activities have been fulfilled.
2. A bond of a surety company authorized to do business in the state in an amount as provided by rule.
3. A surety in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit in an amount as provided by rule guaranteed by an acceptable financial institution.
(b) An applicant for a drilling, production, or injection well permit, or a permittee who intends to continue participating in long-term production activities of such wells, has the option to provide surety to the department by paying an annual fee to the Minerals Trust Fund. For an applicant or permittee choosing this option the following shall apply:
1. For the first year, or part of a year, of a drilling, production, or injection well permit, or change of operator, the fee is $4,000 per permitted well.
2. For each subsequent year, or part of a year, the fee is $1,500 per permitted well.
3. The maximum fee that an applicant or permittee may be required to pay into the trust fund is $30,000 per calendar year, regardless of the number of permits applied for or in effect.
4. The fees set forth in subparagraphs 1., 2., and 3. shall be reviewed by the department on a biennial basis and adjusted for the cost of inflation. The department shall establish by rule a suitable index for implementing such fee revisions.
(c) An applicant for a drilling or operating permit for operations planned in coastal waters that by their nature warrant greater surety shall provide surety only in accordance with paragraph (a), or similar proof of financial responsibility other than as provided in paragraph (b). For all such applications, including applications pending at the effective date of this act and notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b), the Governor and Cabinet in their capacity as the Administration Commission, at the recommendation of the Department of Environmental Protection, shall set a reasonable amount of surety required under this subsection. The surety amount shall be based on the projected cleanup costs and natural resources damages resulting from a maximum oil spill and adverse hydrographic and atmospheric conditions that would tend to transport the oil into environmentally sensitive areas, as determined by the Department of Environmental Protection.
(2) The department shall establish by rule reasonable standards and procedures to determine the circumstances in which execution shall be made against any surety provided under this section.
(a) Such standards and procedures must provide a reasonable opportunity for a permittee to correct to the satisfaction of the department any safety or environmental performance violation arising out of the permitted activity before execution is made against any surety provided under this section.
(b) If there is an unresolved violation of a department rule or permit for which the department has issued a notice of violation and order for corrective action, no further surety under this section shall be allowed the permittee except by special consideration of the Governor and Cabinet.
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 49125
...permit. This amount was based upon the estimated cleanup costs and damages to the state's natural resources that would result from a spill. Coastal elected to join the fund as a means of providing security and paid the $4000 annual fee specified by section 377.2425(1)(b), Florida Statutes....
...Puckett Oil, 577 So.2d 988, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the appellants correctly argue that the final order must be reversed because the department acted without authority and contrary to legislative intent when it required security in excess of the annual fund fee. Section 377.2425, entitled "Manner of providing security for geophysical exploration, drilling and production," requires an applicant seeking a permit for geophysical operations "to provide surety that these operations will be conducted in a safe and environmentally compatible manner." The statute then provides two methods to comply with this requirement. Under 377.2425(1)(a) an applicant may provide a deposit of cash or other securities, a surety bond, or an irrevocable letter of credit. Alternatively, under 377.2425(1)(b): An applicant for a drilling, production, or injection well permit, or a permittee who intends to continue participating in longterm production activities of such wells, has the option to provide surety to the department by paying an annual fee to the Petroleum Exploration and Production Bond Trust Fund....
...For an applicant or permittee choosing this option the following shall apply: 1. For the first year, or part of a year, of drilling production, or injection well permit, or change of operator, the fee is $4000 per permitted well. (Emphasis added.) Nothing in section 377.2425 suggests that the department can require additional security when an applicant has paid into the fund....
...urity. But these statutory and contractual provisions, which indicate that Coastal will be responsible for damages caused by its drilling operations, do not suggest that the department has authority to require security greater than that specified in section 377.2425(1)(b)....
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 152877
...In Coastal Petroleum Co. v. State Department of Environmental Protection, 649 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), we held that the Department of Environmental Protection lacked authority to require security in addition to Coastal's payment of an annual fee pursuant to section 377.2425, Florida Statutes, as a condition precedent to granting Coastal's application for a permit to drill an oil and gas exploration well upon the leased lands....
...able from other possible reasonable sources. Similarly, the trustees here have failed to demonstrate that imposing the bond at issue is the only means available to protect the state lands, particularly in light of the existing surety requirements of section 377.2425, Florida Statutes, and Coastal's agreement in the lease contract to assume "responsibility for all damages caused by [its] operations." Accordingly, we must conclude that the $1.9 billion bond requirement would substantially *574 impair the obligation of the lease contract in violation of article I, section 10....
This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.
